Be a Supporter!
Response to: Former Nintendo President dead. Posted September 22nd, 2013 in Video Games

At 9/20/13 01:53 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Rest in Peace, Hiroshi Yamauchi. You were a great man.

And this I have no doubt about for he and the Nintendo company itself brought the Video Gaming Industry back on it's feet after The Great Video Game Crash that took place in the year 1983.

Response to: Gun Control Does Not Work (proof) Posted September 22nd, 2013 in Politics

At 9/18/13 08:02 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: Feinstein: restrict the second amendment!

When will this bitch learn she's lost the momentum and support? She lost her two "revolutionary" bills this year and many others since 04.

Whenever I look at Dianne Feinstein I sense something wrong with her and she doesn't even get the picture to why Gun Control just won't work for the only thing I can point out is that she's blind by the mind and corrupt by the heart.

The only thing that comes close to Gun Control is Weapon Responsibility as people need to learn to be responsible for there own weapons, and this alone not only includes guns but also other weapons, down to your very own fist and feet.

But as for the Navy Yard Shooting Rampage that took place in Washington D.C. is the sheer fact that the Navy should of listened to reason about Aaron Alexis due to the mental issues he was having, further more, a woman also recalls seeing him before the shootout even took place as mentioned on this Link, she mentions "It was a disturbing type of behavior, I felt fear. A sense of fear because it was off. He looked like he was puzzled, something was wrong. You could tell his behavior, something wasn't right with him mentally."

The one question dose remain when I look at the profile regarding Aaron Alexis himself, how exactly did he end up with all these mental issues to begin with? Did it began somewhere when he was in the Navy? I can recall similar tales with a number of soldiers and sailors suffering from Posttraumatic stress disorder due to the horrors of war one would have to endure and since he mentioned he dose Buddhist mediation to control his mental instability, I can see why but even that wasn't able to prevent himself from commuting various misconducts he committed up to and including the shootout for the only thing I can see within Aaron Alexis himself among with many others with mental issues is the sheer fact he's a mentally broken man, a kind of human being with a broken mind that just can't remain stable at times due to the series of events that caused his mind to break apart like shattering glass and once the mind is finally broken into pieces is when the mental issues really start to come in, some people in life just aren't capable of handling certain things and war is one of those things that some people just can't handle and this is especially true once such people find themselves setting foot on the war zone itself.

The Navy might as well learn the hard way by arming there people at base years in case similar incidents like this ever happen again, in fact all of Washington D.C. needs to get rid of there Gun Control Laws period and the reason for this is because you can't have Gun Control, it just won't work, the proof is already mentioned many times on this thread and if elected President of the United States in the year 2020, I'll do just that, true some people will think I'm nuts for that reason but people who haven't already need to learn that Gun Control isn't gonna work, whatever the easy way or the hard way MATTERS NOT!

What matters so is this, the only thing that comes close to Gun Control that I can only think of Weapon Responsibility for the Local People, especially the Good Locals considering the fact that they'll know when to use there Weapons, how to use there Weapons and what Weapons work best for the proper circumstances because everyone has the right to Defend themselves and Defend others should the moment of need ever arise against the Bad Locals themselves.

Response to: Capcom Low On Cash; Responds W/dlc Posted September 19th, 2013 in Video Games

At 9/18/13 08:00 PM, yetanotherjohn wrote: http://gaminrealm.com/2013/09/10/capcom-152-mil-bank/

So they have $152 million in the bank, and that is apparently dangerously low for a developer of their size, especially as we head into the next generation of consoles. They plan to respond by implementing more downloadable content.

I was told about this from a friend of mine awhile back and for some reason I wasn't surprised, I'm thinking part of it has to due with the sissy fit going on with Mega Man Legends 3 considering the fact it's been rather canceled, good thing Keiji Inafune himself quit Capcom before Capcom even started to have these financial problems going on.

Despite the fact that Kejij Inafune is making a Kickstarter for a Mega Man-like game called Mighty No. 9 he should consider the idea of buying the Mega Man franchise if in the event should Capcom ever go bankrupt and maybe buy the Breath of Fire franchise as well.

In either case this would be a rather big thing if Capcom falls bankrupt if their financial problems they been having go way out of hand, the video gaming company itself won't be the first and at the exact same time won't be the last one either.

Response to: Am i too old for video games? Posted September 19th, 2013 in Video Games

At 9/18/13 08:34 AM, stabyourself wrote: I am an 18 year old kid and my dad keeps telling me to stop playing video games because i am too old for them

I'm in my 30s and I still play video games myself, if your father thinks your "too old" to be playing video games, he better guess again, especially once he sees the numbers of posts of this thread proving him wrong.

And if he thinks were in the wrong should he be reading this well father of the original poster, everyone has different taste and your son just loves video games, more or less matters not but the one thing that truly matters so is the sheer fact that you got to realize that people have a taste for things and I too among with many others have a taste for video games, heak I even talked to a man in his 60s that still plays video games even now, so if you think your son is too old for video games, you better think twice, ask one of your relatives, some of them are into video games regardless how old they are and this i have no doubt about.

Response to: Obama Addresses the Nation on Syria Posted September 10th, 2013 in Politics

At 9/10/13 09:23 PM, thegarbear14 wrote: thoughts....

Syria is a mess and getting involved isn't smart.

Unless Syria actually attacks the US first and in a devastating way like Japan did back with Pearl Harbor then no, I don't see any reason why the US should actually get involved with Syria not to mention the fact that the US already has it's own problems at home it needs to deal with, such as the re-legalization of marijuana.

The only thing I with our current President at the moment is either someone else is telling him to do something that goes against the will of the American people or he's acting on his own as if he's breaking away from control, in either case going against Syria without a proper cause is a very bad idea, even more so considering that our current President isn't paying attention to a number of problems this nation already has.

Response to: Petition to legalize Marijuana (AZ) Posted August 24th, 2013 in Politics

At 8/23/13 12:38 PM, psycho-squirrel wrote: Please sign this petition to legalize the recreational use of marijuana in the state of Arizona.

This would not only benefit the state's economy but also street justice related to drug disputes would be reduced, police and court resources would be freed up for more serious crimes. Aside from recreational drug use, cannabis has several industrial and commercial uses, as over 25,000 products can be made from the crop.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/legalize-recreational-use-marijuana-arizona/fS43MQBV

I rather see marijuana legalized all over the nation itself and not just a select few states within this nation already, if elected President in 2020, that's exactly what I intend to do, legalize marijuana all over this nation among with hemp (because you can make paper out of hemp due to the sheer fact this Nation's Constitution is made out of hemp).

I already got several reasons to why.

If it's part of the eco-system then why are they getting rid of it??? If it's meant to be part of the eco-system then why brother getting rid of it?
If some people just want to smoke marijuana like they do with cigarets and cigars I don't care if they do, even through I don't.
Arresting people just because they smoke marijuana is like arresting people just because there peacefully protesting in a legal manner (of course I'm certain No-Smoking Areas may count Marijuana).
Legalizing marijuana & hemp all over the nation will cause a large population of drug dealers to actually be off the streets (save for the fact that their still will be drug dealers very dangerous drugs such as acid).

If marijuana & hemp doesn't get legalized in 2016 and I get elected in 2020, all of you will see a Native American Decedent if sitting in the Oval Office with the sheer intent to not only make sure marijuana & hemp become legalized but also to ensure that marijuana & hemp don't get illegalized ever ever EVER AGAIN!

Thecrazyman for the year 2020

Response to: ★Unicode★ Posted August 13th, 2013 in NG News

At 8/13/13 04:29 PM, supergandhi64 wrote: the power of unicode is nearly unlimited . . . with great power comes great responsibility

--supergandhi64

For great knowledge in trade also comes with great sense, this I have no doubt about.

Response to: Do you trust still Microsoft? Posted July 22nd, 2013 in Video Games

At 7/17/13 07:38 PM, VoidForce wrote: Trust Microsoft? Nope, never will again. I love my 360, but I'll never buy another Microsoft console again.

If only Microsoft never had that policy that forced FarSight Studios (among with other gaming companies) to use a separate publisher to release Pinball Arcade add-ons for Xbox 360 I wouldn't have lost so much trust in them but because they did so and because of all the complications FarSight Studios had to undergo even before the bankrupt of Crave Entertainment, you normally would think the people of Microsoft would of learned by now to change their policy???

Sadly they didn't do so and that's one of the reasons why people have been going for Playstation 4 and/or Wii U and perhaps neither of them along the line, Microsoft could very well end up in a similar incident like Atari did back in the early to mid 1980s to the point where while they'll still be around, they'll never truly recover as a gaming console company.

Response to: Britain Bans Porn Posted July 22nd, 2013 in Politics

At 7/22/13 11:02 AM, Ononymous wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076.

NO BRITISH PEOPLE WILL BE ALLOWED TO ACCESS PORN OR ANY WEBSITES CONTAINING PORN BY THE END OF 2013

Is this fair?

That's a major loss of independence if they do this, people will find workarounds to bypass it, this I have no doubt.

Response to: Should the UK routinely arm police? Posted July 17th, 2013 in Politics

At 7/17/13 11:05 AM, Camarohusky wrote: Depends. Do UK police officers NEED to be armed?

I think the real question here is, why can't even police officers from the United Kingdom be armed with guns and other weapons in the first place? Apparently whoever is in charge is perhaps one of the stupidest lawmakers I've ever heard not to mention such lawmakers should of gave into the idea of people having the right to protect oneself and the right to protect others in moments of need.

Ironically enough a similar case did happen in Alaska back in 2004 according to this article through that alone is a rather different story as the Village Elders should of realized that what their doing violates 2nd amendment rights as Alaska is also part of the United States and further more, police also have the right to protect themselves whenever the moment of need ever arises for such.

The point is, everyone has the right to protect oneself and protect others should the moments of need ever arise, the unfortunate thing in life is that some people abuse the idea of using weaponry as such people aren't mature enough to handle weapons such as firearms and whatnot.

What dose all this have to do with "should the United Kingdom routinely arm police?" Yes they should be armed with firearms and whatnot to protect oneself and to protect others when the moment of need ever arises and whoever thought of the idea that they shouldn't be armed in the first place is perhaps one of the most stupidest idea ever considered, even so it's a problem the United Kingdom has to deal with on it's own and ONLY on it's own.

Terminator 2 for Pinball Arcade Posted July 15th, 2013 in Video Games

Since I don't think anyone has posted about Pinball Arcade on the Newgrounds Video Game forums, I figured I should if no one else has already.

I'm certain some of played or interested in playing Pinball Arcade before and if those who haven't already, their's a kick-starter going on to one day release the Terminator 2 Pinball Machine for Pinball Arcade if they at least make a total of 59,000 dollars in five days.

They already reached to a total of 47,918 dollars at the moment of this post as shown in this link, I figured I bring this up if anyone's ever interested.

Response to: What If Mitt Romney Was President? Posted June 28th, 2013 in Politics

At 6/27/13 10:54 PM, SpiderManMeme wrote: So what would it be like if Mitt was pres?

He cut everyone to the point where the United States of America will be done and over with, I don't trust that person period.

Response to: DOMA repealed- gay marriage legal Posted June 27th, 2013 in Politics

At 6/26/13 06:15 PM, stafffighter wrote:
At 6/26/13 05:36 PM, HollowedPumkinz wrote: Um, no it's not? Gay marriage is still illegal in most of the United States. It's a state's right to determine its legality. Super misleading title there bro.

What this did was repeal DOMA and equalize marriages in states where gay marriage is LEGAL. It's still completely illegal in all other states.
What this does mean is that states won't be won by half steps. If you get married there, you're married. That is a profound step.

The Federal Government shouldn't even be allowed to handle marriages under any circumstances, it should be up to the religions and only to the religions on how they do marriage through it's already gone to the point where more and more people are rather seeing marriage more differently for they don't see it as marshal devotion.

In either case, the Government should rather focus (in general) on how long people have lived together and how long people have lived alone, I care not if such individuals are straight nor gay when it comes to this, the only thing I care so is that Government bringing Marriage to Government is the same thing as Government bringing Religion into Government which in trade violates the Wall of Separation between State and Religion. I should also note that state governments within this nation shouldn't be allowed to handle marriage either for the same reason as I mentioned above.

Response to: Mad Max game making him American Posted June 27th, 2013 in Video Games

At 6/21/13 10:32 AM, RoadWarrior wrote: Some of you may have heard about the upcoming Mad Max game announced at E3.

While no gameplay was released, it's said that in a demo at E3, the titular character of the uniquely Australian franchise spoke with an American accent.

What do ya'll think? As a fan of the film franchise I'm disappointed... I don't think Max would be the same if he was American.

I personally think they should of showed at least some degree of game play footage before issuing out the "Pre Order Now" after the cut screen comes near at it's end, that's what they should of done, hopfully this game would be better then the NES version of Mad Max even through I could understand why many of the fans protested against the upcoming 2014 version of Mad Max due to the main character having an American accent instead of an Australian one.

Perhaps the 2014 version will serve as a reboot? If only the developers mentioned why the accent change among other things.

Response to: Sacrificing privacy for security Posted June 18th, 2013 in Politics

At 6/11/13 05:44 PM, Ceratisa wrote:
At 6/11/13 04:40 PM, orangebomb wrote: Ok, is it just me or are there just more than necessary threads for the subject at hand?

Plus, why are people quoting Ben Franklin all of the sudden, especially since the quote mostly has nothing to do with the NSA or anything like that?
I don't actually see how the Ben Franklin quote is irrelevant. Seems right on to me...

Especially due to the fact that this nation is part of the land of the free itself and thus should be known as the nation of the free, sadly the corrupt politicians aren't doing what there supposed to be doing, if they know the laws of the nation's constitution and don't follow the laws of the constitution, that's when politicians and lawmakers become corrupt.

And if they fall corrupt despite knowing the laws of this nation's constitution, that alone points out they have sheer intent to rid the nation of it's very constitution, but the real question is why are they still in power? Perhaps they cheated to get there way in, perhaps they also lie about certain things on the news that shouldn't even be lied about and perhaps such individuals are power behind the oval office, the congress, the nation's constitution and similar.

Such things going on are more then likely to arouse suppression among the local populace and the local populace who aren't corrupt will know things are going wrong, if politicians don't think for local populace and go against them, then that alone points out that such politicians are falling from grace and rising to unjust in trade.

That said, a nation within the land of the free is supposed to be the nation of the free but freedom in trade isn't for free for freedom is a cause worth fighting for once the moment of need ever arises for it.

Response to: Dildo ruined a womans life Posted June 8th, 2013 in General

At 6/7/13 03:53 AM, Xenomit wrote: I'm not sure whether she was being serious or not

Go ahead, discuss it and stuff

Seems like she expressed it in a rather serious way after reading what she posted, if anything she might as well see marriage more differently at this point.

Response to: Women favored in divorce courts? Posted May 28th, 2013 in General

At 5/28/13 07:36 PM, Sekhem wrote: don't get married if you're worried about it, dumbass

I rather suggest the idea of marriage not being handled by the states period, it should be handled by the religions and ONLY by the religions, nuf said.

Response to: Lowering age of candidacy Posted May 26th, 2013 in Politics

At 5/25/13 11:03 PM, Dawnslayer wrote:
At 5/25/13 09:18 PM, Thecrazyman wrote:
At 5/25/13 03:06 PM, naronic wrote: The age of candidacy should be 18 for all government offices including presidency, the same age as the age of voting.
your thoughts?
This alone points out to the very reason on why many people forget that Age & Maturity just don't mix, the only thing that ever comes close is growing up as the people we choose to become, thus the reason why kids need to grow up as people first.
Agree one hundred percent, but this brings up a problem of its own: how do you measure maturity? I can't name anyone off the top of my head, but I'm sure there are a number of politicians in office right now who wouldn't pass a standardized maturity test.

I think the best way to measure one's own maturity is to determine how well they do when it comes to taking responsibility for one's own actions, take for example if one dose something where such an individual requires to take responsibility for one's actions, such individual is mature but if one individual dose something where one is required to take responsibility for one's actions and doesn't consider the responsibility first hand, that individual is considered immature for that reason.

If one can handle the responsibility of graphic violent images on TV then the individual is mature enough to handle it, if one can't handle graphic the responsibility of violent images on TV then the individual is immature for that reason, if oneself can handle graphic sex images on TV then oneself is mature for that reason, if oneself can't handle graphic sex images on TV then oneself is immature for that reason and if oneself can handle the job of a political position, oneself is mature for that reason for if oneself isn't able to handle the job of a political position then oneself is immature for that very reason.

Maturity involves taking responsibility for one's own actions and being immature in trade involves not taking responsibility for one's own actions, another reason why people need to realize (such as TheMason) that Age & Maturity just don't mix because mixing Age with Maturity is like mixing Fresh Spring Water with Poisonous Crude Oil and the results are disaster, nothing more but disaster and nothing less but disaster which is already been happening for quite a long period.

Response to: Lowering age of candidacy Posted May 25th, 2013 in Politics

At 5/25/13 03:06 PM, naronic wrote: Age of candidacy is the minimum age at which a person can legally qualify to hold certain elected government offices. In many cases, it also determines the age at which a person may be eligible to stand for an election or be granted ballot access.

Many youth rights groups view current age of candidacy requirements as unjustified age discrimination. Occasionally people who are younger than the minimum age will run for an office in protest of the requirement or because they don't know that the requirement exists. On extremely rare occasions, young people have been elected to offices they do not qualify for and have been deemed ineligible to assume the office.

This is unfair for many reasons, 20 year old's are allowed to vote but not to run for office, there's no willingness to represent the younger crowd in congress. In the US, in most states the lowest age of candidacy is 25 to be a representative. A lot of other countries don't have this system such as in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Germany (for all non-presidency positions) where the age of candidacy is at a minimum of 18.

The age of candidacy should be 18 for all government offices including presidency, the same age as the age of voting.
your thoughts?

This alone points out to the very reason on why many people forget that Age & Maturity just don't mix, the only thing that ever comes close is growing up as the people we choose to become, thus the reason why kids need to grow up as people first.

Taken for granted many people if not a lot of people within the United States of America have brought up a number of "Age Restrictions" and the higher the restrictions, the more they are forgetting on why Age and Maturity just don't mix, I have said it before and I will say again.

Why I say before and again? That's because people need to learn on why Age and Maturity just don't mix, whatever the easy way or the hard way matters not, the only thing that matters so is this. Human beings refusing to learn on why Age & Maturity don't mix with the only thing that comes close is growing up is a "major" form of human mess-up, which is something that just shouldn't be repeated.

Response to: Increasing Tax on Violent Games Posted May 21st, 2013 in Video Games

At 5/21/13 06:04 PM, SmartyPants wrote: Video games are an easy scapegoat. People will continue to blame video games for violence for a long time.

Increasing the tax is really pointless and dumb

Which in turn causes some human beings to become human screw-ups, pointing the finger of blame on something for the most ill reasons imaginable when the finger of blame should be pointed on the individual people held responsible.

Taken for granted people who simply keep blaming video games and other forms of entertainment for the violent actions of other people aren't acting like human beings, they're acting like human screw-ups, human beings putting video games into politics is another sign of human screw-ups.

Human beings should be human beings, not human screw-ups and increasing tax on violent video games just because corrupt politicians think that violent video game are the big cause of real life violence is not only a major human screw-up but also a major sign of immaturity at it's wake, I don't care how old these politicians are, I care about how mature these politicians are and if they are proven to be "THAT" immature and there still in power, then why are they still in power to begin with???

This is without a doubt one of the BIG reasons why video gaming entertainment should stay out of politics among with other forms of entertainment such as movies, music and even books. Corrupt politicians like Joe Biden got one thing coming, they will one day see the "Wall of Separation between Politics and Entertainment" be established so they'll never again bring violent video games into politics!

Response to: Joe Biden Wants To Tax All Violent Posted May 21st, 2013 in Politics

At 5/20/13 10:23 PM, TheKlown wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUPMIMzqgr0

Be warned, excessive Cursing is in the video.

Hard to even believe some politicians still have sheer intent to tax video games with excessive violence if not even ban video games like that, this is why politicians like Joe Biden need to keep video games and other forms of entertainment to stay out of politics, only thing I will bring up is ESRB, they need to change it so it doesn't involve Age under any circumstances and in trade should involve a similar rating system like Indie Games from Xbox 360.

Why do you think Indie Games from Xbox 360 have a content rating system which ranges from Violence, Sex and Mature Content rating from 0 to 3 and leave Age out? That's simple, because Age and Maturity just don't mix with the only one thing that comes close is growing up as the people we choose to become (and why kids need to grow up as people first until there done growing up as people first).

Corrupt Politicians who mix Age with Maturity I got word for you all, you will all one day see The Wall of Separation between Age and Maturity which will one day be established, this word will be spread to not only corrupt politicians but to everyone in the world, yes I mean EVERYONE!

All must learn why Age & Maturity just don't mix with the one thing coming close is growing up as the people we choose to become, either the easy way or the hard way matters not, what matters so, welcome to the new world era.

Response to: Gun Control Does Not Work (proof) Posted May 14th, 2013 in Politics

At 5/10/13 10:31 PM, Cynical-Charlotte wrote:
At 5/10/13 09:33 PM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: Looks like the State Department decided to CENSOR Defense Distributed (3D printing developers) freedom of speech and Second amendment rights.

Source One
Source Two
Vice did a documentary on 3D printed firearms, and Cody makes some excellent points about why something like this can never be regulated or tamed. Nothing can stop the advancement of technology - not even politicians and their sponsors. They are scared to death of homemade weapons because they know all gun legislation will be obsolete within the next decade or less. Unfortunately, gun companies will take a huge blow since all of their firearms can be perfectly counterfeited.

The more I observe the direction the internet is taking, the less I care about what a handful of people decide. However, the only aspect of this which I am apprehensive about is the idea that children and teenagers will be able to download and manufacture their own guns. But, this is 100% within the responsibility of their parents, and has nothing to do with inanimate objects.

Illegally printing guns will be as logistically impossible to enforce as illegally downloading music or copying pictures.

That's true and I have no doubt, but the one sad thing is that even through the corrupt politicians know it's never gonna pass, why do they keep proposing the idea of Gun Control? Why do they bother to begin with, is it because they don't care about the economy? That be one of the big reasons why.

Taken for granted if there soo focused on getting rid of 2nd Amendment Rights and in trade not focused on fixing up the nation's economy then something's wrong, which in turn points out that the politicians aren't doing what there suppost to be doing, this alone makes them corrupt, dysfunctional and asking for the rise of "Independents", asking for a Native American decedent born from the tribes to run for President of the United States in the year 2020.

All will one day know when the moment is finally there.

Response to: No one wants bosy of Boston Bomber Posted May 9th, 2013 in Politics

At 5/8/13 07:57 PM, Warforger wrote: Well yah, that's not exactly news, although it shouldn't be known because this funeral should be private since otherwise it would be flooded with protesters.

At 5/8/13 09:42 AM, stevenman36 wrote: Bosy?
I guess he meant body.

More like no one wants to bury the body of the Boston Bomber, and personally I think they need to let his corpse sit there to rot and have his remains be fed by the pigs, as bad as it sounds to why I say it, he deserves it more then a proper burial for the crimes he committed against the American People not to mention he was already on the Terrorist Watch List back in Russia.

Personally if the people of Russia dealt with him before he was allowed to move to America, the whole thing could of been avoided and I won't even be writing this post to begin with.


This article I post is mainly about Bounty Hunting Rights and why Bounty Hunting should be legal all over the world, and yes I mean ALL OVER THE WORLD, I can point out a number of things to why Bounty Hunting should be Legal all over the world, not just the United States of America.

Armed Poachers Reportedly Raid African Elephant Sanctuary is one of those articles that points out why Bounty Hunters should do more then just hunt down criminals who escaped bail, because Arrest Warrents exist, Bounty Warrents should also exist in trade, as for the Armed Poachers themselves, they need to be hunted down and be brought to justice for there wrong-doings!

Another reason why Bounty Hunting should be legal throughout the world is this article, as it mentions here "The one thing a bounty hunter can never do is take the hunt outside of the United States. Bounty hunters can be arrested -- even shot -- if they stray across international borders." And that without a doubt needs to come to a very serious end!!! My reason for this is simple, legalize Bounty Hunting all over the world and introduce "Bounty Warrents" where Bounty Hunters will have full authority to capture criminals outside borders (from local borders to national borders, even planetary borders matters not).

These are my reasons why Bounty Hunting MUST be legal all over the world.

Response to: As I lay Dying's singer arrested... Posted May 7th, 2013 in General

Another reason why people like him should of considered the idea of seeing Marriage as Bond and not as Devotion, Tim Lambesis will be bound to learn this lesson "The Hard Way".

Response to: Kid rapes and kills mom over COD Posted May 4th, 2013 in General

At 5/4/13 05:38 PM, slaughterMYdaughter wrote: I'm sure his mom knew her son was a nutcase long before this happened

Because Gretchen Crooks (the mother) knew her son had a series of mental issues, she should of considered the idea of putting him into rehabilitation to begin with, instead she ends up missing the chance to do so and in trade is how Noah Crooks (the son) ends up committing the crime otherwise considered as "unthinkable" in the end.

And Noah Crooks did this just because his mother took away his Call of Duty game??? That alone is one sign of immaturity on his part despite the mental issues he has, as for Gretchen Crooks, she alone is at fault for not giving her son the mental help he needs and because of this, the end result is tragedy.

And this is without a doubt a tragedy that should of been avoided.

Response to: my parents finally broke me Posted May 2nd, 2013 in General

At 5/2/13 07:34 AM, rendibsivad wrote: Because my family is a now converted Christian familthey had a wild idea to burn all our VALUABLE movies we could have sold money that we could have put to good use.. plus they burnt the movies I loved alot and didnt give me an option to choose to have them or not... fml.. :(

All I can say about this, if they start thinking that everything in the Bible is true, they'll get a harsh bitter truth coming to them sooner or later, more sooner then later once they realize that not everything in that book is true.

Further more burning those valuable movies is a "major" fault on there part, I don't even think they should of done that to begin with considering how bad the economy has gone.

Do they even think that "money" is the root of all evil? NO, money in all reality is just one part of neutrality as it can be used for good or for ill depending on the will of the spender.

Either way, they pretty much whacked something out of proportion not meant to be whacked out of proportion to begin with considering the situation you got yourself into, further more the wild idea they had in mind sounded like they took the idea of Religion WAY over there heads.

Response to: Who Thinks Bullying Is Wrong?! Posted April 30th, 2013 in General

At 4/30/13 06:58 PM, Kitty199 wrote: Who here is with the anti-bullying?!
What people don't realize is that this is a SERIOUS PROBLEM ( I don't want to sound like all the others but its kinda the truth) Even on this website people just say the rudest things (as well as stereotyping.You can thank GunsnBombs for that!) but here's the thing people SAY that they are but they turn their back on it the second they say that they are trying to help. I'm moving to London soon and leaving my school behind ( Thank god for that because almost every one there is either bullied or the bully) but I have a lot of friends there and I'm worried for them. The reason I bring this up is because one of my friends was bullied ALOT as in she never had a second to her self.
She recently committed suicide... ( Pray for her family she was only 13 ) Here's the thing we thought she was fine bevause she fooled everyone with that smile she always had. Until one day she didn't come to school and I got the call and I had to break the news ( I was already crying so only one person under stood way I was saying)
Please post anyone that has had this happen to them
My friend was Sarah Jonson ): please don't let this happen the reason things like this happen us because people just sit back and watch it happen! After her passing me and my friends started to take action please don't wait start now!

Even before this thread was posted I already took note that bullying has became a MAJOR problem, much of it has to do with how bad the school system has become over the years, I found an interesting website link which explains "Why is Bullying an age-old problem?"

Personally I think the school system needs to be handled by the locals and ONLY by the locals, especially at the point where the problem for bullying just keeps getting bigger and bigger, even to the point where some bullies took bullying to a rather disbursing new levels.

To put it simple, going to school shouldn't even be required and school should be rather the kind of place where people want to go, not a place where people have to go, if anyone, and yes I MEAN ANYONE has sheer intent to reduce the reports of bullying incidents is simple, make School a place where people want to go to and not the kind of place where kids are being forced to go to against there own will!

Response to: Lets imagine You wake up in 1995... Posted April 29th, 2013 in General

At 4/28/13 01:49 AM, RydiaLockheart wrote: I don't want to be back in middle school. Fuck that.

If only I could take all my knowledge in the present back to the past, I simply skip a couple grades and be done with high school at a rather earlier date before the early signs state that the School System really starts to go downhill.

Perhaps going back to the past with the knowledge of the present might be either a good thing or a bad thing depending on the circumstances. Further more if one alters if not changes a certain thing in the past can also alter if not change a certain thing in the future.

So if I woke up back in the year 1995 and have all the knowledge from the year 2013, I've end up altering things if not changing them and hoping for the better and not for the worse and I also do whatever I can to ensure I graduate High School at a much more earlier period before things really start going downhill.

Response to: Will you buy an Xbox 720? I won't.. Posted April 28th, 2013 in Video Games

At 4/26/13 04:25 PM, TheKlown wrote: Confirming that you must have a perfect internet Connection to play single player games. Also, the fact that since the Economy is bad right now, that not even one has internet connection. I think that I heard that 40 percent of Americans still don't have internet or internet that isn't high-speed. I do not want to be renting games, I want to own a game if I pay 60 bucks for it. What are your thoughts about the new Xbox?

This is one of the big reasons why I had major doubts about the 8th Generation Gaming Consoles, I even noticed a number of people way beforehand before this thread was ever made that they expressed on not buying the upcoming Xbox System.

People of Microsoft should of known better then to do this not to mention the fact of the joint effort they made with Electronic Arts (or should I say Evil Arts) which explains one of the reasons why the Next Generation Xbox System will require online connection just so you can play the games, this is one of the worst ideas I ever seen for any video gaming console period.