Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Personally, now that I think about it when Genreal Petraeus quits over an affair, I think this violates the very same law that should of been upheld.

Yes I think quitting a federal position over an affair violates the Wall of Separation between State and Religion, why is this? Because it dose, look at the story people, look at what happens when people quit federal positions over having an affair with the spouse, he shouldn't quit a federal position over having an affair, that's for him to deal with alone, not the federal government to deal with.

General Petraeus, if your reading this, you might as well start seeing Religion, Marriage and even Deityhood more differently at this point, you might as well dude as I will publically type this message right here on Newgrounds for all people to know.

At 11/9/12 09:49 PM, Feoric wrote:

At 11/9/12 09:40 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote: That is major blackmail material. How the hell did he not get caught before? Also, I want to know, is she still friendly or did she rat him out?

Well, if Patreaus was sleeping around now odds are he was doing it all through his career. This kind of stuff isn't exactly uncommon in the military.

More like semi-common if you ask me, again this is why the One Husband/One Wife Marriage just isn't working, if these affairs keep continuing even at this point. Marriage must be seen more of a Spiritual thing, seeing it as the Marshal status thing where it's only one Husband and One Wife just isn't working, it's already on the decline and this is the proof.

So the individual commits an act of suicide over the death of an anime character. As sad as it sounds, the kid in turn is at fault for dying a death not meant to take place.

But who I think is at even greater fault is the parents, they should of took better watch for warning signs and if they did so and got him to realize what he saw on TV was just for entertainment purposes, this story won't even take place, I alone won't even type this kind of thread to begin with and the individual in turn may end up going to rehab in it's wake. Through I think the news report would take a rather different turn saying he end up having to go to rehab instead of him committing an act of suicide to begin with.

This is why some parents are rather irresponsible and immature when it comes to looking for warning signs about there kids, especially when it comes news article like this.

At 11/7/12 12:10 AM, Entice wrote: Source.

Something interesting to discuss besides the election. Do you think it's here to stay?

Because Colorado legalizes Marijuana, it in fact should be re-legalized throughout the whole nation itself. This is the Land of the Free, stuff like this shouldn't even be banned not to mention the sheer fact it can also be used for Medical Purposes.

Might as well consider the thought of abolishing "Say No to Drugs" and in turn replace it with "Don't Abuse Drug Consumption", why is this? That's simple, we all take drugs at some point in life, whatever for medical reasons or for addiction reasons, it's been that way for centuries and centuries and still remains as is even to this very day.

Why the saying "Don't Abuse Drug Consumption" I mention about? Because "Say No to Drugs" will be the thing of the past and because people consume them, people in turn must do so with the responsibility of not abusing the intake, for abusing the intake will only do more harm then good to oneself (why I say oneself is it means himself/herself in general).

At 11/9/12 05:42 PM, Korriken wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/politics/petraeus-cia-resignat ion/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

General Petraeus tenders his resignation, citing an extramarital affair that apparently no one has heard of.

why does my bullshit sensor go off?

where is the women he's having an affair with and why does he resign before anyone has even found out about it yet?

I think there's something else going on here. It might be that he does not want to work under the Obama administration? the timing perhaps would give some credibility to it, given that the election was 3 days ago.

or maybe he's just ready to retire and enjoy the rest of his life. I doubt anyone would think less of him after his incredible career.

One or the other make sense to me.

that's my thought on it, what do you think?

This is one of the big reasons why people need to see Marriage more differently, the "one husband/one wife thing" just isn't working as is, people need to open there eyes and see Marriage more differently, whatever sooner or later matters not.

What matters so is that people need to see Marriage more differently, the same is also true with seeing Religion more differently and even Deity-hood more differently.

To put it simple, the way people see Marriage back then is on the official decline.

At 10/20/12 07:28 AM, Insanctuary wrote: One is a rich, constipated monkey and the other is a blithering monkey that slips on its own banana peels.

I don't trust either of them, all for different reasons.

In the case of Our Current President of 2008, he broke promises, he promised to bring the ecomany back on it's feet, he broke it among with other promises, I keep saying the same thing, yet people still want to vote for this man for the 2012 elections?!?!?

And in the case of Mitt Romney, he intends to violate the Wall of Separation between State and Religion, heak he won't even last a full term in the Oval Office if he actually wins, he'll be put on trail and be removed from office afterwords.

This is why Independents are rising to power, this is why a number of people of both political parites are defaulting and those who haven't defaulted will find themselves in heavy opposition of Independents for they will become a powerful force within the Political Game.

In all due respects, I'm sick of it, I'm sick and tired of this two political party system whacking things out of proportion not meant to be whacked out of proportion, this is why there not thinking about the locals within the United States of America itself. To put it simple, both the Republican Party and Democrat Party have gone dysfunctional, they think of only themselves just as much as our Current President of 2008 thinks only of himself and himself only.

Independents will rise to power, Rise of the Independents is officially at hand.

At 10/20/12 01:21 AM, JoS wrote: A number of restaurants and other businesses are starting to create "Child free zones" prohibiting children under various ages. This is in response to parents bringing their children out to environments that try and cater towards adults.

Some have stated this is a response to a change in parenting over the last 15 years. Before parents would get a babysitter to go out, now often they bring their children with them to nice restaurants. As we all know, children's behaviour can be unpredictable at best, extremely disruptive at worst.

Opponents of this feel its discrimination to ban children. They feel the fact some people choose to have children shouldn't be held against them.

I personally think this is an acceptable compromise. If a business wants to exclude certain people, if thats in the best interest of their business then why not. I mean barring blacks, gays etc is one thing, banning disruptive children is different. we already do that with liquor licences, you can't bring your kids to night clubs, so whats different about banning them from restaurants.

This alone states that some people don't realize why that Age and Maturity just don't mix, only thing that ever comes close to it is growing up as the people we choose to become, for good or for ill depends on the person oneself (on a personal scale I hope they grow up for good, but if they grow up for ill and there's no way to persuade them away from it, then so be it).

It is for this reason why kids must grow up as people first and once there done growing up as the people they choose to become, only then they'll go for other things, these "Child Free Zones" are proof that some people don't realize why Age and Maturity just don't mix, for mixing Age with Maturity will only result in an example of mixing Fresh Spring Water with Poisonous Crude Oil. In other-words it only dose us more harm then good for not coming to that realization.

At 10/29/12 12:56 AM, T3XT wrote: Before anything is brought up, let me say this: Try not to let your gender bias your opinion.

Men are more likely to be against it since they aren't capable of delivering a kicking, fussing, fully-developed baby through a tiny vagina that stretches and tears with great pain over the course of multiple hours. On that note, I can fully understand why a woman would want to abort a baby before it becomes too much of a problem. However, on the other hand, I'm not denying that the baby is a life nonetheless.

So I ask you: What are the pros/cons on each side of abortion? I really can't make up my mind; I FEEL for undeserving women (e.g. rape victims) who would have to experience great pain for a child they likely don't even care about. But when I THINK about it, well...It's killing a baby!

I'm torn. Here's a link for those who don't fully understand how an abortion works (suffice to say, it can be almost painless).

What's bad/good about abortion Newgrounds?

For good or for ill, abortion is meant to be legal, for if ever illegalized by federal law, that alone will mean that people aren't doing what there suppose to be doing witch in turn serves as a violation to the Wall of Separation between State and Religion itself, this in turn will lead to serious inner corruption if ever allowed to happen.

At 10/26/12 04:07 PM, Entice wrote: I don't have much to add, other than I hope that this starts a controversy that will make it's way up to the national level. There's no reason why marijuana should still be illegal.

I personally don't think that anything that grows on the ground should be illegal, why is that? If it grows on the ground then what's the point in getting rid of it in the first place?

That answer is simple, there's no point in illegalizing marijuana due to the fact it simply grows on the natural ground itself. But if it's a group of plants (like trees) that are dying of disease that only affects such plants and tend to spread it among other plants well that's a whole different story, only then such infected plants need to be dealt with before it gets worse, if allowed to get worse will only do us more harm then good to the ecosystem in it's wake.

That said, whatever naturally grows on the ground shouldn't be illegal no matter what it is, this is why marijuana must be re-legalized for that very reason.

At 10/29/12 03:40 AM, Insanctuary wrote:

At 10/29/12 03:39 AM, Thecrazyman wrote: I don't care who's elected in the Oval Office so as long as one is capable of doing the job

Yes, this means that people need to stop applying religious people into a non-religious sector. Church is supposed to be seperate from state. We have shamed our founding fathers endlessly. SHAMED.

This I totally agree with, because some people who are into politics that I noticed throughout the decades still don't tend to separate state from religion, one of the reasons is why some of them want to see the end of abortion, thinking it should be banned but I have news for them to think this way even to this day.

Illegalizing Abortion just because of Christianity rules deeply go against the Wall of Separation of State and Religion, that in turn leads to Inner Corruption among them, the more Corrupt they become the more they become willing to whack things out of proportion not meant to be whacked out of proportion. That said if Abortion became illegal due to this, there will be consequences in it's wake!

Further more it's also to the point where many people who haven't already must one day see Religion more differently, as a devotion to something, someone, a group of somethings or a group of someones, whatever the case, the Wall of Separation between State and Religion must apply at all periods, otherwise people go corrupt for not upholding that Wall.

Some people need to learn not to whack things out of proportion not meant to be whacked out of proportion, those people that keep doing this will cause only consequences that only do all of us more harm then good, witch in turn causes changes not meant to be changed. You know what they say, if one changes something not meant to be changes that change will eventually revert itself back, and in most cases with a vengeance to follow in it's wake!

And what dose all this have to do about this thread called "America Needs a Jewish President"? All due to the fact that even a Jewish person who will one day become President regardless of gender must obey the Wall of Separation between State and Religion, for in due moment more Walls of Separation will eventually be put into place among them.

At 10/28/12 03:57 PM, HomicidialFrog wrote: America is in an economic crisis. Jews have a natural talent with economics. Therefore, America needs a Jewish President.

I don't care who's elected in the Oval Office so as long as one is capable of doing the job and just doesn't break any promises, in fact all future Presidents should simply go by the promise of "working for the American People by the needs of the American people & not by the wants of special interest groups to fuel their own ends". I don't care what the person looks like, all I care about is how well they do the job once elected.

That said, do we really need a Jewish person to become President? At least so as one is capable of doing the job well I can care less, but if isn't doing a good job then the person alone might as well only be a "one term President" if not less then a single term.

At 10/25/12 02:14 AM, Austerity wrote: I agree that Obama should not be in power, most of his supporters (if you take the entire world into account) are 1. not American & 2. hate America.

Either that or some of them don't even realize why they choose to vote for our Current President of 2008 in the first place, some African Americans vote for him just because he's African witch I find one ill reason why, others vote for him just because he killed Osama bin Laden witch in all reality the credit alone should go to the Navy Seal team that simply did the job and succeeded.

That said, some people will vote for one person for the Oval Office for the most baddest reasons imaginable, I think some of those people who haven't already should look deeper into the information before they make a derision, regardless of the reasons, people should full know that our Current President of 2008 is filled with broken promises, filled with corruption and filled with sheer intent to change the very way this nation works.

Those who support our Current President of 2008, think twice while you still have the chance, for the Current President of 2008 is only MEANT for one term and one term only!!!

At 10/13/12 03:57 AM, CaveStoryGrounds wrote: Increasing polarization of politics and in effect the people of America, with the added out of control gun ownership leads me to believe another civil war could potentially happen. Thoughts?

Related

The only way another American Civil War can take place is when States within the Nation itself start seceding from the Nation, in other words if States within the Nation have sheer intent to withdraw away themselves from this very Nation, there's gonna be another American Civil War because of it.

The only way we the American People notice signs of another Civil War is when States within this Nation decide with the sheer intent to fully declare National Secession, is this happening right now? I don't recall anything of such on the news as of recent and I honestly pray hope it doesn't happen any moment soon.

If it ever did happen before 2020, only then I'm moving to Canada, that is if it's ever allowed to happen witch in turn shouldn't be ever allowed to happen, things will go chaotic if another American Civil War is ever allowed to take place not to mention the fact it will be much more uglier then the last.

At 10/12/12 11:10 PM, Camarohusky wrote: If you make it public you might as well be writing it down and posting it on a telephone pole.

For those who think this is Orwellian or police state: Logic FAIL.

As what Benjamin Franklin will say "When you sacrifice Freedom for Security, you get neither". And I think that alone basically means that people need to learn to protect themselves more often from those who make good on there threats and not to those who actually make ill on there threats, a major difference between making good on one's threats and making ill on one's threats.

That said, if individuals like criminals and terrorist do make good on there threats, only then they should be dealt with and if make ill on there threats then it's more then likely the learned the lesson the easy way.

They might as well one day consider the idea of sending Bounty Hunters after such individuals who earned there way of having a Bounty Warrant on there names in the near future rather then have Police patrol Facebook and Twitter, again this is the reason why some nations must come to understanding that "When you sacrifice Freedom for Security, you get neither".

At 10/10/12 09:36 AM, leanlifter1 wrote: Quote from Obama's 2007 bait & hook Campaigning rhetoric: "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank.

Now is this really the kinda of spineless sycophantic propaganda poster boy that really understands how to run a country I mean he has a background in Wall Street nothing more.

First thing he promised to bring troops back home was the first promise he broke, again this is one of the big reasons why our current President shouldn't be re-elected, broken promises bring corruption to one's inner self.

The bigger the promise broken the greater the inner corruption will become, yet some people still even to this day still unwilling to listen to reason, and I also bet some people don't even realize they are voting for someone who's fallen into a state of inner corruption itself.

I say again and again and again, our current President of 2008 is only meant to be a one-term President, nothing more and nothing less, those who read this might as well spread the word if not already, those who read this message who haven't already MUST come to realize how corrupt our current President of 2008 really is, those who haven't already MUST consider the idea of voiding there votes to our current President of 2008 and those who fund him like "George Soros" have sheer intent to bring this nation down, people like George Soros and our current President of 2008 aren't to be trusted.

At 10/3/12 10:56 AM, TheMason wrote:

At 10/3/12 10:39 AM, Camarohusky wrote: Unless anything weird happens, all we have got between now and the election are the debates. As it is right now, Obama has a slim lead.

Agreed. I think Obama's chance of winning are between 52-54%.

This alone proves that a number of people still keep forgetting that our current President of 2008 has a number of broken promises to begin with, a number of broken promises they should of looked into, but noooo, they still keep voting for him, not knowing about the major consequences that will be brought about to this very nation if he's ever allowed to be re-elected.

He's only meant for one term and one term only as Steve Jobs said it himself, his re-election will only do the American people a LOT more harm then good!

Why a lot more harm then good, there's a rather good chance a number of states within this nation will decide to succeed from the nation, native tribes will more then likely go back to there old ways, this nation is arleady coming CLOSE to another Cival War and there won't, and I REPEAT won't be another Abraham Lincoln to save us this time.

That said, those who voted for our current President to be re-elected again, I deeply suggest to re-consider the idea and void your own votes that are getting closer to getting our current President to be re-elected again, I say once and I say again, our current President of 2008 is meant for one term and one term only!

I'm not sure why but when I read the whole thing I sense something was wrong, the only thing I read is just only part of the story to why this individual would murder both his mother and his younger sister, in either case, it'll be interesting to see how the whole story turns out.

Taken for granted I think this is one of those things that could of been prevented but why would his parents not do anything about him is beyond any of us who just recently know about the story itself.

I think the worst video game ever known if not the worst video game period would have to be the video game version of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, why I say this? Because it's one of the big reasons why the great video game crash of 1983 took place, just look up the link and you'll learn why.

At 9/28/12 07:17 AM, The-Great-One wrote: Truth be told I would gladly vote for a third-party Candidate. Shoot Roseanne's platform does appeal to me. However our media does not care for third-party candidates, they only care about the two parties and keeping everything split because if they do then they acquire ratings.

You wanna know why these third-party candidates are not listened to or put into consideration, then that is why, the media outlets and the American public doesn't want to do a damn thing about it, they're too wrapped up in their own vices to do anything about it.

This alone proves that a number of things have to change, because the bulk of the media doesn't care about 3rd party candidates, I'll go for alternatives once the moment arises for it. Look at Youtube and newgrounds for example, alternative ways to get things going, heak I could even sit their playing video games to rack up achievements to become more known to the community to spread influence, it's one of the big reason why work-a rounds exist.

If there's ever going to be another Castle Crashers game, I have a couple ideas to make this a reality.

1: Totally different storyline, storyline should be totally different and shouldn't be considered an actual sequel for Castle Crashers but in turn will still involve the idea of crushing castles hence the name Castle Crashers.
2: It should have the same gameplay as the original Castle Crashers with a number of addons, such as Class Options Warrior Types: Fighter, Feralist, Paladin, Ranger, Reaver
Rogue Types: Assassin, Bard, Dancer, Ninja, Thief
Priest Types: Cleric, Druid, Monk, Mystic, Shaman
Wizard Types: Mage, Elementalist, Melodist, Enchanter, Necromancer
3: The Option to equip spells from old ones to new ones, spells should also increase in power the more you use them.
4: The Option to use either a Weapon with Shield, a Two Handed Weapon or Duel Wield Two Weapons and learn unique moves.
5: Lots and lots of places to explore such as castles, cities, dungeons, temples, towns, villages, even hidden places others thought that never existed.
6: Lots of add-on content that adds more to the game itself.
7: Should be a full game then a download from Xbox Live and Playstation Network.
8: The game should still involve rescuing princesses and other indivitauls besides them.
9: The Option to choose the character's gender & race (humans, elves, dwarves, orcs, even hybrids).
10: The Final Boss of the game's main storyline should be the most craziest looking boss players would ever see.

Yep, that's all the ideas I have in mind for Castle Crashers 2 if they decided to bring that out one day.

At 9/9/12 05:46 AM, Shade wrote: God help us should he visit Newgrounds.

I think it's we who must help ourselves should he even decide to visit Newgrounds, it's already at the point where the saying "God help us all" is becoming rather pointless, it's we the people who must help one another in periods of need.

At 9/23/12 03:38 AM, Thecrazyman wrote: If that many people are voting for our current President for re-election then something wrong, this alone proves that some people are voting for our current President for re-election for the most ill reasons imaginable, have they forgotten that our current President from 2008 broke a number of his promises, have they forgotten that our current President promised to stabilize the company only for the company to get worse then it was when the last President was in office? Have some of the American people forgot that THIS is the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave?!?!?

Since I can't edit I meant to say economy, not company, really don't like it myself when I accidentally put in the wrong word on a post I can't edit. My sincere apologizes when it comes to double posts like this =(

At 9/22/12 08:44 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote: I lived in an apartment complex in 2008 where the apartments were blocks of four townhouses. Apparently the dog in the one behind me was a Democrat because she always peed on McCain signs (much to the chagrin of her owner, who had one) and never any Obama signs. Occasionally I would hear the woman yell at the dog for peeing on the sign yet again. I always found that amusing. Maybe animals are partisan creatures after all, especially after reading that.

Makes me wounder if that same dog will actually pee on the signs of our current President in office, I'm even noticing that our current President is gaining the lead for the run to be re-elected, this doesn't bold well.

If that many people are voting for our current President for re-election then something wrong, this alone proves that some people are voting for our current President for re-election for the most ill reasons imaginable, have they forgotten that our current President from 2008 broke a number of his promises, have they forgotten that our current President promised to stabilize the company only for the company to get worse then it was when the last President was in office? Have some of the American people forgot that THIS is the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave?!?!?

I'm hoping this isn't the case but one thing I know for certain, the Republicans and Democrats aren't doing what there suppost to be doing and when they do things their not suppost to be doing simply leads to serious corruption itself. This is one of those examples as the people who support our current President should consider the idea of changing their minds, the same should also go with other people who support our current President should also consider the idea of changing their minds as well.

At 9/15/12 05:42 PM, Th-e wrote: I want a President who gets the job done and gets it done right!

I also want a President who listens to the people and does what is in the best interests of the people, whether left or right wing or somewhere in between.

Obama has not gotten the job done. I see myself as an example of Obama's failures; I got a Master's Degree in Human Factors Engineering (HFE) last November, but I have been forced to take classes since then because I can't get a job!!! I have a job on campus, but I have to take classes to mainain it. I have applied for HFE jobs, low-end jobs, everything since that time, but I got nothing, and have to return to the classroom.

I am paying more for my classes than I am getting from work, and loans are holding me up. I have been on campus since 2002 (for various reasons, such as changing majors), and I have about $85,000 in loans to pay back eventually.

If I drop the classes, I go home unemployed, and businesses will be even less interested in hiring me. I am still living with my parents, and I feel like I might be stuck taking these classes for the rest of my life.

I am convinced I am the sole example among Engineering Masters, but there are others out there in other fields struggling.

I want a President who can get me employment.

I be the one to do that job if elected as President (Great Chief) of the United States in the year 2020, I already know what I'm in for considering the fact I be the first Independent to ever make such a run since General of the Armies George Washington but I also be the youngest since JFK and the 1st one under the age of 40 to do so to prove a critical point that Age & Maturity just don't mix, most importantly I also be the first Native American decedent ever to do so and I know full well there are those out there that have sheer intent to kill me because of it, but I don't care, I say "Threaten me all you will for if you make good on your threats, you WILL BE DEALT WITH!!!, but if one makes ill on there threats well then the individual may have learned the lesson the easy way."

Why some will attempt to kill me in the oval office due to my native American blood? Because some will think I will boot all others out of this nation but I have news for them, all who are born within North America are native to North America itself (United States of America, Canada and even Mexico), with or without the blood of the native kin matters not, what matters so, THIS IS OUR HOMELAND!

That said if I was elected as President (Great Chief) of the United States, I simply do the job and work for the American people by the Needs of the American people, no more false multiple promises that end up getting broken and that's why our current President has failed to do what he promise he do.

Other reasons why I want our current President to lose the 2012 elections, you guess it, broken promises. Here's the link (PolitiFact, The Obameter: Campaign Promises that are Promise Broken) witch shows the list to the promises he broke in the past.

Taken for granted when a promise is broken and not keeped, that alone leads to inner corruption in it's wake and people will know it, even more so when an individual has a history of broken promises, this alone proves that no President, in fact no Leader should ever swear a series of promises that are just going to break in pieces in it's wake.

Instead if I was ever elected President of the Untied States myself, I only have one promise to the American people, this promise is simple but strict, "Helping the American People by the Needs of the American people". It isn't by the Wants of the American People but by there Needs and only by the Needs.

Why by the Needs? It's what they Need, like fix the economy, but that's just one of them, the other things the American people ask what Needs to be done is up to the American people themselves, that including the locals around the area within the United States of America itself, uphold the Constitution, even if it came to the point where the American people ever ask for alterations, changes expanding or even abolishing & replacing pieces within the living document itself (since the US Constitution after all IS a living document). And when I mean the idea of "Abolishing & Replacing a document piece within the Constitution is when such piece actually dose more harm then good to the American people themselves (such as the Jury Duty system, it needs to change in wake of this incident in the UK, the same can happen within the US as well).

Well that sums it up on why our current President should lose the 2012 elections, broken promises is one of the big reasons why he deserves to lose because he's already underwent inner corruption.

I personally think they should of released this game for also either Xbox 360 or Playstation 3 or even both among with the Wii version, my reason for this one is simple.

As much as Square Enix should give Xenogears back to Monolith Soft, Monolith Soft in turn shouldn't consider the idea of being a 1st Party Developer for Nintendo especially with the way Nintendo's been going. In fact they should consider the idea of becoming a Subsidiary to Mistwalker or perhaps even merge with them for the matter should they be willing.

That said if Nintendo makes a major fall for making Wii U games cost 99.99 dollars per standard copy the people of Monolith Soft might as well consider the idea of defaulting.

On a side note to this, Mistwalker should also release "The Last Story" for other gaming systems besides the Wii instead of having that be standalone, all for the same reason why Xenoblade Chronicles should be released for either Xbox 360, Playstation 3 or even both for the matter.

This pretty much proves Mitt Romney doesn't know the Constitution and just doesn't even care, this is why I don't trust either him nor our current President in power, yet we don't even have much of a choice who to vote for in the 2012 elections.

If Mitt Romney wins, might as well have him take the fall as he would be impeached removed from office for not obeying the rules of the Constitution but if Ron Paul wins, I could care less so as long as he dose some good to the nation itself, if by some weird weird change Mitt Romney and our current President tie and they go for people like me who haven't even voted, I just tell them they won't have my vote.

I'm not surprised about the Voter Fraud in Florida, I also bet similar took place back in the 2000 Presidential Elections when it was "Too Close to Call" when it came to decide if Al Gore or George Bush got the win for Florida, all I can say here is it's just one bad mess that should of been dealt with.

I think our current President needs to lose, my reasons for this as seen below.

1: If Chuck Norris is right about 1000 years of darkness if "he" is ever elected for another term, that alone means our current president will simply keep violating the Constitution to the point where the US will be engulfed in another Cival War.
2: If Osama Bin Laden was meant to die, his death should of been keeped as a "SECRET" and ONLY AS A SECRET but nooooo, now we have to deal with the mess that classified information has been leaked since Osama Bin Laden's Death, why do you think they intend to release the book "No Easy Day"??? Why do you think they wanted Osama Bin Laden's Death go public???? So our current President can further increase his chances of winning, he cares for nobody but himself and only himself!!!! To put it simple, Osama Bin Laden's death exposed to the public has done all of us more harm then good.
3: If "he's" allowed to have another term in office, Alaska will become it's own nation in the event the United States of America makes a major fall, Indian Tribes will go back to there old ways albeit the differences.
4: If he's allowed ot have another term in office, might as well go to Canada and make that a Super Power in it's wake.

If games were cheaper, I be happy, why I would be happy? Because they get more copies sold in the market then the price they have them at for now as most standard copies once they get released are priced around 59.99 dollars.

I'm thinking if only video games as of now where at least 49.99 if not 39.99 per standard copy once brought out to the shelves in the stores people would buy them more often, why 59.99 per copy if the game itself was on a disk? I mean come on man, movies on DVD and Blu-Ray alone only cost from 15 to 30 dollars per standard copy upon release but why do video games on disk cost so much now days?

Several of the reasons why video games cost around 59.99 per standard copy is best described on this link: The Elderly Gamer: Why do Games Cost so Much?

This also brings about a very serious question as well, why are some of the Wii U games for Pre-Order priced up to 99.99 dollars per standard copy??? Do they not know how much the original prices would be or has Nintendo gone way over there heads??? In either case, that's like a price I haven't seen since Phantasy Star IV for the Sega Genesis through the big reason why Phantasy Star IV (and to a lesser extent Final Fantasy VI witch was released as Final Fantasy III in the US as well as Chrono Trigger) was so expansive back in those days was due to the fact it was very high tech of it's period not to mention the extra mega bites back in those days where just very expansive.

I just hope Nintendo dosen't even bother having Wii U games for such a high price but if they do and I do mean if they really do, they without a doubt are asking for a major crash just waiting to take place.