At 6/1/06 12:40 AM, XoSs wrote: first time's aite,

gets better. and some days its kinda surprises the fuck outta u when it gets great outta nowhere.

some days can get repetitive tho, but those days are usually followed by sextacular cumtastic uber days.

btw, to the guy who started this, u said u lasted long? i seriously think that the whole virgins last 5 seconds is a myth. cuz i went for the whole night/morning.. maybe it was the condom, too thick maybe?

My first time was awful. The girl couldn't get me off. I actually wondered if I was gay. The second chick I was with straightened that out (pardon the pun). But anyway, my point is who you're with can be a huge part of it. But if you can get off and it just takes a while, it's probably just a case of your own physiology. It takes me forever to get off too. But I've found that if you wait a while between sex (and not jerking off in between) make it more intense and better and faster. And a supliment called Oogoplex helps. You can find it online for about $50 for a few months' supply. I tried it when I was on Zoloft, which makes for really, really delayed orgasms. It managed to get me back to a point where I could come from sex, so it was good. Worth looking into.

At 5/29/06 12:25 PM, Wtfpwn wrote:

At 5/29/06 12:23 PM, WofMD wrote: blah, how is that surprising, you can get aids

....SHE IS A VIRGIN, number one. number two, you can only transmit aids if you have aids. do you really think i would fuck my gf, knowing she had aids? come on man, think before you speak.

Uh dude, you can get AIDS, and alot of other scary STDs from sex acts other than sex. Herpies and HPV (which kills more women a year than AIDS) are both spread by skin-to-skin contact. You don't have to go all the way to get something unpleasant. I'm not implying anything about you or your girl, but in this day and age it's a good idea to get tested. The microbiology major has spoken. :)

I agree. These people shouldn't be reproducing at all; most people don't grow out of that kind of stupidity.

At 5/31/06 06:58 PM, -poxpower- wrote:

At 5/31/06 06:42 PM, SparkyValentine wrote: Maybe we just beat 'em to it.

Or...
they're too stupid?

Yeah, it must have kicked ass to have fire.

But the Neaderthals had it too. Good thing they died out. Politics would be even more complicated...

At 5/30/06 05:31 PM, Draconias wrote:

At 5/30/06 04:00 AM, -metalstorm- wrote:

At 5/29/06 05:56 PM, Randall81 wrote:

At 5/29/06 05:46 PM, tru_calling wrote: He was 15 and the police are now trying to charge him with rape! What do you think? Bare in mind they are both under the legal age of 16 here in the UK!

It's only rape if she didn't consent, if she didn't consent then it's rape and they can charge. It doesn't matter if she's underaged of not.

Given the circumstances the boy would have been charged with statutory rape. You can be charged of ststutory rape regardless of wether the other party gives their consent.

It's only statuatory rape if one of the partners was above the age of consent. If both are minors, statuatory rape does not legally apply. However, you can be charged with rape regardless of the true circumstances because you can always be charged for anything.

That doesn't mean that you will be convicted of it, though, or that you can't sue the person for slander and reputation assassination. In this case, the girl is better off not trying to screw over the father.

Those laws vary considerably state-to-state. In some places, if the age differnce is less than a few years (like an 18-year-old with a -16-year-old), it's not considered illegal, but it varies considerably.

And whatever the law is, these stories are fucked up and break my heart.

At 5/29/06 06:33 PM, SEXY_FETUS wrote:

At 5/29/06 06:19 PM, Spoonsniff wrote: Ignore the moral implacations here but, wouldn't it make more sense to have children at a younger age. Have a baby at say at 15 be a grandmother at 30 and a great gran at 55.

They say life begins at 30 anyway get a proper career and be able to work til say 65 odd without any maternity interfierence?

The population would be younger, healthier and more achieved

But children born to older parents live longer. There was a test a few years back using fruit flies and not letting them mate, basically they laid eggs they wiped em away the first two or three times, eventually(about 16 generations of flies) the lifespan was double the control group.

But that's fruit flies. I've worked in the largest fruit-fly lab in the country (University of Arizona stock center and Dr. Teri Marcow's lab). There's quite a bit of difference between human and fly reproduction. For example, in humans, you're much more likely to have a kid with down syndrome or other birth defects if you have a kid in your 40's.

But that aside, that's fucked up about a pregnant 12-year old. That's just fucked up on so many levels.

Depending on how you define inteligence, there's at least three other organisms on Earth that could qualify. Dolphins have a complex language (they're trying to decode it, but most of it's way beyond human hearing, so it's tricky), including "call signs" they use to identify themselves as we use our names. The higher primates (i.e. Chimps) pass most tests for sentience. And, the odd third canidates, which most people don't realize, the octopus. An Octopus can actually learn how to unscrew the lid of a jar just by watching another octopus do it. The only reason octopodes don't form civilizations is their short life spans and anti-social nature. The only reason dolphin's don't have a civilization like our is their nomadic nature and lack of opposable thumbs. And chimps...fuck chimps I can't explain it. Maybe we just beat 'em to it.

For the record, I worked in Dr. Teri Marcow's evolutionary biology lab at the University of Arizona and am a microbiology major.

OK, microevolution is more than just "adapting to your environment." It is observable natural selection. It is when the least adapted members of a species or population die out, leaving only the best adapted.

And as for evolution not explaining creation; it's not supposed to. It only explains the constant changes in living things over the aeons. But there are sevearl theories about how life arose from the scientific standpoint, most of them involving how nucleaic acids' self-replicating/enzyme-like activity could have, through sheer dumb luck, crossed the line from really, really complicated chemical to living thing. Self-replicating chemicals can be created in laboratories without biological precursers.

Now, I may as well mention that I am not an athiest. I just think that it's impossible for a reasonably educated person to believe that God intends us to view the book of Genisis as a factual account. Just because science has all but proven evolution to be true does not mean that the message of the Bible is wrong. Only through brainwashing can "the inteligent design hypothesis" and other forms of creationsism spread. Just cause God didn't make the Earth in the same way the Bible says, doesn't mean He's not up there and wants us to do our best to be good people.

Thanks dude, much appreciated

Screenname (AIM): TrahaldSmeagol
Age: 20, but can do older
Gender: Male
Specialties: Gollum Voice, German, British, Russian, and "generic eastern European" accents.

I did a lot of voice acting in high school for our film acting unit. I only have the microphone my computer came, but it works and I'd love to help someone who needs a voice. My natural voice is deep (I sing base), as are most of my affected voices. I can provide a voice sample if you're interested.

Dang, I just saw a really great flash that said this a lot better than I could (and God help me I can't remember the name), but it was a famous college professor, put to music, talking about how it is a common characteristic of evil and opressive governments to claim that anyone who rips on the leaders of a country are in fact ragging on the people of said country. Like in the Bible when Eilijah (I can't splel, sorry), spoke out against the evil King Ahab, and the king claimed one of the greatest prophets of Israel was "anti-Jewish." Stalin's Russia, Hitler's Germany, and more and more of Bush's America had similar policies. So I guess what I'm saying in a round about way is, yes, we need to be able to criticize the government without fear of being labled "Anti-American." We need to be able to question our leaders so we don't degenerate into fascists. Because that would suck; jackboots aren't very comfortable.

If you're a good salesman, I'd go with the hot tub place. Then you know which chicks have hot tubs! But if you're not terribly sales-inclined, I'd go with the theater. Sure, it sucks, but so do restaurants and there's usually a bit more room for advancement in a movie theater, even a local one.

Hey everyone.
I'm new to Flash and I was wondering, why the hell isn't there a category for tutorials in the collections or something. Or is there and I missed it? If not, how do we suggest they make one.
ALL HAIL TOM FULP!