Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

You get a Avengers trailer after the movie.

At 7/6/11 05:59 AM, TheKlown wrote: I hope some how justice gets done and someone kills Casey Anthony. Her daughter deserves justice.

Cause that's how our justice system works. We don't like the outcome so fucking kill that bitch.

You all are mad, but here's the fun fact of the case.

You listened to the media who wove an integral story that backed up the prosecutors claim that Casey was guilty based on whatever the prosecutors told them. Here's the problem. We don't judge someone by the media. We are supposed to be impartial and objective and here you all are spouting off like a bunch of vengeful retards who have little understanding of how the fucking justice system works.

1. All of the evidence was circumstantial. In recent judicial history it is now flat out nearly impossible to get a murder conviction without DNA evidence or witness testimony. Hell, they didn't even say she had a motive.
2. The prosecution could have convicted her with negligent homicide. I am 100% sure they could have. For whatever reason they decided to go big and failed big. I'm not sure what angle they were trying to pull, but it was a terrible one. What on EARTH was the prosecution thinking? It almost feels as if they felt they had a slam dunk, but didn't even think that maybe they should back up their evidence?
3. Their forensic evidence backfired on them. There just wasn't enough for it to be conclusive. You can speculate all you want but the forensic scientist flat out told the jurors that the evidence does not point one way or another.
4. Get the whole chloroform, tape and whatever other circumstantial crap out of your head that you keep spouting as fact. The only damning piece of evidence was that she didn't report her daughter missing for 30 days. Was that enough to convict her of capital murder? Apparently the jury didn't think so not to mention, again, no clear evidence.
5. The jury had the luxury to go into this case without any outside forces interfering with what they heard from the prosecution and defense. So all of you are looking at this from and entirely different level than they did. I am not shocked they made this decision and the fact that you all are dumbfounded just proves that you are dumb and easily manipulated by your emotions on this.

The law is cold, but it needs to be just.

Sad to say though...at the end of the day a little girl is dead and we might never know what happened. I can assure you, though, that whatever the prosecutors cooked up wasn't what happened thanks to, survey says, burden of proof.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why your irrational outrage is retarded.

I have a theory on how everyone reacts.

Look at their age.

The OP is 18 years old. You were 8 years old when 9/11 happened. To you, as a child growing up, you had little knowledge of bin Laden nor really cared that much. How many children would? Don't say you did because to children the world of reality doesn't really hit them that much.

X-TERRORIST-X you are 19, Furry Demon 14 (and Australian), Chris V-2 18. See what I'm getting at?

Instead you grew up with some of the stupid shit the United States did in response to 9/11. Yeah, we still act irrationally when regarding Islam or the Middle East. We are human and make mistakes and the US made quite a few bad decisions.

I was 14 when it happened and have a vivid memory of everything. I wasn't mature, sure, but I wanted to understand everything just like most people did. Flash forward 6 years when the OP is my age now. It's 2007 and allllll the shit proceeding 9/11 is happening in the Bush years. He's probably slightly getting more interested in events around the world or maybe not. Who knows, but he probably has general knowledge. Sure he knew OBL was the perpetrator, but just didn't connect the face to evil like we did.

I talked to someone who was 18 and born on 9/11 the other day. He told me that he didn't really understand what was going on at the time anyway.

So, in the end, I contest that he makes his arguments because he didn't see it like the rest of us did.

At 12/28/10 08:28 AM, ming-the-merciless wrote: Haha sucsessful troll.

:D

At 12/28/10 08:21 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote:
here take 4 lines of this shit and calm down. I use this shit recreationally all the time and I feel GREAT.

Aren't you in the military? So am I.

No.

At 12/28/10 08:20 AM, Yert wrote:
From the person who assumes I would have made the exact same choice if I was in a similar situation years from now.

I didn't assume you would make the same choice.

I just assumed you were a fucking idiot.

At 12/28/10 08:16 AM, Yert wrote:

At 12/28/10 08:15 AM, Stoicish wrote: U mad?

Such a mature response.

From the person who said I should be stabbed.

At 12/28/10 08:15 AM, walterwagner wrote: your a disgusting fuck go die in a hole

U mad?

At 12/28/10 07:48 AM, Yert wrote:
So I magically gain a new sense of reason when I buy my own home? Do you have any facts to back up that claim?

I'm older than you.

At 12/28/10 07:36 AM, Yert wrote:

At 12/28/10 07:31 AM, Stoicish wrote: Wah! dont do drugz around me >:(

You're a fucking douchebag for calling the cops. You should be stabbed.

Lol! Don't care.

When you grow up and own your own home then maybe you'll understand. Til then fuck off and go ruin your life.

Show me your vagina.

Fucking cop just told them to keep the music and stop blocking the street. Fucking useless.

At 12/28/10 07:29 AM, Jon wrote:

At 12/28/10 07:15 AM, Stoicish wrote: I don't give a fuck. Don't do drugs around me.

What fucking harm is it doing you?

Fuck you, that's what kind of harm.

At 12/28/10 07:14 AM, Jon wrote: Wow, selling your own sister out to the cops? If you're being serious, you're a douchebag of a brother. Be thankful that she's doing it in her own home and not some skanky street corner or alley where she can put other innocent people at risk.

I don't give a fuck. Don't do drugs around me.

MUAAHHAHAHA! The music is down and everyone is freaking out.

Brb later. Hear commanding voice asking if he could step in.

Ha, they are still doing drugs.

Blow was had and now someone is bringing out the mushrooms.

Hope the cops get here soon.

Called the cops. Said I was a neighbor and there was loud nosies next door. Lulz.

Will keep posted.

At 12/28/10 05:22 AM, Asalraalaikum wrote:

At 12/28/10 05:21 AM, Stoicish wrote:

At 12/28/10 05:19 AM, Asalraalaikum wrote: This is just wrong.

In separate rooms dick shit.

Someone here is mad.

Yes, it's 4:30 here and I should have went to bed at at least midnight. I like my sleep and if I have to hear one more crappy remix of Hide and Seek or Love the Way You Lie I will strangle something.

At 12/28/10 05:19 AM, Asalraalaikum wrote: This is just wrong.

In separate rooms dick shit.

At 12/28/10 05:14 AM, JohnnyDamon wrote: Do nothing, and be glad that your sister is letting you live with her.

I pay my share of rent.

It's our fucking house.

When I say I live with her I mean we both live together.

I live with my sister.

I have a low tolerance for heavy drugs. I don't care what you consider a heavy drug or not, but I have a low tolerance for anyone who does something above pot.

Right now she decided to invite a whole lot of people over and they dropped ex and drank a fuck ton of Vodka. It's 4AM and I'm pretty much about to fucking lose it. If there is an orgy going on or anything gets broken I'm going to lose it.

Right now I'm so pissed I just want suggestions for IRL trolling.

At 12/19/10 10:52 PM, Proteas wrote:

At 12/19/10 10:01 PM, poxpower wrote: Oh and you do realize now that what you're saying is "well they can't say they're gay. TO ANYONE. EVER. If anyone finds out you're gay, it's your own fault for putting the evidence out there!".

That's what the policy says, man. They find a shred of evidence you're gay, you're gone.

And that's the problem. Didn't even need the rest. See, the purpose wasn't to find evidence because they aren't supposed to ask. It hindered on the idea that, when originally started, that you weren't to flaunt your sexuality while in service. Your private life is your own.

They also had third party sources.

Which meant that there was a way to get around the whole "Don't Ask" part when a "reliable source" can tell the command that they saw or heard about someone engaging in homosexual activity. The law was beyond fucked from the get go.

By the way, I get it, you have a problem with it. Suck it the fuck up.

By the way. You don't speak for the whole Corps.

Most marines are pretty much not okay with this.

At 12/19/10 05:20 PM, JoS wrote:
If they were employed by the NYPD, NYFD, Ports Police or any other government agency, shouldn't it be their employer who pays, in this case the city of New York for many of them? Generally thats who would pay for your benifits package if you have one.

They are kind of failing at that.

Let's not forget that a Federal Government agency told the responders that it's okay to go to Ground Zero and that the dust was not toxic.

Fucking whoops.

At 12/19/10 12:36 PM, adrshepard wrote:

At 12/19/10 09:40 AM, KennyD wrote: Seriously, we don't give a fuck. stop making a huge deal with it.

That is all.

Have you ever met a marine who did care?

I would but I'm too busy drinking and being awesome.

At 12/19/10 11:17 AM, Proteas wrote:

At 12/19/10 03:09 AM, Stoicish wrote: Don't reservist have a voice in this too?

Would you ask the one guy who worked part time at your workplace their opinion on a new policy if they only worked 1 weekend out of the whole month? No?

I was also pointing out that I'm a Reservist.

Ass.

We also get called for active service too.

Douche.

At 12/19/10 04:35 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote:
"I'm trying to deliver these food parcels to these citizens but I can't with this FAGGOT working next to me!"

Well, maybe that person will have to suck it the fuck up and deal with it. If people can deal with it in their civilian jobs then our military is more than capable of dealing with it on duty.

At 12/18/10 10:42 PM, Korriken wrote: now to count down the days until the ACLU begins filing lawsuits because some openly gay pretty boy tries to rub it in the face of a real man and gets his ass kicked for it.

Prettyboy: Oh, don't i just look FABULOUS in this uniform? C'mon tough guy, say it, say I look FAAABUULOUS in this uniform!

Tough Guy: ..... *knocks out Prettyboy*

You are perpetuating the stereotype that all gay men are queens. Yeah, that's not true.

I've met plenty of plain spoken gay men before. You also have a total misunderstanding of what gay people are like. Most of them don't go after men who they know are straight and it's a different dynamic when you are in the military.

Besides, you don't need the ACLU. Both their asses will get NJP'd for that nonsense.

At 12/18/10 07:28 PM, Proteas wrote:
Those numbers are a tad bit skewed, you know. They polled members of our nations reserve military AND spouses of active duty military personal along with the active duty soldiers (click). So I wouldn't put a whole lot of stock in what the poll says. In fact, I'm willing to bet it won't be to long before we have an ACLU lawsuit filed against our military by an openly gay serviceman/woman for sexual discrimination.

Don't reservist have a voice in this too?

Besides, from my experience the Marines aren't fucking okay with this.