Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Why US want to side with Israel from the day of independance of that very country?

If US keep on continuing siding with Israel, i guess one day no just countries will listen to US anymore.

Israel is already violating many rules, they should be stopped.

1) invading one's country and terrorising its neighbour.
2) have WMDS.
3) terrorise its own citizens.
4) Sharon is trying his very best to take full control of Israel himself and his party.

Israel is getting from bad to worst.

What if US stop interfere other countries' politics and completely focus on their country only? NO more full-scale war but just economical scantion and money and weapon supply? what will it be?

so the conclusion is we have to stop thinking about the past, concentrate the present and let the future to decide for its present.

Is it because of US different presidents that resulted in different opinions or simply because US is hyporcrite.

don't get me the wrong idea. i support the GULF war 2 but i don't agree in some political intervention did by America. example, the IRAN-IRAQ war where US support IRAQ and the support of the TALIBAN to overthrown the corrupted government.

Yah, in these intervention, US only supply money and weapons to those country or faction but not in sending troops to the country to liberate its ppl.

Is it true that US rightful intervene will only come when there is a full-scale intervention but not in any type of intervention like economical scantion for IRAQ, no-fly zones and demilitarization in Germany and Japan.

i don't know whether i'm right US will only have a full-scale invasion or liberation if the particular country has all of these four conditions.

1) a corrupted leader and a governing system
2) has WMDS.
3) support terrorism
4) invade or terrorise neighbouring country

or else like the ANTI-US countries like to say "US will only attack if you are not the friends of US"
i truly hope this is not true.

i hope from posting of this very topic, i will get some ans.

oh mine. this is already a very old old old topic.

summed up everything: any political party manifesto or governing system is good, provided

1) they have anti-corrupted leader and a system.
2) the manifesto and the system is just and respect everyone.
3) the manifesto and the system rewards the diligent and ppl who contributes a lot of good stuff to the society and punish the wicked and shame the ignorant and the good-for nothing.
4) the system and the leader is graceful enough to those first-time criminals. who break the law once.
5) they are alert enough to spot the wrongdoers.
6) they are able to creative in economy issues.
7) protect and help the weaks
8) creating an initative and an encouraging environment for ppl who can do the country proud. or simply support those ppl.
9) free media.

well, i'm not a parent.
Anyway, i guess if a person wants to be a parent. he or she should be mature and should think the responsibilities, discipline, enthical teaching, scarifices, burden of having a children. not forgetting in creating a nurturing environment for the kids to grow up to become a good and successful citizen.

If you never do it in a good way. the kid turns bad. you have the total responsibilty.

In S'pore, we fines or jails the parents when his or her offsprings becomes a nuisance to the society which means breaking the law.

Just like a employer running an office, no superior will end up caning their subordinates. they treated them as adults.

i guess parents should deal with their children more maturely when her children reach the age of maturity.

if the children turns bad. i guess the parents should have the duty to spot the children and help them to change before they become worse and break the law.

(the correct way of solving a problem)

When there's problem, we should not ignore it or push blame. instead we must quickly find a solution to solve the problem.

if the problem is too big, which involve a huge number of ppl to participate
or
the problem has concerned your loved ones but not you or
the problem will eventually comes to you.

then the solution for these above conditions is to make the person who's at fault to understand the situation in an encouraging way and help to change.

that's the biblical way.

However, the problem is still not that easy to solve.

it will be easy, provided

there's no miscommunication

and the person who at fault is willing to change. this has to depend whther he or she is a stubborn fellow or not.

if that person is a stubborn ass, i guess anyone who is mature and wise enough in that particular group should take up the initative to tackle the issues.

to prevent the problem from resurfacing,

one should make anyone in that particular group to
let them understand the issue and set up a loving and mature environment in that particular group so that in future, there will be no chaos when the trouble is created or discovered among that particular group.

NOTE:- that particular group can meant anything. be it, in a family or in a government.

anway, the most perferred march i like is THE LONG MARCH CONQUEST lead by Mao ZE TONG.

their objective is ingenious, righteous, interesting, courageous and also ...... a bit tragic.

read about that.

anyway, the march is quite silly. their objective is "Occupation is not liberation"

oh c'mon. even my brother who don't give a damn on war know that, Americans are doing a righteous war.

That is American soldiers never acts like Nazi soldiers and the Japaneses forces.

Americans never harm the POWS,
never killed the aggressive civilains,
never posion any water source,
never starve the villagers or the Baghdadis to death,
never rape innocent ladies.
never use the civilian as threat to saddam.
never loot the city and the palace.
never have any capital punishments on the civilains and the POWS.
never steal the oil but intend to set up company to
retrieve more crude oil region in Iraq to produce more oil for every countries.
never bomb innocent building like mosques and university and fire station and police station.

just don't why. ppl still want to protest. wasting their time.

you have spelled wrongly.

it's "TAIWAN" not "TIAWAN".

humans are like that if there's is no tragedy happens, no one will give a damn on their mistakes and change for the better or notices things that goes around him.

this can be found in Bible. that is why Jesus choose to nailed dead on the cross to let everyone know the deadly sins of a human. Stubborn to know they had made a mistake and failed to continue to "run the race" (inconsistence).

oh mine, then i have to cut it real short.

do you ppl think or feel that ppl who does things like a stubborn goat, ignorant pig, inconsiderate bustard and irrational bull should deserve respect and forgive for their action they did in any incident you may think of?

choices for those ppl:- help them to change through encouragements (quite tough), forgive them, tolerate and understand for their flawed personality, lastly punish and shame them for what they have done.

no. i think Saddam should be killed.
FBI or CIA should search for him and killed him right on the spot.

all this war begins, it is all because of that stupid fellow. if not, this war is meaningless.

don't repeat the same mistakes as Afghanistan where Mullah Omar and Bin laden had escaped.

do you know that recently, Omar had leaded his men to have sabotage and horrifying attacks on the new democratic Afghan.

he had sworn to make it tough for the new president of Afghanistan by leading his top loyalty officer to do some dirty killing to scare the ppl who support him.

do me a favour?

keep the ball rolling by posting a thread on my topic.

thanks.

i feel the the topic deserve to be discussed. it's the core for every problem in the world.

then i think that the judge or the jury are all anti-idiots. like dilbert.

anyway, this is a sad case.

dumb or ignorant it's ok. they can still be taught and trained. like Jesus trained up Peter, who is just an ignorant fisherman and not a religious scholar.

but if the person is irrational, stubborn and inconsiderate. that is definitely NOT OK.

anyway, funny. lol.

may i know what is the purpose of setting up a politics or philosophy crew for?

individual and independant opinion is still the best.

don't depend on ppl's opinion to make it into your own opinion. it's best to be mature and have your own opinion which is truly depends on reasoning.

not by...... this comment:- i think you f***ing sucks.

it's best to have the initative to get your knowledge. and not to depend on someone to feed you.
it's kind of dumb.

by the way, it's hard for intellectuals to stay together as a team. they are bound to have some disagreement because everyone wants to make a point. not forgetting misunderstanding.

intellectuals will stay and form as a team unless they have a common goal. like a political party who goes for general election

R u sure?

if the court acts like that, they will soon get retribution.

I don't know. i posted this topic a day ago. but it had been erased from the forum. i had checked all six pages. nothing!

anyway, i think this topic has to be discussed.

do you ppl think or feel that ppl who does things like a stubborn goat, ignorant pig, inconsiderate bustard and irrational bull should deserve respect and forgive for their action they did in any incident you may think of?

to me, i choose to shame them if they repeat their mistakes for umpteen times by talking SENSES to them.
can't tolerate anymore.

so anyway guys, what's your opinion?

Maybe Bush is not good in handling ecnomics but i think he makes a good decision in this war.

Saddam is dangerous and he have to be stopped at all cost.

i think if you lie, you will get even fewer support and that's very true.
unless your lie never get exposed or the ppl who support you are ignorant and they like to live in a world of fantasy.
Arabians get real. goodness.
fight till you drop if there's a chance to stop corrupted leader in taking over your media.
Don't depend on any superpower for your freedom.

Be like CHINA and VIETNAM and CUBA and THE PHILLPINES and BURMA.

Yah, there are free at last. but that doesn't mean they are free and happy forever.

right now, their country is in deep shit. rubbles everywhere in the city. no government, no civil and police forces running the state. looting everywhere.

like the WAR in Afghanistan, america has to spend billins of dollars in setting up a democracy gov't and hope that the democracy is not polluted by the corrupted leader around the region, except Turkey.

The gov't is not only to be democratic. it has to like my name:- Anti-corruption.

Saddam is a war-hungry person. he have to be stopped.

in 1980-1988 he invaded his own neighbour Iran.

next, he gobbled up his small neighbour Kuwait and occupied it for six months. in 1991

right now, in the 1990s to 2003, no single country is as ruthless and power-hungry as Saddam. no even Kim Jong ill and the therocracy leader in IRAN.

it makes me feel that movie stars are like hypocrite.
NATO.
No Action Talk Only.

why the world don't make who wants to be a billionaire? i guess i will be doing one.

except all the fifteen questions will be politics.

this will make the world all interested in politics. from local to worldwide. From popular to rare.

Winner takes all. if he or she answer every questions in fifteen minutes. many ppl stands a stands a chance to be a billionaire?
in the show, i will not be putting any ads to cut the crap.

instead all participants have to pay $1500 for participate fee. hee.hee.

Darkcrystal, you definitely never touched bible in your life. you are just a typical church-goers.

thank God, they are ppl here do support verses to against what he said.

True, Arabians are always the threat to US and Israel and now worst, it becomes a threat to Southeast Asia.
totally sick of them.

but now Middle East religion's Islam have spread all the way to Banglahdesh to the east.
to the west, Islam have spread from Saudi Arabia to Africa, Sudan.
Damn it, the virus is getting bigger and out of control.

this is a very old and often appeared topic.

Conclusion:- it should leave it to the woman to decide since the baby feed on their flesh and blood.

I guess pregnant woman will definitely right decision.

yah true. i support Chibangin101. Saddam even personally killed his brother-in-law at the Iraqi airport while he returned from US.

while his eldest son even rape a woman and runs away from it.

And all along i don't support ISLAM. i feel the religion IS LAME. just like the Pakistan's Capitol that describe it. ISLAMABAD = ISLAM IS BAD.

Read carefully, Koran is written by man who is never ever be inspired by GOD at all. look at them, how they treated their women. they HAVE TO ALWAYS cover up their hair to be faithful MUSLIM and everyone knows that gals love their hair to be displayed on their head. dyed it and perm it to make it curly.
Worst of all, their guys can have four wives. see how biased.

totally disagree in outlawing religion.

we need a religion as our rolemodel and the benchmark in our lives.

if not, the ppl in this world will result in complacence and egoistic. worst of all, ppl will never give a damn to hurt or kill other ppl since there's no such thing as retribution but just the justical law's punishing sentences.

then, ppl in this world will have this mentality that as long i never get caught, i will be still innocent.

Christianity is always not abt killing. in fact, in book of Matthew to John, God wants us to practise a perfect standard that Jesus also did. that is to love our enemies. right now, i still can't do that.

Never in the bible, it said that Christianity is a religion or a books of laws. it's said that Christianity is a relationship God and Man by Jesus, Moses, Joshua and Joseph.

Christianity is about understanding and practise the good deed that what the biblical ppl did in the bible. and not about following and blindly obey and practise it.

Note:- Christianity is also not about doing good deeds and be nice to ppl. NIV Eph 2:8-10 and the last chapter in Matt; the great commission Chp 28: 18-20. pls read that to prevent any misunderstanding.

yah, for that very statement i brought up is meant to imply that that's impossible for human to be perfect.

however, we should tried our best to be perfect. be it, in our work and our character.

sorry, my side note is seemed to be too long.

i meant it to be short and sweet for my personal side note.