Monster Racer Rush
Select between 5 monster racers, upgrade your monster skill and win the competition!
4.18 / 5.00 3,534 ViewsBuild and Base
Build most powerful forces, unleash hordes of monster and control your soldiers!
3.80 / 5.00 4,200 ViewsEVERYONE IS FORGETTING THAT IT SUCKS DUCKS BECAUSE OF NO HATS HJAOHTAOUSHTOAS/(%H·O(%HAOWE(H%OA!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I got it. Started on hard because it was too easy at first. It is kinda easy, tho. Haven't played much but I'm lv14.
At least, it's worth it because now I can wear a shirt with a rainbow turd on my avatar thanks to it.
At 7/24/10 11:06 PM, Gobblemeister wrote: Because KH2 didn't grow at all from KH1, nope, it was just the exact same game reskinned
AFAIK, KH2 was more button-smash-friendly than KH1. It was also waaaaay too easy, man. It just isn't cool when games are so easy!
My only problem with Capcom is the lack of new Onimusha games. I loved that series, man!
At 7/24/10 04:32 PM, CyprusX wrote: Great party.
Same time next week I guess.
Everyone's wasted, quess it was a good one.
At 7/21/10 06:12 PM, sinfulwolf wrote: One character I thought was a badass was Rubi Malone from "Wet". Sure not everyone likes the game, but she was still quite the bad ass.
No bro, her ass wasn't bad it was just fine.
At 7/22/10 09:53 PM, Liquify wrote: 11. Castle Crashers
Castle Crashers had a story? That's news for me.
My only problem is that there is now an abundance of shit engineers. Holy shit my team had 7 engineers on a CTF map and we were getting owned. That just shouldn't happen with 7 engineers, bro! It just shouldn't happen!
That's not Valve's fault, tho. I personally haven't gotten my wrangler yet, tho. But the Frontier Justice and Gunslinger are pretty cool. Specially love spamming the mini-sentries, they are more useful than what I expected. Even if only to distract the enemy for a second while I run away.
Just get a No-CD Crack/Patch
Dude, you know noone reads walls of texts about uninteresting crap, so why the fuck did you waste your time writing that? And why did you waster OUR time?
Naughty Bear was pretty overhyped.
At 7/22/10 06:20 PM, Liquify wrote:At 7/22/10 10:35 AM, MrPercie wrote: Played it and completed it.... it's 15 dollars, but people will pay 60 dollars for trash that can be beaten in a matter of hours cough cough Modern Warfare 2 cough...
Sucked balls, too short
Yeah man. A lot of retail games are about as short as Arcade games, yet they cost more. Zeno Clash: UE is a wonderful game, it's only 1200 points. It's pretty shot, but the quality of it is way better than a fair lot of retail games, and it's about the same length. Specially good considering it's an indie game by a Chilean team too.
Also DeathSpank. I'm not sure, but I read it's about 15 hours long. It's more original, fun and longer than some retail games and is also cheaper.
However, in MW2's (and others) defense , noone gives a fuck about it's campaign and only like it for the Online MP. And MP has like infinite replay value depending on who you ask. The best Arcade games are single player only games without too much replay value.
But there's also stuff like Castle Crashers on the arcade, lots of replay value with both it's online and offline.
What I'm trying to say here is... I don't really know what I'm trying to say now, honestly. Probably that both Arcade and retail services offer fairly different games?
At 7/22/10 05:30 AM, arcansi wrote: I download a lot of games from XBLA, and I saw this one and the first thing that hit me was the sheer blackness. Like, sure it may be the most well-constructed platformer ever, but holy shit is it black. I had to skip over this one, mostly because I found the visual appeal to be sub-par.
That's racist!!!
I would've gotten it. I got 5200 points around the 14th. Then I bought a lot of stuff, like DeathSpank. And I ended up with 800 points, so I didn't buy it.
It looks really interesting, tho. I will get it eventually.
i-Ninja, Gitaroo Man, Half-Minute Hero, Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble, Way of the Samurai series and a lot more. These are the first ones that come to mind.
OK, here's the shit. It's fucking bullshit.
I downloaded this game's demo. I really liked the game. So I got some MSPoints for this and other games, like DeathSpank.
That's not the point tho.
The thing is that when I try to BUY the motherfucking game, it won't let me. Says it's not available for my region. What the fuck is this bullshit?
My region is USA. Fuck. Why can't I buy this shit?
At 7/19/10 03:17 AM, walale12 wrote:At 7/13/10 07:52 AM, KeroKeroMario wrote: My simple answer: games =/= reality?Have you ever played far cry 2?
That game was hardly realistic. It was trying to be realistic but failed to be realistic. Mostly, it failed to be FUN.
Hey, I crashed my car right into a tree! OH NO! My car is gonna explode! *gets out of the car, tightens a bolt in the engine and the car is good as new*
At 7/18/10 12:34 AM, Sparky119 wrote: I shit you not, the new game is called Sonic Colors. I am not lying, cross my heart, swear on the bible, look it up on the internet if you dont believe me.
Finally, a Sonic game that goes deeper about the subject of how racism affects the modern society.
At 7/17/10 04:21 PM, arcansi wrote: Nothing on the Wiiware section is worth it's price, even the emulated games cost a fuckload for what the less ethical put on their PSPs for nein. Look at XBLA where the indie games are $1, and the really nice indie games that get epic good reviews are between 3 and 5 dollars.
But you have to be online to actually play the damn games, which is the bad part about the Indie Games section of the XBLA.
XBLA itself does have a fair lot of cool games.
So I finally got around to playing some good Army of TWO: The 40th Day with my cousin today. I was reminded of this topic because shotguns are way far better at longer ranges than in other games.
Now, I don't really know what's realistic or not when it comes to things such as these, but I could shoot people from fair distances with my shotgun. A longer ranges it took like 2 shots to kill most enemies. At one point I was shooting enemies from a distance that seemed to be around the distance you talk about in your post.
And I could kill the enemies with 2 shots, sometimes with a single 1. Since I love using shotguns in videogames, I instantly loved how I didn't really NEED to use a rifle or a gun most of the time. Only used an assault rifle when there were WAY too many enemies, just because the rifle has a sight.
So yeah, OP, try Army of TWO: The 40th Day if you want shotguns that are "realistic" (quoted because I don't actually know what's the shotgun effective range).
Now, on a fairly different topic, I'm sure a fair lot of the modifications you can do to your weapons aren't all that realistic. Not like it matters too much in that game.
So yeah...
I almost never replay games, I just can't seem to do it.
But the games that I have found myself replaying are: the whole Way of the Samurai franchise and Kenka Bancho: Badass Rumble.
Way of the Samurai because, well, the game is very short but it has a lot endings and weapons and stuff. So each replay can be pretty different from the previous one. I don't really know about Way of the Samurai 3 (which I have, but haven't really gotten into. I need to play it.) but WotS1 & 2 did have a lot of different endings. I remember that I could end WotS2 pretty fast with some endings, but other playthroughs for a different ending just felt like they were completely different and longer.
Kenka Bancho doesn't really have many different endings (only like 3) but it's also really short, like Way of the Samurai. In fact, Kenka Bancho feels like River City Ransom with a mix of God Hand and Way of the Samurai to me. But anyway, all the levels and stuff you gets in one playthrough transfers to the next (like, New Game+) and since the game is so short, you really need to replay it a lot if you want to learn all the moves and stuff.
There's no point in ignoring games you like just because they have a horrible fanbase. Or even saying you don't like the games when you actually do.
Just ignore the fanboys and try not to become one.
At 7/14/10 08:32 AM, EDUCATIONALWAGON wrote: The last great FPS's i played were Timesplitters 2&3.
probably more fun than any modern fps today
IT'S TIME TO SPLIT!
Kinda interested even if I don't know anything about the show.
All I know is that I will get the trial for it ASAP and see what's what.
At 7/12/10 03:06 PM, Crink wrote:At 7/12/10 03:05 PM, bartymany wrote:I don't even know...
Epic Triple Post.
Also, he was in a shit game.
how that happened
The triple posting made it even funnier. I LOL'd.
I don't play games online at all except for TF2 myself and maybe some random MMO-ish game if I ever feel bored enough.
In TF2 at least, there are some servers in which the people are actually cool and aren't complete fuckwads. But from what I've heard, everyone on Xbox Live ARE complete fuckwads. Don't really know about PSN, but I bet it's about the same. And they most likely are either doing it to bother people or just to try to be funny. Or both. You just know these same people wouldn't be such assholes offline (maybe).
And yes, campaigns are becoming pretty short in games that have online MP, because it seems that single player has taken a sort of backseat to MP in SOME games. Like the Call of Duties. Even tho I found WaW to be as short as MW2. And I found MW1 to be pretty short too, but it was a tad longer than MW2. MW1 was great fun because of the arcade mode thing, and at least MW2 has the spec ops which had a little more single player playtime.
Actually, I think WaW is shorter than MW2 because it doesn't have any extra missions. All it has, AFAIK, is Nazi Zombies. But no extra missions.
However, I also think that campaigns are just becoming shorter in general. A game that I find to be a sort of exception is Borderlands but that's just because the single player missions are the same as the multiplayer ones, but the game is supossed to be played online with 4 people. And because the game is filled with fuckload of side missions, the main missions themselves don't take much to complete.
I think that Bioshock 2 was shorter than Bioshock 1 too or atleast it felt like that. (The fact that the plot was way less memorable didn't help it at all, either). And with the multiplayer being online only too...
That brings me to MY main problem with all the online multiplayer nonsense. Not only single player gets ignored a bit (sometimes), but that offline multiplayer is kinda ignored. Sometimes completely, sometimes it just is lacking in some way. Like, generally, most games don't have offline multiplayer with bots. I think that online multiplayer just isn't the same as offline multiplayer. Offline multiplayer just is more appealing to me.
At 7/10/10 11:15 PM, EpicFail wrote: Honestly, Left 4 Dead 2 should be all you guys need...
We like it, but not enough to play it over and over and over at least 1 time a week for a few months.
At 7/10/10 11:06 PM, Androu1 wrote: I don't like Halo too much
Hate typos. HATE THEM.
At 7/10/10 10:43 PM, Lost-Chances wrote: Also, Call Of Duty: World At War. Nazi Zombies is a lot of fun, especially if you can pick up the map packs some how
I have CoD: WaW but I don't find Nazi Zombies too fun for some reason. Haven't really tried playing it co-op and only played it a bit right after finishing the campaign, tho. Reminds me I have MW2 too and haven't tried Co-Op Spec Ops.
At 7/10/10 10:50 PM, fawnret wrote: all the halo games have splitscreen offline co-op and are pretty fun. You could also get some of the lego games if you want or rockband if you're into music games and are willing to get the instruments
I like Halo too much, but I might consider it. Neither me or my cousin like Lego games too much and not interested in Rock Band and games like that. (The only music game I'm looking forward right now is DJ Hero 2)
At 7/10/10 09:06 PM, Makeshift wrote: Kane & Lynch
- I liked it.
Oh man, I've actually have been wanting to play that. Didn't really know it had Offline co-op. Now I'm more interested in it.