75 Forum Posts by "Amoeboy"
Second off I know why you're calling me a sampler now, it just hit me that I flamed one of your previous submissions by actually correctly pointing out that you sample. It seems that you deleted the song though.
I don't recall you flaming one of my songs, sorry. (and your comments on my reviews of past are just & probably fair, I was a dick, but intentionally to get recognition, ever heard the phrase 'There's no such thing as bad publicity).
Yes it's true I once used a couple of samples for some beats, about 5 years ago and I freely admit it, maybe you should be big enough to admit all your music is full of samples, sorry 'Patterns', ha! Just cos you select a sample/pattern and use it in a song does in no way classify it as yours or something YOU made, you are merely an arranger, like a kid sticking lego bricks together, badly.
I make a good living from my current music & have just finished soundproofing my new recording studio after 2 years of building, how bout you?
Oh, and the 'You don't even own a full version of FL-Studio at the minimum' is classic, well done!
(I have never used FL, and I never will. it's a good all-round 'access to music' producing tool but it's hardly what I would call industry standard).
Love Amoeboy. X
oh and ps: If you think that I really sample, why not put your money where your mouth is and take on a little Mix Vs. Mix challenge, or are you too chicken-shit to actually go through with anything when you're actually asked to walk the walk?
erm, no thanks, I have nothing to prove to you, my conscience is clear.
At 6/23/09 06:41 PM, Cross666 wrote:At 6/23/09 04:27 PM, Amoeboy wrote: but it's all samples. none of it is orginal work!Um no you dick, I used only a drum kick set preset in Battery, I can't even get most audio files to work for me in FL studio
then again you're probably just in a pissed off mood.
Damn right I'm in a pissed off mood, I hate when I hear people passing off sample heavy music as their own creation, it's just a big lie, I don't undersatnd how people can live with it on their conscience.
Ok, I'm a dick for pointing out that you just threw someone else's pre-made samples together, then asked someone to sing over what is essentially 99% not your own original work. That's makes ME the dick does it?
In fact, I just went and listened to your other music on here to make sure I wasn't just slamming you for no reason and now I'm more than happy that I am right, it's a sample fest, you'd have to be deaf or just plain dumb not to realise, just consider yourself lucky I didn't 0 bomb you for being such an uncreative peddler of vacuousness.
End of rant, & regardless of the undoubted below-par intelligence repost, I will not go on anymore about this in the hope that because you have already been found out, you might change your ways. (COME ON! It's so much more satisfying to make something from scratch!)
This is a fight against unoriginality in music, the companies who make the samples and the plebians who use them i.e, you.
but it's all samples. none of it is orginal work!
I listened as I thought I might know of someone who could sing over it for you, unfortunately I doubt she would ever put her name to a piece of music that is just slopply thrown together samples, with a total lack of originality or even basic arrangement skills.
ermm, I don't want to rubbish your efforts, but what's the point? Seems like a lot of time and effort for no reward. It's not like this will make any difference.
grats bro! I always buy Clash so I'll keep an eye out, which issue will it be in?
At 2/6/07 05:08 PM, ZekeySpaceyLizard wrote: In the future, all cats will look like that.
Now THAT would be cool:)
At 1/24/07 04:20 PM, Glib wrote: Anyways album is in the final stages, it might be released under bustede.com records.
ermm, whoop de do?
Good luck to you mate, i'm liking your new tunes a lot, i'll buy it when i'm next paid.
At 11/9/06 07:04 PM, da-pope wrote: For me B0UNC3 is miles ahead of eeryone on here.
utter nonsense! there are many more accomplished artists on this site who create music with individuality and superior production to BOUNC3, not to diss the guy cos his music is pretty good, but it's hardly ground breaking is it?
At 8/4/06 05:23 PM, dave wrote:
Thank you for your wonderful comments. I love showing off my insane two reviews total that I have acquired. Your post must be the most excellent post on this BBS. I love how you took the time to reply, but not listen to my shitty music.
What a guy.
thanks
well, someone's paying you attention, either that or you're just a sad fuck who advertises the fact that you are getting reviews, who knows. I'd listen to your music if I gave a shit, but I reckon it wouldn't be worth my time.
At 7/24/06 07:15 AM, Psyreaper wrote: i'm not really bothered since i rarely visit the audio portal
what a pointless response!
As for the idea itself, yes, it's good in theory but it's been brought up loads and loads and loads and loads and loads of times and nothing's changed, so I don't imagine that this thread will make the slightest bit of difference.
also.. take the music off the frontpage of the audio portal, unless it is changed to feature various artists. i for one am really fukd off with hearing those tunes everytime I go to the audio portal. No offence to the guy that made the trx, but surely even he must understand that it's really goddamn annoying heaing those tunes over and over, even if you can switch them off. i think it's such a wasted opportunity. It should feature the best artist of the day, or something like that, it's been the same fucking trx for over 3 years!!! c'mon, sort it out.
you need to get a good quality soundcard, either that or you have plugged it into the wrong port.
personally iI think you might be taking yourself and your music a little too seriously, unless you're about to get signed to a major label then what is the problem with sharing your music, don't worry about the constraints and restraints, just submit lo-fi versions, if you're really worried that you're music is sooo good that it should only be made available for paid download then don't bother submitting it, there's really only two answers, sumbit, or don't, but don't waste peoples time asking just to try and garner some attention.
the main thing that should be sorted is that audio should be screened like flash so you dont get sooo much shit filling up the bandwidth.
LJC that is fucking awesome, i've been looking for something like that for a long time, thanks for pointing it out.
At 7/3/06 08:47 AM, UN1QUE wrote:At 7/3/06 02:11 AM, DJCityScape wrote: fruity loops is good, but sound forge and acid are better.Yeah I use all 3 and more programs.
Sound forge and acid don't create any sounds - they are for slicing and cleaning everything up.
Reason is supposedly the standard if you are serious about producing electronic music. It's a hefty pricetag though.
not if your serious about making music it isn't. It's an incredibly good investment.
At 7/3/06 07:53 AM, Deflektor76 wrote: Yo,guys!
I made this topic,since i noticed in the new "audio artists" some talents.I 'm thinking about Rioross,BeatyB,Medieval7,Deflektor76(lol,i made it again),and those i forgot.So,what do you think?
I think you should stop making threads like this and stick to making music instead of being an audio whore.
Reason. It's easy to pick up and is a very adaptive program once you have learnt the basics, although I would reccomend running something like ACID alongside it as Reason doesn't allow direct audio input, so you cant record directly into it.
Fruity Loops is ok, as long as you're creative, personally I only used that when I was a kid and although any program is only as good as the person using it, I find it to be a bit limiting.
At 6/13/06 10:47 AM, Chronamut wrote: whats wrong with being gay?
I'm gay.. -.-
nothing, but do you have to keep on telling everyone you are and commenting on dumbass threads like this just makes u seem a little weird.
There's some good breakcore out there, but most of it is just drum mashup nonsense with dodgy samples thrown in for good measure. As with any genre there's a lot of shit you have to trawl through to find the good tracks.
I agree with SpamWarrior that venetian snares is a good example, his album
'Rossz Csillag Allat Született' is quality, a rare mix of strings/classical with big breaks over the top, nice.
Both are crap names, you should probably stick with your original one though, as people are aware of you under that name and it would be stupid to change it.
It would just be like starting again on the site if you changed it, also I think people should stop making these sort of threads, it's a blatant attempt at getting more attention and is nothing to do with music.
this sounds like an intersting proposition, but I would reccomend anyone who signs up for this asks for a written contract detailing all the specifics. Make sure you have 100% copyright of your tracks and don't sign anything over unless you are absolutely sure.
why don't you leave a list of the artists tracks you want to use so if they see this thread then they can get into contact with you.
New Track up, just a little thing i made this morning whilst bored at work.
Break It Up
At 5/16/06 11:19 AM, Khuskan wrote: Prehaps if they cloned the ng-mags audio player, reskinned it slightly and stuck it there...
now that is a good idea
