4,601 Forum Posts by "BeFell"
At 12/8/04 04:34 PM, Proteas wrote:At 12/8/04 04:17 PM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote: I still do not know how to quote multiple posts.Right click on the "Reply with Quote," and open a seperate window containing the post you want to reply to. Then just cut/copy the part/s of the post you want to reply to, and put it in a blank "Reply to Post" message window. That's how I do it at least.
Damn you, that was my only leverage.
You can also do it all in one window by formatting a post copying it moving onto to the next one and pasting then adding new stuff to it, then copying and so on.
At 12/8/04 04:17 PM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote: I still do not know how to quote multiple posts.
I'll tell you after I see a picture.
And there is still the matter of the sig pic.
At 12/8/04 12:57 PM, N0mbre wrote: Perhaps we do only care about states that can swing the election. Republicans are not innocent of this however. Gay marrige was only on the ballot in swing states I wonder who requested it was put there?
Gay marriage plorized both sides and brought out the vote for each. I'm sorry more people are against gay marriage than you would like. Democracy is a bitch isn't it?
I'm pretty sure I didn't get any.=(
At 12/8/04 07:43 AM, ursamajour wrote: It's called compassion, not justification. If there is a god, we'd all better hope s/he's a lot more forgiving than we are. If not, we will burn. We will all of us burn.
Of course we would, that's where Jesus comes in.
At 12/8/04 02:52 AM, Maus wrote: I know, I know. It's just unBearable. :P
Ah I almost missed that.=D
Isn't that how the one we're discussing started?Ayuh. Doesn't mean they can't keep asking. This time it's Green and Libertarian.
ONN article
Whoa deja vu. Those guys use their time and money about as productively as I do.
At 12/8/04 02:32 AM, Maus wrote: Um. They already said yesterday that the recount here is over. Bush won by 119,000 votes.
Can't you see we're too busy to watch the news?=)
However, just today, two third party candidates requested another recount. LOL.
Isn't that how the one we're discussing started?
Hey Rugby, send me a picture of your Canadian hippieness, Now!!!
And while your at it make my new sig pic pretty. There is a clean picture on page 761.
There could be illegitamacies but the margin is wide enough that John Kerry would have to win almost all of the votes that are called into question just to be close.
At 12/8/04 01:45 AM, The_Darklands wrote: its called a thought experiment, you display your distaste for arguments.
It's called bitching because someone doesn't want to restrict thier thinking to an impossible situation and nulls your point.
Besides that, how does this reasoning even relate to the question at hand. Nobody is going to argue that stealing is a severe enough crime to warrant a death sentence. My question is how to you justify things like murder and rape? Would your family starve to death if you don't rape and murder prostitutes? I'm sick of you hippies bullshitting with your feel good tugs at the heart strings.sometimes your are so damned annoying. I was making a point to a kid that said he would never steal, ever. I tried to show him that some people do things out of desperation and that given circumstances he would do the same.
I agree with him, there are a lot of people out there who would seek other options. I'm not saying they don't have a breaking point but I don't believe some people would let themselves get there.
People above were talking about severe punishments for theft, if you bothered to read it. Oh and feel good tug? what a dumbass remark, i tried to imagine a situation that could be perceived by a 'criminal' one that some think they are in. Whether they are wrong doesnt matter to much to the conversation.
Yeah I read that part and I chose to ignore it because I thought it was a diversion.
It seems you likely have a very screwed up notion of justice and its purpose. A murderer in some cases is far more redemable than a rapist. A theif less redemable then a rapist is possible. Strawmen are your best friends it seems.
Yep I have this screwed up idea of feeling people should be held accountable for their crimes rather than coddled because they were in "extreme circumstances" There are some crimes that I just can't see any justifiable reason for.
At 11/21/04 06:47 PM, NotYouZ wrote:At 11/21/04 06:44 PM, Soul_Chamber wrote: How did he acually win? All i got was, "recount" = bush comes on top, "recount" = bush comes on top again...and repeat.Because he did.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/feb2001/flor-f05.shtml
World socialists eh? Well there's an unbiased source if I've ever seen one. "So what if Bush won according to Florida state law and the constitution of the United States dimpled chads should count."
This Ohio recount is fun too, if Kerry gets almost 100% of provisional ballots then he might have a chance.
Jeez you people are fucking stupid.
At 12/8/04 12:18 AM, The_Darklands wrote: you dont seem to comprehend the situation, im talking about having no options to not have them starve but to steal. (this is how some feel, they cant adequately provide without theft or drug dealing, etc.) Im sorry but if you let your family starve id call you immoral :)
Well that's a bullshit scenario. "Let's just envision a magical place where there is no other option but the two I specify for you. In the real world there are always other options.
Besides that, how does this reasoning even relate to the question at hand. Nobody is going to argue that stealing is a severe enough crime to warrant a death sentence. My question is how to you justify things like murder and rape? Would your family starve to death if you don't rape and murder prostitutes? I'm sick of you hippies bullshitting with your feel good tugs at the heart strings.
I don't think the size of the student body matters as long as class sizes are reasonable. If these super schools have a large enough faculty to give adaquete attention to each student then I don't see a problem.
This little bear bear likes to snack on horny n00bs.
At 12/7/04 09:08 PM, Z17 wrote: Wouldn't throwing them in prison for life prevent them from hurting anyone else again?
People are killed in prison all the time.
It makes sense, punishment serves no real purpose because the deed has already been done but preventing somebody from doing it again is logical.
At 12/7/04 08:39 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: Damn I've been here a long time...
Shrike, hold me.....
You know what would make you happy?
A bear suit.
At 12/7/04 08:22 PM, EvilGovernmentAgents wrote: No digital camera, no picture on the computer of me, nothing.
No picture.
That's lazy talk, find a way.
*lazy Canadians*
This bear likes to be poked in the tummy.
At 12/7/04 07:53 PM, EvilGovernmentAgents wrote: That looks freakishly like me.
Scary Biggles.
Send me a picture damn you.
At 12/7/04 07:22 PM, Rooster349 wrote: Yeah, Befell. You made a sarcastic comment, and I thought you were a liberal. I thought you were being serious so I bitched you out. Then I realized it was you with a different name.
That made me LOL.
Would you like a bear suit?
This bear spends the majority of his time telling his computer, "Of coures I'm 18!!!"
Glenn Beck, he's a Mormon.
At 12/7/04 06:29 PM, spanishfli wrote: I demand "Mr. Biggles" to change his name back to the former, BeFell.
I will regain my sanity only after my work is complete. Now I expect all of you with no pictures to email me one in the next 25 minutes, or whenever. Bitmaps are acceptable. You will have a bear suit damn it.
Look a Kosher bear.
At 12/7/04 06:00 PM, NotYouZ wrote: I can't wait for Rooster or some other right-wing dick to respond to this.
Who the hell is rooster?
Typical commie garbage. If you don't like it give all of your christmas gifts to the poor and fuck off.
Happy Holidays=)
hmm..., Black Bear.=)
At 12/7/04 12:52 AM, aingery_faic wrote: Bear suits?
Of course
I had to let out this suit a little.=)
At 12/6/04 11:46 PM, Maus wrote: I know all the reg's faces but that one! TELL MEH!
Oooh new game. Guess the Reg. All the clues are there.
This bear doesn't let a little addiction affect his musical aspirations.
