Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

So themes or no?

At 9/13/07 05:17 PM, Lost-Chances wrote: Here's a better question: Who cares?

Why should people care what happened in the past? How we were made. If it was from god's shit or from monkeys who throw shit at each other. Either way, we are what we are and what happened way back then hundreds of billions of years ago will not change that.

Because if we were created by God then that proves he exists... The minute you stop caring about history, is the minute that you lose any hope of advancement or progress. How could we ever advance if we didn't care about what has already happened?

At 9/12/07 11:17 PM, Shawn wrote: Of course there turning to rock, Considering alot of rap "songs" are stolen from old roack songs...

Haha no one here knows anything about real rap.

At 9/12/07 09:24 PM, VenomKing666 wrote: RAP

R etards
A ttempting
P oetry

You're a genius.

Here's one for you: (VK for venom king!)
Vuge
Kunt

It'll fit on the rail noob, it's so clear from the picture. That reddot sucks though...

I think he means the looks of the right click menu.

The system link for DA isn't working for me and my friend. Has anyone had this problem? We host a game, and quick search and nothing comes up...

Thanks!

If one of my friends is coming over to my house, and we're trying to get some achievements in RB6 Vegas. Some of them require split screen gaming. If he recovers his account on my box, will the achievements transfer over to his account, or does it need to be on HIS box?

At 4/18/07 09:41 PM, Proteas wrote:

At 4/18/07 12:15 AM, Bolo wrote:

If it was semi-automatic, it wouldn't have made the least bit of difference if it was an AK-47 or the Lueger .22 pistol like what my grandfather owned, you still have to pull the trigger each time in order to fire one round at a time. Same mechanism, they just look different.

You're wrong, an Ak-47 and a Luger .22 firing semi-auto or not are ENTIRELY different weapons. FPS, accuracy, all completly different. At least know what you're talking about, that's like saying a 100mph car and a 50mph car are the same thing, they just look different.

Cellar, you're still completly ignoring the fact that your speculation was entirely wrong.

At 4/17/07 06:40 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: But never mind the fact that the guns used in this rampage are both legal in almost every single western country. Also never mind the fact that the shooter shouldn't have had guns anyway because he wasn't a US citizen.

Funny, I remember you saying that you highly doubted that the guns would be legal, and how wrong challenging gun laws were if the guns were illegal. Well they're legal and now you're reversing your entire arguement

Hmm, also funny, you stated yourself "the shooter shouldn't have had the guns anyway". I wonder if gun loose laws have anything with that. You contradict and switch your arguement constantly, but if you want me to provide an original link of what your speculation and your arguement at that time, I'd be happy to.

Nice!

I heard conservatives also hate blacks, arabs, mexicans and anyone that isn't from Texas.

At 3/25/07 07:27 PM, Proteas wrote: Awww.... did I bruise your little ego with the 22 Ways to be a Good Democrat topic? I'm sorry....

NOT!!!!

Maybe it wasn't relevant to you at all, you egocentric prick.

While this may seem hipocritical, I agree 100%. I hate when people think that because I'm liberal I don't support war of any kind, and that I'm open minded. I'm not open minded at all, I'm just not a bigot.

At 3/25/07 07:01 PM, Memorize wrote: Logical? Me? Haha, maybe sometimes, tho it makes me appear cold and heartless.

Haha, I meant it as a compliment, I assure you.

At 3/25/07 06:46 PM, Memorize wrote:

At 3/25/07 06:38 PM, AMFYOYO wrote:

Source please. Oh wait, nvm America's saving the world from those invisible WMD's.

Well it's not like the UN is doing anything useful. Altho, I never cared about the WMDs. But the point still stands that Saddam was attempting to obtain them and planned to build them after the santions weakend.

"He added, however, that the ISG concluded Saddam had the desire and increasingly the capacity to develop WMD as sanctions weakened, and in 2003 was only months away from producing mustard gas.

"Evidence suggests that, as resources became available and the constraints of sanctions decayed there was a direct expansion of activity of supporting future WMD reconstitution".

Mr Duelfer said that he could not "definitively" say that WMDs were not transferred to other countries nor that stockpiles would not yet be found.

But he said the ISG had made concerted efforts to ensure that Iraqi insurgents would not be able to obtain WMDs - though they had been trying to obtain them - and that it would continue its search for further evidence."

tada!

Muy bien, that's the kind of arguement I like. Do you not agree however, it would have been more advantageous to put money to finding Osama, the man who is really behind the taking of thousands of innocent U.S. lives?

See, people automatically characterize me as a coward who is against all war. I am not against war, I think it is certainly justifiable and necessary, at certain times. However I think it is important to pick your battles, and I do believe it would have been better to pick a battle with the enemy that actually attacked our country rather than the one who might have attacked our country in the future. I have no problem with occupation in Afghanistan.

Do you agree at all Mermorize? Thanks for bieng logical, unlike some others on here.

At 3/25/07 06:25 PM, Texsk8er56 wrote: we are there for a good purpose

Source please. Oh wait, nvm America's saving the world from those invisible WMD's.

Also the fact that you even mention Iraq and Nazi Germany in the same sentence almost makes me sick to my stomach. If you can't see the giagantic difference between World War II and this little fuck-fuck operation taht we like to call a war, you don't belong on the internet.

At 3/25/07 05:25 PM, Imperator wrote:

At 3/25/07 04:54 PM, AMFYOYO wrote:
Talk about pessimism. We can't beat hate. And that's what were trying to do. If you say otherwise you're ignorant.

Bullshit. You think your grandpa had that attitude against the Nazis? If you've got the constitution to put your mind to a great task, you'll accomplish a great task. If you got in thinking you'll lose, guess what? You'll lose.

The world united and took down the EPITOME of hate; Adolf Hitler. Don't give me that bullshit defeatist attitude. Go hide in Canada somewhere, they welcome cowards like you.

Your a dumbass. At least Memorize argues with logic. WE WENT TO WAR ON A FALSE PREMISE. How the fuck does it make me a coward that I'm against something that's morally corrupt, and how the fuck does it make you a "man" cause you're willing to slaughter people who don't deserve to have you there.

Fucking idiot.

At 3/25/07 05:02 PM, Memorize wrote:

At 3/25/07 04:54 PM, AMFYOYO wrote:

Talk about pessimism. We can't beat hate. And that's what were trying to do. If you say otherwise you're ignorant.

That explains why they couldn't set up a government.

Oh wait.

Umm...you think they'll stop hating us? You really do? Are you being serious? They're trained to despise us, it's not going to change.

Also I owned you on that Mencia thing. Stop saying Oh wait.

At 3/25/07 01:36 PM, zeus-almighty wrote:

At 3/25/07 12:44 PM, AMFYOYO wrote: but to try and stop an unbeatable enemy.

Don't be so pessimistic if we can't beat them then we are dead.

Talk about pessimism. We can't beat hate. And that's what were trying to do. If you say otherwise you're ignorant.

At 3/24/07 10:11 PM, Memorize wrote:

At 3/24/07 09:44 PM, reviewer-general wrote:

Carlos Mencia is a fucking hack.

Because....?

Fascinating.

Because.

Oh, sorry I was out last night. Y'all are right, I don't have any proof that those are civilians, this war just frustrates me. It's not even for the welfare of the country, but to try and stop an unbeatable enemy. It frustrates me.

I still can't see people defending a war where attrocities like this happen:

http://www.ichblog.eu/content/view/987/59/#jc _allComments

It's extremely clear to me that US soldiers aren't ready for this kind of integrated civilian/enemy society. Look at how great the US is, in a country it has no right to be in, killing it's civilians. Hawt.

At 3/18/07 06:37 PM, Memorize wrote:

At 3/18/07 06:32 PM, InsertFunnyUserName wrote:

And the hundreds of millions of plants and alge that are in the ocean go through the process of photosynthesis. If the oceans are poluted, these plants die. Less plants = more CO2.

New plan: Lets get everyone to stop breathing.

New plan: Lets ignore the situation until it's too late.

At 2/26/07 04:27 PM, Pennmannen wrote: Hitler was a great man if you mean great as in "A man who you don't fuck with because he can kill you and rape your mother".

I have no idea what you just said, but I got a boner.

Yeah, and at least 65,000 isn't a waste of human life for a pointless war. It's not a lot of people anyway, don't worry about it. Also I heard they live in caves so they basically aren't even human.

This is why you'd be republican. http://www.boulderrelocalization.org/weblog/T om%20Tomorrow%20Peak%20Oil%20Cartoon.jpg

At 3/20/07 12:40 AM, Memorize wrote:

You're still as much of a fucking dumbass as ever, it's laughable!

So you support going to war on a false premise? And being in huge debt? And a less than 40% approval rating? Phone tappings, prisoner camps, torture, ect... You seem to be the dumbass, dumbass.

Ya, I should be, it just got to me. Believe me I've seen my fair share of this shit.