1,397 Forum Posts by "AxTekk"
Ok guys, I'm banking on some of you guys being crazy enough to know what to wear to a fetish party.
Basically, I'm pretty newly single and normal club life is fun, but overly complicated and sorta boring. I kinda figure if I want to do something crazy like this, probably best to do it while both young and single. So I've decided to go to a fetish club night on Friday in a warehouse-venue in my city (all safe, just a couple hundred metres from some regular clubs).
Problem - I only have vanilla clothes. The fuck do I wear to a fetish party?! I don't want to look too OTT in case everyone else just goes relatively normal. Nor do I want to look so pervy that 45 year old guys approach me without recourse, or so vanilla I go home having had 0 fun experiences.
HALP GUIZ
At 2/18/14 08:25 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: Who says it's Science ?
Anyone remotely familiar with the empirical method brah
I'd like to say I don't think you're homophobicI am beginning to think you wish I was.
lolk
Choosing to be Gay is a learned behavior just like everything in life. For example an individual is not inherently born Jewish they learn it because people are a product of the environment they are born into.
Really? So you could choose to enjoy sucking dick?
The idea of a rasa tabla model of psychology was big in early philosophy but it's been pretty comprehensively debunked. Religion, culture etc. is 100% artifice but we are definitely born with the seeds to be certain people within us. It seems unlikely that the majority of homosexuals are so out of choice especially since most bisexuals, like myself, opt for a 99% straight life simply out of convenience.
Being gay really isn't easy right now.
At 2/18/14 07:46 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: That's not science that is rhetorical nonsense. Were the men tested closet homosexuals ? The only somewhat logical hypothesis would be to entertain the notion that homosexuality could be mother natures why of population control.
No. No, it is science. 80% of the homophobic men tested responded to homo-erotic stimuli by getting hard.
I'd like to say I don't think you're homophobic - I think you're just a lil ignorant, and that if you got to know some *normal* LGBT people you'd find us a lot more bearable. I'd say 90% of us don't rub it in peoples faces, we just do our daily stuff like standard human beings. Having said that, I will never judge a gay man for acting feminine because I understand how difficult it can be trying to fit into a society that has deemed you without purpose.
Hell, the camp gay people are only acting out the role that you gave them. You tell kids that gay people are flamboyant, effeminate fashionistas? Don't be surprised when the gay kids can't see themselves as anything else.
I don't have any exercises I'm good at lol, I gotta slug through all of them and build up muscle as I go. There's a couple martial arts moves that I was surprisingly good at when I did Tae Kwon Do.
So, uh, do flying kicks count? They're surprisingly useless but incredibly fun.
At 2/18/14 04:35 PM, RyderOmega wrote: - I am a multi-instrumentalist, playing guitar, bass, mandolin, banjo, baglama, sitar, a bit of violin, some piano, harmonica, melodica, and even some saxophone.
Have you ever tried some percussion, like the djembe or tabla? It's relatively easy to pick up, insanely fun and one of the most musically liberating experiences you can have. No key, no bullshit, just you and the rhythm.
- I had, for a short period of time, faked my own death with the murder of a fellow classmate. (honestly, no bullshit).
I reeeeeeaaaaallly need more details bro
- I had anal sex with a West African princess
- I got to jam with the guitarist from the Average White Band
- All the men in my immediate family are bisexual
I feel interesting now ^.^
At 2/17/14 06:19 PM, X-Gary-Gigax-X wrote: I see this subforum of newgrounds as the underworld of Hades, a grim and gloomy land of shadow, where poor lost souls wander lost in the darkness of their ignorances for eternity, groping the black for answers, a reprieve, anything, always in a condition of semi-consciousness, [...]
best fucking post 2014, and it's only february
At 2/18/14 05:56 PM, sharpnova wrote: Everything you just said falls right under the umbrella of what sheep are led to believe by the mass media.
And it's not even a remotely sophisticated view.
And it happens to be backed by empirical science.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014
You're honestly such a cunt, I really don't mind being judged by you.
At 2/18/14 03:34 PM, naronic wrote: My politician is a politician I back and may occasionally harbor some bias for, your politician is a politician you back and may occasionally harbor some bias for
oh sorry am I doing this wrong?
ffs naronic, gawd
At 2/18/14 03:26 PM, leanlifter1 wrote: I did not see any Gay people being beaten to death did you ? If your Gay keep that shit to yourself. I like pussy but does that mean I have to act like a meat head pig everywhere I go ? If Gay men learn how to act in society without offending others then they would not get beat up. That or move to San Fransisco.
Swap gay for straight in this post - methinks the lady doth protest too much.
It's never been between gays and straights anyway. Straights need to be tricked into thinking gays are pedos, witches or whatever bullshit. The beefs always between gay people and latent gays.
At 2/16/14 09:46 PM, sharpnova wrote: It is *not* a phobia. That term is liberal horse shit designed to emasculate people who dislike gays. It makes it appear as a weakness.
It's absolutely a phobia. Phobia doesn't just mean fear (pleb) it can also refer to neurotic disgusts. Homophobia is absolutely neurotic.
At 2/18/14 08:39 AM, leanlifter1 wrote:At 2/18/14 08:10 AM, AxTekk wrote:By the same token though, to cover them in the government health plan could be extremely expensive and not very effective. I genuinely think the debate does boil down to AHCA. Maybe this should have been posted in an existing AHCA thread.I don't think their is one. That said if these HIV victims were not forced into AHCA then they would have been covered. Once again we are witnessing the inefficiency of monetary economics.
Yeah, then I think this is the proper place for this discussion. This is basically the new AHCA thread guiz
My politician is a true democrat who listens to his people. You're a politician is a spineless populist.
At 2/17/14 02:57 PM, aviewaskewed wrote: Um, is this not a thread about the Hiv patients in lousianna? Because I thought it was, not a way to indict or defend the merits of the AHCA or alternatives to such. Back on topic or just stop replying to the thread and let it die please.
I'm not sure this is so off-topic.
These guys got turned away because HIV/ AIDs victims are easy to marginalise, and ofc insurance companies will be keen to take them off their books (them also requiring lengthy expensive courses of treatment). Equally though, I think the government genuinely wants to treat as many people as well as possible so it really is a case of them getting turned away because of how much of a stake the government has in their healthcare.
By the same token though, to cover them in the government health plan could be extremely expensive and not very effective. I genuinely think the debate does boil down to AHCA. Maybe this should have been posted in an existing AHCA thread.
At 1/30/14 07:33 PM, WallofYawn wrote: Also consider this:
Less people born=more jobs for the rest of us. Sounds a lot more appealing now doesn't it!? ;)
Nah, also means less people creating jobs.
Hmmmm, maybe, but you can deserve something and it still seem stupid that so many people give it to you.
For me, state intervention in the economy has nothing to do with (or little to do with) poverty. I just believe in diminishing returns, and think the best way to increase a country's net happiness is to take millions from the people it means little to and give it to the people it means lots to. After all, no-one would be rich without each other. We all depend on the existence of a lawful society in which others have become able to buy our services/ products.
This literally isn't a criticism at all. It's just whining that progressives talk nicely.
Hahaha, this was a pretty sweet idea.
I love making breakdown atmospherics getting metallic sounds, putting on a shitload of reverb and then slowly bringing in a tremolo effect. It feels like shivers.
At 1/24/14 12:23 AM, Xenomit wrote: Doesn't make them not terrible
If your reasoning for them being terrible is that they're all the same, yes it does actually. Yes it does.
I also have to say, as someone who's been on the pub circuit with guitar music and also works with hiphop artists, it's reallllyyyy easy to underestimate the art that goes into making a good beat. Like I said, J Dilla, Pete Rock, these guys are unparalleled in terms of technical skill and innovation.
At 1/24/14 12:22 AM, Entice wrote: The think for me is the bathrooms are shared per floor so I don't really see the bathroom as "mine"
after a certain point I'd rather piss in my own sink than a public bathroom
I have the same thing, it's like 2 bathrooms between ten flatmates. Idk though, I just don't want to go out my room some times.
At 1/24/14 12:12 AM, Xenomit wrote: Because the majority of rap is very very similar to other rap,
Okay, here are five of the most commercially successful rap songs of 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkZZo0XSm5s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBAtAM7vtgc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbGs_qK2PQA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF7C8NFzAGQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZa2lY9CFyM
You'll notice that these tracks are MASSIVELY different in EVERY FUNDEMENTAL WAY
I'm just happy it's not just me. Literally twenty seconds from the toilet too. I'm not sure if it's the remnants of m social awkwardness or just being really lazy. Meh.
At 1/24/14 12:01 AM, Xenomit wrote: I don't feel like going into musical theory and the structure of music ranging from harmony to melody. It basically means that it's not very musical at all. There are plenty of exceptions, but that doesn't help it out in the least.
As I said earlier, country is more musical than the majority of rap.
Okay, musically speaking that's just untrue.
If you're talking in terms of technical harmony, you'll find more rap songs with extended chords and chromatic harmony. In terms of structure, hiphop innovates waaaaay more than country (see: Peruvian Cocaine by Immortal Tech). In terms of rhythm, you'll never hear polyrhythmic country but every flow a rapper busts must be rhythmically interesting. In terms of melody, I guess country tends to be more melodic but it's far less melodically complex (look at the intonation of ANY biggie track).
Country innovates less instrumentally too - Basically no two rap songs have the same instrumentation and no two country songs have drastically different instrumentation.
Xenomit, you are kind of talking out your ass here.
"The immediate effects of taking marijuana include rapid heart beat, disorientation, lack of physical coordination, often followed by depression or sleepiness."
Lmao, I know which of the two usually follows lighting up and it sure as hell ain't depression.
At 1/22/14 12:42 PM, tox wrote: i would not be taking a lgbt bracelet...
And I'm not gay... In a pan, yes, there is a difference
Pansexual is essentially the master-race of sexualities.
Also that's a freaking sick trip planned out, are you not afraid of the unrest in Iraq though?
At 1/23/14 11:46 AM, Otto wrote: Yeah man, Scotland obviously trumps Wales, and I say that as a non-blood family relation to the poet laureate of Wales.
Definitely. Wales is pretty much irrelevant in UK politics beyond just being a liberal England. I do think they have the second best music and poetry though, and if you took out London and Manchester probably the best. They also have that beautiful Celtic melodic accent, which only the Southern Irish can top.
At 1/23/14 11:42 AM, Sense-Offender wrote: Yes. Donuts.
ma nicaraguan
