Guys something's fucking wrong, there's more ice in it now than there was when I bought it and it's over 30 degrees celcius in here

I just bought a 2 litre bottle of lemonade and I drank a little bit before I realised the rest was frozen! What do I do!?

At 2/23/07 01:56 AM, Team-Bunny wrote:

I think everyone will agree with me that it's fairly insane for you never to have heard of mathematics

yeah, yeah, I know what mathematics are, but I have NEVER heard the term "maths" before, and I think everyone will agree with me that you still said your post a bit like an asshole.

...because it's so difficult to figure out what it means by the fact that it already contains half the fucking word

At 2/22/07 04:58 PM, JoSo wrote: What the hell do mathmatics have too do with creating Trading card games?

Are you joking? If your game isn't near perfectly balanced there will always be a definitive winning strategy that is unbeatable, I've seen this happen many times, but base your game on an already well defined algebric structure like a module algebra, then you can create varying sets of cards, acting as the module sets, one of which is a field, and the others you can cater to act as morphisms on the sets, that way you have definitive paramters you know you can't exceed or your game will destroy itself.

At 2/22/07 01:24 PM, Team-Bunny wrote: And Sekky, no offence but, you kind of sound like an asshole.

I think everyone will agree with me that it's fairly insane for you never to have heard of mathematics

At 2/22/07 04:05 AM, Team-Bunny wrote: To Sekky ~ No, I really have never heard of maths, care to give me a link or something on it, thanks.

...are you for real? you are honestly saying this? Either you're mocking me or you're very sheltered

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics

At 2/22/07 03:07 AM, Team-Bunny wrote: I'm sorry, what do you mean by "maths"?

You've never heard of maths?

How the hell do you expect to make a balanced card game?

Wow, this is going to fail

Can I see the maths?

This Is The Most Impressive Performance In Human History

At 2/18/07 03:24 PM, henke37 wrote: Yeah, leave the poor guy alone.

Thank you

At 2/18/07 03:15 PM, thecoshman wrote: What the hell is wrong with this guy.

He posts in the programing forum with somthing that is 100% flash forum material. Then when he gets offered advice that he is dam lucky to get, he has the cheek to mouth off.

Somebody isn't reading the topic

"Yes, I posted this topic in the Flash forum but I quite simply can't get the feedback I want there, but here I think it will be appreciated a hell of a lot more."

Also: http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=64 1052

All I got there was gust "being a fucking twat", which is apparently all I'm getting here.

And this ISN'T 100% flash forum material, this is mathematical programming that just happens to be build in AS, go away.

At 2/17/07 09:39 AM, GustTheASGuy wrote: Nobody cared in the Flash forum which he didn't accept as I told it and decided it would be a bright idea to make a fool of himself *yet again*. Bad luck. :P

Wrong, there was only YOU who didn't care, and I quote from impotent boy:

"gust your a fucking twat"

Newgrounds sucks

At 2/16/07 12:23 AM, Alphabit wrote: You need to give a better description of what each class does.
And I don't want to have to download a PDF, just a quick link saying "class description for classname" that leads us to a brief description of what the class does.

There is a brief description, it's next to the class name on the page.The pdf is the shortest way that every method and property of every damn class there can be listed. What do you want me to do? Teach you the entirety of abstract algebra from the ground up?

Most people who will download your class are people who know nothing or very little about maths, I would suggest you give us examples of how they can be used etc...

They'll be in the pdf.

I'm gonna write an abstract algebra primer

At 2/15/07 06:19 PM, LordAba wrote: Other then that, you should try to add more to your linear section. You can then market it a little more as a 3d engine!

Try n-d engine :P It's not limited to 3-D space

Hello Programming Forum,

Yes, I posed this topic in the Flash forum but I quite simply can't get the feedback I want there, but here I think it will be appreciated a hell of a lot more.

http://www.stylebucket.co.uk/index.php?sectio n=2&page=Flashmatics

I'm working on a library of Mathematics classes for AS 3.0, I won't go into too much detail since everything's pretty straight forward, bascally I'm looking for feedback, criticism and suggestions on where to go from here or what people would be interested in seeing or using in a library such as the one I'm building.

Thanks, Sekky

I thought I'd revive this topic because I've recently added a ton of new stuff, so please go check it out and tell me what you think

http://www.stylebucket.co.uk/index.php?sectio n=2&page=Flashmatics

At 2/14/07 11:51 AM, johnmcmadeup wrote: Hello, I'm currently making a turn-based RPG, and I was wondering how to do damage calculations correctly. Are there some sort of basic ways to calculate damage?

ever heard of addition and subtraction? I'm not sure how much more basic you want it...

At 2/14/07 11:51 AM, Volit0 wrote: here is one of the bosses

i called him ninja taji

why are the military fighting ninjas?

At 2/14/07 11:45 AM, Toast wrote:

LOL I AM FUNNY :D

If by funny you mean "shut up", then yes, you are.

good coding practise and better functionality

seriously, the advantages of OOP can't be explained in eight thousand characters, just try it and see for yourself

At 2/14/07 05:12 AM, Vengeance wrote:

At 2/14/07 05:11 AM, shadowford wrote: I think he means "At The Moment"

and wounderful means wonderfull

Wow! Did you know that sarcasm means sarcasm too?

...When you say "sarcasm".....

At 2/14/07 01:10 AM, shadowford wrote: I got it fine. It isn't worth it though. Personally I am not liking AS3 at all.

It's not a case of 'like', there's no subjectivity for an upgrade. It's better, get used to it or stfu.

At 2/13/07 12:13 AM, Par-a-doX wrote: yeah my bad, I meant to put them all on one thread, first day on the bbs, anyways I learned a lot more by look at the code than from people telling me, Ill try harder I guess.

What he was incinuating is that you should already know. Don't steal code, write it yourself, or you'll learn jack all.

At 2/12/07 03:53 PM, flashbound18 wrote: Im good at drawing and what not but its quite a project to create drawings for an entire collection of cards... I might make the comic book; actually I will... but your going to need a team of artists to create a card game lol!

Ok perhaps I should have been a little more specific.

I am actually looking for more than one person BUT, this is easily achievable by one man. For the test set we're probably looking at between 40 and 60 cards, which is easily achievable by one person imho, no more working than making x number of fluid animations for a platform character really.

Oh, and in addition to that, it'd be nice to have a short comic book detailing the backstory of the card game itself.

kthxbai

Well I've been absent recently, hey guys, what's up and such forth.

Anyway, I've been mathing a lot since I started my course, a hell of a lot, and I've kind of come up with a loose idea for a card game based on an idea I had for a beat-em-up a long time ago. I don't expect anybody's ever come forth to this forum asking for an artist for a card game, so I won't reveal too much about it because I'm expect somebody to snap and say "hey, that's for me", so give me an email or add me on msn at professorrhythm@gmail.com

This is just for fun, and to see if I can balance it properly, but it should be a good laugh. Any takers?

~Sekky~

At 1/19/07 08:45 AM, OldGust wrote: Let's just say Sekky wins, he was right all along on the fact that you couldn't have a normal discussion in his thread (mostly because of himself).

I'll settle for "Oldgust is 14 years old and doesn't have a fucking clue what he's talking about, so he's going to spout off pseudo-intellectual bullshit in a paltry attempt to confuse everyone into thinking he's right."

At 1/19/07 07:54 AM, ImpotentBoy2 wrote: gust your a fucking twat.

...in other news, what do you think of my scripts?

At 1/19/07 07:07 AM, Luis wrote: This is true, i recall some rumor of them getting a real sour deal out of it. Always gotta be careful with big corporates.

The company basically said "$1.5million, we buy copyright", just like that. So the guy walked away.