Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 4/20/06 12:02 AM, MoralLibertarian wrote: Why are all you liberals so fucking daft, dense, retarded, and stupid? How many times have I stated that a corporation, always striving to increase its profits, will allow supply and demand to decide the price so they can sell the product at its equilibrium point?

When taxes are cut, that's a huge expense down the drain. The supply curve drifts down, which brings down the equilibrium price and increases the production, thereby increasing profitability.

The real question is, "Why wouldn't a rational firm not want to profit maximize?" You guys are so stupid. I'm losing my patience.

Surely they can't all be stupid, I'm sure any second now some wise liberal will wander in and point out the inelasticity of the demand for oil. Any second now...

*crickets chirp*

Hmmm....

You dumb asses should really pick up at least a remedial economics course.

Hey I just parroted what I was told by a tire guy, he was a tire guy.

At 4/19/06 08:39 PM, Penal_Disturbance wrote:

I know how they operate: inefficiently.

What the FUCK is your definition of efficency? You seem to put numbers and money before actual real human beings, and then act as if people should actually respect you before their arguments.

Corporations don't exist to benefit mankind they exist to make money for their owners. If all of mankind wants to benefit I suggest they buy some stock and shut the fuck up.

Make whatever comment you want about their quality of life. That doesn't change the fact that they are inefficient states with high unemployment rates and lousy labor markets.

If it's a better place to live, why does that matter? How are they "Lousy" labor markets? Belgians for instance, are the most efficent workers in the worlds. The U.S. may be more productive, but that's nothing to do with the labor market. You do have much less in the way of holidays, too. At best the U.S. is a small notch above Europe in terms of "labor", and two notches below in most other areas.

Yeah France is a real paradise due to their labor practices. Didn't those riots spread all accross Europe a few months ago?

And are *slightly higher* high unemployment rates that terrible? You only view people as machines, that have no worth unless they work. But being unemployed and getting decent welfare is better than working your ass off in McDonalds and never being able to get anywhere because you're not one of those lucky ones born with a natural industrious streak. Yeah, people have to pay for that. But there's a billion other things people have to pay for too, and there's all kinds of nonsense where the money goes down the drain in the U.S.

Wait you think that if you can't immediatly get a job that pushes you to middle income and above you shouldn't have to work? GO TO FUCKING COLLEGE YOU STUPID SON A BITCH THEN YOU CAN GET A GOOD JOB!

Also there is plenty of room to advance at McDonalds, a dedicated employee can usually make manager in a year or so and become a store manager after 6 or 7 years. From there they can advance to area store manager and possibly try for a promotion to the corporate level. If they save their money like good boys and girls they can even eventually become an owner. Don't knock McDonalds just because you're incapable of working for a living.

At 4/19/06 06:40 PM, red_skunk wrote: Totally unfamiliar car.. I'll tell you tho, that fugging GTI with 17" rims felt really heavy and ponderous. Thing's smaller than my Accord, but, yikes. Really made me think about ever putting 17"s on my MINI.

When I was rim shopping I was told 17"s have about the same characteristics of wagon wheels. Because they have such a low profile you have to fill them with such a redicously high number of psi that you wonder why they don't just make the tires out of solid rubber. Sure they may look cool but you eat a lot in handling and the quality of the ride. You don't see real race cars and dragsters running on 1/4" inch of rubber.

At 4/19/06 06:27 PM, Begoner wrote: You have the right idea, Moral, but you're not going far enough. Instead of ending corporate taxes, why shouldn't we end corporations altogether? After all, they only get their profit by exploiting their workers, and, at the end of the day, it is those workers who have to pay the price.

You mean through purchasing easily affordable quality goods? Ask someone who lived in the former Soviet Union about their toilete paper, fuck that it's Charman Ultra for me all the way.

At 4/19/06 06:12 PM, stafffighter wrote:

At 4/19/06 06:10 PM, BeFell wrote:

Funk was complaining about some tightness in the crotch.

Not a problem you ever have

Oh it happens every time I see one of your bitter retorts.

*fap
*fap

CALL ME A MONKEY BITCH!!!

At 4/19/06 06:08 PM, stafffighter wrote:

At 4/19/06 06:05 PM, red_skunk wrote: You're wearing my pants?

Has anyone found mine yet? because it's a bit early in the year to be going without

Funk was complaining about some tightness in the crotch.

At 4/19/06 06:05 PM, red_skunk wrote: You're wearing my pants?

I got lazy in my little quote game.=(

At 4/19/06 05:57 PM, BeFell wrote:

At 4/19/06 05:56 PM, red_skunk wrote: Found it. woof.

*wanders off*

Was it in the pants you wore yesterday?

No, those are the same pants I wore today.

As long as we are talking about the effiecient Europeans (*snickers*) I would like to point out that some of the best performers in the EU have switched to flat tax systems.

Nah, you wouldn't want any incentive for companies to continue doing business in the United States global expansion and relocation are so tempting.

At 4/19/06 04:43 AM, iseeingi2i wrote: yea i have to say definatly polygamy contradicting the ten commandments

Weren't Abraham and his sons and their sons all polygamists? OMG SINNERS!!!

and the fact that they believe that jesus was in the US even though the indians found in 1800's or somewhere in that area(i hate history) were documented as savages worshipping many gods but than again thats my opinion

So you would expect things to stay exactly the same for 1800 years?

At 4/18/06 10:20 PM, 1WingedDragon wrote: It was a mere retort to ironmaiden's commentary, moron.

Neither expressing humor nor actual desire, nice try though.

... Do you even understand what you just wrote?

How come nobody has mentioned the South Park episode? That always shows just how clever mormon naysayers are.

At 4/18/06 09:12 PM, 1WingedDragon wrote: Who the fuck said I was being witty?

I'm sorry, I was just hoping for your sake that your posts were a failed attempt at humor and not an actual indication of just how subpar your levels of thought are.

Well my mistake, apparently you are just an idiot.

At 4/18/06 06:36 PM, 1WingedDragon wrote: Would you like to lick this asshole?

Oh my, you are just full of wit.

Perhaps heaven and hell are the exact same place. The Ned Flanders types would enjoy because they don't do any sinful stuff anyways and the rest of us would veiw it as eternal torture.

Ok, I'm going with the psych class because my wife told me to. Apparently I gave her a hard time when she dropped her phsych minor so she thinks this will make me less of an anoying smartass.

It's really going to annoy her when I get an A.

Alright I just looked again and sociology doesn't fit with my other classes unless I take the web based class but I've found those are ususally a lot more work.

At 4/14/06 09:38 PM, Jim-Sween wrote: I'm gonna major in criminal psychology when I get into college, which shouldn't be that long, actually.

You should double major in accounting, that combination would put you pretty high demand with most businesses and law enforcement.

Apparently somewhere along the way I missed a 100 level requirement for my accounting major so next year as a senior I'm going to have to take some bullshit class with several hundred freshman.

My choices are Anthropology 100 (I don't know what the hell anthropology is), Psycology 101 and Sociology 101.

I was wondering if anyone had a recomendation.

I would like to reasert my offer to do taxes for 20 dollars or a Foamy t-shirt.

That is all.

At 4/13/06 06:08 AM, x_Toadenalin_x wrote:

At 4/12/06 07:10 PM, BeFell wrote: Also just because not everyone participates in the terrorist activities that doesn't mean they don't support them.

1) At least one Christian has had an abortion
2) This abortion was not participated in by every Christian
3) Therefore every Christian supports abortion

Can you see your logic falls down?

No I can see you're a fucking moron.

Christians are expressing a concern about the amount of abortions taking place among Christians and others. I do not see muslim societies actively campaining against terrorism.

At 4/12/06 11:24 PM, JoS wrote: I am not anti-American.

It's ok, most of us are anti-Canadian. I just can't believe there is a country in such close proximity to us that puts maple syrup on tacos.

At 4/12/06 08:40 PM, ProudDem0307 wrote: The Germans murdered 12 million people total during WWII, with a majority being civilians and people deemed 'unfit' to 'Aryan' society. It was the Communists back in 1962 who nearly nuked the United States off the map

We faulted all of those societies for their actions. Why do we not fault Muslim society for allowing terrorism to be so prevelant?

At 4/12/06 07:22 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote: Do you know why that is? Individuals or groups who claims that a cultural/religious/racial group are terrorists simply because they’re a member of that cultural/religious/racial group usually ARE racists.

People who ignore a tendency of a particular cultural/religous/racial group to participate in terrorist activities and claim there there is no connection between the two are usually stupid.

Obviously, but just because a tiny percentage supports terrorists, and an even tinier percentage actually are them doesn’t mean shit. How many Christians support the blowing up of abortion clinics and death threats sent to medical practitioners just because of the job they have? How many, born and bred, white Americans dream of bringing down the federal government every night?

Condemner a whole, for what is obviously the actions of a part is illogical to say the least.

How many abortion clinics and federal buildings were blown by extremist Christian groups in the last year? Hell let's say the last 10 years.

How many things were blown up in the name of Allah in the last 10 years?

Hmm... perhaps there is a fault in your comparison.

I find it interesting that we can immediatly lable someone or a group of people as racist and it's acceptable but it is somehow wrong to describe a society with a strong tendency towards senslessly blowing up civilians as having an affinity for terrorism.

Also just because not everyone participates in the terrorist activities that doesn't mean they don't support them.

I am sick of hearing "Muslims are really good people and it's just a corrupt few who create a bad image." FUCKING BULLSHIT!!!

We are talking about a group of people who had large violent protests over fucking cartoons. How about the majority of Palestinians electing a terrorist organization to lead their government? What about the absolute jubilation in the streets of Muslim countries after the terrorist attacks of September 11?

If someone can explain to me how a large proportion of the Muslim population doesn't support terrorism despite these obvious contradictions I won't dismiss your idiotic, happy, "there is no reason everybody can't get along," ignorant ideology as the best reason I can think of for our society to be wiped out.

At 4/6/06 07:15 PM, TheShrike wrote: My only problem with minis is that they're so damn small. I'd be uncomfortable being in one doing 70 next to a semi truck.

I've been in a semi truck doing 70 next to a Mini. It made my penis feel mighty.

At 4/6/06 09:30 PM, Fenrus1989 wrote: How do god dammed people boast about having sex every other fucking week.

Wow!

I do it a lot more often than that.

At 4/6/06 05:13 PM, JMHX wrote: I AM FUCKING PISSED.

Read Rant.

YOU'RE FUCKING STUPID.

Read Reply.

=P

You're an idiot.

Where you not paying attention when Bush's own party rose up and said hell no about Harriet Myers and the port deal?

Nope?

Guess you were too busy ranting about how moderate you are or something.

The United States and Europe don't get along but they are still known to team up on occassion.