Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 11/30/05 09:50 PM, F00D wrote: It's hard to follow all these scandals. There's so fuckin many.

How about that Indian Tribe bribery scandal? Is that already old news?

Both Republicans AND Democrats may have participated in that scandal. Although the ratio of Republicans involved to Democrats involved is something like 4:1. That's beside the point. It's all contributing to a general air of corruption in Washington. *sigh*

Not to point out the obvious, but there are a LOT more republicans than Democrats in national office. Just a thought. Corruption was much more a Democratic issue before Republicans took the White House AND Congress. Now it's more an us issue. I bet the party corruption rate is probably about 25%-35% for both parties.

At 11/30/05 06:09 PM, red_skunk wrote:

At 11/30/05 04:53 PM, smith916 wrote: And we did, beleive it or not we found enough supplys from iraq to support 1 nuclear bomb,

Source? News to me. What sort of "Supplies"?

Al Franken..."The Truth with Jokes" (paraphrased):
In one site alone we found 300+ pounds of high grade explosives...
He had mobile weapons facilities in which we'll never know what was housed because Bush allowed them to get away...
He (Saddam) had dozens of short range missles...
Tanks of Sarin Gas...
Etc...

In Conclusion, we know for "a fact" (quote marks mine) Saddam had no WMDs.

In his rush to conclude Saddam had nothing, Franken admits to several discoveries of weapons we found.

At 11/30/05 12:47 PM, Morextremist wrote: I think the only way terrorist can cause a stir with americans is if they hurt our economy more. I mean, if they like cause a rampage in one store in the US it will instill fear all across the nation and people will stay home. Then big business will whine to Bush and he'll tell the troops to come home.

Um I'm not sure where you're going with this. It sounds like you want us to be attacked again. It really sounds like what you're hoping for.

And as for your logic, I don't understand it. Terrorists bombed the WTC. It hurt our economy. It scared our people. And that was a hell of a lot bigger than "on store". What was our response? We invaded two countries with links to al Quida or terrorism in general. Big business AND the American people called for retaliation.

So I gotta say, despite the fact that it sounds like you're rooting for our enemies to kill your fellow countrymen, your logic is severely lacking. We have a tendancy to attack back, so the cause you are so hoping for will only cause the exact opposite effect of what you desire. I don't know where that idea came from.

At 11/29/05 07:30 PM, Lucky_Mabey wrote: Those silly Republicans. (Funniest thing about it was they jumped on Clinton for getting his cock sucked like a pack of wild dogs.)

Yea, he wasn't being sued or anything, and lie under oath. It was all about his dick...not perjury or obstruction of justice or anything.

I'd like to point out that while every single Democrat rushed to defend Clinton's perjury against those "heartless Republicans" that so far I've only heard the equally corrupt Tom "Clownfucker" Delay come out in this guys defense.

People who make this partisan need to shut up. It's not about Republican or Democrat, it's about a corrupt politician, and we have plenty of them on both sides of the aisle. If you're not willing to look at corruption as corruption, but only as Republican or Democrat, you have nothing of value to contribute to the national discourse.

The earlier argument that because you're getting defensive is a sign that you have the white guilt....cracks me up. NOT getting defensive and standing up for yourself is more of a sign of the white guilt. The black racists won't ever shut the hell up until we call them on the carpet for their blantant racism every time they spew their hate. You should stand up for yourself when you're unjustly accused. If you get called a murderer or rapist, then you're just speaking in your own defense if you deny it. But if you deny being racist that makes you guilty of something? I don't buy it. That's bullshit and the guy who posted it knows that.

At 11/30/05 12:09 PM, Kuuuter wrote: Who really cares anymore. Its now a reality that we lost in Iraq. The only people who are losing their lives are those dumbass bottomfeeder us soldiers so I really don't care.

Wow, you're a piece of garbage! Number one, it's not a reality that we "lost" in Iraq. And you won't find anyone who actually knows what they're talking about (i.e. not you) who will agree with that idiotic assertion. And as for the only people losing their lives... those soldiers are people. They're not bottomfeeders as you called them. They are people risking their lives for complete strangers, so even if they were the only ones dying, you're still a jackass for saying that. But they're not, innocent civilians and Iraqi troops are dying too, so not only are you a jackass but a heartless idiot as well.

Which fits the profile of bottom feeder more? A brave soldier who risks his life to bring freedom to a country full of people he's never known? Or some jackass rooting for the insurgents to kill our soldiers and innocent people? I for one...go with the second one, you.

LOL, I love idiotic clap trap.

"We don't belong in Iraq, I hate Bush, blah blah blah."

Fast forward a couple of months, Bush does exactly what people have been bitching at him to do...set a time table to leave. What's the response?

"Stupid Bush. What a coward. AND he's a flip-flopper"

Fine, if you want to bitch about flip-flopping, I say he flip-flops BACK, fights the war like a war, and stops trying to pander to anti-war pussies.