6,867 Forum Posts by "SadisticMonkey"
At 9/10/14 05:52 PM, Feoric wrote: Notice how this devolved into a pedantic argument about ~*~ｔａｘ ｎｏｎｃｏｍｐｌｉａｎｃｅ~*~ after his shitty arguments got destroyed.
None of my arguments were destroyed. I CORRECTLY pointed out that you and several others were using the term 'tax evasion' incorrectly. Something being illegal or not, especially in the context of claims that most corporations are doing it, is NOT pedantic.
You were the one who was objectively incorrect when you said:
At 9/5/14 12:57 AM, Feoric wrote: Aw, you think all tax evasion is illegal.
Notice how Light's quote actually disproves YOUR claim?
At 9/10/14 03:16 PM, naronic wrote: Our brains
This doesn't prove what you seem to think it does.
At 9/10/14 12:45 PM, ChloeFlora wrote: But I'm sure that it's not because of their skin color, but because of their living conditions.
Well that's irrelevant to my original point, but I could provide you with evidence to the contrary if you like.
At 9/10/14 06:31 AM, Light wrote: "Both tax evasion and avoidance can be viewed as forms of tax noncompliance, as they describe a range of activities that intend to subvert a state's tax system, although such classification of tax avoidance is not indisputable, given that avoidance is lawful, within self-creating systems."
So, nothing that disagrees with what I said? Got it.
At 9/5/14 08:42 AM, SCTE3 wrote: Evasion and avoidance are similar in meaning so.... no they are not different.
Banning drugs is dumb and doesn't work because people can still buy drugs.
By the way we should ban guns.
At 9/5/14 11:56 AM, ChloeFlora wrote: Sorry pal, that were not facts! That was your personal attitude!
Are you denying that the avergae IQs of african-american and hispanics (for whatever reason) are lower than that of whites and north-east asians?
And yes it was racist. Or at least you're so overfilled with prejudice that can't even find logic in our discussion.
I said "Are only american teenagers interested in booze an sex? Do you have evidence that an interest in booze and sex can explain poor educational achievement generally?"
To which you replied:
"And if to talk about the teens and booze: of course not only teens are interested in booze, but it's hard to educate a person who is not interested in education."
Which didn't answer my question at all.
too bad he wasn't a black democrat
At 6/7/14 11:46 AM, MrPercie wrote: Yeah it could be good, would a good fuck you to the queen and UKIP.
hahahahahah wow
yeah getting rid of a 50 labor MPs will really stick it to UKIP !!
At 9/5/14 12:57 AM, Feoric wrote: Aw, you think all tax evasion is illegal.
Tax evasion and tax avoidance are different, dumbass. Tax evasion is by definition illegal.
At 9/3/14 01:45 PM, ChloeFlora wrote: That's one of the most racist pieces I've read recently. And the most funny thing is that it's written by a guy with a black man on a profile pic.
So facts are racist now?
One has to deny facts in order to be non-racist?
I guess you forgot about those whites who live under the poverty rates, those rednecks who have the only love to their mama and their gun, those ignorant freaks who don't live in ghettos, but still think that the USA can have some geographical interest in the Middle East (perhaps they haven't seen a World map yet)
What on earth are you talking about
durr...redneck stereotypes hur hur hurr
For what it's worth, poor white kids go better than rich black kids on the SAT so, there's that. I'm sure you have a nice little narrative prepared to explain that away though, of course.
And if to talk about the teens and booze: of course not only teens are interested in booze, but it's hard to educate a person who is not interested in education.
Is english not your first language or do you simply have the worst reading comprehension in the world?
Maybe America really does have an education problem.
At 9/3/14 12:48 PM, Jmayer20 wrote: Good cops that regularly volunteer for the dangerous patrols and are able to handle bad situations well without losing there cool or getting trigger happy should get various rewards such as higher pay.
Cops that are inadequately ""trigger happy"" in bad situations are the cops that get injured or killed.
At 9/3/14 12:31 PM, Feoric wrote:At 9/3/14 09:16 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote: You have knowledge of widespread corporate tax evasion? Does the IRS know about this?!Yes.
So, the IRS chooses not to punish companies for breaking the law?
The reason this is a thing is because of how the west have used Hitler and portrayed him, almost to the point of caricature, as the most evil person imaginable.
“We painted Hitler as a monster, a devil. And that’s why we could not move away from that portrayal after the war. We had mobilized the masses against the devil incarnate. And so we were forced to continue in this satanic scenario after the war. We could not possibly have explained to our people that the war had actually been only a preventative economic measure.” US Secretary of State James Baker in an interview with the German news magazine Der Spiegel in 1992
At 8/29/14 09:41 PM, Korriken wrote: 1. They tend to be family oriented.
yes but that's oppressive to women. family is a concept invented by the patriarchy is exploit women for the benefit of men.
At 9/1/14 05:30 PM, Warforger wrote: Exactly; because whereas the freedom of press, privacy, speech, from unlawful search and seizure, right to a speedy and fair trial and ultimately right from cruel and unusual punishment have all been attacked by the Right Wing
>Thinking that the left cares about any of that
At 8/27/14 11:24 AM, ChloeFlora wrote: The World IQ statistics says that the USA lies in the 20th place for the average IQ after the most of other "advanced" European and Asian countries.
That's not particularly meaningful without controlling for race. Blacks and hispanics drag the US average down considerably.
Does that mean that nonetheless our politicians are trying to attract smart people from poorer countries, our country is still getting more and more stupid! I'm pretty sure that that is the consequence of the awful educational system we're having.
The number of low-IQ mexican immigrants entering the US gulfs the number of high-skilled mexicans entering the US, so its dumb to expect the average IQ to increase as a result of it.
First, a person needs to be really interested in getting knowledge to really get some. And we all know that it's really difficult to raise the interest of a teenager to something besides booze and sex.
Are only american teenagers itnerested in booze an sex? Do you have evidence that an interest in booze and sex can explain poor educational achievement generally?
And second, even if you have that interest you have to pay for everything! (Books, scholar programs, extra skills, high edu etc.) Which is hardly affordable for a large amount of people. Seems that someone who invented that system didn't want us to leave our castes. Cause a person has to be really genius to get a grant for higher education after a public school
America ranks fifth in the world for percentage of population with tertiary education, higher than the much lauded scandanavian social democracies. So I don't see what your point is here.
At 9/2/14 08:26 PM, Light wrote: Most corporations have no trouble evading corporate taxes
You have knowledge of widespread corporate tax evasion? Does the IRS know about this?!
You heard it here first, folks!
Even if they didn't do so, it's not as if they wouldn't try to find ways to maximize their profits at the expenses of their workers and/or the American taxpayer.
Right, and in an environment where the government doesn't erect barriers to entry and doesn't engage in an assortment of cronyism to protect established/dominant firms, competition keeps this profit-maximizing behavior in check.
At 9/1/14 10:47 AM, Camarohusky wrote: I hate this move. Sure companies can point to stats about high taxes, but who the fuck cares? It's not like they'd use their extra money in a productive manner.
What PRECISELY is this based on?
Do companies not ever expand? Open new office/branches/stores? Do they not invest? Have you ever actually read an annual report of corporate financial statement before?
All it does is pad the profits or payouts to people who already have a ton of money.
Non-invested profits can be used for executive income or shareholder income.
In both cases, the money is taxed, and in the latter case, the recipients are not necessarily rich.
It's well known that tax dollars go back into the economy at an extremely higher rate than private dollars, especially high end private dollars.
"pretty well known" isn't going to cut it here.
And "going into the economy" isn't all equal. It takes many forms.
Rich people don't lock their money away in vaults and swim in it scrooge mcduck style. Most of their net wealth is in the form of investments, which is 'going into the economy'.
Government spending can get money into the economy in a number of ways. Welfare spending is obviously a big one. Regardless of how important you think it is for the government to provide financial support low income individuals/families, from a 'good for the economy' perspective this is the least productive kind of spending. The best kind is investment, which is what leads to economic growth.
- 2 white men want to eat at Waffle House
- The white men are Ralph Weems, a Marine and Iraq Veteran and his friend David Knighten who is an Air Force Veteran who served in Afghanistan
- Man in parking lot suggested they go elsewhere
- Said the black men inside were angry over the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson and that it may not be a safe place for white people
- The two men go inside to eat
- After entering an argument broke out and police were called
- They cant do anything
- They decide to leave to eat elsewhere, end up going to Huddle House to eat
- A group of 20 black men from Waffle House followed them to parking lot of Huddle House
- The 2 men try to calm the angry mob but it doesn't work
- They get attacked and beaten
- Knighten gets taken to the ground and kicked repeatedly and suffers minor fractures and cuts
- Weems gets attacked much more severely, close to death and ends up needing brain surgery and was put in induced coma by doctors
- Racial remarks where yelled by the black crowd towards the white men during the beating
- Police show up after crowd leaves
Quote from the police chief Tim Brinkley: "This does not appear to be a hate crime"
Gosh, it sure must be tough being black in a country like America ! !
they're white, racist pieces of crap who use their position of social authority to entrench white privilege and prevent oppressed people of color from seeking the justice they deserve
At 8/26/14 12:06 PM, Feoric wrote: They said he was shot at from the back, i.e. while he was fleeing Wilson with his back turned.
Right and the autopsy clearly shows he was shot from the front.
Hmm, I wonder why you're so adamantly standing by Wilson despite all the flimsy evidence in his defense? I'm having such a terribly hard time thinking as to why that could be...
Why defend someone who was clearly acting in self defense against a violent piece of shit and who is now the subject of an hysterical witch-hunt at the hands of an angry, ignorant and violent mob?
gee, what a mystery.
They said he was shot in the back. He absolutely was not.
I can't make it any clearer for you.
At 8/26/14 02:02 AM, Feoric wrote: "More than a dozen witnesses have backed up the account of Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson in the controversial shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown, police sources reportedly told St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter Christine Byers."
Ooh, the elusive 'police sources.'
The police would deny this is a heartbeat if it were untrue.
So your evidence that the people who have the same exact version of events are lying is simply "because I said so." Okay. I will take your word for it, Person On The Internet.
They're either lying or disastrously wrong.
Outcome is still the same.
At 8/26/14 01:48 AM, Feoric wrote:At 8/26/14 01:46 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote: At least a dozen witnesses confirm itsource?
and the witnesses saying it wasn't it wasn't self defense were shown to be flat-out lyingsource?
The key witnesses said that Brown was shot in the back when this is absolutely wrong. (It's basically impossible for them not be lying, and if they really were simply mistaken on such a simple issue then that just means that the rest of their testimony is entirely unreliable anyway.)
At 8/25/14 08:02 PM, aviewaskewed wrote: Firstly, since when did Al Sharpton become the representative of the whole Democratic party? That'd be like saying Rush Limbaugh represents the whole Republican party. He's a pundit, he's on tv, he's a political celebrity, but he is not the spokesman of the party last I checked. Picking out Al Sharpton as a crappy rep of Liberals is easy, just like it's easy for me to pick out Rush Limbaugh as a crap rep of Conservatives.
In your opinion, what proportion of democrat voters consider Al Sharpton to be a race-pimping buffoon compared wit those who consider him to be a respectable civil rights activist?
At 8/25/14 05:54 PM, Feoric wrote: To say that the officer "clearly" acted in self defense is disingenuous at best.
At least a dozen witnesses confirm it and the witnesses saying it wasn't it wasn't self defense were shown to be flat-out lying. It's over. The only thing keeping this witch-hunt going is paranoid racist hysteria from liberals/blacks.
To still be clinging to the 'michael brown was executed for being black' story IS entirely hysterical though. These people don't know or care about what the facts or evidence say. It doesn't matter how much their narrative is debunked, a white person killed a black person and now they want blood, simple as that.
At 8/25/14 10:39 AM, Feoric wrote: I completely agree. It's hysterical to see people bending over backwards to support Wilson and the subsequent actions of the SLCPD.
What's hysterical? people want this man dead for something which is clearly self-defense. Supporting him against the mobs of violent blacks is completely rational.
