608 Forum Posts by "Profanity"
Shut the fuck up. Seriously? Not a difficult question. Anything that serves no purpose other than to entertain the mind is art. English developed over thousands of years to describe this bullshit with simple canopy words, but now we're evolving out of that.
Call video games anything you want. Interactive art. Games. Artificial environments are going to be popylar once we have full immersion. The world isn't cut and dry.
Fuck your shit. Fuck it.
At 4/15/14 10:44 PM, Clamstuffer wrote:At 4/15/14 10:11 PM, TitusRyland wrote:Looks like a reply of some sort? Let's see... "TitusRyland" looks like some kind of comic robot avatar maybe? "Interesting little reply here... looks like and evaluation of a thread maybe?... Lots of dots and words but not really my thing...."At 4/15/14 09:55 PM, Clamstuffer wrote: Hmmm, nice little thread here... looks like there is url linking to a video... seems interesting enough but not really my thing...Interesting little reply here... looks like and evaluation of a thread maybe?... Lots of dots and words but not really my thing....
Yeah, I'm not really a fan of that... I like the format though... Interesting...
Hmm... It looks like uh [heavy breathing] some sort of [smacking lips, breath pressurizes against congested nasal passages] looks a bit like a comedic... Sort of... A... Some people responding to each other. [Out of breath from stringing too many words together]. I guess that uhh [breathing in deeply] if I were heavily into responding to people in a comedic fashion, that, um, I might do that. Here.
At 4/13/14 02:42 PM, SneakyGameBoy wrote:At 4/12/14 05:34 PM, Decimating wrote: 9/11 was an inside job. Fact.finally some people that realize that america is a bunch of liars. iraq is not capable of doing shit like this. only america can make anyone loook like the bad guys
You don't even know what the fuck you're talking about. The invasion of Iraq wasn't even remotely connected to 9/11. Except that the timeframe was similar and Rumsfeld/Cheney were accused of leading the American public to believe that the invasion was tangential to that event.
Jesus Christ.
Guy,
I am asking you WHAT HAPPENED that brought ANY MODERATOR into the discussion as a suspect. I do not care about the rest of your bullshit.
That's not 'why', that's you describing the discussion. I dont care about that.
What happened that lead anyone to think this was anything other than user icons being changed by someone exploiting a vety confined and harmless vulnerability?
Please explain in a clean and concise manner why you are discussing the possibility that a moderator's account is "in on it".
My monkey's on several things:
1. A banana tree
2. Session swapping
3. The perpetrator is Ma1achi
4. He can only mess with people who are online and communicating with the server
Meaning the more you try to post, the longer you stay active on NG, the more likely it is you will be targeted. He wouldn't have access to anything important. Unless you're autistic and think having your user icon messed with is a "fate worse than death" (–Decimating).
At 4/8/14 02:14 AM, MissAllanPoe wrote: Yep. We still exist. And on many accounts too >_>
Nerd.
Men and women have very similar orgasms.
The difference is that men have sensitivity spread throughout their penis, and women have a high concentration of nerve ends in their clitoris. Men tend to have reduced sensitivity throughout their penis, with high sensitivity in the testicles, while women tend to have a wide variety of sensitivities in penetration, with extreme sensitivity in the clitoris. This leads to much different anecdotal evidence coming from the mechanics of sex.
Men are capable of multiple orgasm just as women are capable of ejactulation. The convulsions are identical and hormonal releases are similar. I have read that from a research perspective, the orgasms are biologically identical.
That said, if I were a woman I would be a nasty little slut who wears pant suits in public and chases strong men. I'm straight as a man, why wouldn't I be straight as a woman?
None of these people are worthy. They will tarnish your account.
At 3/27/14 10:27 PM, Scintillating wrote: Wow, that sounds so wise and considered, even though it's completely idiotic. People shouldn't live a lie and participate in religious organizations that they have no particular connection with. It's disingenuous, and there are many other ways to get life experience.
Except that if you actually went to church and got to know the people there, you'd discover that aside from the self-righteous ultraconservative "my business will refuse you service based on my religion" people, most of them are very down-to-earth and warmhearted people. And the rest are some form of an Agnostic church-goer who doesn't buy the whole package. And then you'd discover that the reason most of them are religious is that it ties a social atmosphere into their desire to live a healthy, moral, and fulfilling lifestyle.
He's not going to end up getting kicked out for sitting there twiddling his thumbs while they douse the Flame of the Ancients with Blood of a Phoenix or something just because he's not a strictly religious person. You attend, you smile and make eye contact, you get scholarships, and you pat yourself on the back after college.
At 3/27/14 09:53 PM, tox wrote: My count in this thread is
Shut the fuck up you retard.
Setting religion aside, this is about convincing SpankyG not to forfeit his opportunities, which are probably the only opportunities he has access to considering that he lives in the middle of the fucking American Mormon Bubble.
At 3/27/14 09:28 PM, Chdonga wrote:At 3/27/14 09:22 PM, Profanity wrote: get scholarships or free tuition from your church...This. Ignore these goofy fedora tippers
Dude, thanks for calling attention to what I said. I was afraid I might get sidelined if Tox came back to talk about his "athiest" (sic) acceptance.
Idiots here might not understand how much damage you can do to your social life, college and post-college life, etc by going against the church you were born into. I would think that is especially true if you are a Mormon in Utah. It's like being Catholic in Italy, Jewish in Israel, Shia Islam in Iran. When you're on the inside, you are in their good graces and they will help you to make things happen. If you toe the line, people can literally ruin your life to use you as an example of bad behavior.
Just play along, go on a Mission to get some world experience, get scholarships or free tuition from your church, and slowly drift away from Mormonism when it's safe to do so without getting disowned, kicked out of your family, ostracized, and whatever else.
Don't just climb out of the frying pan and fall into the fire.
At 3/24/14 09:52 PM, Natick wrote: holy cow, if stupidity could be converted into energy, you could run an entire town on this thread for about a week
The human brain runs on 20 watts per day. So, no. Not even close, or clever. Think more before you type.
At 3/24/14 06:00 PM, Sekhem wrote:At 3/24/14 05:56 PM, Earfetish wrote: In Russia, they think Americans are the aggressors and that your state is totalitarian and controlling and that the US unleashes its military at the slightest provocation because it is stuck in a Cold War superpower mentalityin the u.s. we view russia as a gas station that masquerades as a country
russia is poor and sucks
they lost the cold war
couldn't keep up
It doesn't matter how you view Russia in America. They have enough nukes to turn North America into radioactive dust.
You gotta go with TV Tropes for this sort of thing.
At 3/23/14 04:49 PM, iBested wrote: I mean the total degradation of culture and society on a global scale along with earth being rendered ecologically unstable *supposedly* within 15 years are pretty big to me as opposed to resurrectin the guy who's just too lazy to do it again himself.
Um. What's going to cause the degradation of culture and society on a global scale, etc etc etc, and how does that relate to cloning technology?
Also, Crimea.
And that? How does that factor into the discussion?
At 3/23/14 04:20 PM, Elitistinen wrote: If you tell me that time travel is going to be made possible (soon), I would tell you the same thing as I did above.
Nonequivalent. The leading theories in cloning research predict that this sort of revival is possible using existing techniques. The leading theories in physics predict that time travel is impossible and there is no technology which incrementally approaches that milestone.
At 3/23/14 04:30 PM, iBested wrote: I feel like if we advanced to the point in technology able to clone someone from ancient remains then we're gonna have a lot bigger problems and questions than whether or not the supposed son of God should be brought back to life.
If you'll read the thread (ig:'s not worth reading, you can skip that step), I have already quoted a PhD in Genetics, professor at Harvard, George M. Church, as stating that is already technically possible to de-extinct an ancient species, the Neanderthal. So, do we have bigger problems?
At 3/23/14 03:26 PM, Elitistinen wrote:At 3/23/14 03:22 PM, Profanity wrote: stuffTheories and hypothesis are fun to read. But any evidence that they have done it? None.
Come back in 20 years and you may prove it. But now, Jesus is a dead bunch just like everybody else.
You're abusing the vocabulary of science to support your own opinion. Here we have an expert in the field, whose hypotheses are more likely to be driven by intuition and experience, talking about what is possible with DNA that is even further divergent from the human ancestry, and reconstructed from 30,000 year old samples:
quote
SPIEGEL: Setting aside all ethical doubts, do you believe it is technically possible to reproduce the Neanderthal?
Church: The first thing you have to do is to sequence the Neanderthal genome, and that has actually been done. The next step would be to chop this genome up into, say, 10,000 chunks and then synthesize these. Finally, you would introduce these chunks into a human stem cell. If we do that often enough, then we would generate a stem cell line that would get closer and closer to the corresponding sequence of the Neanderthal. We developed the semi-automated procedure required to do that in my lab. Finally, we assemble all the chunks in a human stem cell, which would enable you to finally create a Neanderthal clone.
end of quote
I believe that it is not so far-fetched as it is hampered by the discovery of the genuine Tomb of Jesus, consent of a world government, funding for that research, and societal acceptance.
At 3/23/14 03:09 PM, Elitistinen wrote: We can't even clone extincted animal with live DNA.
Cloning: Can it resurrect extinct species? (Ewen Callaway, 2/29/2012)
Fresh effort to clone extinct animal (Paul Rincon, 11/22/2013)
Incredible Technology: How to Bring Extinct Animals Back to Life (Tanya Lewis, 8/19/2013)
Interview with George Church: Can Neanderthals Be Brought Back from the Dead? (Philip Bethge, Johann Grolle, George Church, 1/18/2013)
At 3/23/14 08:48 AM, Phobotech wrote: Clone him just to sate the fanbase...but they're never going to find such a discovery. As time presses on, such genetic information will decay into invalidity. It would never be a true, perfect clone. You'd have better chances of shitting into your own hand, through the self-inflicted stigmata so it all pours out like a tube and not die from horrible infections than you have the chance of finding Christ's remains and cloning anything remotely functional, let alone Holy.
Assuming that it's profitable, won't there someday be a way to compute solutions to revert the genomic changes from postmortem mutation? I mean, if there's suddenly a dysfunctional allele and a computer model suggests that it should be some other structure that already exists in the mammal genome, couldn't we extend the timeline for discovery by hundreds of thousand of years?
If some future team of archaeologists manages to find the final resting place of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, and they collect his DNA and sequence his genome:
Should he be cloned? Why or why not?
At 3/21/14 02:30 AM, Jin wrote:At 3/19/14 10:11 PM, Profanity wrote: Look at yourselves.We don't have enough posts making fun of OP's misspelling?
He had four days research and come to a minimally communicative understanding of this news before posting a thread to discuss it, and this half-assed typo bullshit is the topic he went with. Yeah, I'm pisses. He's a science student.
Oh, well that's pretty accurate.
Crimea is already forfeit though. And there may be a war coming.
At 3/20/14 11:10 PM, tox wrote: I think that she is 24 ish
the media is saying she is 33
Ever heard of a little thing called makeup?
Someone told me he looked Xenomit up to confirm that he's a teenager once after he posted his parents info. I guess he just likes to play pretend online. No harm in that.
At 3/20/14 05:27 PM, stafffighter wrote: Yes she is. also adorable. this lady shirt! Also a boys shirt.
XL ladies shirt.
That's not a shirt, that's a dress.
