The portal is full of movies, some good, most not. so it is a simple matter for people that do not feel patient enough to watch a movie to click the vote they think that the movie would get without actually watching it. Since more are turned away then are accepted it takes someone with a huge fucking IQ to realize that if you just vote 0 on everything then you are done voting in 20 seconds and you have the experience that so many of you require. Your "button pushing experience" that is.

At 12/15/04 08:06 PM, oxxIX-Calibre------- wrote: Just to se this straight, you either give us the PROOF and nothing else than the undeniable PROOF (sry for the caps) that Eric is Foamylock, or just shut up about it.

Eric/Foamy provided the proof and I pointed it out. The fact that you can only say to "shut up about it" shows you have nothing to say about the proof I provided.

Putting such things and just talking as if it'd be true isn't fair to the person accused. If you have evidence or hints about it, then fine for you but that isn't a proof so it would be better to keep it for yourself until you can combine everything to prove what you claim to be true.^^

When there is enough evidence to point all to the same direction then yes it does qualify as proof. I combined all I needed to doubtlessly make most anyone see. I practically spelled it out for you.

How about we do this the other way around and say DBC=Wade Fulp (Its just an example and I admit its not a very good one)? Why? Well of course we can wait until someone brings the proof that he isn't Wade and accept that this way is going to cause VERY much Chaos and leaves time for gossip to expand or we ignore it until someone proves he is Wade, if so, we know it and if not nothing much happened.

Being there is no evidence in the slightest that Wade is Eric it is the extreme on poor examples. There is more then enough evidence that Foamylock is Eric_Wolf. The mere fact that your leader changed stories is proof alone that something is afoot.

Same goes for AAHC mass voting. They simply aren't until its proven. I'm sure its in the own interest of this club that if it turns ot wrong that everyone doesn't comes in here and taunts you about it.

That is a mere rumor started with no presented evidence at all. I am afraid you are making your point non-existant now. Would you like a shovel to dig yourself in even better?

If you searc for evidence, fine, but just don't be like "Oh! Eric has the word "Foam" in his sig! >_> That must be because he's Foamylock!" It doesn't matter how many of those hints you find, if you can't prove it everything's worth nothing, nichts, rien.

This basically means that no matter what we show to you, you may twist it to mean nothing in your own hopes that he is not the alt of Foamylock and your leader.

If you are going to defend yourself then do it right. If Foamylock and Eric_Wolf are available to prove their innocence then certainly they will not mind finishing this talk in a private forum. I am very certain he is familier with what I talk about.

I have a few things to bring to attention.

At 12/2/04 05:27 PM, Eric_Wolf wrote:

"I'm sorry Twin_Uzis, that post above wasn't really me, FoamyLock must've figured out my password, I think I should change it now, so FoamyLock won't be able to get in my account. How low of him.

Once again, I'm sorry."

Yes indeed you sound quite sincere. Fake yet sincere.

Once again, fake.

Next post was from Foamylock:

"I know, but thank goodness you changed your password. Alright, I'll stop doing these kind of things. All I know is I was telling the truth. Twin_Uzis was deniing that the AAHC still spammed, I mean look at his recent post there. (below yours on page 525 in there). They can't deny it now."

There's one story. Apparently FoamyLock had hacked into Eric_wolf's account. This was said and agreed by both Eric_Wolf and Foamylock.

At 12/13/04 06:57 PM, UglyBastard- wrote:

"You guys are still talking about that? Eric and me went skating the time that happened I should know, but Eric told me that FoamyLock lost his password and wanted to post something, so Eric was nice enough to give him his password as long as he didn't post anything dickhead like, and guess what that's what FoamyLock did, so now we know that he can't be trusted."

You've changed your story, Deary. Now correct me if I am wrong, but you, Eric_Wolf, and FoamyLock are all one and the same person, arn't you? It makes perfect sense to me. Perhaps if you were to pull your head out and listen to me for a moment. In fact everyone should put these facts together.

I've lightly scanned the past posts and come to this:

1) Eric_Wolf tries well enough to make it well known he is anti-foamy (never watched it myself). Foamylock includes that name in his own name. An act to make it seem unlike the same person in that effect.

2)All three of the accused post nearly exclusively into the "opposite" club, save for FoamyLock who occasionally flames. Despite the fact that Eric_Wolf is a member of the Anti-Anti-Hentai Club.

3) Eric_Wolf and the leader of this thread (I do not recall his latest name) apparently know each other through our assumption. This helps with some excuses that would be needed to be made I would think. On the fly you could always say "Eric wuz at my house" or something similar to pass the suspision from his being Foamylock. In reality you could simply never have been anything more then an alt of the leader's. And I believe that you are.

4) Foamylock is by all means an alt even if not one of Eric_Wolf's. He came to this thread to flame it in the beginning, and then disappeared for a month. When he returned he had full knowledge apparently of the events that he was not here. Furthermore he carries a low post count (signaling low forum experience) and talks about the forums of NG like it is a policing job of his. This fact takes not a genius to figure out.

5) Foamylock's before mentioned flaming for this thread turned to flames torwards the opposite thread due to "spam". The fact that he only focused on that one thread's "spam" and ignored the "spam" that happened elsewhere entirely shows that he would likely have his secret identity from this thread, or the opposite one. That alone is a simple-to-understand part. However in this case he is technically of both clubs.

6) This alone suggests nothing, but I have never noticed a picture of the leader's in his past posts, yet I have seen one of Eric_Wolf's. Since only one picture was provided of the three accused users itwould be a possible nudge into the direction that they are one, since there was only one picture to give. However I cannot count this as proof since at no time I recall Anyone to show a picture at a time that there wasn't.

And off the record "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" is only what the guilty hope for. Now, offer someting better then something I'd have to completely take your word for. Or just make up more little ditties that you did with your other self. And if you would please change your story more. It makes things easier.

Fetch some miseltoe and hang it over my ass. Happy holidays.

Damn. The popular one didn't get a single post for her birthday or afterwards. This is interesting. Are you lacking in popularity? Are you going down in the eyes of others? Are you perhaps old news?

I thought this went against rules. The fan club is an appreciation crew. Besides that indeed why would somebody want to make a fan club of Aasha of all people? Perhaps they feel sorry for her obviously blank mind?