Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/25/03 06:09 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: *DAG light on*

You know, by the scale I'm using people on welfare are worth more dead. In fact, if we take the poor, and feed them to the hungry, what we have is a self solving problem. Poor people could also sell their children for the local cash value for a life. Why has noone thought of this before.....

Oh yeah, they did. They called it cannibalism and slavery, and it worked for thousands of years before this "civilization" fad of morals came along. Look what happens when we ignore ancient solutions to ancient problems, eh? Homeless poor and starving people. At least slaves are kept fed, so they can do a decent days work. As for the crippled and old worthless people, well, the slaves have got to eat SOMETHING, dont they?

That, my friend, is hilarious. It's also a great concept, if you think about it... I mean, I'd give up my dead body for poor folks to eat if I died. I won't need it. Just burn my head and sprinkle me over Ireland or something, if you really need to do some sort of closure ritual. Really, I mean, what's wrong with cannibalism (aside from his blind hatred and ignorance, ha ha)? It's actually a pretty good point. What's so immoral about eating human? Just because society deems it wrong, doesn't make it so. It used to be "wrong" to be black, or gay, or anything other than "white male landowner" in this country!

"I'd eat people if it were legal, I'd eat people if it were legal" -Reel Big Fish

That being said, you wouldn't like the taste of me. I assume I'd be all stringy and tough. Now Shrike, on the other hand, I think has the right meat/fat ratio for some damn good steak...

*Passes up chance to make a sexual innuendo at one of the ladies with the phrase "eating someone"*

Word.

Word.

I only hope that my name comes to mean something equally as epic someday...

No way, man! I love(d) that game!

I can never find anyone to play it with, anymore. I only played a few times, and then the GM up and moved to Washington.

"What's that? You'd want a piece of Darklight? He could kick your ass even without feet!" Jonnen Paradox, mild-mannered store clerk and alter-ego to "Darklight, Superhero extrordinaire"

Ever play Shadowrun?

At 5/26/03 11:25 PM, Lyddiechu wrote: every child is a gift from god?? my skinny, non-pregnant ass it is.. a gift to go on welfare and eat government cheese for the rest of its life uh huh.

I can't believe you said this. I love government cheese. Almost as much as I love masturbating.

*Shuffles off to his VCR and bottle of lotion*

At 5/27/03 10:59 AM, cannibal7878 wrote:

At 5/27/03 10:41 AM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:

Shih, all I have to say is that everyone wants to play D&D, yet I have been trying to find people to play Vampire: The Masquerade, no one wants to play that...which fucking blows goats, yeah, d and d is cool, but I like Vampire better. So, either way, I am in favor of roleplaying...(especially in the bedroom) >:)

Something tells me I should have figured cannibal to be one of the "Vampire" crowd. You don't run around in the park at night, do you? If so, that'd be just the saddest thing ever. When a D & D gamer/nerd (such as myself) makes fun of you, you really need to reconsider what you've been doing with your life. It's like the social hierarchy in high school filtered down to the nerdy guys playing D & D at the bottom, and then they turn around and give the pseudo-goths a wedgie. You know what I mean?

That being said, if you play Vampire on a table-top, it's pretty cool, but not really my style. If I had to go the route of White Wolf, I'd pick Wraith, or Mage.

Good picture, commander. I was wondering if the females were going to get representation is such pics as a separate entity. But, alas... you beat me to it. Now I can't look like the cool guy by posting a female-oriwnted pic.

At 5/23/03 11:49 PM, jimsween wrote:

At 5/22/03 02:39 AM, PreacherJ wrote: My mom tells me sometimes (in her fits of rage) that I was a big mistake, and that she never should have had me.

My mom tells me that every day, that is of course after the beatings... Wouldnt want to interfere with the beatings...:-(

AWW... Poor Jimmy. I know ecatly how you feel, believe me. I picked up a bat one day and changed all that, though... :-(

*marks down anm assist for jimmy*

Ahh. The simple things in life.

Word.

At 5/26/03 04:25 AM, TheShrike wrote:

*Lies under kittie and positions her "over it"*

Damn. I never thought Hitler would ever use that symbol to start a big empire of evil. Now I have to go back in time and invest some other symbol of peace, love, and... Beer.

*Hops in time machine*

At 5/24/03 12:19 AM, mrpopenfresh wrote: Ha! The day i'll be jealous of someone i've never met, pigs will fly. Trust me on this one.

So you aren't jealous of like, Bill Gates for having a lot of money, or John Stamos for being married to Rebecca Romijn? There's a rather long list of people worth being jealous of that you might not have met. Are you sure? Because if so, you are a better man than I.

At 5/22/03 10:13 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote:

At 5/22/03 08:34 PM, jimsween wrote: Fine, I wont post in here anymore. *adds the URL of this to his blocked sites list*

Oh please describe more of what youre doing *laugh histerically at sween for being a complete moron*

Poppy-

Shut up. Jimmy didn't lash out at you at all, and here you come with another flame. That being said...

How much of the news on TV do you (anybody) think is biased toward politicians? How much of it tries to actually report the truth? How much of it is just total bullshit?

Thoughts?

"OMFG You started it11!!1" "Nah-uh j00 started it!!!11!1"

Whatever. I don't give a fuck. I'm trying to end it. Stop. It's pointless and non-constructive.

Jimmy, Poppy, DK (Virus, not the monkey)-

Stop this. If you want, I can go to the General forum and post a topic thread called "Jimmy, Poppy and D2K throw insults at each other." I'm getting tired of sifting through all this crap. Make up, shake hands, and use correct grammar, and everybody will be happy. Stick to the damned topic, or... uh...

I'll kick your asses! Yeah! That's the ticket!

*Makes tough-guy face*

Word.

*Buckles up his riot armor and loads his Desert Eagle .50 AE*

*sigh*

I figured it may come to this...

Oh that's hilarious. I love the fact that you guys picked up Nitro. You'd have trouble coming up with a better title than "Alchemical Master."

Wasn't he banned for plagarism? Meh.

Lyddiechu-

If you feel the need to manipulate the DAG to your own needs, then fine. I'm sure that there's nothing I can do to change that. I would have liked to extend a hand to you to join, but alas, Commander, in his zeal, has turned you into the arms (claws?) of the DAG. Well, just to clarify, I don't really see the DAG as enemies. Rivals, perhaps, but not enemies, per se. We just don't agree, and a lot of animosity seems to stem from that, on both sides.

It's all terribly juvenile, and Shrike and I (to name a few) have been trying to cut it back, but it seems that peace can't be achieved. There's just too much on both sides, apparently.

As for Snooble, well, it's Snooble. We don't deprive any "n00bs" of anything, really. It's more of a planning ground for PC projects and intercrew politics. Ask Volt. He can tell you about it, I'm sure.

Anywhoo, I wish you luck in your upcoming DAG membership. I hope all goes well, and that you hold no animosity towards me on the basis that I have a yin-yang instead of a devil face and a mock title.

Now if you wanna hold animosity towards my beliefs, you go right ahead. Just be ready to defend your points! :-P

Go Devils!

As for section 8-

My whole family uses that program... I sure hope it's not on the chopping block in more places than philly...

At 5/22/03 03:29 AM, Judge_Dredd wrote: point-

They won't be cartoonish - they'll be near-realism artworks or video.

They won't be selling to some perv-mates, they'll be "broadbanding" on cable modems.

So how does Preacher feel about it now?

By "cartoon" I meant "not real." As for broadbanding on cable modems, you aren't going to find it unless you go looking for it, now will you? Why do YOU know so much about this? Been doing a little "research" of your own? :-P

At 5/22/03 02:26 AM, metaph0r3 wrote: marijuana being natural wasnt my point. a person can smoke 1 joint in about 4 hours for a good buzz. but then, another person smokes about 8 cigarettes in 4 hours. Who is going to live longer?

If being natural wasn't your point, then you shouldn't have said the "100% natural" line. Make your points clearer. As for the smoking amount, you once again have no basis, as I know people who smoke more weed than tobacco. There's also no way to tell how much longer who will live than the other. There's too many variables in life.

And again, why blame marijuana for somebodys coke addiction. yes, they may have started smoking marijuana with a coke dealer. but it is that persons behavior and own responsibility to choose to either take the coke or not.

I'm not saying the marijuana itself did it. You seem to have trouble grasping the concept of "environment." I'm just saying that exposure to marijuana can lead to exposure of coke. What you appear to think I'm saying is that if you smoke marijuana you automatically try coke, which isn't what I said. Besides, now that we're on the point, you don't think that marijuana alters a person's judgment at all? You might be "Ultra-cool guy that weed doesn't really affect," but I have a few friends who have a lapse in their better judgement when they decide to do something potentially harmful and/or deadly and think it's hilarious because they're stoned.

Poisons? Name them

Carbon Monoxide, Ammonia, Actone, Benzene, Toulene, Acedaldehyde, and Benzopyrene, to name a few.

Now, once again, I'm done. Feel free to spout off whatever, but I'm not posting here again. I'm tired of the weed argument. If you did go back and read some of my posts, you'll see an exhaustive amount of info, and you'll notice that I actually support legalization.

Go weave me a hemp necklace or something. I'm tired of this crap.

At 5/22/03 01:41 AM, bumcheekcity wrote: Laws are made for the law-abiding. If you are going to kill someone. You'd kill them weather or not the law says you shouldn't.

Oh, bummy, that's a little ridiculous. You're advocating anarchy, here. If there weren't any laws in place, there's a shitload of people who wouldn't be among us today, from my hand alone. Now that might make me a bad person, but I guarantee you'd cheer me for turning at least a few of them into fertilizer, given the circumstances. There's also a host of stuff I'd steal, because, hey- I need beer, and I don't have any money this weekend.

Good question...

On that note, exactly how old are you, metaph0r3??

:-P

Just kiddin'.

I think that if people wanna draw cartoon kids getting reamed, they should be able to. That's less time they're spending kidnapping kids to perform deviant sex acts under the eye of the camera.

I think that if they want to sell these pictures of cartoon kids, they should be abe to. It's just art, and shouldn't bother anybody who isn't looking to be offended.

Damn you, Shrike, for making the "age is relative" point. We always share some view, don't we?

Word.

*Stops, looks around, realizes that this is a lounge*

Hmmm...

*Walks over to big comfy chair, sits down, and begins to prepare current G.A.D. report*

Sometimes I wonder how the world would have turned out if I'd been aborted. My mom tells me sometimes (in her fits of rage) that I was a big mistake, and that she never should have had me. It's an intriguing thought, really. Sometimes I wish I could live the "It's a Wonderful Life" episode to see.

That being said, I believe in pro-choice.

"Women's bodies are their own fuckin' business."
-Jay, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back

At 5/22/03 01:54 AM, metaph0r3 wrote:

At 5/22/03 01:30 AM, PreacherJ wrote:

At 5/21/03 11:30 AM, D2KVirus wrote:

I'm sick and tired of this bullshit. People say that Marijuana contains more tar than cigarettes...Let me educate you

When you smoke THC, your lungs expand. They move farther apart and thus gives you more room to breath. Less tar gets through this way.

When you smoke Niccotine, your lungs do the exact opposite. They move closer, giving less space for the smoke to get through. This way your lungs are resinated full of tobacco smoke.

And once and for all, the marijuana LEAVES contains for tar than tobacco. But, you do not smoke the leaves. You smoke the buds, which if grown properly is 100% pure nature.

And as for your statement on how everybodys different, you're right. Everybody is different. Some will smoke weed and it might lead to other things, some might not. But, you're forgetting a key factor. Why blame a plant on a persons behavior? If somebody becomes addicted to coke, its not because he smoked marijuana. It's because he is so dependant on a drug he will lie, steal and pawn anything just to get that quick fix. Don't blame somebodys problems on an herb...

I'm tired of sifting through anti/pro marijuana studies to defend my beliefs. If you care enough to sift through the several posts I made on this topic, go nuts. But for the record-

I did not say "tar". I said "poisons."

I didn't say that marijuana always leads to coke addictions. I merely stated that everybody's different, and that exposure to the drug element can lead to people trying other things, and then becoming addicted. If you're partying with your weed dealer, and he happens to deal coke as well, and he offers you some, and you try it, and you become addicted, didn't it all stem from you buying weed from him in the first place? That's what I meant, and it IS because he decided to smoke weed.

Bottom line-
Marjuana is harmful. Even the most benevolent of sites that claimed to have done research on the topic said that it contained at least 33% of the "tar" content in cigarettes in the buds of the marijuana plant. If you put enough smoke of any kind in your lungs, what the fuck do you expect? I'm tired of this "it's 100% natural" bullshit. So was the fucking bubonic plauge. Momma Nature can still kill you. Go hug a tree and leave me alone.

Damn! Newgrounds doesn't understand Japanese! I was going to double code the message. Oh well.

Get out this week's decoder rings kids!

LYU TQO AK LGG KLMHAT LG HGKL AF LYU HGDALASK VWJME

Enjoy all the decodin' fun!

ƒIƒnƒCƒI?BŽ„‚Ì?_! ˆ«–‚‚ÌŽxŽ?ŽÒ‚̃Oƒ‹?[ƒv‚͉Ž‚̃oƒbƒg‚ð‹z‚¤!

At 5/21/03 11:30 AM, D2KVirus wrote:
So, why is weed, which has so far proven to have NO direct fatalities, NO addictive elements, and NO ill effects on people's behaviour illegal? The same can be said for LSD, MDMA, mushrooms - none are addictive, and none have detrimental effects.

And don't try the "Oh, one leads to the other" argument. I've smoked weed for five years, and haven't paused to think "Wait, I need something stronger." I've experimented with other drugs (except Heroin; no fucking way, thank you very much), yet don't dash around looking for a fix every time I crawl up the walls (besides, Coke didn't do much for me, and Ketamin is boring, and I sneeze the shit out in five minutes anyway).

If anything, shouldn't MORE people be encouraged to smoke a joint every once in a while, to chill the fuck out? Or how about a little mind expanding with some mushrooms. For both, you can function perfectly well, and think a lot clearer, yet drunken hicks call you "hippie" and try and kick your head in, although they can't make up their minds which one of the three they should be aiming at.

Alright-

Weed does have detrimental effects. It contains seven times the amount of toxins and poisons that cigarettes do. How many people do you think died of lung cancer and had it blamed on weed? None, I'm sure, when big tobacco is soaking up most of the blame. Do a little bit of research before you spout stuff like this off. As for the effects on behavior, whether or not you can act fine under the influence of weed and whether or not everybody can are completely different things. Just because you don't know anybody who can't drive well when they're stoned doesn't mean that they don't exist. By that same token, just because the other drugs weren't your cup of tea doesn't mean that it doesn't affect other people either. You said yourself that you tried other stuff (except for heroin), and just because you didn't like it doesn't mean that there aren't other people who get exposed to it because they smoke weed.

Yes, most pot smokers don't move on. But basing your argument that none of them do on the basis that you didn't doesn't mean anything. Just because I'm not gay doesn't mean that you aren't, you know?

As for the other things, I hope to god that you aren't advocating people to drive on acid or mushrooms. That's a mistake with a big fucking capital "M." Once again, you might have been cool, but I myself have tried both acid and shrooms, and I was in no condition to drive. Now, using the same argument you did works for me, however, because my inability to drive while fucked up shows that not everybody can be a completely functional member of society under the influence of this stuff. Maybe weed/shrooms/acid helps you think clearer. But for many people, it doesn't, you dirty hippie :-P.

Sure, alcohol has a bad effect on your ability to drive and it's legal. But claiming that these drugs have no ill effect on your behavior is preposterous.

*Curses his own 56k connection*

To join the PC-

Make 200 (mostly legitimate) posts. Ask a member, and you'll be assigned for observation.

Don't be a jackass or blind hatemonger, and we'll lovingly accept you.

If you do want to be a blind hatemonger, the DAG's standards are less stringent, and they're willing to waive the 200 posts rule, just to swell their ranks with newbage.