Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 6/30/11 04:02 AM, Lolzer wrote:

I am now proposing that the term night owl be changed to Batman.

Hello, fellow Batmans

Right now, somewhere in gotham city, Bruce Wayne is facepalming in his bed.

He can facepalm all he wants, my proposal still stands.

At 6/30/11 03:56 AM, kisame wrote: the term is night-owl you idiot.

I am now proposing that the term night owl be changed to Batman.

Hello, fellow Batmans

At 6/16/11 12:20 AM, TheKlown wrote:

At 6/16/11 12:15 AM, Tateos wrote:

At least we had better sportsmanship than you guys. Canuck fans were booing the Bruins at the end. Think what you want.

Your fans would have done the same shit if you Canucks won the cup at your home too. This is exactly why I still and always will hate Bruins fans they think they're better hockey fans than every other town when they're the opposite.

Considering the fact that Canuck fans are rioting and burning stuff in their own city, I don't think Bruins fans would do exactly the same thing as them.

At 6/15/11 09:56 PM, ian4678 wrote:

At 6/15/11 09:55 PM, maxninja234 wrote:

At 6/15/11 09:53 PM, ian4678 wrote: You guys are pussies. I kill any fucking inset or pest that gets in my way.

Actually, we are not cats...I just think you should know that missy.

You're not funny. You should know that. You weak cock sucking motherfucker.

You only act the way you do to make up for your own shortcomings in life.

Perhaps the comment was made more so as a joke rather than being something malicious, as you perceive it? It's pretty common for girls who are good friends to make comments like that.

At 6/15/11 11:10 PM, orangebomb wrote: craphole Boston, and it's arrogant, spoiled fanbase.

Now comes the Boston fans onslaught. *dons flame war armor.*

Arrogant I believe, but spoiled I'm just not seeing it. And Boston isn't that bad a city, I've seen far worse.

Also that was a pretty awesome game

At 4/17/11 05:19 PM, ghdude85 wrote: I FUCKING HATE TF2!!!

The game that used to be the beast of co-operation FPS is now the biggest scam in the world of gaming. People actually buy these silly hats! I have seen people buy hats for enough money to buy themself a load of new games.

WTF is the point? It's not like your Scout is gonna run faster by wearing a new hat that don't suit him at all!

If I ever play TF2 again I will be sure to be on my beloved PS3 where the game still rocks!

So buying hats somehow breaks a game, despite the fact that the hats, by themselves, dont do anything?

At 3/6/11 04:50 AM, Saren wrote: Notch is a moneywhore fucking prick. .

I would like an example of how he has scammed people in the past.

Him and his big ass company

<10 people=big?

have all the time in the world to update the game and give us stuff, stuff that modders could make in less than a MONTH yet he's too fucking lazy to do it, making multiplayer features IS NOT HARD, and I don't care if he has other projects or real life things to do because he's had almost HALF A FUCKING YEAR or more to do it. This article shows that all he really wants is money.

No, it's doesn't show anything. You're reading far too into it.

At 7/21/10 05:24 AM, Gobblemeister wrote: I concur

Street Fighter and Brawl are both great games

I suppose it's just the fact that other people try to overblow Brawl that annoys me

Either way I care little to further the arguement

Agreed. I mean, I'm an RTS kind of guy to begin with.

At 7/21/10 04:43 AM, Gobblemeister wrote:

At 7/21/10 04:21 AM, Toastman7007 wrote:

At 7/21/10 03:40 AM, Gobblemeister wrote: Give me an example of said 'insane combos'

Even though all you have to do is dodge and you bypass it completely

Still, I want you to give me one good example of a Brawl Combo

So basically type into youtube "Brawl combo" and paste the first thing that shows up?

Those don't count because you can dodge mid combo and completely nullify it

A combo is inescapable once it gets started and until it ends

How about we just end this and move on with our lives? I mean, this sorta has gone on for a pretty long time and there really is no point.

At 7/21/10 04:14 AM, Liquify wrote: Why hasn't this advertisement been locked yet?

Eh, somebody call holla.

No mods are online, although I'll send a pm when one comes on.

I like it, it's something I can quickly pop iin and play without having to think much. A good basic shooter.

At 7/21/10 03:40 AM, Gobblemeister wrote: Give me an example of said 'insane combos'

Even though all you have to do is dodge and you bypass it completely

Still, I want you to give me one good example of a Brawl Combo

So basically type into youtube "Brawl combo" and paste the first thing that shows up?

At 7/21/10 03:21 AM, Gobblemeister wrote: A combo in one button?

I'm sorry but that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard

I went off a little on that one but the point is basically that you can still combo in Brawl. Which I believe that you were trying to prove with your "Brawl's 2 hit combo". You can pull of some insane combos in Brawl, just like you can in any other fighting game. Because Brawl is a fighting game.

It's not even worth quoting

Now this is really pathetic. What am I, suppose to feel bad because someone didn't quote me? I can just feel the agony now, oh wait, I don't.

Yet again proving that the "Brawl is a fighting game" people don't know how to play fighting games

How do I button mash?

At 7/21/10 03:05 AM, Gobblemeister wrote:

At 7/21/10 02:54 AM, Toastman7007 wrote:

At 7/21/10 02:44 AM, Gobblemeister wrote:

At 7/21/10 02:37 AM, Toastman7007 wrote:

So you're saying that a fighting game, isn't actually based on fighting but rather if it uses a bar as a health system? Is that your final answer?

Yes actually, almost every genre of video games has fighting.

The health bar centralizes this fact. While it is not necessarily the most important part it is essential. Everything about fighting games revolves around health.

Either that or the devs couldn't think of a more original idea so they stuck with what the other person did.

How much damage does x character and x attack do?
How much health does X character have?
Is the amount of damage done by X combo worth the expense?

OH EM GEE THAT'S IN BRAWL TOO.

CHARACTERS IN BRAWL HAVE HEALTH? WELL OMG I MUST BE PLAYING THE WRONG GAME
COMBOS TOO!? I DIDN'T REALIZE 2 HITS WAS A COMBO

SO, WHAT MOVE IN STREET FIGHTER DOES MORE THAN TWO HITS FOR EVERY TIME YOU HIT A BUTTON?

Smash Bros does away with these fundamental ideals and even furthers itself from a fighting game with features like Items, and Four Player gameplay.

Because obviously Bowser can't take more damage than Fox. Because obviously Captain Falcon's Falcon Punch isn't usually worth the offset of winding it up.

Obviously.

Fox can take as much damage as Bowser, 999% to be exact. It's slightly harder for Fox to survive it than Bowser but it's still possible.

I don't know the exact percentage, but the difference between the two characters is much more than what you make it out to be.

In fact, though you aren't aware of it, all of the characters in the game can take up to 999%

Because, you see, in fighting games characters don't lose before half their health is depleted

Actually, they can, if you run out of time the person with the most health wins. So really you could just get hit once and lose.

At 7/21/10 02:44 AM, Gobblemeister wrote:

At 7/21/10 02:37 AM, Toastman7007 wrote:

So you're saying that a fighting game, isn't actually based on fighting but rather if it uses a bar as a health system? Is that your final answer?

Yes actually, almost every genre of video games has fighting.

The health bar centralizes this fact. While it is not necessarily the most important part it is essential. Everything about fighting games revolves around health.

Either that or the devs couldn't think of a more original idea so they stuck with what the other person did.

How much damage does x character and x attack do?
How much health does X character have?
Is the amount of damage done by X combo worth the expense?

OH EM GEE THAT'S IN BRAWL TOO.

Smash Bros does away with these fundamental ideals and even furthers itself from a fighting game with features like Items, and Four Player gameplay.

Because obviously Bowser can't take more damage than Fox. Because obviously Captain Falcon's Falcon Punch isn't usually worth the offset of winding it up.

Obviously.

If that's what Brawl is about, than what about the other ones?

You see, in an actual fighting game there is this universal HUD piece called a 'Health Bar'

The point of the match is to reduce said health bar of your opponent to zero

Brawl has no health bars, it instead revolves around building damage until the opponent is knocked out of the arena.

Fighting games are about hitting enemies with attacks and setting yourself up for consecutive strikes while keeping yourself defended.

Smash Bros is about hitting each other until one of you gets lucky and knocks the other guy out of the ring. You may have 367% and he only 250%, but you can still win because it's a PARTY GAME and not a FIGHTING GAME

So you're saying that a fighting game, isn't actually based on fighting but rather if it uses a bar as a health system? Is that your final answer?

At 7/21/10 02:04 AM, Gobblemeister wrote:

At 7/21/10 01:54 AM, Toastman7007 wrote:

At 7/20/10 09:33 PM, Calcos wrote:

At 7/19/10 12:25 PM, Figikii wrote:

At 7/19/10 10:55 AM, Calcos wrote:

Because obviously every other fighter game you block automatically, and I also seem to have forgotten that memorizing a long ass list of moves is fun.

then do it again, and again, and again. There is no solid combo system,

Man, it feels like you haven't even played this game.

If you think Street Fighter has 'long ass combos'

I guess long ass is a bit exxageratted, but really, do I really need to press left, right, left, right, a,a,a, to do a single move? Whats the fun in that when I can link combos together already

you obviously know little about fighting games.

Played a little Street Fighter. Played some Mortal Kombat, and some Soul Caliber 2 and some other less known games. So yeah, I'm no fighter guru but I know most of what I'm talking about.

Combos aren't about length, it's about effectiveness. Smash Bros does not have an effective combo system. The game revolves around poking the enemy with weaker attacks and then hitting them with much stronger ones.

If that's what Brawl is about, than what about the other ones?

I'm not saying this is a fault in the game. In fact I don't even know why you want to call it a fighting game so bad.

Because wikipedia said so, so it must be true.

It won't change anything. It simply isn't a fighting game. It's a good game, but it's not a fighting game.

WIKIPEDIA DISAGREES WITH YOU MY GOOD SIR.

Not to mention that it's futile pretending there are any complexities to the game. It's a fun game that caters to fans in a way that makes it fun without being complex.

Just because it only has a couple of moves for each person, doesn't mean it's not complex.

I don't think anyone who plays Nintendo games would want a severely complicated and precise game. t's supposed to be fun and easy to pick up.

Again. play an actual fighter to understand the differences

You actually never said that to begin with. Also what I find odd is how you were led to the assumption that I've never played a fighter game in my life. Perhaps you should actually know a person before you make such a remark.

At 7/20/10 09:34 PM, arcansi wrote:

At 7/20/10 09:11 PM, flippy133 wrote: by 18+, I mean that there is some nude drawings, Monst of the 18+ stuff is in the roleplaying.

Nobody is interested in n00dz from a site called 'Hypnodragon', seeing as how most normal people find fucking half-animal frankenstein monsters to be somewhat repulsive.

also FYIAD

Actually, considering what the Newgrounds populace is made up of, flippy probably has the right crowd...

At 7/20/10 09:33 PM, Calcos wrote:

At 7/19/10 12:25 PM, Figikii wrote:

At 7/19/10 10:55 AM, Calcos wrote: Actually, saying that Super Smash Bros. isn't a fighting game is correct, because it isn't.

Wanna give a reason why? You kinda sound like a troll.

Ok, here's why:

It's major hype is that it allows you to beat the crap out of your friends with famous Nintendo characters.......and nothing else.

Remove "famous Nintendo" and you have the other 99% of fighting games. BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT A FIGHT GAME IS.

2) must use a button to block (it's a 2D game, for Christ's sake!), and the dreadfully simple gameplay system.

Because obviously every other fighter game you block automatically, and I also seem to have forgotten that memorizing a long ass list of moves is fun.

3) Lack of Satisfaction. Whenever I win a match in SSB, I never feel good about it. Why? It's too simple, and doesn't allow for any sort of complex design mechanics, all it is is hit your opponent and wait for him to recover,

So you wait for him to recover? Well you obviously haven't mastered any fighting game to speak of if that is your strategy.

then do it again, and again, and again. There is no solid combo system,

Man, it feels like you haven't even played this game.

no complex strategies, nothing. Games get boring when you can master them in a week.

Says the person who lets their enemy recover.

4) The Community: This is the straw that broke the camel's back. I can't believe the lengths the community will go to make a game that isn't balanced and tournament-based and turn into something that it was never meant to be. Almost everything is banned in tournaments, and the game is constantly being modded, which just shows what the game was really meant for: Havoc. Undeniable, brutal, and absolutely insane amounts of, HAVOC.

TF2: No crits
CSS: No AWP.
etc...

I will admit, the game isn't bad. It's what it's being treated like that makes me wish that it never existed. It's a lot like the Power Stone games, but has a giant fanbase of drooling idiots. I constantly tell them to play an actual tournament fighter, like Street Fighter,

but whenever they try one out, they drop the controller in 5 minutes because they think it's "too complex". And no, Soul Calibur isn't a tournament fighter. Games don't deserve to be hated only after 5 minutes of playtime.

That what it feels like. You only played the game for five minutes. I thought I had the game mastered too, but then when I went up against some people who were actually GOOD, then I lost horribly. It's because they had a strategy that didn't involve spamming a/b. When he actually explained how the characters were used, I realized that there was much more strategy than I had thought was involved.

Give it a chance, and if you truly like Fighters, then you'll like them, and leave Super Smash Bros. behind, like I did.

This statement made me rage.

Not the best argument I've made, but I'm still happy with the end result.

Around 50% before the downloading paused. :C

At 7/18/10 07:14 AM, Smorsh wrote:

At 7/17/10 04:51 AM, Toastman7007 wrote: Implying top down shooter = third person shoot.

How the hell would top down work in first person?

I didn't say first person.

It's "Who's the murder", only on the internet. You won't know until it's too late.

At 7/18/10 03:31 AM, geekgo4 wrote: If Japan really was the only one to make video games?

Then there would be no valve, thus no steam. I would be sad indeed.

As well as Korea making MMO's?

Koreans are into RTSs, silly.

It seems that those two are the only ones that really matters in it video game community.

Japan and MMO's are the only things that matter anymore?!
NOOOOOO!

Everyone likes Street Fighter= and The King of Fighters. Everyone likes Rumble Fighter.
Who gives a crap about Mortal Kombat?

The people who play em? Which is still a bit.

Everyone likes Mario Kart. Many in the East likes KartRider. Who cares about Need For Speed.

That's ONE game. Also I care about Need for Speed. A little bit. Sorta.

And First Persons Shooters are considered bland, boring and repetiive.

Depends on the game. Can't be generalizing now.

At 7/18/10 04:05 AM, HeadbangingLegend wrote:

so it's not like there's anything worth hacking.

He used it as a means to spam. I think that's valid enough.

At 7/17/10 04:34 PM, PoloPancake wrote: Well, I don't give a shit, because I'll be long since dead.

Little did this poster know, in a secret laboratory, a mad scientist is making a device that preserves humans for almost eternity, and this mad scientist is going to round up all the people like this poster and stick them into his device and preserve them until 18 billion years. Oh the irony!

On a serious note, yeah you'll be dead, but these problems got to be fixed today. We can't just "wait until the last minute" to fix problems that could end humanity.

At 7/17/10 06:30 AM, Madnath75 wrote:

At 7/17/10 06:19 AM, Toastman7007 wrote: He's playing xbox live and complaining about it. I am not amused.

While he has some good points he has to realize most of those stereotypes are actually untrue, so why start complaining about them?

If you watched the whole thing, he started at the beginning talking about how some stereotypes are wrong, but some people have to exhibit the signs for them to stick.

I did watch the whole thing. 20 minutes of it. Yeah, we have a bad seed here and there, doesn't mean you have to shun the whole gaming community as a bunch of lazy jackoffs who have never exercised in their life. Most of the gamers I know have good jobs, know the concepts of reality and how to interact with society. I mean it be different elsewhere but from my eyes, we're a pretty good group of people.

I'd join, but I'd have to get BTS.

I personally punch in the face any virus that tries to infect my computer.

Yeah, I'll get an anti-virus sometime...

Depends on how the spaghetti is prepared. It's all on the mood.

At 7/17/10 05:47 AM, Madnath75 wrote: Link

I found this after reading your argument, and I think it's pretty much what your getting at.

Nearer to the end

He's playing xbox live and complaining about it. I am not amused.

While he has some good points he has to realize most of those stereotypes are actually untrue, so why start complaining about them?