Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 1/26/05 08:03 AM, EvilGovernmentAgents wrote: BTW Befell, the guy to the left looks like somebody in As Good As It Gets.

OMG FLI IS JACK NICHOLSON!!!... Or Helen Hunt.

At 1/26/05 12:44 AM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote: Drilling for oill causes lots of pollution, plus the risk of a problem like a spill. The Alaska oil is near/in a wildlife refuge. Its fine in the ground. SO its betetr for the environment in the ground, its been there for millions of years, so its not gonna do anything more.

I thought this topic was about video games...

But sitting in a dinky room playing video games all day isn't punishment. It's college.

Why were there video games in prison to begin with?

At 1/25/05 11:40 PM, stafffighter wrote:

At 1/25/05 11:38 PM, BeFell wrote: YAY.

Hate and crappy art all in one

Do I detect jealousy? Just because you can't make a gif don't take it out on me.

YAY.

At 1/25/05 11:17 PM, Maus wrote: I think it;s completely tacky, especially when the same school strips an entire family's name from the school because of the transgressions of one member.

At 1/25/05 11:08 PM, BeFell wrote: Down syndrome is not a terminal illness.

syn·drome n.
A group of symptoms that collectively indicate or characterize a disease, psychological disorder, or other abnormal condition.

Down's Syndrome eventually kills through complications.

Semantics, bleah.

Everyone eventually dies. People with down's syndrome can still have long meaningful lives.

At 1/25/05 11:13 PM, stafffighter wrote:

At 1/25/05 11:08 PM, BeFell wrote:

Down syndrome is not a terminal illness.

Get it then say that.

It's a genetic disorder.

At 1/25/05 10:52 PM, stafffighter wrote: This is why thinking adults specify their points monkey boy. But you could go either way on treatment of the termanally ill and sat throat cutting is a bad way to go.

Down syndrome is not a terminal illness.

At 1/25/05 10:39 PM, BigBlueBalls wrote: They got nukes too... if that is what you're referring too.

We have more hippie.

That's idiotic.

Oh and by the way, we would obliterate them.

Every time an event like this happens everyone always jumps to governement conspiracy. The Kennedy assasination is a good example of this. I think in this case it is a desire on the part of some people to believe that Bush is all they claim he is.

At 1/25/05 10:16 PM, stafffighter wrote:

At 1/25/05 09:41 PM, BeFell wrote: I wonder if it would be different if she had murdered a "real person."

The kid was 6 months old, as in post born. Your rhetoric is powerless against me.

I meant I suspect the reason she is forgiven so easily is because she murdered a child with down syndrome.

At 1/25/05 09:59 PM, CountPoopoo wrote: Good job judging on an article, I'm sure you'd appreciate it if people did that to you.

If I killed a baby?

I wonder if it would be different if she had murdered a "real person."

At 1/25/05 09:24 PM, aviewaskewed wrote: Ok, I'm done, I'll say it. The way you make your fiance sound when talking about stuff fli says, you made her sound like she alternately didn't like gay people, and didn't like latinos, at least to me you did. Didn't take serious examination I just read those posts, and that's how it sounded. So in future? Phrase things better, simple.

Wow you got all of that deep psycological evaluation from a single sentence? Damn I'm going to be hours figuring out were I went wrong here.

At 1/24/05 10:31 AM, BeFell wrote: I would invite you but my fiance loathes you.

Are you sure you guys aren't reading just a bit too deep into it?

Just as someone has to go through a hunters ed course before they can go out and use a gun perhaps people who wish to own dogs should have to complete a course in propper training.

At 1/25/05 07:37 PM, -Wraith- wrote: *Ducks head out of door to the other room, where giggling girls and Barry White music can be heard*

I got in. *talks to person in other room*
Hey, hold on a sec baby, I'll be back in a minute...

Umm... those aren't girls.

At 1/25/05 07:26 PM, BeFell wrote: You just wait till we get that plauge of frogs.

The above post was joke that was in no means meant to be examined seiously.

This is why we need tort reform.

At 1/25/05 07:02 PM, stafffighter wrote: This is the god monkey we're talking about here. So with him it would me more like "only God knows for sure....and he told me that if gay people are allowed legal means to celibrate love and commitment he'll blow stuff up."

You just wait till we get that plauge of frogs.

It's about God damn time.

At 1/25/05 06:07 PM, -LazyDrunk- wrote: So when are we gunna get to see these new sigs dammit?

Rugby had to go into work so not until some time after 11 EST.

Alright Rugby, I'm ready whenever you get back.

At 1/25/05 12:46 PM, JusticeofSarcasm wrote: The only thing I did to this picture was crop it and resize it. I love how beautiful people think I am. This is also the same image that was made into a bear suit.

The bear suit pic would have gotten you a perfect 10.

Bush, Bitches.

At 1/25/05 02:43 AM, -LazyDrunk- wrote:

At 1/25/05 02:35 AM, Mr_Biggles wrote: I was trying to get a special pose done for my sig and found out Haqnspit is a guy. That completely blows my mind.

I liked that sig that you had up for about 2 minutes. You gunna use that in the sig contest?

Shut up you, shut up shut up shut up shup ssutpaf ajfupalkfdasklaklfdsakjak!!!!

Imagine my surprise when I posted with my alt and saw the very sig I was trying to keep secret staring me back in the face. Damn these botched test runs.

At 1/24/05 06:44 PM, FatherVenom wrote: I heard someone say that this would be the best way to keep the Roe v. Wade decision: threaten to make only the pro-life people pay for the losses due to pregnancy, pay for the baby, basically pay for everything.

I would gladly accept those terms. I don't think there is a pro life person out there who wouldn't pay a few dollars more in taxes to save lives.

Would this work? I know it'll never happen but it's not less than pro-lifers deserve. It's not even a good compromise though because a lot of people have abortions because they don't want to be pregnant in the first place.

Imagine that.

At 1/24/05 05:08 PM, Maus wrote: BeFell, I apologise if it seemed that I was personally attacking your girlfriend. Her actions were all I needed to address, and I was a bit overzealous in it.

Thank you, that's all I wanted to hear... see.

Now that we've established I'm a smart ass (again) would it be too much to ask you to give me the benefit of the doubt?

But it doesn't matter because you won't read this. :)

If you took my advice you shouldn't be reading this.=)

Ok Reiper I worked this out. Say your house with interest included will cost you a total $150,000 so this translates to a minimum payment of $5,000 every year for 30 years. Now you propose to make 10,000 payments for 15 years. Now say instead of doing that you take the extra $5,000 and invest it at 7% for thirty years while making your minimum house payments. At the end of thirty years you would have accumulated $505,036. Now if you were to do it your way and pay off your house in 15 years then invest $10,000 a year for 15 years you would only have $268,000. So as you can see you will actually end up with almost twice as much money if you stretch the payments out and invest the money you were going to use for double payments.