Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Let's get the situation clear here.

If two guys make a deal in which one will kill the other's father, in exchange for biting the first's penis off, those guys are insane.

If two furry guys make a deal in which one will kill the other's father, in exchange for biting the first's penis off, all furries are insane.

I fucking hate people sometimes.

Considering the world of The Legend of Zelda is ridiculously uninteresting, I'd say it would be a bad idea.

What have you got that's original in Zelda?

There's a volcano.

There's a forest.

There's a waterfall.

There's a desert.

And there's a castle.

And there's a few rock people, mermaids and fairies going around places.

How can anybody possibly argue that this game is better than Fallout 3?

I keep hearing these arguments on the internet that Fallout 3 doesn't live up to Fallout 1 and 2, but as far as I can tell, it vastly exceeds them.

For starters, Fallout 1 has an ugly world. It's uninteresting. It's dull. I didn't have any desire to explore it. Of course it didn't have the technology of Fallout 3 to create a complete world, but there are plenty of games from the time that actually look good. It's just a bunch of sand coloured square buildings put together, with a couple of different coloured vault maps put in in a few places. They could have done a lot better on the art design.

Second, the writing is terrible. Sure the writing isn't great in Fallout 3, but every single line of dialogue in Fallout 1 sounds so incredibly stilted you'd think that it was written by a robot. Not only that, but the story is completely uninteresting. But to be fair, that's the case in Fallout 3 as well, only that game does everything bigger.

There's also very little to do in the game. I completed the game thinking that I'd done a minority of side quests, but upon consulting a guide, I found out I had done practically everything I could do.

I've heard people complain that in Fallout 3, nothing you do has any significant consequences (as opposed to what happens in the other Fallouts). After having played through Fallout, absolutely no decision I made had a lasting effect on my game. None at all. I have no idea what people were talking about with regards to that.

To summarise: Fallout is ugly, small, badly written, and nothing that people have hyped it up to be. I bought into the obvious rose tinted glasses that these people see their childhoods through, and came out disappointed. Absolutely everything about the game was done better in Fallout 3.

For shame, people.

For shame.

Let's take bets to see how long it takes before he's sick of it.

I'm going with 3.

At 7/22/09 12:11 AM, uchiha666 wrote: Personally i would give this to Doom. All it really needs is updated Graphics and it would be an Instant hit.

When was the last time you played Doom?

The gameplay is downright archaic.

Obviously they'd have to do a lot more to Doom than just improve the graphics.

At 7/21/09 01:40 PM, tiegizzle wrote: When i say vampire i dont mean like super ultra invincible vampires.

That's what a vampire is.

Vampires are super, ultra and invincible.

That's why there's such a big deal about stakes through the heart, and sunlight.

Well, have you played Half Life 2 and Half Life 2: Episode 1?

If not, then yes definitely get it.

Braid.

It's one of the most important games to come out for a while.

At 7/22/09 01:36 AM, Crownjo wrote: Plus why would you need to install a game after you download it?

The same reason you do on computers.

Nintendo, and their fans, seem to think that "dark=deep."

In any case, Zelda games are not dark at all by conventional standards. None of them.

Sure one game may be a little more dark than the other bright, colourful games, but they're still childish fantasy.

None of the characters have any personality (sure they tried a bit with Midna, but didn't do well at developing her) so it's difficult to care about any of them (especially Link, which Nintendo seems to think people will have an instant attachment to just because they play as him) and everything always turns out okay for everyone in the end, no matter what small crises they go through.

Nintendo needs to step up their game.

At 7/21/09 10:09 AM, Ragnarokia wrote: wait no 8, wtf thats the best one they cant select to skip it.

I wouldn't say VIII was the best one, but in terms of storyline it was definitely the most interesting.

It really tried to be its own game.

However, the junction system is ridiculously broken and the fact that refusing to fight any random battles at all leads to an easier game just makes the actual gameplay of FFVIII a little... Bad.

At 7/21/09 07:57 PM, Lost-Wisdom wrote: Bakemonogatari is a great show.

Why is that title not translated into English?

The portmanteau works exactly the same in English.

"Monstory."

Because people will pay.

Sometimes I just forget to eat all day, and then it'll be 9pm and suddenly I'll realise how hungry I am.

I'm dangerously underweight.

At 7/21/09 05:19 PM, Jereminion wrote: ok i fixed the leg animation a bit

The way his legs move are still off.

He's moving his legs forward without bending his knees, then sort've kicking his foot out to reach the ground, again like he's doing the can can.

Take a look at some videos of people running, and you can see how the legs should actually move.

In addition, when he's running, his whole body should move, but you've got his torso set in place.

Here's a video of someone running on a treadmill to give you an example.

At 7/21/09 08:05 AM, TheThirdSix wrote: After all being gay is a choice. It's just a mental disorder

This seems contradictory to me.

Like saying, "being gay is a choice, like schizophrenia."

Someone wants to be Bjork.

At 7/20/09 07:02 PM, Jereminion wrote: http://spamtheweb.com/ul/upload/200709/6 8545_fightgame2.php

maybe i can do all the backgrounds with photoshop and just the objects and characters in flash...

I love the ridiculous way that he moves his arms while he runs.

It reminds me of Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof.

"If I were a rich man..."

At 7/20/09 10:34 AM, Hades wrote: Holding your hand around your stomach is a result of extreme laughter that sometimes causes spasm-like muscle contractions in your abdomen. This effectively causes a slight dull pain, something like the aftermath of a whole lot of push-ups, to which your body reacts with a reflex of grabbing the "wounded" area, to prevent further pain.

I'm not talking about grabbing your stomach. I'm talking about wrapping your arms around your stomach like you're hugging yourself.

I see this often in drawings and animations, but I've never seen it in real life.

When was the last time you saw a twenty-something year old in deep conversation with an 11 year old?

Never is right.

I find waffles underwhelming. They're like stale pancakes.

Pancakes aren't hard to make. I'd rather just make pancakes.

I'm a very unassertive guy, so I'd probably just lay down and take it.

At 7/20/09 04:43 PM, zamorakwizardwarrior wrote: and he had this really nice girl id never met over and she seemed to kind of like me she was really cool and everything

shes single do you think i have a chance?

Shouldn't you know this more than anyone here?

All we know here is that she "kind of like(s)" you, and that she's not very good looking.

You've actually seen how she reacts to your presence.

Get him a ride in a racing car.

That's really the best I can come up with upon knowing only those facts.

Question.

Have you ever wrapped your arms around your stomach while laughing?

At 7/20/09 09:18 AM, ScreamsToday wrote: Lol, I remember when finding your father's porn stash meant finding his huge stacks of Hustler and Playboy magazines. XD

Well I remember when finding your father's porn stash meant finding black and white photos of fully clothed women showing off their britches.

Delete the videos, run a virus check, tell your dad to use his own computer next time.

Music is better today than it ever was.

I don't have to look hard at all to find good music.

All I have to do is listen to my local student radio station.

At 7/20/09 07:39 AM, nerdking wrote: Really why isn't there a option to mark as spam when a submission is in the portal?

What do you think would happen if you told a storm trooper how to do his job?

Phoenix Foundation.