Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 12/5/04 01:48 AM, fastbow wrote: That may be true, but people crusade against Christianity more than ANYTHING ELSE! Pick up a copy of Voice of the Mayrtrs to see the persecution that Christians experience around the globe. I have personally met people that have been imprisioned for practicing Christianity. Did you buy Chinese christmas lights this year? They were probably made by people in political prisions, many of which are Christians.

What about jewish people? I believe their death numbers are greater then the christianity numbers. As well as that, the number of deaths attributed to Christians is far greater then any other religion. Not saying that it's a bad religion, it's that rulers have manipulated Christianity to suit their agendas.

At 12/5/04 01:08 AM, Thelonius wrote: You may need to elaborate more for me to fully understand what you mean here, but to my knowledge black stars are nothing more than "hollowed husks" of their original selves. Their radioactive core is burned out, so they no longer emit any sort of detectable radiation. If this is true, then it seems unlikely that a black star could therefore be unstable.

If a black star continiously absorbs energy, then where does all of this energy eventually go? I think Hawking was thinking along the lines of what you're thinking, but later reversed himself in the last couple years. I'll have to get a source for that.

I am by no means an authority on physics, but the early Newtonian principle that the more distant two objects in space, the weaker the gravitational attraction between them still stands, to my knowledge. I would be very interested to see if you could produce a source that supports this claim.

I know I can't produce a source for my claim. It's all something that I'm going to have to prove myself. Basically it's a collective gravitational pull, and when you're near the fringe of the universe you are experiencing the full onslaught of this collective gravitational pull. This could also be used to explain why graviy is such a weak force because it is weakened by itself.

If what you say is true, then it would be impossible to even reach the extent of the universe. The further out you went, the more energy would be required to continue. Infinite energy is an impossibility.

Infinite energy would be required to overcome the collective gravitational force of the universe, but it would only be near infinity to reach the fringes of the universe.

Yes, but string theorists believe blackholes do not explode, but rather gradually recede.

String theorists=theory
What I'm saying=hypothesis which with more data and calculations could become a theory.

Don't take anything I say as fact, I still need to prove a lot of this stuff through math/observations.

Nice to know we will be working in the same field.

I'm not sure if I'm going into this field, but I am merely going towards an engineering degree. I also need to edumacate myself with some more on what is occuring in the universe and come up with my own ideas instead of branching off of someone elses.

At 12/5/04 12:44 AM, Thelonius wrote: However, your crusade against Christianity's impact will be as light as the millions that have tried before you.

Which is why only 33% of the world's population practices Christianity right? Because people haven't crusaded against it.

Oh and something about the US...

At 12/5/04 12:42 AM, -poxpower- wrote: time is a loop.

Which is what I believe. Except more along the lines of a sine wave and time being different in different places.

At 12/5/04 12:20 AM, FAB0L0US wrote: And this is some wierd shit when you think about it. I have thought for a long time, where the hell did all the universe come from?

Let me answer with my beliefs, and I'll let Thel answer with his... Don't forget I have completely different beliefs from anyone that I know.

What was before the big bang (if that really what it was)?

Before the big bang was an unstable black star, but there were many universes occuring at the same time.

What is it really like to reach the end of the universe?

The end of the universe does not really exist. Gravitational energy is relatively weak in the surrounding area because of the going so slow in large masses, but once you get near the fringe of the universe, the pull from almost all of the gravitational energy would be too great to overcome and you'd be pulled back in. So you could go to the end of the universe, and it'd most likely look on one side a bunch of massive stars. But it'd be impossible to stay in this position for more then a second. The universe is continually combining and exploding. Combining into black holes and exploding from blackholes that can't contain themselves anymore. Stars that cannot contain they're matter is more typically seen because it emits detectable electromagnetic waves. These explosions are supernovas. For a black hole, the electromagnetic energy is so compressed(the wavelenghts of the pulses) that it looks almost like nothing. Don't take anything I say as fact, I still need to prove a lot of this stuff through math/observations.

And how the hell is that possible there is a finite end?

There's a possible finite end, but it is constantly changing. So in reality, there is not a constant definete end, but an evolving finite end.

If there is a God, how the hell did he get there? Did anything make him?

Ahh the who created the creator problem.

Kinda wierds me out when I start thinking along these lines and really how little we know of how the hell we are where we are.

Cool thing about thinking like that is that you can make things as simple(religion) or as complicated(all of the mumble jumble you'd like) but it has a simple reasoning. To explain why we're here.

Thelonius your argument is very strong. I can't deny that. The thing is I don't believe in theories for proving the existence of God because theories are all speculation. Another thing, I don't believe in the big bang theory. What I do believe is that the universe is constantly in chaos. Black holes constantly suck matter into an almost timeless "pit" and once it reaches it's optimal mass it'll excrete it's matter in a violent explosion, like almost the Big Bang theory. Except while this is occuring, other universes are co-existing. Basically it means that there was no beginning, only alterations of time do to extremely large masses and the interactions between supposed "differences of times" between different large bodies of matter.

I always say this whenever someone says something about the Big Bang theory so....

Oh man this thing almost got me until I read the address as www.word-cnn.com not cnn.com

At 12/1/04 07:08 PM, Hammurabi3 wrote:

At 12/1/04 03:36 PM, Ravens_Grin wrote: Ahh democracy, oppression by the majority.

That what political system do you suggest, eh? I mean if democracy sucks, what else is left?

All political systems have their plus and minuses. There is no good political system. Democracy is most likely the best because it is what I have seen work the best. Communism is in theory a better idea for everyone then democracy, but has never worked. It is hypocritical for me to complain but then praise about democracy, but the more you know about a topic the better you can harness its capabilities. Thinking of this... I wrote an article in my english class, I'll post it on here after I get back from work(On here I mean on another topic).

At 11/30/04 08:54 PM, NotYouZ wrote: ...we really need that guy in the White House.

More then 2/3 vote will surpass a Presidential veto.

Ahh democracy, oppression by the majority.

At 11/16/04 03:44 AM, spanishfli wrote: Again, here's the topic: "A fetus a human, or not a human."

A fetus is as much as a human as a liver is. Let's think about it for a moment. They can't breath. They can't eat. They are completely dependent on the organism that is carrying them. Both can cause complications, even death, to the bearer. If it was removed from the body, it would just become dead tissue. Hmm....

At 11/15/04 10:40 PM, BeFell wrote: Do you have any idea how many genes are in 1% of a our total DNA?

Too fucking much. A 1% difference, let alone a .5% difference in genetic structure can severely alter the resultant organism.

I'm so sorry, I've been talking in reverse syntax for awhile now... I need to stop.

At 11/15/04 12:07 PM, BeFell wrote: That's bullshit, you went through the exact same developmental process just as every other human who ever has and ever will exist.

Are you a child still?

I was referring the muslims as the muslim's in the middle east. I might need to clarify that.

three toed sloth

View your post, click on "view profile" right beside your name.....

At 11/14/04 02:26 PM, DudewithHeadphones wrote: What about domestic terrorism, like the Army of God or The Aryan Nations (White Supremacists) or ELF, aka "Earth Liberation Front" (Eco-terrorists)?

Because if we suppress them then they have a legal basis to attack the federal government on. They would say that it was a violation of their freedom of speech. As for the muslims, they have no legal standings in our government.

I'm not great at C code so I can't really comment on what it does. Just flop it into your code though and see what it does.

At 11/2/04 11:39 AM, MamaTequila wrote:

At 11/2/04 11:09 AM, JohnnyWang wrote:

At 11/2/04 11:05 AM, Slaker4012 wrote:

Also, DarkMaster, you're right, a girl can get pregnant earliest at age of 9. So, wrap it up people!

for some reason..that post wierded me right out...

Why you don't go for the 9 year olds? Jeez.

For a MMORPG you might want to make your own map maker...

You know it takes a shit load of grain just to feed a cow that will produce a minute amount of food when compared to the possibilites with the grain?

At 10/17/04 12:46 AM, afliXion wrote:

Kerry IS dumb. The Bush having an IQ of 91 thing is a lie, and a fake. Who made that site that gives it?

Read my post which was 4 above yours...

At 10/13/04 09:29 PM, FAB0L0US wrote: Plus, how does anyone know these guys IQ's? I have heard rumors of 91 before but never any proof. Can someone please settle this for me once and for all?

They based it upon the speeches the president said and the articles that they wrote by themselves.

Saying I can easily drive to DC, I can go. Just need a specific time/date.

At 10/8/04 03:12 PM, silent_explosions wrote: next time you start a thread though, try not to make the subject so broad... the question had too many answers...

I know, exactly my point.

Is the majority right most of the time? What perspective are you looking from?

At 10/6/04 02:15 PM, Lord_Aba wrote: Anyways, there is the Microsoft Visual C++ .NET compiler, but that might be too much/too expensive for you.

Actually you can get the compiler for free, not just the IDE. Look on microsoft's website for net toolkit.

At 10/6/04 07:55 PM, Slaker4012 wrote: Dividing the empire into a Western and Eastern half led to a less effective government

Which was the result of the government over-extending itself, and various other factors that you can google to find out. There are a lot of reasons for the collapse.

I honestly like Jesse Ventura. He doesn't dance around like what Kerry and Edwards did in the debate, he is very direct. In 2008, I will definetely elect him. We need a person of sense, not a politician, to be president. I remember watching him on CSPAN one time talking about budget glut. Very persuasive, and gets his point acrossed quite easily. As for the possibility for him to being elected, I think it's slim to none; too many people vote a straight ticket.