Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/26/13 11:11 AM, Chdonga wrote: A few years ago I took part in some afterschool program where I would help teach english to foreign exchange students in my school. This Burmese girl never saw a black person before and she always wanted to feel my hair.

Wow, that sounds annoying. Was it like a one time feel each day curiosity, or would she just always want to get her fingers in your ringlets?

At 10/26/13 10:40 AM, Slint wrote:

At 10/26/13 09:38 AM, Loki wrote: Is that some kind of disease why yould you want that what are you stupid I hope you read this whole unpunctuated sentence and ran out of breath.

Wow shut your mouth nerd or I'll shut it for you.

I swear to mother jesus if you dont all stop your bullshit I will go across the road to the cornershops buy a bottle of jack a lighter and three packs of codine pain killers drink all the jack letting slosh all over my face and shit swallow every single codine pain killer motherfucker then set my face alight so I can know the peace the dead feel far away from this meaningless existence where people say things I think are silly over the internet

At 10/25/13 10:20 PM, Entice wrote: http://politic365.com/2012/04/11/8-things-white-parents-should-teach-about-black-people/

Because nothing teaches a child equality better than saying "these people are different, and you will never truly understand them".

At 10/25/13 05:13 PM, Insanctuary wrote: I am aware of the british lad, yes. What exactly do you think I would like about this philosopher? I'm curious.

Well, although he moved to Britain he's more Austrian than British both in terms of his nationality and his style of thought. His style of writing is both definitive and original, daring and confident whilst remaining objective. He draws logical proof for grand ideas from language itself. It's the same bold didactic style that you yourself favour, I think you'd enjoy it.

Plus Tractatus is free on tintehwebz.

INSANCTUARY HOLY SHIT

Have you read Wittgenstein? I think you'd enjoy Wittgenstein.

At 10/25/13 10:23 AM, Vinnyy wrote:

At 10/25/13 10:18 AM, NewgroundsMike wrote:

At 10/25/13 10:02 AM, CaveStoryGrounds wrote: I wish I had dramatically improved cognitive abilities.

Granted, but you lose all your physical abilities in return.

I wish for a better sight.

Granted, but your hearing is now impaired.

I wish someone would leave a present for me outside my door.

Granted, and its even a normal, enjoyable present, but it is riddled with STDs. Enjoy your Hepatitis C, jackass.

I wish for world peace.

Mixing/ mastering has got to be one of the most important (and difficult) things to learn. I mean, you can learn chords pretty damn well in about a year, but mixing/ mastering takes wayyyyyy longer.

At 10/23/13 06:01 PM, midimachine wrote: now it's just cracka ass hipster boys like me pretending to be hood :v

Bro, if Elvis was alive today, he'd be dropping mandy wearing some skinny ass jeans.

At 10/23/13 05:58 AM, Yoshiii343 wrote:

At 10/22/13 06:52 PM, Sequenced wrote: trap is such a stupid name for a genre

why can't they just name it "modern instrumental hip-hop" or something
anyway, I've got no advice for ye...sorry.

Dude, you could say the same about so many other genres. The only hiphop trap even sounds vaguely like is dirty south, other than that it's rappers using trap beats not trap artists making rap ones.

An' it's named trap after the place you'd make your pick ups, because so trap artists were all about dat life.

At 10/21/13 11:06 AM, Splats wrote:

At 10/20/13 09:59 PM, AxTekk wrote: its more like 5% mass produced music, 95% people doing what they love getting stupid amounts of money. Do they try and make music with mass appeal? Sure. I think pretty much everyone makes their music with an audience in mind.

Who do you think is making music solely for profits?

Wow. That's actually a great point, I haven't looked at it that way.

Hahaha, thanks man. I mean, don't get me wrong, a large portion of its still really freaking forgettable but I think that's how its always been since music's beginning. Some ideas last, some don't, its all just melodies. We're still all singing round the campfire, we just bought some better equipment.

At 10/21/13 02:27 AM, Lintire wrote: I'm a fresh pimpin rider
Ruthless as a tiger / Not a lover but a fighter
When it comes to a scrap, I'm a motherfucking biter

So this gangbangers bit-tah / Thinks I'm some lowlay fuckin' quit-tah
Let's see how tough -this motherfucker is with my finger up his shittah-

And I don't quit / 'Cause quick as a cat I'm on his dick
Suckin it / Pumpin it / Lickin it / Strokin it
All while my pinkies up innis fucking shit

So don't fuck wit' my girl, / or Imma fuck you
And that's on par for the NG crew

I'm so sci fi, dunno it cause them pain yes,
Cause I'ma digitally rearrange the insides of ur anus,
Cause my flow is far from brainless, far above yo mental capacity.
I'ma widen up yo mind like I widen yo rectal cavity

At 10/21/13 05:51 AM, Calamaistr wrote:

At 10/20/13 09:59 PM, AxTekk wrote: Sure. I think pretty much everyone makes their music with an audience in mind.

I dont.

So if you get a review suggesting you change something you aren't bothered? You don't mix and master so your songs sound good on other people's speakers? You've never entered a music competition?

If we didn't make our music (partially) for an audience, it would beg the question why we share it and actively promote it. Wanting other people to enjoy our music is perhaps as natural and inherent as wanting to make it in the first place.

At 10/20/13 03:54 PM, Slint wrote: All right here's the 411 folks:

Say some gangsta is dissing your fly girl..

What do you do?

Buss some nex freestyle, crushing his self esteem, reducing onlookers to tears of awe and making said fly girl insufferably moist.

Nah, depends on whether he is actually in a gang, whether he has people with him, if he's actually pissed etc. Probably just a slagging match, most gang people round where I'm at are just jokes.

At 10/18/13 10:47 PM, Shauna wrote: No. The way British people talk is the reason why I want to have wild sex with them.

OLRITE LUV FANCY GOIN DAHN THUH PUB L8R FER UH PISSOOP?

At 10/20/13 09:38 AM, Splats wrote: 90% of today's music is solely meant for profits and constantly defend those "artists" in doing so piss me off.

Whenever people talk like this, it makes me think of really salty thirteen year olds pissed off because they think that they deserve to be famous. You're probably not like that at all, but it really makes me think like that.

Yeah, there's mass produced bullshit (Ke$ha, X Factor etc) but most musicians are musicians because they want to be musicians. If you look at the charts, its more like 5% mass produced music, 95% people doing what they love getting stupid amounts of money. Do they try and make music with mass appeal? Sure. I think pretty much everyone makes their music with an audience in mind.

Who do you think is making music solely for profits?

At 10/20/13 12:25 PM, exudaz wrote:

At 10/20/13 12:25 PM, Confucianism wrote:

At 10/20/13 12:23 PM, aides wrote: The fact that the English Empire is no longer a force in global politics any more is also part of it.

. . . . .

I don't seem like such an idiot now, do I?

>Gordon Brown
>English
>1D
>English
>English Empire

FFS guys how can you not get that, probably best satirical post yet.

At 10/20/13 10:13 AM, Ericho wrote: I haven't learned much about the scientific statistics behind this stuff. Is it something people can not control and are simply born with like being gay? Again, REALLY don't want to compare zoophilia to homosexuality. Even the freaking BIBLE says that zoophilia is worse than having gay sex. If it's a kind of sex too deranged for religion, we know it's bad.

There's a huge difference between "wrong" and "gross" though, and waaaaayyy too many people confuse the two.

For example, eating ice cream with ketchup is... disgusting. I think we can all agree that it shouldn't be illegal though.

At 10/20/13 05:31 AM, leanlifter1 wrote: Gun's, ignorance, Meat .... sounds like a facist redneck to me LOL.

Yeah, can't you tell? Camarohusky has a tractor and is hooked on Oxycontin too lol.

I never get how people with perfect spelling get accused of being rednecks. Maybe it's unfairly stereotyping, but if a white dude who doesn't know hiphop spells stuff badly on the internet I will, 90% of the time, assume he sleeps with his cousin and/or livestock.

At 10/19/13 08:22 PM, stevenman36 wrote: Well I know I'm not a hypocrite like most of the NG users under 25.

Although I wouldn't say I have morals.

This. I've grown less hypocritical with age, but mostly cause I've dropped certain morals.

At 10/19/13 10:42 AM, GameChild214 wrote: Meant to say starved to death. Anyway "cruel and unusual", I think raping a woman, or killing a woman (or anyone for that matter) is pretty "cruel and usual" in itself, you reap what you sow.

OK, so if we're being serious I only have three ideological objections to this statement (in terms of pragmatics, the death penalty just flat out doesn't make sense).

Firstly, most rapes/ murders aren't what you'd imagine them to be, usually being perpetrated by those known (and often loved) by the victim. There is a key difference between gang/ serial rapists and drunken, pissed off husbands. Both are despicable, yes, but to take the life of the latter seems inefficient to me. Why not focus on rehabilitating them, making them capable of atoning for their crime? If they for the most part live perfectly functional, productive lives, how do you justify your own self righteous anger as sufficient reason to deny society whatever that person might contribute? For example, if once a rape is committed you have the option of making the rapist contribute to society for the rest of their lives or just killing them, why would you choose to just kill them?

Secondly, to sentence anyone to death requires judging a person's life as without worth. If all you know about a person is one night's actions, however bloody and gruesome they might be, how can you form a judgement about their entire future as a sentient being? I think you have to be really absorbed in your own self righteousness to think that you could ever make such a judgement. However small a box you keep someone in for however long, there will always be room for atonement, but if you take away their ability to think you deprive their ability to acquire worth.

Thirdly, the death penalty is always an act of vengeance committed systematically by the state. I don't believe that an act of vengeance is ever good for a person's well being as it bases happiness a) on external sources and b) on harming other sentient life. In a case by case basis, I can see that there may be exceptions, and even if a single person systematically indulges in revenge you might be able to write it off as an excusable personal choice, but for an entire state to commit revenge systematically creates an unjust justice system and sets a degrading moral code whereby the foul acts of others are allowed to justify the foul acts of our own.

Also, I hate this argument that just because the criminal committed a cruel act, we are justified in punishing him/ her cruelly. I mean, however you phrase it, that is letting your own moral code depend on the actions of murderers and rapists. I mean, so many supporters of the death penalty/ castration shout that "murder and sex crimes are always wrong!" and proceed to advocate punishing these criminals with murder and sex crimes. It just isn't morally coherent.

At 10/18/13 11:30 PM, Light wrote:

At 10/18/13 09:56 PM, stevenman36 wrote:

This is really interesting. The internet dislikes atheism but LOVES Dawkins.

Well he's the science guy.

That's Bill Nye, bro.

Also hella popular. Seems the more science a man contains the more internet love he gets.

At 10/18/13 09:31 PM, stevenman36 wrote: Atheism: 0
Religion: 0
Agnostic: 1

Suck on that funk.

This is really interesting. The internet dislikes atheism but LOVES Dawkins.

Inconsistent much?

I just gotta say this: All y'all who be like "modern music sucks" are coming at it from the wrong perspective. If you measure how good you are at music by what Bach etc did, of course Bach etc are going to be the best. Here's the thing though: most musicians you guys hate aren't taking that route.

I'll say this: I didn't get club music till I started clubbing. I didn't really get psychedelic music before I dropped a tab. I didn't really get metal until I got into my first mosh pit. I didn't really get rap until my friends started busting freestyles. Just like how I didn't really get classical until I started training in classical music theory.

Most people who are big right now are great at what they do. What they do just tends to be really fucking annoying (at least to my ears).

At 10/18/13 07:44 AM, Ononymous wrote: A question to the atheists ITT: what evidence would you require to believe in God? I'm talking about a bare-bones deistic God here, not a personal deity.

I'd probably swap over if they found some mechanism by which one could exist simply, in keeping with established physical laws. Otherwise it's kinda unknowable and unnecessary complicated, one of the 7 unanswerable questions and dat.

At 10/18/13 12:58 AM, GameChild214 wrote: They deserve to be castrated and stared to death.

That's just cruel and unusual though. Not so much the castrated part, but the staring part. The slow insanity gazing into the windows to another man's soul. The crawling of the flesh. The burning of the eyes. The screaming of the mind.

At 10/17/13 02:04 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: "Call me Janet Jackson. I got a hundred dollars. I got the jungle fever run with a hundred zebras." What?

He's not as successful as the first rapper Heems and only has a hundred dollars (like Janet to Michael Jackson). He also has jungle fever (is in love with black culture) and so is part of a tribe of half-black people (zebras). Half black because Victor is actually half afro- carribean.

Das Racist are actually deep as fuck.

At 10/17/13 01:47 PM, Shibe wrote:

At 10/17/13 11:48 AM, Cyberdevil wrote: Isn't that the same thing though? :P

Haha yeah cause Asians have small dicks and black men have big dicks!

Also, just because this is a really popular urban myth: East Asians, specifically South Koreans generally have the same size penises as standard West African men. Who are also the same as white people.

Literally the only evidence to the contrary is badly sourced or propagated by racists like Rushton.

At 10/17/13 01:45 PM, Sense-Offender wrote: No, I don't feel you. What are you saying?

WHITE DEVIL DETECTED

At 10/17/13 01:47 PM, Shibe wrote: I'm a Korean

Shit, there's loads of dope Korean rappers, plus all the NGE black dudes boast about being Asiatic. Fuck, you've got a better leg in than I do.

IF WEST ASIAN IF EAST ASIAN

At 10/17/13 11:00 AM, mrray06 wrote: ho can i market my craft better i am a musician and like most i think my shit is dope im not like kanye west or anything but i think my shit should b getting thousands of views like others on here while there good they not as good as me is it something I'm doing wrong

It takes time breh, you'd be better off talking to a true rap legend to get the real low down tho