At 4/6/08 12:40 AM, BonusStage wrote: Well it's a good thing that link was already posted and you surely didn't repost it for more post count, that's for sure.

WHo posted it before me? I didn't see the link posted earlier...

Mine would be bleach; shattered blade.

It had potiential to be an epic fighter, but instead they replaced the real story with a shittty made up on the spot one, made the final modes a bit choppy, had long ass loading screens and was way too expensive for what it was.

At 4/6/08 07:14 AM, Life-Stream wrote: Wow, that chain went on for quite a while O_O It completely changed subjects and got a bit out of control, but hey, thats NG for ya!

True.

Anyway.....howabout 3500 posts in 5 and a half years?

Thats just pathetic. You should at least have 7K by now.

I bet you weren't ever on the BBS until like '07 though...

Am i cool?

Yes.

Level 20!

At 4/6/08 12:18 AM, knightsofthecircle wrote: Well, I'm talking about the timelines after OoT. So, you're right, there are actually 4 timelines, but excluding the first one.

Wait, how do you get a 4th timeline out of that excluding the orignal? Explain that theory and this new timeline to me.

At 4/6/08 12:18 AM, Ximos wrote: Thats a good time-line, and I agree with most of it. But try to include the CD-I games. Most people can't.

They aren't classified into the time line because the weren't made by Ninentdo so it has nothing to do with their grand scheme.

To the person who said super paper mario and to cericon; Ugh super paper mario sucked major ass.

However if you don't already own Paper mario 1 for the N64 or Paper Mario 2 and the thousand years door for the gamecube then get those.

Those two games were some of the best games i've ever played.

You guyswill find this video interesting.

Tp is supposed to be in OoT's future, yet its the bad ending of MM which is in OoT's past...

At 4/6/08 12:13 AM, knightsofthecircle wrote: As BomShaw said, there could be a third timeline, completely devoid of the first two timelines. This doesn't seem likely though, but could still be proven in later Zelda games.

Well it starts off with one timeline, then it turns into two, then one of those two turns into two more.

So really there is 3 timelines.

This post is bassed off of both this video and this thread.

So it looks like the time line goes;

Minish cap
OoT

OoT's past

MM

MM bad ending

TP

MM's good ending

Links awakening
Zelda 1
Zelda 2
Four swords
A link to the past
Oracle of A/S

OoT's future

WW
PH
Oracle of A/S

I also have the theory that Links awakening was a dream link had when in a paraell timeline Ganon appears and link isn't there to stop him.

That is the story behind the dream.

Mods, Please Note before locking/deleting: This thread wasn't made in the orignal topic because this thread is for discussing the zelda timeline and links awakening as a whole, not just one part of the time paradox.

At 4/5/08 11:57 PM, Noodleboy111 wrote: It's been practically confirmed WW is the Timeline of OoT that had Adult Link in it, where Adult link returned to the past after beating Ganon, and that's when Ganon came back, and he didn't return.

So wind waker wasn't the good ending?

At 4/5/08 11:40 PM, SpeedMetalSandwich wrote: You have to many posts for the time you've been here. Really. In almost a year you already have 11,000+?

People with 10K+ posts that didn't sign up in or before '04 have no lives.

Why do you guys think Wind waker is the good ending?

Why?

BUMP.

I'm not joinning or anything, but does anyone else think that the landscape in TP looks moon like and that it might have been the result of MM's bad ending?

At 4/5/08 11:16 PM, DarkSoldier wrote: Well...i don't spend all my time on newgrounds...
So...5k is good to me ;)

If your a memeber of a forum for roughly 2 years and you have 5000 posts, its is both proof that you are a regular of that forum, but not to the extreme of not having a life.

In honesty 3-5K posts in one year should be what ng regulars strive for, not 10 - 15 K per year.

At 4/5/08 10:41 PM, BonusStage wrote: I often realize i don't answer stated questions, i merely just wish to speak what i want to talk about, and the quotes and supposed to be answered questions are sometimes merely venues for this occurrence to be portrayed :).

Your doing it again.

At 4/5/08 09:59 PM, Gu-rrilla wrote: Now add "not" between "your" and "the".

No, fuck you.

You ruinned the joke.

At 4/5/08 09:20 PM, BonusStage wrote: *I take every question seriously and write a paragraph answer despite it being a simple yes or no question.*

This has been bugging for a while so i'm going to get this off my chest...

You type way more than necessary and have very little point to the topic.

/Confession.

At 4/5/08 09:52 PM, Gu-rrilla wrote: I'd rather not.

I'm not talking to you, stop butting in and acting like your the center of the chain.

At 4/5/08 09:43 PM, SpeedMetalSandwich wrote: Something tells me you're talking about yourself...and possibly your new username?

Actually no, but if you interpret it that way then sure.

At 4/5/08 09:46 PM, DarkSoldier wrote: Spencer is very fucking hawt 'and i want run my hand down his long and juicy cock!

Now between 'cock' and the ! put 'then I want to rub it till it shakes violently and gets cream all over my face'

5000 Posts!

No one congratulated me on 5K so i'm not congratulating you.

Oh what the hell....Congrats dude!

took a pic myself :)

That would be quite disturbing if you took that out of context.

At 4/5/08 09:37 PM, DarkSoldier wrote: Spencer is very fucking hawt!

Now remove the ! from your sentence and add 'and I want to run my hand down his long and juicy cock!' right after the word 'hawt.'

At 4/5/08 09:34 PM, DarkSoldier wrote: Spencer is very hawt!

Now add 'fucking' in between the words 'very' and 'hawt!'

At 4/5/08 09:13 PM, DarkSoldier wrote: It is very hawt.

Now change 'it' to 'Spencer.'

I won't be sleeping tonight to know that their is a religous influence involved with making spongebob.

At 4/5/08 08:46 PM, xscoot wrote: Art thread, not general.

Its a photoshop thread.

I think...

At 4/5/08 06:59 PM, BonusStage wrote: Yeah, getting reminded of the fact they're no longer custom is kinda a drag, but hey, what is, is.

Your an optimist, aren't you?

Also >_>, 2:34, i must reiterate about how much i hate it ):<, and yet cum whenever i see it

I bet he saw someone else do it and he spent months copying that, trying to get it perfect.

At 4/5/08 07:36 PM, Blaze-Heatnix wrote: So was Sonic Spinball, and bean machine.

Both of those games weren't orignal, but they were hard as fuck and challenges are fun.

As 3-d blast is not challenging at all.

I'm actually surprised they didn't include peanut butter jelly time and RIck roll.

But the rest I suspected.

At 4/5/08 07:18 PM, xscoot wrote: Sonic 3-D.

Sonic 3-d blast? Fuck no!

That game wasn't fun....at all.

It was an utter borefest.

At 4/5/08 06:47 PM, MeatMachine wrote: If that happened, then maybe Sega could become a first-party console competitor again.

That would be awesome!

If Ninentdo, Sony, Sega and Microsoft squared off it would be awesome!

The imigine if Atari made a comeback as well?