3,173 Forum Posts by "Ted-Easton"
Check out this video of "The World" project in Dubai.
At 3/16/06 05:41 PM, Morextremist wrote: go on a molten core run and don't forget fire armor spells
I need a mount first. Can I borrow yours?
The more reasonable conclusion is that you voted on more flash than was necessary yesterday, and they've carried over.
You can request to have your account deleted, but Newgrounds is not in the practice of aiding in the destruction of evidence.
What's more, I seriously doubt they will be calling the Internet Crimes Unit because you're truant.
At 2/28/06 03:40 AM, EviLudy wrote: now I have to perform for 700 people ... the Day after tomorrow.
Wear a jacket. When I went and saw the film it looked like it got kind of chilly
Best of luck to you!
It's a perfectly justifiable law.
According to the most recent Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) study on crash rates by the number of passengers across different driver age groups, crash rates for teens rise significantly as the number of passengers increases. This is especially true for the most inexperienced drivers (16- and 17-year-olds). In 1999, 16- and 17-year-old teens driving with no passengers were involved in 1.6 accidents per 10,000 trips, yet the rate rises to 2.3 accidents with one passenger, 3.3 accidents with two passengers, and sharply rises to 6.3 accidents with three or more passengers in the car. This latter number is three times greater than the accident rate per 10,000 trips for 18- and 19-year-old teens driving with three or more passengers (2.1). Source.
The highest death rate was among drivers aged 16 years carrying three or more passengers (5.61 per 10 million trips). Source.
Either respond to his thread or don't. We really don't need another dozen people telling him he's posted in the wrong forum.
At 2/25/06 07:14 PM, -Sickair- wrote: I'm sorry if queers find this offensive.
My gay? I own a gay?
Oh, of course. Maus, where are you?
lol at grammar
At 2/16/06 07:23 AM, madknt wrote: david letterman?
I'm going to have to go with David Letterman.
The courses typically count as 2 or 3 years driving experience, thus giving you a lower insurance rate. Provided you're not stupid enough to get in an accident, it will save you much more money in the long run.
At 2/1/06 05:12 PM, Dark6 wrote: I forgot, what's the minimum top experience place you need to be able to vote?
You have to be in the top 2,000 users.
There are aleady a number of similar clubs, not the least of which is The Elite Guard Barracks.
Please check the C&C Forum for existing clubs before creating a new one.
If anyone else caught the leader's debate tonight, you may have been surprised to hear Paul Martin say that he would push for a constitutional amendment to remove s.33, the Notwithstanding Clause. While exceedingly difficult to do, this could have far-reaching implications, depite the fact that the clause is rarely used today (and almost never outside Quebec).
If you're not familiar with it, the clause permits governments to enact legislation notwithstanding (in spite of) certain sections of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It has only ever been used by Quebec to enact certain legislations to protect the French tongue, and by Saskatchewan (albeit unnecessarily).
For more information, see here.
Or to read about s.33, see wikipedia.
Thoughts?
The last time Maus came to visit me here in Canada, she was so cold her tits turned blue.
At 1/5/06 06:31 PM, bigbadron wrote: so it's one of those "make your own story/game" threads, right?
Of course not.
At 1/5/06 04:50 PM, Dissection wrote: You can murder npc children, rape animals and women, steal horses, or anything else you can't do on an mmorpg game.
You mean you can't do these things in real life?
This would work better as an RP in Clubs and Crews.
A great list of submissions this time around.
Not that there isn't always.
At 1/2/06 04:56 PM, Slightly_Crazy_Dude wrote: If you had attended mod con, you would know me just aswell as you do now, because i didn't go.
Well, that lets you know just how well I know you anyways.
I think we chatted once, for about 3 minutes, on modchat.
I haven't washed my fingertips since.
At 1/2/06 12:47 PM, Slightly_Crazy_Dude wrote: Ted_Easton
Since he's actually been active on the forums in the last 30 days, he gets a review. Never had a problem with him, since he doesnt post. Quite a funny guy, but can be serious aswell.
Thats all i know about him unfortunately.
Review Rating: lolwtfwho? 3/10
Fair enough, fair enough. I do rarely post, either in my old Politics hangout or in general. Perhaps we'd know each other better if I had attended Modcon. Alas, that our love will never bloom.
Such fools, to not know of Ponn Farr. I mean, what are they going to do if their ship is mysteriously sent to the other side of the galaxy along with the crew of an enemy ship, and there is a vulcan on board, and it will take you seventy (though actually seven) years to get home, and he is guaranteed to need a mate, but there is no way of getting one?
Have any of them thought of that? Now who will be the chief of security?
Welcome to the Christmas version of Newgrounds. Things are rather festive now with the new site icon, and we're kicking up the good cheer by handing out a few more bans.
All the best over the holidays,
Ebanezer
You cannot expect a person to entirely remove their own views from their career every day and dole out information like a robot. It's ridiculous to expect this.
I find the questions humourous and statements otherwise equally so.
It's not so much a button, as it is a vast roulette wheel with every user's name on it.
No, no, he's right. It wasn't just a dream. James just added the new feature that lets us summon users via dreams to keep an eye on our apartments for us. It was touch-and-go for a while, but it's running smooth now.
If you did a good job, you'll be dreaming about my place tonight.
Wielding both sticks of ban and rods of secks, we do carry our wrath unto you, the oppressed. Brought like fire from Olympus, we descend on clouds of blood from our fortress of Modlympia. BrotherFunk covers the rear, for reasons known onto to himself, yet we advance and spread the terror that is wanton wherever we go.
Tremble, mortals. For the day of reckoning is upon you.
Brotherhood of Mod? There is no Brotherhood! Of what do you speak?
Well, it seems something changed. I'm informed today that they no longer care about it. Seems the debate has been called off. Thanks for the help, though, everyone.
Stupid people. (Not any of you).
As I said, all input is welcome. Unless you post "I'm for it. So shut it up you." In which case, a ban will soon follow.
At 11/14/05 06:13 PM, -SkyCube- wrote: Oops, I meant Ted. I always get you and stealthsteve mixed up for some reason. :o
I can see why. We're secretly the same person.
Nice try, Denver. It's still illegal under Colorado state law.
The Denver district attorney's office wants people to be clear that even though the intiative passed, it's still illegal to possess marijuana under state law. They added a rarely used exclamation mark to the end of one sentence to drive home the point.
"It is still illegal to possess and consume marijuana!"
"The change in Denver's city ordinance does not change Colorado state law. It is still illegal to possess less than an ounce of marijuana anywhere in the state, and that includes Denver," says Morrissey.
Read the full article here.
I'm not looking for an actual debate on the topic of stem cell reseach, I've agreed to participate in one. I've put my two cents in here a number of times on the subject, but I'm looking to the learned of NG to supply me with more fodder.
Here's the situation. I need to argue against stem cell reseach, preferably on solid legal grounds. Any input, from sources to precedents, arguments to philosophical questions, is welcome and appreciated.
