Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

The way I see marriage is simple, marriage is in fact a spiritual bond between various people, through such bonds will differ from one another depending on the person oneself, even if similarities exist among others.

At 8/22/12 04:23 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:

At 8/22/12 10:59 AM, Jmayer20 wrote:

At 8/22/12 03:14 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: There is noway that God wrote the bible. It is a collection of stories written by men.

My point exactly.

I am glad that we agree.

All for different reasons, for that book isn't meant to be taken so literally since after all it is a collection of stories written by various people.

Unfortunately not everyone will agree to this and will still take that book very literally, this is one of the big reasons why people who haven't already still need to see Religion more differently as the Private Club of Devotion to someone, something, a group of individuals or something in between that, exactly how people see it is without a doubt entirely up to them.

In any case, those who still refuse to realize the truth about that book being written of stories by various people the easy way, they will the hard way and in some cases the hard way can be the best way to learn.

They should have the Deadliest Warriors show decide how the whole match would turn out rather then just who would win against who.

At 8/24/12 01:38 AM, VGmasters wrote: http://kotaku.com/5937183/horrible-father-hits-toddler-over-
video-game-loss-gets-arrested

Apparently a 39-year old Japanese man beat his 3-year old daughter, putting her in the hosptial because he lost at a video game. Pretty messed up.

Now that's just wrong man, I understand frustration when losing at a video game if not trying to earn a hardcore achievement on a video game but this pushing frustration way over the edge, the dude should of known better to control his own temper, I mean seriously is the father of his own child that immature?

It seems people who haven't came to the understanding must come to the understanding that Age and Maturity just don't mix, because of this the father acted in an immature way for losing to his daughter on a video game.

That said some people no matter how old they are still act like immature childish brats even to this day and still has been even for centuries.

At 8/23/12 02:22 PM, Snuff wrote:

At 8/23/12 01:55 PM, Cootie wrote: I wish the true Black Isle Studios was coming back. How many years now have we been waiting on the third installment of Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance?

Oh my God you read my mind completely. I need to know what the mummy motherfucker was at the end of II.

I was personally hoping they would finish up Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance with a 3rd game only to realize it never happen, if it's true that Black Isle is back, I'm hoping for a possibility that such is a allowed to take place.

If anything else that should be done I also think they should re-release Baldur's Gate Dark Alliance, it's sequel and the 3rd game for Xbox 360 and Playstation 3.

This is just messed up that Nintendo Power will eventually put an end to printing magazine for Nintendo itself considering the fact they been saying that Nintendo itself is becoming more increasingly hard to work with, witch in turn begs a question.

Why is it that Nintendo Power finds it harder to work with Nintendo to bring out magazines? Is it because Nintendo is losing money or is it because there's inner drama going on within the higher ups of Nintendo and the people who bring out Nintendo Power itself?

Whatever the case, Nintendo has been losing ground since the day the Wii was released, I personally think they should of at least wait another year or two to release the Wii rather then having to release an upgraded version of the Wii itself, if Nintendo waited another year or two, only then they would make the Wii a whole lot better then it is now, like custom upgrades (such as the ability to play Nintendo DS games on the Wii like the Gamecube having an addon to play Gameboy & Game Boy Advanced Games alike).

At 8/19/12 07:49 PM, BloodCoveredWolf wrote: Many people say that MK is better then SF and others say SF is better then MK. I say MK is better i just like all the blood and gore in the game. So what do you think is better MK or SF

Whatever people favor either Street Fighter and/or Mortal Kombat is without a doubt up to the person oneself since everyone has different taste, I think both are great games even for different reasons.

Now that you mentioned it also begs the question, because Street Fighter X Tekken has been released by Capcom and eventually Tekken X Street Fighter by Nemco will soon be released will wounder fighting fans this question.

Will there ever be a Mortal Kombat X Street Fighter and a Street Fighter X Mortal Kombat game coming out in the near future? Because a number of fans has been wanting this to take place only to see fan-inspired sprite movies of both popping up on newgrounds from years ago I think Capcom and NetherRealm Studios should get together and create Mortal Kombat X Street Fighter and Street Fighter X Mortal Kombat.

That way players will experience Mortal Kombat Characters fighting Street Fighter Characters in two crazy games.

I personally think people should consider the idea of an energy source that serves as the equivalent of nuclear energy but in turn a equivalent that dose more good then harm to the environment itself, not more harm then good to what nuclear energy dose.

My reason for this one is very simple, nuclear energy not only dose more harm then good to the environment itself but also more harm then good to mother earth as well for the planet itself is also a living being of sorts.

That said, people need to relay on things that do more good then harm then more harm then good to not only mother earth but also environment and themselves, this planet has already been tarnished enough for that reason.

A world without religion is a world without cults, this is why people need to see religion more differently, as a private club of devotion to someone if not something, this is why people alone have the sheer right to choose.

People will learn to see religion as cults, either the easy way or the hard way matters not, what matters so is that all religions, and yes I do mean ALL RELIGIONS began as Cults and end as Cults, nothing more and nothing less.

That said, a world without religion is a world without cults.

At 8/8/12 11:55 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:

At 8/8/12 06:56 PM, Iammittromney wrote: Haven't I already said this publicly? I've stated that marriage is between a man and a woman.

I am glad that Mitt Romney is posting information for us.

This alone proves he doesn't see Religion more differently, this also proves he doesn't even see Marriage more differently.

If this really is the real Mitt Romney then I have words for you, you will one day see Marriage more differently, you will one day see Religion more differently, I know you don't support the US Constitution and neither dose our current President for his name I don't like saying for his name is a violation, a curse.

In any case, you will see even Deityhood more differently as there is without a doubt a Deity in us all and you will one day see a Native American Decedent one day become elected to the Oval Office itself in the year 2020, and this Native American Decedent will have a woman be his Vice President, for once this Native American Decedent is revealed from Oval Office (even if it means I must die in the Oval Office), this woman Vice President will one day become President of the, no wait, The Great Chief of the United States itself as this Native American Decedent will write his legend in history, a history for all the world to know.

If you are the real Mitt Romney, you will know what I have said onto this day, all of Newgrounds will know and so will the rest of the world.

At 8/2/12 09:34 PM, Jmayer20 wrote: Puerto Rico is a colony of the United States. My question is do you or do you not think Puerto Rico should become a state? This would make it the 51 State. Please explain your answer.

I would rather see California be split into two separate states rather then Puerto Rico become a 51st state, if Puerto Rico is meant to be it's own nation then let it be it's own nation.

At 8/2/12 03:51 PM, PMMurphy wrote: i agree completely. Gay marriage should be completely legal in every way and form.

And further more, banning Gay Marriages will only further violate the Sacred Laws of Freedom and Romney in turn will pay a major price from the Gay community if he actually succeeds becoming President and Banning Gay Marriages in it's wake.

That said, as much as I won't ever vote for the current President in office, I won't even vote for Romney either, I don't trust either of them and I don't even think Romney uphold the ideas of the US Constitution either.

At 8/4/12 04:12 PM, Jmayer20 wrote:

At 8/4/12 03:07 PM, Ketzelkab wrote:
And the reason you get many different perspectives throughout the bible is probably because God didn't write the bible.

That's probably true.

I wouldn't doubt it, in fact I also wouldn't doubt the same with all other various bibles for other religions. Heak man I also wouldn't even doubt a group of people calling themselves the Bungholioist would create the Bungholio's Bible and proclaim Cornholio as there crazy Deity.

At 7/12/12 08:37 PM, CWBHOODJONES wrote: Please post which political faction you stand for and support. I'm not recording anyone's answer. I only want to see what people believe in and why. You do not have to say why. I want to also tell which one is more popular than the other on Newgrounds. Before hand - Thank you for your post; My friends and I are all having a political conversation on the same subject and would like others to join.

I used to be Republican for awhile but ever since I felt betrayed due to the sheer fact both Political Parties have been fighting among themselves and not doing what there suppose to be doing for the American people caused me to eventually default to become Independent.

My reasons for defaulting are simple, for one: I'm very sick and tired of seeing both political parties fighting like little brats, for two: I for one will know they will do something that will cause great harm to the native tribes, for three: They will one day see not only another Independent to run for President in the year 2020 but also one who just happens to be a Native American decedent, one who felt personally wronged with the way things have gone for some people have forgotten about this being the Land of the Free.

All who are born within the North American Lands are Native to the North American Lands, Religion will be seen more differently, more Walls of Separation will one day be established, all without the blood of the natives have capability of tending to the ways to Native American and the rest of the world will know that what they see in the oval office once elected in will teach the World why Nuclear Energy will only do not only Human beings and other living beings but also Mother Earth more harm then good.

That said some people need to learn to use energies that do more good then harm, aside from that, I defaulted to become Independent due to great betrayal.

At 6/11/07 06:47 PM, dodo-man-1 wrote: If you entered this thread because you read the title and want to unleash a rapid-fire barrage of insults, then leave now. I don't want to deal with you, just those that respect my opinion, whether they agree with it or not.

Now, on to my point. Why do gun stores sell semiautomatic weaponry without having to fill out some kind of form or going through a screening process or something? If you're a deer hunter, or a duck hunter, or any kind of hunter, you don't need semiautomatic fire to kill one deer. If you collect guns, you should be willing to fill out a form of some kind to get a gun you probably won't use. The fact that there is no control on these guns in most places leads to things like... oh, I don't know, the V-Tech rampage?

Don't you think?

I rather see more people armed with guns with the sheer intent to protect themselves against real psycopaths, my reason for this is very simple: You arm people with more guns you have less shootings, in fact you arm more people with weapons you eventually have less fighting. People who haven't already need to eventually learn to govern themselves from the National Leaders down.

At 6/22/12 02:27 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:

At 6/22/12 11:36 AM, JCFfilms wrote: This is serious for consumers in North America.

I would enjoy seeing the end of Xbox.

I rather enjoy seeing another video game crash take place instead of seeing Xbox be banned from the North American Lands. That said Death is just another path for the Death of some video gaming companies brings life into new video gaming companies, especially the ones that seriously need to go bankrupt.

At 6/25/12 06:34 PM, CyperHunter wrote: What do you think Black Ops 2 should have?
Name perks,guns,and anything that relates to Black Ops 2

They should make this game more RPG-like as well as women soldiers in multiplayer, reason for women soldiers in mulitplayer is simple, soldiers are soldiers, never forget who your enemies are, never forget who your allies are and never forget who the neutrals are, one forget who's who, your gonna have problems.

It would be very interesting to see what Call of Duty Black Ops II has to offer and I know it can offer a lot more then the other Call of Duty Games, women soldiers in multiplayer is one of them, that needs to happen.

What Call of Duty Black Ops II also needs is more melee weapons, like swords and maces, especially in Zombies, you honestly think I'm gonna take a knife to a zombie and stab it at close melee-range??? No way man I want bigger melee weapons to fight zombies with, not just big guns but also swords and maces of various kinds.

Juggernaut suits from Modern Warfare should also make an appearance in Black Ops II as well, or at least something similar, and yes they too should also make an appearance in Zombies, so you can combine the power of the Juggernaut Suit with the drink of the Juggernog Soda so the player could feel like a moving mountain against zombies.

A separate leveling up system for Campaign, further more the leveling system in Black Ops II should also allow the player to unlock special abilities such as the ability to double attack, triple attack or even quadruple attack with a melee weapon in hand, other special abilities should also include the ability to hold more ammunition then normal (like Backpacks from Doom) as well as withstand more hits as you level up (Campaign and Zombies Only) before finally going down.

Melee Weapons should also be empowered by the Pack a Punch machine as well.

Yep, all the ideas I have for Call of Duty Black Ops II.

At 6/25/12 01:52 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: Hopefully this gets overturned and ruled as unconstitutional.

As it should because the Health Care Overhaul violates not only the Constitution itself but also the Laws of Freedom as it forces people to do things against there own free will.

At 6/25/12 02:19 PM, Davoo wrote: There is a law that could get implemented very soon that, if it were to become recognized as legal, would create a constitutional precedent that--if we were to have a Christian extremist-majority in Congress for even two years--would make it legal to pass a federal law requiring all American citizens to purchase New Living Translation Bibles, or face fines of hundreds of dollars.

What does Newgrounds think of this? Do you believe that Christian fundamentalists wouldn't ever be able to gain a majority in congress, and the white house?

Such a law would be heavily challenged in the High Court if it was approved, further more the Christian Fundamentalists responsible would be put away in Federal Prison for violating the wall of separation between state and religion itself.

Again this also proves that some people forget that this is the Land of the Free, there only asking for a Native American Decedent to one day assume the Oval Office itself and get these people to realize that THIS isn't a Christian Nation and THIS is the Land of the Free.

That said, no law should be made to force people to buy health care nor christian bibles period.

I just hope they come to the realization that neither the active running candidates aren't worth voting for, there already in two political parties that aren't doing what there suppost to be doing for the American People but instead being fueled by the personal agendas by these so-called Special Interest Groups.

That said, I honestly hope they don't vote for our current President in Office as I also hope for those who haven't already come to the realization there isn't anybody to turn to, nobody to turn to but themselves as Independents.

Some people who live in the United States of America even to this very day have forgotten that THIS is the Land of the Free and is meant to be treated as the Land of the Free.

My thoughts on the problem with Atheism are very simple, people need to see Religion more differently.

Why see Religion more differently? That's simple, what if people living in the United States of America actually saw Freedom as there Religion? What if some people see Technology as there Religion, what if they even see Bungholioism as there Religion and worship Beavis as there Deity because of it?

What dose this have to do about Atheism? They don't know where to turn to, feel betrayed from the organized religions because many of those organized religions just don't see Religion itself as differently as it's suppost to be.

At 6/19/12 06:36 PM, TheKlown wrote: Or is it only the ones in recent history that seem like that they just read off teleprompters and don't write any of their own speeches.

The President of the United States, or should I say The Great Chief of the United States isn't meant to be treated as a puppet to someone's own personal agenda, The Great Chief of the United States is only meant to serve to work for the American people by the needs of the American people.

Those who haven't come to realize this fact the easy way will come to realize this fact the hard way, especially once the two current Political Parties are out of power and new Political Parties (such as the Independents) are in power.

That said old leaders need to be replaced with new leaders, it is the way of democracy.

What's wrong with the Republicans? That's simple, what's wrong with the Republicans is also what's wrong with the Democrats, the two major political parties have already gone corrupt and we the American people have gone aimless since then, aimless to the point where they don't know where to turn to.

No where else to turn to but themselves, hence the reason why the Independent Party is already on the rise, further more the bulk of the Republicans and the Democrats aren't thinking about the local people within the USA itself and that already comes with bad results.

That said the reason why I say what's wrong with the Republicans as well as what's wrong with the Democrats is very simple, there not doing what there suppost to be doing, there not working for the American people accommodated by the needs of the Amiercan people.

Take for example a leader, a leader has followers and the leader's job is very simple (witch is of course easier said then done), work for the followers accommodated by the needs of the followers so as long as they follow the leader and so as long as the leader dose what the leader oneself must do. If a Leader either treats it as the other way around or isn't able to work for one's Followers any longer, the Followers in turn may decide to default, whatever sooner or later matters not, what matters so is that they will default.

And that's the one thing that's been happening, the leaders within our own nation not doing what there suppost to be doing, there not working for there followers by the needs of the followers for things have already gotten out of hand. Heak man if I was your President of the United States, I work for the American people by the needs of the American people, even if it was easier said then done, I care not, what I care so is the American people as a whole for things have already gotten out of hand as is.

At 4/26/12 07:47 PM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 4/26/12 07:14 PM, Gambit wrote: Exactly. A giant waste of money. A giant useless waste of money.

What is the purpose of having an military force?

That's simple, the purpose of having a military force is to train for war and prepare for war should war ever take place, that's the main purpose of having a military.

It's for this reason when one is in a War Zone, the Laws of Peace fall silent in the favor for the Laws of War and the Laws of War have there say on how things should really go.

1: Never forget who your enemies are.
2: Never forget who your allies are.
3: Never forget who the neutrals are.
4: If one forgets who's who, your gonna have problems.
5: Know when to turn your tail and run like heak.
6: Be at least one step ahead of the enemy when in a war-zone (for if one is several steps ahead that be very impressive).
7: One must train both physically and mentally.
8: Every advantage counts.
9: Abie by the Laws of War when on stepping forward and onward to the field of Battle.
10: When fighting for one's own country, one doesn't just fight and die for one's country, but to fight and LIVE for one's country and make the opposing enemy DIE FOR there country!!!

That said, when the Laws of Peace fall silent, the Laws of War have there say on how things should go in a war zone, what dose all this have to do with the thread "Canada shouldn't have an army"??? This is more like Canada should have a Army and these Laws of War are the big reasons why, what if Canada got struck with an alien invasion of sort? Then they need a Military to defend themselves with.

At 4/22/12 07:08 PM, Camarohusky wrote: Actually, Madison wrote that merging government and religion would not only harm government, but religion as well. In order to keep religion pure and free from the lusts of politics it had to be kept separate.

That said, the Wall of Separation between State and Religion must be preserved as it's meant to be preserved, sadly however I took notice that the Wall of Separation has been violated several times due to the sheer fact that some of those public schools have actually been allowing some of the priest (especially Christian priest) to preach within the public schools.

Such individuals that manage the public schools that are known to violate the wall of Separation between State and Religion should be either fired or in some cases be put away in Federal Prison for the wrongs they committed against that Wall of Separation.

People will come to know why this nation isn't meant to be a Christian Nation, all who are born within the North American Lands are native to the North American Lands, one doesn't have to have to be a full-fledged Indian to know this nor doesn't even have to have Indian blood to be born in America.

That said, the things in America that are meant to be preserved need to be preserved, the Wall of Separation between State and Religion is one of those things, eventually different versions of Wall of Separations will also take place as they will serve as "The Laws of Freedom".

Our Independence as a nation is already threaten as is and the Independent Party will rise to power for this reason.

I don't know much about Mitt Romney nor all the other canaidates but the one thing I do know for certain...

Because no woman is running for President then originally predicted, Obama is sure going to be re-elected for another term, is this is what you want, is Obama you want to be re-elected for another term for his presidency?

Those who prevented Sarah Palin from running for President of the United States will one day know that they postponed a prophecy originally meant to take place, and postponing a prophecy originally meant to take place can result in serious consequences in it's wake!

Why I say this? A lot of people only wanted President Obama to serve just one term and Sarah Palin in turn is originally meant to be elected President in 2012, but something has changed, something that has prevented her from running for President.

In any case, I said before and I say again, the prophecy I was once given WAY before Barack Obama and Sarah Palin became known is this...

"An African American will one day become President of the United States and an American Woman will one day become President of the United States sometime afterwords."

This is all I was given as a prophecy, nothing more and nothing less, why you ask? Pure and simple, it was all I was given, no names, no dates, nothing else, just that prophecy and when Barack Obama and Sarah Palin finally showed up, it became clear to me they where meant to be.

What dose this have to do with Mitt Romney and the other male candidates? They won't win because it isn't meant for them but should Obama win, then rest assured Sarah Palin will run and win the 2016 elections and in the year 2020, you will see a young native American decedent run for President of the United States.

Why I say this? Because it's already at the point where even Sarah Palin and Barack Obama must know the prophecy and why they are connected to it.

At 12/31/11 10:49 PM, Proteas wrote:

And lastly, the serious one...
- Obama will lose, and supporters everywhere will cry RACISM in addition to their usual charge conspiratorial voter fraud.

And Obama in turn will try to cheat, because the President has the unconstitutional power to suspend any presidential election during times of war and that's what he'll try to do since no woman is running for President, Sarah Palin in turn must get back in the game and Obama in turn must be convinced that cheating isn't worth it =(

It comes to no surprise that Kim Jong-iI finally bit the dust and thus will be recognize as the bad leader he is, every leader no matter how good or bad can't stay in power forever.

That said, one way or another, old leaders are replaced with new leaders, if a leader is good, a good leader works for one's followers accommodated by the needs of the followers, if a leader is bad, the bad leader makes it so that the followers work for that leader.

The only thing I know for certain is that Obama can't be re-elected, he's only meant for one term and one term only, some democrats need to come to realize that re-electing Obama will only do the American people even more harm then good, even Steave Jobs (CEO of Apple) said so himself.

That said, some Presidents are only meant for one term while others are re-elected for another, as I said once and I'll say again, Obama is one of those Presidents only meant for one term.

How ironic, and the Video Game Homefront said Kim Jong iI died sometime in 2012, it seems he just died a year earlier.