Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

JossosJossosJossosJossosJossosJossosJossosJossosJossosJossos

At 6/7/04 08:50 AM, Jossos wrote: Hehe. .i know . .guess I put the general intelligence bar of this joke a bit to high for some.

I've had my fun too.

At 6/6/04 10:14 PM, mojokid88 wrote: Hahaha u crack me Al

Recap: No, I was not prejustice against homosexual people.

Thank you and goodnight.

At 6/6/04 10:11 PM, mojokid88 wrote: Have u got a prob with gays Al?? Dont be discriminating on NG.

You should really stop listening to the voices in your head.

At 6/6/04 10:08 PM, shak3s wrote: Thanks Joe, for defending my uniqueness. I've really stuck with no profile for too long now. It fits me like an old pair of jeans. (that's a good thing)

I was going to come up with a super spiffy reply but then my mind fell short.
So yeah...it's cool to not have a profile or something.

At 6/6/04 10:02 PM, mojokid88 wrote: Are you trying to imply im gay? First of all how does seeing a hot anime chick on the comp make it any better then seeing a dude? If ur one of those freaks that actually gets off to those Dress Up games then dont talk to me.

You sound pretty defensive for someone who's not gay. :)

At 6/6/04 09:59 PM, shak3s wrote: more derogatory, such as . . .?

Are you ever going to create a profile?

At 6/6/04 09:57 PM, mojokid88 wrote: By telling another user to not even try talkin to me is a diss to me. Therefore you dragged it on. Just stop postin in this thread, Im to tired to argue.

I was planning on leaving but then I thought I'd stick around and enjoy the sweet, sweet irony.

If you haven't clued in yet, you're a hippocrite.

At 6/6/04 08:32 PM, mojokid88 wrote: If your planning on making a dress up game make it of Tom or Wade, or something interesting.

How exactly does putting Tom or Wade as dress up dolls make it interesting opposed to girls?

...oh.

At 6/6/04 09:55 PM, Pilot-Doofy wrote: Does that mean they aren't signed up? Or just haven't activated an account?

Neither, they simply haven't created a profile.
We really should think up a more derogatory name for those non-profile junkies. :)

At 6/6/04 09:49 PM, mojokid88 wrote: Wow... thats really great to "not bother with him" yet ur still draggin it on, just shut up and get over it.

Telling another user to stop arguing with you is means I'm doing the exact opposite of dragging it on.

You fail.

At 6/6/04 09:33 PM, canada_rules wrote: Canada was a commonwealth of Britain. Look up commonwealth in a dictionary.

Eh, don't bother with him.
Learn from my experience and avoid the idiots.

At 6/6/04 08:19 PM, mojokid88 wrote: No u dont u fucker, I know what DDay means, it means that more then just Canada made an effort on DDay...

Do I detect backpeddling?
No one said that only Canada was included in the war. This is for remembering every that died.
Stop being an ignorant fuck.

At 6/6/04 08:10 PM, mojokid88 wrote: what the hell do u mean by that?

That you're an ignorant kid who has no concept of what D-Day means. So instead you go for the gut reaction to compare US and Canada in military strength when the sole purpose is to remember those who died 60 years ago.

At 6/6/04 07:13 PM, mojokid88 wrote: Who do you think would win in a war: America or Canada?

/me looks in profile
/me looks at age

Yep. No surprises there.

At 6/6/04 08:00 PM, liljim wrote:

At 6/6/04 07:58 PM, Rabid-Echidna wrote: It's going to be released as soon as the text search is back up.

Not funny.

That blow was low.

At 6/6/04 07:06 PM, Phizzle wrote: You're acting like Canada is the only country that did anything.

Except I'm not. Acknowledging Canada's efforts doesn't mean I'm missing the other Countries' efforts.

At 6/6/04 07:08 PM, 1337_Baka wrote: what? @.@ I was'nt trying to be an ass...just diddnt know that canada had an army....I was told they were neutral

Wasn't trying to be an ass either. My apologies, sir.

At 6/6/04 07:01 PM, 1337_Baka wrote: wha?
@.@

drools: i diddnt understand that...lol..are you trying to tell the hystory of canada or sumtin? I thought canada was a neutral nation and never had an army. Except in south park the movie lol :D

Grow the fuck up. Why don't you stop jumping on the bandwagon of dissing Canada and recognize the soldiers that played their parts in D-Day on Juno beach. They didn't spill blood and sacrifice their lives so you could question their existence with attempted humor 60 years later.

At 6/6/04 06:55 PM, EtonBoy wrote: surely you are labelling these people as stupid? and therefore putting them into a social group (admittidly one no one wants to belong to but still a one that people get put into by others)

So you're saying that any adjective in the English dictionary is a social label? We're talking about media influenced groups like goth, punk, skater, prep etc.

It's pretty arrogant to say that 'stupid' a social label since it's a trivial word for describing. It would impossible to describe anyone (in your world) without putting them in some sort of social category, according to you.

There's no social label of being charming, funny, lovable, arrogant, touchy, happy etc.

Because those are just regular adjectives.

At 6/6/04 06:55 PM, skullmaster wrote: get really this is life you cant just say you cant lable your self or others you have no power with sasiety you have no power any where

What are you talking about? Anybody can label anybody they want with their own personal power. Society has little to do with one's ability to categorize.

Though labeling is a nono.

Oh yeah. Go back to school.

Rikku and Tifa.

At 6/6/04 06:49 PM, EtonBoy wrote: so are you saying your stupid because your trying to give other people the stupid social label because they are trying to fit in?

Of course! Well in a parallel universe where I actually do give social labels and categorize everybody I see.

When did I say I label people?

These shows bug me.
Candid my ass, there are cameras shoved in their faces as they're flirting and saying stuff as if the camera isn't there.

Anybody that tries to fit into a social label is pretty stupid.
Then again, anybody that tries to give other people a social label(when the other person is trying to be original) is pretty stupid.

The Guzz

That is actually true. I've seen quite a few people at my school with those water bottles.

At 6/6/04 09:12 AM, thegreatmorph wrote: No earfetish i don't know this guy. Actually he is kinda freakin' me out.

Wow...just...wow

At 6/6/04 09:06 AM, Earfetish wrote: It's such a clever irony for us to be using foul language though. You've got to admit, it's brilliant.

Y'kno what else is clever? Responding to a thread called "What do you hate?" with a post "TOPICS LIKE THIZ ONE!!!". Equally as brilliant and true.

Todays comedians could learn from me.

Any hateful racist words(especially the N word) aren't allowed.

At 6/6/04 02:25 AM, -shock- wrote: I like their team better, what can I say...plus, the Canucks blew ass this year, so two of the teams that I was rooting for got taking out by Calgary...damn San Jose and Vancouver....

Well it was a horrible Vancouver year. And I'm not even talking about the playoffs.

The Bertuzzi incident(of course).