See you in 29 days.

Rule 9.

29 days. See ya.

At 11/23/09 08:41 AM, OMGhaxedlol wrote:

please dont month ban

29 Days

So far I'm winning the POS computer contest.

933Mhz Processor
Pentium I
512MB RAM - originally 256
60 GB HD
Compaq
Windows XP

At 11/20/09 10:11 AM, TheUnwisePoet wrote: I think I invented something funny!

Where are my glasses?

I've always said... Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what'cha gonna get...

1. You're only 1 day closer to death than you were yesterday.
2. I'm going to be 28 soon, don't try to tell me 10 is old.
3. Chances are you're going to live way longer than I will.
4. Who are you
5. Happy Birthday!
6. 1/5 = 10. Not 20. Learn elementary maths pls.

Does 55-65 hours (self emplyment) per week count?

Thanks everyone!

I haven't slept since about 5AM yesterday morning, which means I've been up for close to 36 hours. I'm going to try and get a little sleep while I can.

At 11/19/09 03:23 PM, evan210 wrote: I noticed that I have gone almost 3 days now without being banned.
I do believe something is wrong here.

Fixed.

I'm giving you a 3 day time-out so you can study the English language.

It's official! I'm a dad now!

Me and my wife proudly welcome out newest addition to our family, Saeed!

Our son was born late last night and weigh a healthy 7lb 1oz.

Saeed = Happiness. Our feelings when our son was born. Originally we were going to name him Akhilesh, but that's my brother's name and even though I really like that name, Saeed is even better.

9 months ago :)

I'd be indifferent about adding new levels for a future redesign. Personally, I think 60 levels is enough even more so considering lvl 60 hasn't even been reached yet.

Happy Birthday Wade!

4 words, 2nd try http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&safe=off&
q=frogbag+octopus+daffodils+nugget&meta=
&aq=&oq=&fp=18e7e31dcf191863

This thread is against the rules, No sig threads.

At 11/14/09 10:32 AM, STEM wrote: If you were banned from the thread made this morning, you can redeem yourself! Send me a short message saying you understand the difference between a real topic and a spam topic, and I shall relieve you of your 1-day ban.

Same goes if I banned you for 1 day in the [controversial topic], which was most likely made while no mods were on considering how long it went before I finally dealt with it.

At 11/14/09 10:33 AM, Wolferz wrote: Nice job telling people, but one inquiry, since you created this "no mods online" topic yourself, would that mean you are going to lock this thread?

I wish people would read some of the replies before responding to this topic.

For the third time now...

That would pretty much defeat the purpose of this topic. If I locked this, it will fall into oblivion, people will forget and I'll have to ban again next time I'm the only mod online and I see more no mods topics.

At 11/14/09 10:26 AM, kanon1 wrote: good thing you remind people of this, but one question because you made a "no mods online topic" are you going to lock your own thread?

That would pretty much defeat the purpose of this topic. If I locked this, it will fall into oblivion, people will forget and I'll have to ban again next time I'm the only mod online and I see more no mods topics.

Have him consult a doctor instead of asking a BBS where people get all tickled pink over the mention of penises.

[controversial lock / ban message]

Standby for your controversial ban messages, folks.

At 11/14/09 10:07 AM, FlashCam wrote: Wait...uh.....Are you gonna lock this then??

That would pretty much defeat the purpose of this topic. If I locked this, it will fall into oblivion, people will forget and I'll have to ban again next time I'm the only mod online and I see more no mods topics.

Hi STEM!

Oh, wait...

don't make topics like this, we WILL eventually see them and ban you as needed.
Yes I know this has been made before, but people seem to think posting topics about no mods online is acceptable.

At 11/14/09 06:57 AM, Dapper wrote: No mods online, eh?

My guess is that yo were hoping I wouldn't see this topic.

banned

That's nice. Mention it in your userpage or forum sig.

Oh Snap! She pulled a Sanjay!

Needledick (Twilight) has requested a lock on this thread.

At 11/4/09 11:15 PM, MyGuitarSticks wrote: RULES, MOTHERFUCKER! DO YOU READ THEM?!

I'm guessing you haven't read them yourself, regarding your all caps and borderline backseat modding post...

At 11/4/09 10:39 PM, blockdude wrote: I noticed some reviewers write quality reviews a lot, and I think they should be rewarded. So here is my suggestion:

Making quality reviews is like putting on clean underwear. It's something you should do, not something you need to be rewarded for.

Every time a review is labeled as helpful by (#) people, (#) experience points are added to the writer of the review.

Explain how this won't encourage people use alts to mark up their reviews and or do a favor (vote + on someone else's reviews in exchange for them to + vote your own.)

This would encourage better reviews in general.

No, it won't.

and provide another method of gaining experience points.

Which is a crappy way of getting EXP points IMO

I would like your suggestions on how to make this better

Leave the EXP system as it is.

Let's save the votes for when the official 2009 BBS awards nomination thread is made at the end of this year.

I was in my late teens when the whole pokemon frenzy first started in America. Considering mostly kids 13 and under were interested in it, I showed no interest whatsoever.