At 10/25/06 01:58 PM, WadeFulp wrote:
At 10/25/06 01:44 PM, Nightfaery wrote:
Okay, Wade, without trying to sound aggressive (because everyone is raising valid points here), could you please tell me what was wrong with this review I wrote?
"Sorry, dude, but since you used the word Hentai just to attract, I've lowered the score. Too many people do it and it's annoying. Besides, I've learnt that if it does have Hentai in the title, it's bound to suck arse. It wasn't that bad, but Michael Jackson jokes are starting to get rather stale. And the lad's voice was too quiet. The graphics could have been improved too. Good luck on your next one! *^_^*"
For starters, there is a problem. M-Bot doesn't seem to include the Summary, so we don't know if your Summary was abusive. As for the body of the review, which we can see:
"Besides, I've learnt that if it does have Hentai in the title, it's bound to suck arse."
You seem to be reviewing the title of the Flash, rather than the Flash itself. While I agree with you, you should stick to reviewing the Flash, not whatever silly title it has, etc. Without seeing the summary it's hard to conclude anything though. How recently was this deleted?
Okay, this is the whole e-mail. It's the same for the other deleted review:
This message is to inform you that the following review, which you left for HARDCORE INUYASHA HENTAI on 4/14/05 at 7:04:11 PM, has been deleted:
"Sorry, dude, but since you used the word Hentai just to attract, I've lowered the score. Too many people do it and it's annoying. Besides, I've learnt that if it does have Hentai in the title, it's bound to suck arse. It wasn't that bad, but Michael Jackson jokes are starting to get rather stale. And the lad's voice was too quiet. The graphics could have been improved too. Good luck on your next one! *^_^*"
Please review the Portal review guidelines to ensure that you are following the rules.
Also, be aware that repeated review deletions will result in administrative action against your account.