608 Forum Posts by "Profanity"
This is just a thread to make fun of that spammer guy.
60 people have divided their time to keep some idiot manchild from being a nuisance, batting him around like a cat playing with a mouse. The admins refuse to nuke him because they pity him.
Mouse declares himself the winner. Game over.
When a retarded person (or any person you've decided is stupid) tries to compliment your intelligence, how do you react?
At 11/16/13 11:55 PM, Supermonkeydude8888 wrote: Shit we aint even got quantum computers yet ni##a come back some other time
What do you call D-Wave Two, dumbass?
Say it with me: "Kwahn Tum Kahm Pyoo Tar"
At 11/16/13 08:46 PM, Cally wrote: The longest place name in the world is in Wales:
Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch
The longest place name with spaces in the world is in Thailand:
Krung Thep Mahanakhon Amon Rattanakosin Mahinthara Ayuthaya Mahadilok Phop Noppharat Ratchathani Burirom Udomratchaniwet Mahasathan Amon Piman Awatan Sathit Sakkathattiya Witsanukam Prasit
Any make-up aficionado or someone who knows what to look for typically will be able to figure out which person was born male and who was born female in a lineup of women who are chosen for traditionally female characteristics and transgendered MtFs. However, those obvious and subtle traits are often invisible on screen and in print. They can be further obscured with Photoshop and plastic surgery. Over time, plastic surgery has progressed to make it ever more difficult to distinguish between 'Genetic Girls' and 'Trans Girls'. That trend isn't likely to stop anytime soon, and it will eventually be possible for transsexual surgery and medical treatments to change sex completely, making these ethical debates unnecessary. But that's far off.
Victoria's Secret should not be forced to hire trans girls out of pity if they do not hire genetic girls who have comparable flaws which are being hidden with the same techniques. The practice would put genetic girls at a hiring disadvantage.
At 11/16/13 05:23 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: "They question whether the condemned can freely give consent, or are desperately hoping to win clemency. They worry that such practices would make judges and juries more likely to hand out death sentences. And they are troubled by the notion of using inmates for spare parts."
Yeah, that's completely void of any kind of ethical matters...
Was that a lazy attempt at sarcasm? You know every scenario can be broken down into an "ethical dilemma" if you are too eager to scrutinize it.
They should not need the consent of the prisoner. It should be a Doctor's decision to decide whether or not the prisoner's organs are healthy enough for donation or whether they should be given to medical schools and criminal forensic laboratories for study. This is not complicated.
Anyone who thinks it is morally wrong to allow death row inmates to donate their organs is a complete moron. "Ethical Dilemma" my ass. That guy just likes to sound important.
ITT
OP, "My favorite posts get overlooked!"
People who don't know how to make threads, "You're doing it wrong."
People who are terrible posters, "OP, you are a terrible poster."
Try-hards who never have bilateral discussions longer than one sentence, "OP, I'm going to critique your logic here."
Seems like a pretty good idea!
i grew up with an atheist family in my neighborhood. They were all absolute geniuses. Artists, musicians, a writer, a doctor, a very wealthy engineer, and a world-renowned published environmentalist. (Good looks, too, it's almost unfair how much good fortune they have) The entire mansion was essentially a six story library-museum! People like that are few and far between in the theist Churches I've been to. It would be nice to meet thousands of people like them.
At 11/6/13 05:58 PM, thatkidkenji wrote: Why are the owners of the athletic and academic assosiations white?
Why don't the millionaire black rappers, millionaire black ex-athletes, and millionaire investment bankers buy sports teams?
Why is the House of Representatives and Congress virtually a white man's club?
Why do black politicians win in white districts? Why do white politicians win in black districts?
Why are all the record labels under media conglomerates owned by whites and Jewish (who, despite their attempts to say otherwise, are obviously fucking white)?
Why is Shawn Knowles-Carter white? Why is Kanye white with a white-on-white Kardashian?
Why does Greece have a seriously anti-brown-immigrant problem that has caused riots several times for the past decade?
The Olympics haven't been hosted in Greece since 2004.
Haiti was the only successful slave revolt, and it paid for it heavily through systematic retaliation from the (white ruled) United Nations for several decades before being admitted into their fold, and it is still highly neglected by the World Bank. It is an extremely poor country. You need a fact checker.
Really? If Haiti wasn't so successful at retaliating against the white empire, then why are they independent enough that they don't need a shitload of charity?
At 11/6/13 05:44 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: This is still not a proof that there aren't inequities. The fact that some blacks can be succesful nowadays doesn't mean that we've attained perfect social and political balance between ethnical groups.
Was I talking to you? If I wanted your white ass opinion I would buy a pair of rose colored glasses, glue pages from a soc textbook to the lenses, and dip them in mayonnaise.
Would someone please sew this bitch's mouth shut.
At 11/6/13 05:24 PM, thatkidkenji wrote: "The System" is not fucking Skynet. It's made up of you and your kind continually shoving people of color off the world stage.
Why are there so many successful African athletes and Asian academics? Why is the President of a White Supremacist Nation a black man? Why are most of the top rappers black? Why do African athletes win footraces in the Greek Olympics? Why is Haiti one of the most successful nations, while the Dominican Republic is a boring waste of space?
Why is there such an uneven distribution of skill, wealth, and achievement?
At 10/26/13 02:39 AM, wildfire4461 wrote: This country is getting overun by socialists who want their money handed to them instead of working for it (which is why that POS is in the white house). Socialism has no place in this country.
The average worker produces more while working less because he has access to technology, resulting in a reduced wage, higher profits, and fewer jobs.
I guess you would need to be intelligent or well-read to know that. You are forgiven.
Family Guy needs to die (I seriously want to see Peter get shot in the head for the finale).
Who gives a shit?
Anybody who says guys shouldn't like MLP are bigots. And if they're going to say that, they also need to say girls can't like guy things also and keep that type of bigotry going.
Again: who gives a shit?
Political correctness is a disease that's going to eventually kill this country (unless mr. One Big Ass Mistake America beats it to it).
You have the right to free speech, go ahead and use it.
Copyright law is broken and only serves major corporations that are abusing it. And the Copyright Gestapo created by those companies is out to control the public with help from the government, including shit like SOPA, CISPA, and similar legislation.
It has positives and negatives. I agree overall though: American intellectual property laws (patents especially) have a stranglehold on innovation and creativity. They need to be brought into the 21st century.
No new gun control laws are needed, and liberal cocksuckers who want it need to get out of this country.
We need a way to keeps guns out of the hands of people who can't handle them, or better ways to defend against active shooters. Stricter gun control laws are the only proven effective way to lower the rate of gun related deaths.
(I know those last two will piss off a couple of people here).
Awwww here it goes.
Aah feels good to vent.
Feels good man.
At 10/15/13 08:48 PM, gamejunkie wrote: I've been here for nearly 11 years now and have no plans to leave. I'll be here until either Newgrounds or I die.
This.
At 10/11/13 05:26 PM, Elitistinen wrote:At 10/11/13 05:22 PM, Profanity wrote:You know what more scary? People who can't sense satires.
The point of the armor is to deploy it with Special Operations...
I know. I have nightmares about them.
At 10/11/13 05:24 PM, Aethos wrote: So anyone else thinks this will be the longest shutdown on the records?
Yes. February/March of 2014 with recall elections in a few districts.
At 10/11/13 05:22 PM, Aethos wrote: Just thought about this, by why is a religion topic posted in the Politics forum?
I mean, they aren't the same thing.
It's something people have tried to make a lot of threads about in either forum. Most of those threads deteriorate into flame wars and loose arguments with a lot of cheerleaders. This thread acts as a sort of lightning rod for an absurd subject that few people agree on.
At 10/11/13 05:05 PM, Elitistinen wrote:At 10/10/13 09:22 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote: I suppose it was only a matter of time. Looks like it comes with its own Jarvis too, in a way.I bet an RPG-7 with 2 rockets is cheaper than that armor. Plus an RPG can blow the wearer to pieces, and I'll use the 2nd rocket to turn him/her to sauce.
I'd love one, but where would I put it? I only have so much closet space.
The point of the armor is to deploy it with Special Operations covert operator missions as a way to mitigate more probable gunfire. Targets don't normally have RPGs on hand to destroy humans, they save them for when they're fighting large groups and vehicles because they're more difficult to smuggle.
Also, I would think that rather than destroy this sort of armor, they would try to capture and neutralize the wearer, and use the armor for themselves.
At 10/11/13 04:54 PM, lolomfgisuck wrote: And you have the proof that it happened on it's own do you? Because last time I checked nobody knew what started the universe. There are a lot of educated guesses out there, but regardless of how intelligent those guesses sound, they're still just that... guesses. If you can't prove that the universe was created some other way then you have to keep all possibilities open. As ridiculous as it might seem to you, God is still a possibility. It might be very improbable, but that doesn't make it impossible. Like it or not, at this point in time, it's not wrong to believe that "God" created the universe.
If, and I do mean if, God is the creator of the universe, the proof of God would lie in his creation. Thus ruling the "invisible unicorn" argument moot. In other words, I just found invisible unicorn poop.
Maybe I'm wrong, but my evidence says it came from a unicorn. You say it came from another animal. We both have to prove our arguments true (burden of proof works both ways)... you have to prove to me that another animal made it and I have to prove to you that the unicorn made it. Can't prove to me another animal made it... then you have to keep the possibility open that maybe, just maybe, it is unicorn poop just as I have to keep the possibility open that maybe it's not.
Theists aren't arguing that an invisible God exists that has no effect on the world at all like your unicorn example wants us to believe... they argue that God is real and can be proven to be real indirectly. Invisible Unicorn argument = desperate bullshit argument.
Atheists have a lot of strong arguments on their side, they shouldn't have to result to this. You got the entirety of science on your side. Math and such. Invisible unicorn arguments are just you being a dick.
At least, that's how I see it.
The argument for a "God" has been falsified daily for thousands of years. It turns out the Sun doesn't actually fall into the ocean, hide behind a hill, or get carried off by a magical flaming chariot at night. It turns out the Moon and the Sun aren't the same size, nor are they balanced opposites. It turns out there were more stories written for the Bible which were not included in the final publication. It turns out all of the stories in the bible (and other religious texts) were written decades and centuries after the events they are purported to describe, that their stories are editorialized, exaggerated, loosely translated, and gratingly illogical.
Science has made short shrift of every proposed "God" hypothesis for the entirety of history, debunking all sorts of mystical hypothesis and then slowly whittling down the plausible explanations for physical phenomena until settling on the most likely candidates. Where Science has made tremendous progress over the past 3 centuries, Religion has done nothing but reorganize its arguments to accept new Scientific facts—or futilely attempt to block those discoveries from reaching the ears of society at large.
Religious leaders themselves know there is no "God". They rationalize perpetuating the lie as a way to keep civilization from collapsing, or to do good for humanity during their lifetime. It is because they believe that without religion there is no hope for our planet.
Whenever a "God" hypothesis is suggested, it's written in a way that is meant to trick the reader into agreeing with the writer. "God" must be hiding if we have no evidence for him. "Everything" must be the evidence for God. "God" leaves no evidence. Humans are too fallible to understand the divine work of "God". There is never a simple explanation, none of the explanations agree.
Realistically, there is no reason to pull someone out of a religion and force them to learn the truth. If someone isn't intelligent enough to rise above the lies of society and curious enough explore the reality of the world around her, it would be rude to destroy the fragile framework of cautious optimism that keeps her satisfied.
At 10/11/13 06:43 AM, Ononymous wrote:At 10/8/13 02:42 PM, Profanity wrote:Unicorns are not described in the Bible, and Scientists have verified that unicorns cannot exist.At 10/8/13 12:59 PM, Ononymous wrote: The idea that the concept of unicorns and God is comparable is fucking laughable.Sure, it's hilarious. It is correct, though.
God and Unicorns are both magical creatures described in the Bible which have never been verified to exist.
Scientists have not verified that God does not exist.
Obviously you have never actually read the Bible. You like to find images and short paragraphs which seem as though they might refute arguments against Christianity, but you don't understand the subject.
Ten bucks says it's made with liquid unobtainium actuators and powered by an unobtainium radioactive isotope engine, and they need 500 million for research.
At 10/9/13 03:51 PM, AcetheSuperVillain wrote: Which is exactly why I said so. You can get hundreds of random cuts of soft tissue from a triceratops, because there are hundreds of Triceratops fossils. Way to read, fuckface.
Are you any better with metaphors than you are with Biology? You're going to have this fantasy geneticist rebuild the "Seven Wonders of the World" using three or four puzzle pieces from a "Seven Wonders jigsaw puzzle" and a whole bunch of jigsaw pieces from a huge collection of modern architecture puzzles. What's he going to do next? Squeeze a live elephant through the eye of a needle?
At 10/9/13 03:27 PM, AcetheSuperVillain wrote: Or so they thought once, but they have actually found intact soft tissue inside dinosaur bones
My understanding is that the DNA they do find is still incomplete, so you are better off using very common dinosaurs like Triceratops or Euoplocephalus, which are known by hundreds of specimens, rather than T-Rex or Parasaurolophus which are known by a dozen or so. As in the movie, Jurassic Park, scientists would probably have to fill in DNA gaps with close living relatives like crocodillians or birds.
There is barely enough DNA to clone Neanderthals and Mammoths without filling in the gaps with living relatives (George Church, Harvard). There is no way in hell you will get enough genetic material from a random cut of soft tissue that may have been preserved somehow.
At 10/9/13 03:23 PM, Shibe wrote: wow another smart ass that thinks he's clever for dodging the topic of the thread
I bet when girls try to flirt you correct them in a matter of a fact because you hate yourself and feel the need to prove your intelligence since you have no other likable qualities
but who am I kidding, being a smartass was never a likable quality in the first place and girls don't try to flirt with you anymore
...because its impossible to act differently with girls I'm going to fuck and random dudes on the Internet, right? No, sorry I'm not some brain damaged moron who has trouble differentiating between men and women.
Impossible. DNA has a half-life of around 500 years, meaning that it's been millions of years since the last remaining Dinosaur alleles have disintegrated.
At 10/8/13 03:26 PM, Senmetsu wrote:At 10/8/13 02:45 PM, Profanity wrote: Protein load your diet, never go a day without exhausting some muscle group or another.It seems like if you're exhausting muscle groups then you're probably working out...
Muscle weighs more than fat, and it builds faster. You will gain a lot more weight by working out than whatever other methods are posted here. The OP asked how to gain weight without "tubs of ice cream" also, which probably means he's looking for us to disagree on the definition of "weight gain" as a way to test us.
Protein load your diet, never go a day without exhausting some muscle group or another.
At 10/8/13 12:59 PM, Ononymous wrote: The idea that the concept of unicorns and God is comparable is fucking laughable.
Sure, it's hilarious. It is correct, though.
God and Unicorns are both magical creatures described in the Bible which have never been verified to exist.
At 9/28/13 01:31 AM, HeavenDuff wrote: Humans aren't machines. We have feelings, subjectivity, individual and collective symbols, imagination. We have poetry, music, litterature, painting. Does aren't just means of communication. These are arts, these are expressions of what makes us human, subjectivity. Artists, poets and the likes have written masterpieces about contemplation of life, nature, unicity in diversity.
Humans are machines. Feelings, subjectivity, individual and collective symbols, imagination, poetry, music, literature, painting, and language are all programs being run on the human machine. If you can't see that, you're living in a fantasy world which artificially inflates human value.
At 9/21/13 11:43 PM, Jin wrote: Except he's not breaking any rules. You're behaving exactly like those care bear circle-jerk communities who bans for anything. You're a perfect fit for a place like Gaia.
Wow great post Jin; I certainly approve if everything you said! So insightful and grammatically flawless! Wow! Inspiration ally intellectually incredibly impeccably incisive!
Lets hold hands and sing!
lest you forget: RealFaction has admitted to two things: (1) he was accused of being a rapist and (2) the accusation was believable enough to get him ejected from a large social group
meaning (A) he actually IS a scumbag rapist who is pretending to be super moralistic to compensate for his sense of social justice or (B) he's the kind of person who is just fucked up enough that he seems like a rapist
in either case, he's too much of a whiny bitch for General, and too much of a rapist for Gaia
