Be a Supporter!
Response to: Geek-mind - Name The Game Posted August 15th, 2010 in Video Games

This shit's way too easy, to the point of being really boring later on as it just starts repeating shit.

I could've literally gone on FOREVER if I wanted to, but I'm not THAT bored.

This is where I quit due to being bored:

Geek-mind - Name The Game

Response to: Disappointing Games... Posted August 15th, 2010 in Video Games

Oh wait wait wait. Shit.

I just remembered another one.

Shin Megami Tensei: Devil Survivor. The gameplay isn't too good compared to other SMT titles and the characters look waaaaay too much like generic anime characters, specially the stupid teenage girl with massive tits. It seems like they were trying to steal Disgaea's fans or something like that.

Response to: Disappointing Games... Posted August 15th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/14/10 11:00 PM, SloppyMoe606 wrote: Army of Two: The 40th Day.

First one was amazing and fun. Second one, not so much.

Totally agree with this. However, I actually played The 40th Day first. But I had so much fun with it that I thought about checking out the first one.

When I played the first one, I was surprised to see excellent proof that most reviews on these games are completely stupid.

The 40th Day is considered as better in most ways, but that is simply wrong. The first one had more variation, it was sillier and funnie and the gameplay itself was more fun. The 40th Day improved some things, like the weapon updgrade system (oh, so damn much. It kinda sucks in the first one) but it actually feels more generic. Specially considering that The 40th Day actually took away stuff that the first one had.

Fable 2 I think was fairly dissapointing for me. I loved the first one, but I just can't get myself to play Fable 2 for too much. It's so surprisingly booooooooring...

I would say more if I felt like going through memory lane.

Response to: Bethesda can't do ladders Posted August 15th, 2010 in Video Games

It's WAY better like this.

Ladders are boring to climb, it's actually pretty awesome that they are not in their games. This could only be considered a negative if you like super boring stuff.

Response to: Lose/Lose. Posted August 14th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/14/10 02:21 AM, xLegionnaire wrote: I've seen the game before. The first few posters replies seem like they only read your post so they really missed the point of the game.

I read it.

Doesn't make it less retarded.

It's more like an excuse to fuck people's PCs. Like, "This game is deleting ALL MY FILES but it's concept is so deeeeeeeeeeeeeep!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!"

Response to: MW2: Why all the hate? Posted August 13th, 2010 in Video Games

The multiplayer isn't too good and that's what moste people get it for. Considering that the game costs more than what an actually good multiplayer game can cost you (like TF2), I think we can consider it overpriced.

Apart from this, it was overhyped and it is overrated by it's fanbase.

So yeah.

Response to: Lose/Lose. Posted August 13th, 2010 in Video Games

Only people that would play this are people that wanna be trendy and gay or something like that.

However, this seems like a good game to give your friends to play, just to fuck their PCs. Specially if they aren't actually your friends!

Response to: Disturbing bosses in Non-horror Posted August 13th, 2010 in Video Games

Brood Mother from Dragon Age: Origins

That bitch burned mah eyes!

Response to: Sonic Colors Posted August 13th, 2010 in Video Games

There's something very wrong about that pic of "the Sonic Cycle". Mainly the "gameplay looks to be the same old" part.

That is wrong. The problem all the stupid faggots seem to have is that the gameplay changes. I bet that if it was for them we would be playing Sonic Adventure 10 or Sonic 14 or something by now instead of games that try to do something different. (and Sonic Adventure 2 sucked, so I'm happy they didn't make more like that. Sonic Adventure 1 was great)

Response to: Bioshock Infinite Posted August 13th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/13/10 08:09 AM, arcansi wrote:
At 8/13/10 06:19 AM, MrPercie wrote: There seems to be a very strong divide in the opinions if you havent noticed
There will always be faggots that believe any change from a working formula can only make the game worse. These people are the reason we get things like New Super Mario Bros. and the new Donkey Kong Country game, and why Zelda hasn't changed at all since 1999.

And look at Pokemon too, oh god damn it.

Seriously, it's fucking stupid how the change of setting, characters, time and all that stuff is the most criticized thing about Infinite so far. Specially when you consider that most people didn't like Bioshock 2 because they felt that Rapture had been exploited enough already. Now they want to go back to Rapture?

Fucking bullshit, it must be so hard to be a videogame developer if you give a shit about your fans and your game. And I am awre Bioshock 2 was handled by a different team, but still most people dislike it because it feels like a "soulless cash-in". I personally liked it, but the first one is superior in story. Bioshock 2 was superior in gameplay, IMO.

Plus, the new setting itself is REALLY interesting. Change can be good, you just gotta give it a chance. Changing for the worse is probably better than not changing at all and becoming stale. It means you at least try.

I think Infinite will be awesome, and I have no reason to doubt it. What little we know so far sounds really good and I haven't felt like "I NEED THIS THING RIGHT NOW" in a while. I probably wouldn't be so interested in it if it was like "OK, so you're in Rapture again. You're this other random dude with no name. You have to kick the current leader or whatever' ass for whatever reason. Go do it!"

I'm sleepy as fuck so this shit probably doesn't even make much sense.

Response to: Kirby's epic yarn. Posted August 13th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/13/10 06:44 AM, MrPercie wrote: SUre a 3D kirby game with graphics like killzone or crysis would be a bit off but hell fucking better than this.

Call of Kirby: Modern Crysis of Wars

Response to: Show us your GameBoy! Posted August 13th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/13/10 12:43 AM, Kogey wrote: You know you want to.

Not really. Due to how you are like ORDERING me to do it, I'm just gonna get the fuck out and go play 360 instead.

Response to: Bioshock Infinite Posted August 12th, 2010 in Video Games

They probably haven't talked about Bioshock 3 because they don't want it to get overhyped. You know that a lot of gamers set up their expectations way too high and that's why they perceive a decent game as being bad.

So yeah. That's my take on it, anyway.

Response to: Bioshock Infinite Posted August 12th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/12/10 02:26 PM, Samen wrote: And, while I'm glad they're trying their best not to rehash the first game, what's the rationele for making a giant flying city? In the first two games, it mad sense that Rapture was underwater. If you want to hide and escape from society, you go where no one can follow you. But a flying city? There's no way that people wouldn't notice that, which means there must be some other reason for it's being.

Apparently, the city was made to show off how awesome america is. So that city goes flying around showing off like a whore, but then shit happens.

Response to: Bioshock Infinite Posted August 12th, 2010 in Video Games

I need this.

Response to: Scott Pilgrim vs the World question Posted August 12th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/11/10 07:23 PM, GenArmegeddon wrote: Are you making an unclever gesture about how Scott Pilgrim vs The World is similar to a video game, and asking "How to Play?" questions in attempt to be witty?

Hmmm, what the hell?

Response to: NES Console?! Posted August 11th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/11/10 10:45 PM, sweet21 wrote: i would rather just play the emulators on my PSP, hell they're free aren't they?
Excuse me, but im going to play LOZ: Ocarina of time.
jealousy ensues

If only it was a good game

Response to: Games killed by the loading time Posted August 11th, 2010 in Video Games

I don't have too much of a problem with my 360 games, because they aren't annoying after I install them. I honestly don't know much about the PS3, but doesn't it allow you to install the game to the HDD to load faster too?

Also, don't most PSP games suffer from this unless it has data install? Or you use the *cough* other method *cough*

Response to: Opreration Flashpoint Dragon Rising Posted August 11th, 2010 in Video Games

I have this game but haven't even started it, this thread makes me want to start it right now.

Response to: Looking for a game I use to play Posted August 11th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/10/10 02:03 PM, Jackho wrote:
At 8/10/10 01:15 PM, KeithHybrid wrote: Farcry 2?
How the fuck is Farcry anything like what he described?

It would be cool if it was, however.

Response to: Borderlands ending Posted August 9th, 2010 in Video Games

I don't really see why people care so much about plot and story and shit. Specically when playing something like Borderlands!

Response to: Most played TF2 class. Posted August 8th, 2010 in Video Games

Pyro, with 58 hours.

Response to: Returning back games. Posted August 8th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/8/10 04:04 PM, Makeshift wrote: Just Cause 2 sucked. (6/10)

Ah, so you are one of the retarded fuckwads that thinks that 6/10 means a game completely sucks and not that it's above average?

Anyway.

It depends on what you want to do with them, really. IMO, the 3 of them are really fun and are higly replayable, but it depends on how you like them. Do you really want to return them? Or do you want to keep them?

Personally, I would finish up Dead Rising (if you haven't) and give it back, then get DR2 when it comes out and I would keep Crackdown even if I already have Just Cause 2.

Just Cause 2 is more like "let's fly around and blow shit up" and Crackdown is more like "let's jump around and shoot bitches up". That's 2 very similar but different kinds of fun!

Response to: Official Fallout: New Vegas Thread. Posted August 8th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/8/10 01:33 AM, SloppyMoe606 wrote: Can anyone tell me what Hardcore mode does exactly?

The only thing I know right now is that you have to eat and drink.

So far, this is what we know about hardcore mode.

Response to: 360 not reading any discs. Posted August 8th, 2010 in Video Games

Mine did that once.

It looked and sounded like it was reading, but it just said "open tray"

I unplugged and plugged the 360 and it worked fine ever since.

Response to: Fangril Invasion... Posted August 8th, 2010 in Video Games

At 8/8/10 01:32 AM, darklink4567 wrote:
At 8/8/10 01:13 AM, mario-dude wrote: What exactly has this got to do with video games? And how can a women rape a man
Why can't a woman rape a man? Also fangirls can be fangirls to either anime or video game characters, turning the males into homosexuals and pairing them up with other male protagonists in which the fangirls dreamt of them being homosexual, this is called, Yaoi.

Only weeaboos and pussies use the term" yaoi". Normal people use the term "gay porn".

Response to: Fangril Invasion... Posted August 8th, 2010 in Video Games

I do wonder what grilled fans taste like, too.

Response to: Official Fallout: New Vegas Thread. Posted August 7th, 2010 in Video Games

Anyone else going to just play it on Hardcore the first time around?

If it's as easy as FO3, that is. I played FO3 on very hard from the start and it's too easy. Specially later on, because you will probably have like 200 stimpaks and you can just stop time to heal yourself.

Response to: So I bought Soul Calibur 4... Posted August 7th, 2010 in Video Games

There's already a lot of porn in the internet, and it shows more than what you can see on SC4. You could also try fuc---nevermind.

And lol Yoda.