i am not sure when that n00b line is crossed.

however anyone who lights their own pubic hair on fire is probably still on the newbie side of the line. i can only assume.

not at all. i respect the rules of where ever i am. in this case i wasn't aware that my action violated the rules. i have no problem with the ban, i just wanted to know why. and now i know.

yo people drop that whole 'assclown' thing. i didnt know that wade replied. that 'assclown' remark was universal it was said to everyone. how come everyone cares more about wade being called an assclown than themselves? wade is a big boy he can handle himself. he can cut me off right now if he wants to and i respect that. but i aint gonna kiss ass to everyone i meet. i swear i think that some of you guys get erections when you post to a forum that wade or tom is on.

HAHAHA!!
Whoa. I didn’t notice that Wade had replied. Now you guys know two of my dirty secrets: I don’t read the rules and I don’t read people’s names.

I will say that I do regret the spam review. I have to plead ignorance on that one. But as for that ‘assclowns remark’ well I am standing behind my choice of words on that one. If the ban stays…it stays—I had a good run!

As to answer a earlier question: I wrote that shitty review to kind of symbolize the amount of "delete this," "pleaseBLAMthis," "blamMe," submissions that this site gets all the time. My question of ‘why’, was to the author of why submit something that you just want people to blam.

So I could argue that what some people interrupt as spam could in fact be artistic expression. Is my review any different the Janet Jackson’s breast?

thanks! i had no idea idea that repeating a word in a review would count as spam. I have seen the error of my ways. thanks again assclowns!

hhhhmmm good point. now i know. thanks.

opps. i meant "where" not "were".

I was banned from writting reviews and I have no idea why. There should be some kind of court were one can turn to if they feel they have been banned for no good reason.

NOTE: For anyone who feels the need to say to me: "you were banned cause you are a whinny bitch punk gay asshole etc etc...." I just ask you be creative with your insults-HA!

At 10/16/03 09:36 PM, RugbyMacDaddy wrote:

Ha. Good point.

When the Pope says that Homosexual activity and abortion is wrong over and over again, to the point were nuts walk into A Planned Parenthood and shoot up the place, then I would say that that is hate speech.

They spread money around to get more recruits! The helping people is a front. Why do some many people who go into AA come out praising Jesus! Missionaries go into Africa to feed and educate the people and teach them about THEIR religion.

The US uses “aid” as a front to carry out its global police state, the Pope uses “aid” as a front to carry out his global religious state. It was a Pope hundreds of years ago, who term the word “propaganda” and it has been the nature of the beast to spread lies and deceit people for power ever since.

Here, Here!

George C. Scott you bring up a good argument. There are many religions that truly don’t believe in wealth. And there are others that preach it but don’t practice it. AND I thought I made myself clear above when I wrote "Pope" and "Catholic" several times that I was speaking of the Catholic Church asshat!

The Dalai Lama or Budda isn’t on TV every other day or in the papers spreading hate for homosexuals, but the Catholic Church is!

Well I most certainly don’t speak for the Pope, but Catholics have changed their stance on many different “traditions” that they have held in the past. Woman we banned from hearing mass and now they can. And just up until the 1950s, or was it 40s?, Catholic mass was performed with the priest’s back to the people and it was spoken in Latin. For almost 2000 years it is only performed like that and then they change just like that. The Catholic religion is against homo-sex and abortion, cause you can’t get any new recruits if you kill the baby or if two people with vaginas are having sex. Which is horrible!

Man + Man = No Baby = No Catholic Baptism = No $$$$$

The church needed to compete with other cultural influences in the 50s, like radio, Hollywood, books, and the soon to be popular TV. Once they realized they were losing money and converts they gave in and allowed people to hear the mass in their own language, and allowed to priest to face his crowd during mass, this gave a human face to it and people could then relate to the material. And hence they stayed and came back the next week, with money in their wallets.

It will happen again. In the coming years, when more and more people are turned off from the Catholic Religion, the Pope will come out (by then he will be half machine) and will allow gays to be married under his watch, cause it extra money.

Maybe homosexuality is nature’s way of keeping the population down. 8P

To say that two people can’t be together purely because they can’t reproduce together is dumb. Logic like that implies that a person can’t marry another person who is sterile. And there are so many heterosexual people having sex that the population would still survive if some weren’t spending their lifetime bring babies into the world.

To bring up the point of one homo-nation on the basis of argument is dumb, cause that would never happen. Granted it would be a very fashionable trendy society, but still it would ever happen.

If two people want to share is in a cultural ritual like marriage, let them. Gay people can go to church and put money in the collection plate, but they can’t go through the steps of ritual? It makes no sense?

First and foremost, Operation Ivy does kick AFI’s ass!

So many countries throughout history and today base their system on Church and State. I would think it must be a horrible state of affairs. Here in the wonderful happy land of The Red, White, and Blue we separated ourselves from the Church pretty much when we said bye to the Queen. We filled the loss of space in our lives with products AND MORE PRODUCTS! So now we are a country of Corporation and State. We replaced one repressive reign with another. At least the Church promised Eternal Salvation, now we just get a 30 day money back guarantee.

“….one nation under McDonalds…..”

At 10/15/03 09:37 PM, General_Patton wrote:

At 10/15/03 08:14 PM, yoman90531 wrote: i am not sayin US is blamed FULLY for the war but divding the country was the mistake that eventually led to the war. If i am wrong, please correct me, because u r probably more wiser than me since i am only 13....

Ok, here is how it is. The US has its hands CLEAN on the start of the Korean war. Here is why.
1. The division of Korea was a necessity. Nither side could possibly give up the whole territory, or take the whole territory.
2. Soviet Russia and the USA were to totally dichotomous systems of government, they could not have overseen the territory together. That would have probably led to a massive civil war.
3.While the SK's WERE extremely anti NK, they were never supplied with enough munitions by the US to launch any invasion on their own, and invasion the US government would have stopped, not wanting to start a war with the communists so early on.
4. North Korea invaded first. There is no way to gussy it up either. This was not a symbolic invasion, or encroachment into foreign territory. This was a full-fledged, balls-to-the-wall invasion that almost totally crushed all south Korean forces on the peninsula. Due to America's hesitancy to give the SK's anti-tank equipment, and their tentative trust with the division agreement, NK tanks were able to blitz almost to the doorstep of the Seoul.

I think you have a great knowledge of popular textbook history.

But the Korean War didn’t start on the day North Korea invaded the South. The US had their hands in the events that led up to the war.

The US and Russia had their armies stationed on the Korean peninsula while they were fighting the Japs in WW2 and eventually kicked them off. After the war neither country wanted to leave. Why? Because in the late 40s America started their anti-Cold War foreign policy--which was to stop the spread and contain communist governments at all costs! Pres. Truman supported the operations of covert teams, which were to stimulate guerilla activities within foreign countries, if they thought that the country was going to fall to Communism.

America was not going to leave the peninsula cause they saw the current Korean government as a threat. So when the Russian and US divided the country, the US installed their puppet government in the South. Which activity sought to over throw the North Korean government and unite the peninsula. It was America’s own puppet Capitalist state that the North was attacking. If the US didn’t create the government to begin with, to counter balance the spread of communism, then Korea would have been united and their would have been no war.

At 10/15/03 10:40 AM, Slightly_Crazy_Dude wrote: I think that owning these nuclear weapons is more of a deterant than an actual weapon, but if we got rid of them then maybe "we" wouldnt be super powers anymore.

I disagree, If a country has stock piles of mouse traps it doesn't mean they have less mice. A weapon is built to be used.

As much as I like the idea, I don't think it is possable to get rid of nukes world wide. Somebody will always have a bigger gun than you.

What a great post about all of Bush's misdeeds. I hope you have addressed some of the issues you bring up further than this forum.

At 10/15/03 05:21 AM, Ambyth wrote: So America plans to put a McDonalds in Baghdad as soon as possible as they believe it will "Bring in a sense of normalcy and stability." Although with fighting still going on out there Chaney did say that the plans could be hampered by "Continued and intensified violence"

So something occurs to me, it was stupid sending troops into Iraq they should have sent in McDonalds and Burger King. It seems that they hold the key to victory.

Ha. Isn’t that one of the reason’s why we went to war in the first place. The rebuilding process starts and corporations are there to save the day. Oil is not the only resource the vile corporations want from Iraq, soon the Iraqi people will be workers and customers as well. In a couple of years the Iraqi’s will be having coffee in one of their 900 Starbucks that will open up and then go shop at their local Wal-Mart.

I wonder if they will change Ronald's name like in Japan or change him all together like in France. Ronald McJihad.

Even though America is owned and operated by corporations we are not the only ones to blame. Corporate run capitalism is a world wide problem that had infected every “Free” country on the globe.

At 10/14/03 10:19 PM, General_Patton wrote: Ok, first of all, NK CAN reach us before we reach them, if THEY fire first. This is WHY there was a little soehting called the COLD WAR? Ever hear of it? Second of all, I frankly don't GIVE a damn whether they attack or not. For all i care, we should plant a cruise missile smack dab in the center of Kim Jong's forehead. He's a frightiningly hypocritical leader who rules his people with an iron fist. He can't even feed half of them, and he's building museum's of Technology with "north korean" (america) space shuttles displayed in them and building nuclear weapons. Not only that, but he threatens to turn our country into a "sea of nuclear fire". I say we just kick his sorry ass beofre he gets any damn ideas, or at least destroy all his silos and weapons production facilities (along with a few bombings along the DMZ, to make sure he does not follow up with an attempted invasion of SK).

Yes but the US has threatened North Korea as well. Remember that thing called the Korean War. Where the US jumped in and fought North Korea, all for the grace of god to keep capitalism in the south. North Korea has every right to attack, cause of the west's attitude toward it.

At 10/14/03 09:54 PM, General_Patton wrote: First of all, free trade with the 3rd world will boost the world economy you drunk hippie. Maybe its time they put down the damn tariffs that keep all of the normal industry out of their countries.

The problem being that while free trade boosts the world economy its "the normal industries" that see that money, not the everyday people.

As a side note to General_Patton:
You said in a previous review: "Ok, the last time america used its nuclear weapons was over half a century ago. No one is going to use them now, especially bush, and especially on territory we have already taken. Are you retarded?"

The US still uses uranium in their arsenal. Such as "The Bunker Buster," which was used in Iraq (which is terrority that they own).

I hope I am not straying to far from the main focus of this thread?

He may not be a politician, but Subcomandante Marcos is a polilitical figure that I admire. He and his group fought against NAFTA.

Free trade will be the death of us all!

At 10/14/03 06:24 PM, bulletproofdisaster wrote: first of all, this should be in the politics forum. secondly, most of the users on the POLITICS forum are more liberal and anti bush than you think. and about the cartoons being pro bush, its more entertaining that way and its also an easier perspective to follow and make an enjoyable movie or game out of. lastly, your conspiracy theory is stupid and may need revision

wow, I'll admit it "I was wrong." After viewing the politics forum, I guess there are more anti-bush people here than I thought. I guess I have been viewing the wrong movies. Forgive me for I am still new to the newgrounds forums. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction.

After viewing many movies and games at this site, that use the Iraq Conflict as its subject, I have noticed that the majority of them have a pro-War and pro-Bush slant to them.

Why is this?

Could it be that newgrounders are mostly hawkish conservative Republicans who support the evil Bush Family War?

Could it be that the people putting out this Pro-Bush War flash crap are either to dumb to realized the truth or to brainwashed?

Or could it be the ultimate conspiracy theory? Which is that Newgrounds has been infiltrated by US agents who are creating Pro-War flash movie and games propaganda, to create the impression that ordinary citizens are for the war? :P

i try to keep my eyes open, but i fall asleep from bordom while I watch those Clock movies.

Got any Friends!?!?!

Super Monkey Ball 2 - the best multiplayer game on the cube.

So the Freedom Fighter Renegade Clock shows his/her face……

Renegade Clock don’t think of yourself as a fool for sending me your proclamation. I would have done the same if I received a Pro-Foamy email. You should thank me; I brought your fight into the open. By publishing your email on the forum, I made more people aware of your fight, and therefore you should be able to convert more Newgrounders to your cause.

WHY I IMPLICATED THE CLOCKS (and I would have gotten away with it if it wasn’t for those pesky kids):
Here is my confession, Renegade Clock’s email provided me with the ammo that I needed to get the Clock and Foamy people fighting. I dislike both series equally and if they started fighting one another, then possibly they would wipe each other out OR BETTER YET actually compete with each other and put out GOOD movies that are worthy of straight tens. So what I did was just “spin” the email to my advantage or in layman’s terms “I stated the message with my bias.” The President and the media do it all the time. Its fun you should try it.

I find it interesting that the Clock people, are distancing themselves from this email.

How can you say that the email isn't about Clocks. The dude mentions "I know not all of you are Pro-Clock" and he calls himself, "Renegade Clock!"

Is he the offical representive of the time keepers? No! But he is hiding behind the Clock Brand to propagate his message of hate. :) You are fools if you think otherwise.

I am dark, I am not supposed to just follow follow the rules.

Yesterday, I have received an unsolicited email from RENEGADE CLOCK. This Renegade Clock is calling for the utter destruction of Newgrounds’s beloved character FOAMY. Renegade Clock is trying to persuade Newgrounds viewers into joining his crusade for the installment of a CLOCK-ENDORSED-UTOPIA ON THE INTERNET.

Why did I whistle blow on Renegade Clock’s master plan? I dislike Foamy a lot, probably just as much as Renegade Clock. However, I shutter to even thinking about a place where Clocks are the supreme beings.

I loathe the Clock Crew as much as Foamy! But I will not join the Clock Side.

Here is the email that I received:

Date: 9/29/2003 19:55:29 -0400
From: Comrade Thomas Moll-Rocek <llegovski@earthlink.net>
To: vinnykaprat@americawasted.org,

Subject: Do you hate Foamy? So do we!

Dear fellow enemies of Foamy,

For quite some time now NG has been plagued by the atrocious films of
illwillpress. His Foamy character is not only annoying but an insult to
our intelligence. I am in shock that this so-called animator can
generate such a loyal following while making slanderous remarks at his
own viewers. He has created an army of zombies on Newgrounds that will
blindly vote 5. All of this at the expense of his own fans. By
belittling people in his Foamy Fan mail he creates a false sense of
superiority among those fans who don't get subjected to his rantings.
While those who simply want to see "the Goth Chick Naked" are made into
a spectacle and cast away into the shadows.

I want revenge for everyone at Newgrounds who has to be subjected to
this bullshit. It is time to strike at illwillpress! I am forming an
underground coalition to create flash movies powerful enough to depose
this tyrant. Please join me, and help to enlist others. We must remain
covert. Do not mention this in NG or CC BBS as they are not secure. If
you are with me then I will direct you to a new BBS at my own site to
plan the ultimate SWF attack to defeat this bastard. If not then just
disregard this letter.

Your agreement to help in the termination of illwillpress' abomination
to Newgrounds is greatly appreciated. I understand that not all of you
are pro-Clock, but really the Clock Crew have nothing to do with this
matter. We must put aside our differences for the time being to achieve
our common goal: The Death of Foamy.

Thank You
Renegade_Clock

Both corpses and fudge get gooey over time. I think you are on to something.