Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

:D

Found the one bane of trolls.

Connecting with them.

At 10/19/10 01:00 PM, Wolfos wrote:

At 10/19/10 12:59 PM, razorbladesigh wrote: Today on Mythbusters! We prove whether or not Obama is the Anti-Christ by throwing holy water on him!

What would happen if Obama would melt?

And we found out they threw acid on the president? We'd likely execute those two know-it-all egghead assholes. Of course, BEFORE that, Bill O Reilly and Glenn Beck would applaud their attempted assasination efforts.

At 10/19/10 12:51 PM, Hyrcia wrote: Good luck with finding sufficient evidence to arrest an entire community of 10000+ people.

Also,

yes, the online community of teenage bigots and paedophiles

Lol.

Truly, any website that doesn't take the time to spellcheck pedophiles is lolworthy.

At 10/19/10 09:38 AM, AgroNurse wrote: This?

A hundred times that.

Anyhow he's just doing this as one of many ploys he's going to be doing to try and get America's youth more into science and math, since they suck so bad at it. It's simple, increase education, increase our hopes for a better economy in the future. Smarter students mean smart adults, who fuck up less frequently.

hem, if I may sum this up with a single picture.

At 10/19/10 12:39 PM, MuyBurrito wrote:

At 10/19/10 12:37 PM, HayBayBee wrote:

At 10/19/10 12:34 PM, BigLundi wrote:

Actually, NEGLECTING getting done up just for you.

Even better, truly.

True ;p but it seems your "marriage" is off now.

I'm sorry, HayBayBee and MisterWonderful. My heart has been stolen.

My god...I listened to the video without looking at it. That is `10 times freakier.

But it is an unrequited love MuyBurrito! Do not throw away what you could have with HBB for a girl with the greatest laugh in the universe!

It is not many who earn my respect. Whether this is fake or not...I am impressed my friend.

At 10/19/10 12:32 PM, MuyBurrito wrote:

At 10/19/10 12:30 PM, HayBayBee wrote:

At 10/19/10 12:28 PM, MuyBurrito wrote: HBB to the Rescue!

Of course, I stopped in the middle of doing my liquid eyeliner just to type it :P

All done up just for me?

Actually, NEGLECTING getting done up just for you.

Even better, truly.

Truly, the closest thing you have to this is Afroninja's game where you command him to make a game....Fuck it I can't be bothered to find it right now. I just got off of work and I'm coming down from a 5 hour stacker.

At 10/19/10 12:27 PM, GenocidalTendencies wrote: Good ol' marijuana.

I was going to mention that if you MEANT my good girlfriend Mary Jane, I would have to tell you NO! I do NOT wish to quit, because not only is it not unhealthy, but it brings me nothing but pleasure.

...

You cannot sue Anonymous

Anonymous cannot be sued

Anonymous cannot be defeated

Anonymous is all

Anonymous is none

Anonymous WANTS you to be angry

To fight Anonymous is to lose.

At 10/19/10 12:21 PM, GenocidalTendencies wrote:

At 10/19/10 12:13 PM, BigLundi wrote: To be clear, what substance are we speaking of?

Nicotine brah, nicotine.

Ah hah, nevermind then, I'm not a smoker in THAT regard.

I hear trolls don't enjoy fire.

To be clear, what substance are we speaking of?

So. I heard this yesterday onh the Bob and Tom show, while they were discussing strange news, and I decided to do some research. Sure enough, there is apair of 21 and 22 year old sisters from China holding a kung fu tournament to decide who gets to date them.

Here's the link to the story.

If you dont feel like reading, or opening a new browser, here's the short version.

Two girls that may or may not look good don't like online dating, so they revert to old style warrior princess style manners in which to chose mates, I.E. a tournament where martial artists will prove they can fire arrows, walk across sharpened spears, and beat the girls themselves in full contact sparring.

If you beat all the challenges, you get to unmask the girls and see what they look like. Yup, you don't even know what they friggen look like and you're going to walk on spears for them.

From what I can guess, I believe all the men who pass all the tests will likely go into a fourth part of the tournament where they fight eachother until only two are left, and winner of THOSE two gets first dibs on which sister, while the other gets the unchosen sister(just what I'm thinking, not sure how this shit works)

So. Fucked up? Funny as hell? Entertaining? Setting your Tivo as we speak? Hot? Absolutely insane?

What's Newgrounds think?

At 10/10/10 06:53 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote: I knew he was a troll the whole time, no need for explanation...

At 10/10/10 04:02 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote:

At 10/10/10 03:53 AM, walterwagner wrote: Does OP hate it because he's scared that if he signs up hes gonna have like 5 friends?

This is my favorite facebook troll response.

To be clear, I'm not questioning your ability to recognize a troll, I'm informing you that RESPONDING to a troll is the last thing you should do.

General rule of thumb Rob. If it pisses you off, don't respond to it. Chances are good whatever it was that pissed you off was SUPPOSED to do so, and intending for your angry response.

Nobody goes around saying ignorant and socially unacceptable things and actually believes what they say. If they DO believe what they say, then they are to be laughed at. Not argued with.

At 10/10/10 04:14 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote:
Simply because you disagree with me, does not mean I'm a troll.
IN this thread, or in other threads.

Didn't call you a troll. Said you were feeding a troll. Learn the difference.

I simply despise people bashing people who choose not to use facebook.
It's as dumb as bashing someone for not liking the same TV shows you do.

When someone goes as far as to insult a group of people for no reason.
Hurr u have no friends...
They deserve nothing but a retaliatory response.

Unless the remark was made in order to inspire retaliatory response, in which case DOn'T DO IT! DON'T DO IT!

At 10/10/10 06:31 AM, yurgenburgen wrote:

At 10/10/10 05:58 AM, Mariojinx wrote: @XxRobJohnsonxX: This argument, according to BigLundi, has moved to PMs.

It could be the lack of sleep, but for some reason that made me lol massively.

Your comment on what made you lol massively made me lol at a medium level.

If you have no desire to continue the conversation, then for god's sake, why have you responded several times saying the same thing?

Look, you can believe what you want, but if what you believe is fundamentally flawed, it should be called such. Not that I'm calling your beliefs fundamentally flawed, but if a belief is unclear, it has the potential to be, hene my questions, which led to you taking offense and thinking I was arguing, hence this snowball effect we had.

I refuse to shit at work.

I sometimes work 12 hour shifts.

Needless to say...it can get painful.

I don't feel like typing out my feelings on Lady Gaga, as they have already been typed out here.

Be forewarned, you can easily get addicted to this website. Very easily.

Rob. Buddy. I wasn't actually saying you were saying gay bashing hate speech. You clearly are overanalyzing, or at the very least simply misinterpreting my intentions. I put that up there in response to your constant summarization of my own posts, which, at one time, was literaly just an insult to my own intelligence, or need I remind you one of these summarizations was something along the lines of "A bunch of mindless rabble." So, I felt like giving you a bit of a taste of it. what i said wasn't mindless. If I were mindless I wouldn't know how to operate a computer...hell I wouldn't know how to form words...I might actually be dead. So no, nothing you said was gay bashing hate speech, but nothing I said could be clasiffied as 'mindless' either. As I stated in my PM to you earlier, I'd like to take this conversation, tone it down privately, and be more civil.

Weren't you the one complaining that I was taking your points off tangent anyhow? Well you just did that to me. Happy now?

At 10/10/10 05:48 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote:

At 10/10/10 05:46 AM, BigLundi wrote:

At 10/10/10 05:41 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote: A bunch of gay bashing hate speech.

lol
and the truth comes out about who is blinded by hatred.

Doesnt' feel so good when someone misquotes you with an insult does it? :(

At 10/10/10 05:41 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote: A bunch of gay bashing hate speech.

You were not giving me concepts of reality. You were stating your opinion, and I questioned it. Reality was not the topic. As to the points you've made. I have not gone off on a tangent, I have simply asked questions, allowed you to answer, then pointed in your answer where you are wrong, or where you are unclear. And as to my mind being open enough, trust me, it is. There are very few my age who understand politics, religion, and of course your basic mathematics and science to the extent that I do. In yet at the same time I accept all viewpoints, provided they are not inherently false, as per either being hypocritical, or previously proven otherwise by outside sources.

I literally couldn't think of a single statement to balance out the sheer stupidity of this thread.

I tried though.

At 10/10/10 05:33 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote: an insult.

Insulting my intelligence, and then stating the conversations is over is a direct violations as to what is supposed to end a debate, which you clearly believed we were having. We are to either agree to disagree, or concede the point. I consider your final words in the argument, which are simply an insult to my intelligence, to be your closing remarks. As you closing remarks have nothing to do with the subject, I will assume you are conceding the point.

If you prefer 'intelligent conversation' so much, do yourself a favor and get off of the general forum. It is designed to not be intelligent. You do yourself no favors in this place.

At 10/10/10 05:27 AM, Dawnslayer wrote: Unlike the moron who had the thing, I'd use it to locate a girl who was actually interested in me, that I didn't NEED to impress with phenomenal cosmic powers to get their attention (which obviously didn't work anyway). The empty void in my life thus filled, I would have no further need for the gauntlet and subsequently dismantle it.

Why bother with settling for a girl you don't already want? If you have such power, there would be no reason to 'settle for the girl that actually likes you back'

Also, while I assume you recieved your knowledge about its origin simply from that wiki posting, I'm still going to call you a nerd for knowing all this :P.

At 10/10/10 05:19 AM, Mariojinx wrote:

Thatain't that hard to tell...or do.

Funny, did you think to yourself, "She Blinded Me With Science"? -Thomas Dolby

No, as I said, she's very superstitious.- Rick James bitch.

At 10/10/10 05:12 AM, XxRobJohnsonxX wrote: I find it hard to believe you would even be part of a debate team.

I find it hard to believe you consider yourself intelligent.

Yeah...doesn't feel good does it?

Do you succeed at a debate because the opposing party simply resigns after explaining simple concepts to you that you fail to grasp?

No, I usually win because I reduce the opposing party to gibbering idiots that have nothing more to say than simple insults and curses. You're heading down that line yourself it seems.

Not only do you fail at comprehending my argument, but you also fail at understanding the simplified explanations that I put into terms that are much-more easily understandable.

Not only do you fail to understand MY questions, but you also fail to see that I'm not arguing with you. You're turning it into one. God knows why.

One cannot grasp the concepts described within Calculus prior to learning basic Algebra.
The same holds true with my argument about how an individual develops homosexuality.

Agreed.

If you cannot or do not grasp an explanation, even after attempting to bring its context to something you are able to relate to... rather than coming off as a fool, ask me to explain again in terms you can understand.

I did understand. I understood the understanding you didn't mean for me to understand. It's not my fault you're not clear enough at times.

What really helps me decide on your level of intelligence is your inability to understand the choice scenario:

If you have option A,
...you have had option A your whole life.

you have option B,
...you know nothing about option B.

You are claiming that option A is better than option B, based on absolutely no influence/knowledge.

Ah hah. You are referring to "If you only know women, you can't possibly love men." explanation, yes? Well, in the first place, to refer to homosexuality as an 'option' in itself is debateable, so you cannot simply state that options are there when they might possibly not be.

I can only know women, yet understand that I do not enjoy myself with a woman. That would make me homosexual. The same goes for if I were straight and only knew man.

I might not KNOW what the other 'choice' is, but I do understand what I feel, and what I'm feeling, isn't good. Now, as I don't know of the other 'choice' I WOULD likely simply assume that it is not MEANT to feel good, but now that isn't a natural enviornment is it? That's more like forced mating than anything.

This is defined solely as ignorance.

An ironic statement, concerning your own ignorance.

You are ignorant. I'm sorry, but although it may hurt you to hear it, you don't know everything, and you cannot simply state opinions and claim them to be factual information.

And you don't know everything either. Does that hurt? No? Didn't hurt me either. That's like telling me I'm not god. I'm so hurt by the mere notion that I'm not omnipotent :'( look at me cry.

Let's go back to what you said that sparked my interest in the first place.

"There is no reason why in a natural enviornment a male would mate with another male." this interested me because in plenty of natural enviornments, this very thing happens, which caused me to scrutinize your post, and ask more questions. These questions, in your view, meant debate.

The next time you quote my post as an insult towards my intelligence again, I shall do the same to yours. Fair is fair :D.