Be a Supporter!
Pop Quiz Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

Pop Quiz, winner gets a cookie.

What are the top two countries with the highest Muslim population in the world?

1.?
2.?

Response to: nuke iraq Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

Bush said if Iraq uses chemical warfare, he'll nuke them...welcome to MiddleEast Disneyland -Glass Kingdom

Response to: Feeling Futile Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/30/03 02:24 AM, Anti-corruption wrote: it's their EXTREME ISLAMIC corrupted mullahs who spread the wrong idea to the public a few hundreds

ding ding ding! you got it. for anyone else that doesn't know what a mullah is, it's a Middle-Eastern religious leader who coincidentally is lso in charge of the education system.

Response to: another bigger threat II Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

the US allows for personal initiative, the other world punishes those who are assertive

Response to: 0 Factor Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

lol well i've written 365 of them ;)

Response to: 0 Factor Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/30/03 01:23 AM, Anti-corruption wrote: and everyone should remember the lesson we learn from the World War 1.

which one?

A) One small scuffle can start a great war
B) Secret treaties destroy international fabric
C) Illegal use of sea(air now) is a major international issue
D) Poison gases should be eliminated from warfare
E) An effective body of representatives from various nations should help control disputes

gee...it sounds like we're starting a new WWI

Response to: is it ok to insult ppl in public? Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

if eminem is a source of this sort of vulgarity, the government will not care because it is out in the open and it can be controlled if necessary. The underground groups that cause conspiracy are the real fear and enemies of the state.

Response to: another bigger threat II Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/30/03 12:41 AM, Anti-corruption wrote: don't u think that because of the ignorance and the stubborness from the people. it leads to the world lots of disorder.

of course, but the governments are to blame, not the proletariat

example of ignorance:- some of the "peace" protestors in the West are doing protesting that is simply superficial and worst of all stupid.

they are worth as much as the shirts on their back when it comes to political power, for example, look how much we've dissed them in this forum

example of stubborness:- because of refusing to take another media's perspective like the CNN and the FOX news, those Arab people are far more being conned by their own media. setting up furious and violent protesting. thus, leading to even building even thick walls between US and the Arab nation.

i didn't realize that Arabs had basic cable...where do they put the wire?

Response to: 0 Factor Posted March 30th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/30/03 01:16 AM, mysecondstar wrote:
it was painful saying that. i'm so anti-Kim Jong Il it isn't even funny. but the problem is that if we do that with everyone, we should technically be bullying the French right now. i know something will be done with Kim Jong Il, because, as you say, most cacti are spiky. but it just isn't right to assume that.

hey, we're on the same page here so i have absolutely no bone to pick with ya. :)

Response to: 0 Factor Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/29/03 03:07 PM, NJDeadzone wrote:
At 3/29/03 02:48 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote:
so I can't call Kim Jong Il a monstrous, bloodthirsty, overbearing, sadly cultured dictator because i don't have the privlege to live in NK?

ok so after mysecondstar's valid rebuttal i can only say that he is a cultured dictator. I reserve all the other comments to myself!!!!

Response to: 0 Factor Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/29/03 03:42 PM, mysecondstar wrote: there isn't any real proof that he is other than defectors from NK. and there is no way to independently find that out because no one can enter NK and if they are allowed in they don't get to see very much. it's unfair to call him that, although it's assumed he is, because we don't know first hand.

of course, but if you've never seen a cactus first hand, and you understand what a cactus is and its characteristics, you know that it's spiky, green, and is moist on the inside

Response to: Hussien/ Bin Laden Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/29/03 02:48 PM, bumcheekcity wrote:
they dont dislike us because of that. they hate us cos we opress them and make their lives shit.

no, i'm sorry, that one just crosses the line. Iraq, under Saddam invaded Kuwait 10 years ago. The US gave Iraq 10 years to shape up and still did trade with them for oil. Iraq is ruled by the man that has the record of most deaths of Arabs under his reign. He is a dicator that keeps his people in the 17th century and uses terrorism and deceit to add to his 12 Billion dollar assets. Given the opportunity to be left alone and never again be bothered by the world by leaving the country, he has chosen to let Iraq be decimated by coalition troops. In addition, he has forced his army to lie as being civilians, destroy humanitarian supplies from the coalition, and to put children in front of them as means of additional defense. Who's oppressing whom? Being nice just won't cut it when it's a people that have been taught not to tolerate anyone else.

Hussien/ Bin Laden

Response to: Feeling Futile Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/28/03 06:12 PM, bumcheekcity wrote:

you have to be nice to them and then they wont bomb you because they like you.

what if they never liked you, and don't ever plan to like you. Naivete was the cancer of the later 90s and early 00s. There's no popularity contest in the world...the rule is don't get in the US's way, since it's the only superpower now. If the US goes down, the world does too. It was the depression in the US after WWI during the 20s that screwed every European nation's economy and led to fascism. Although the US is its own entity, the world and the US live symbiotically now.

Response to: Perhaps we are too "nice" Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/28/03 06:02 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: Actual physical torture is NEVER an option.

Sleep deprivation, lights, hoses, but never actual violence. That's something you don't do to prisoners, for any reason.

put forced tolerance on that list too.

Response to: Too apologetic... Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/29/03 03:16 PM, Slizor wrote: And my analogy remains, if say HAMAS said "Surrender or we will bomb you" and the Israelis don't surrender, is it okay to bomb them?

does surrender mean to hand over illegal weapons? although in semantics it's not, i see your point Slizor. However, once this stupid scuffle is over, the history books will call it what it was.

Therefore, it's of no value to interpret this war validation or invalidation until it's over(and yes, ends justifies the means in reality :-\ )...

Response to: Who's line is it anyway? Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

if the UN does change Iraq, it must help the nation become co-existent with the world and not continue their one religion, one dicator, one economy lifestyle

Response to: 0 Factor Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/29/03 02:48 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote:
You have a right to complain about his foreign policy, but you have no right to call him a bad president unless you live here.

so I can't call Kim Jong Il a monstrous, bloodthirsty, overbearing, sadly cultured dictator because i don't have the privlege to live in NK?

Response to: 0 Factor Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/29/03 12:55 PM, jazz_mazter wrote:
They made an interesting point on that website. Bush never went into office until 2001... maybe he is spared from the curse then? :)

these presidents were elected into office in a year ending in 0, and took their oaths the following year so i believe Bush fits the parameters...sorry

Response to: Wacky Dissent! Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

bring chewbacca and yoda

0 Factor Posted March 29th, 2003 in Politics

Have you heard of the 0 factor? It's the coincidence of assassination attempts on presidents who were elected in a year ending in 0

1860-Lincoln(death)
1900-McKinley(death)
1960-Kennedy(death)
1980-Reagan(failed attempt but left president in critical condition)
2000-Bush(?)

will the trend continue?

Response to: "Peace" Protesters Posted March 28th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/28/03 12:21 AM, Newgrundling wrote:
"Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity."

even though it's friday, that's the quote of the day for yesterday

Response to: Al Queda Fighting With Iraqis Posted March 28th, 2003 in Politics

Osama is dead, all of his recordings are previously taped. This all could have been arranged, like no one else saw a second war in Iraq brewing when GWB took office. We are listening to an Orwellian Goldstein. Don't worship a corpse

Response to: "Peace" Protesters Posted March 28th, 2003 in Politics

::yawn:: these protestors are just losers that are following a fad.

The Anti-War movement is valid, but hardly should be represented by sponges that soak up the attention from media.

Response to: Thai police kills 42 Posted March 28th, 2003 in Politics

i'm glad they're enforcing the law...unfortunately, it had to result in this method.

Response to: 03/27:Firm to rebuild Iraq's oil Posted March 28th, 2003 in Politics

the whole coincidence is kinda fishy

Response to: Economy Posted March 28th, 2003 in Politics

capitalism, people like options

Response to: Anti-War/American Comparisons Posted March 27th, 2003 in Politics

At 3/26/03 11:34 PM, Jiperly wrote: isn't it in the constitution that if your are suffering a large series of equalities its not your right, but DUTY to protest?

Not even the Lockean principles mention "duty" to protest, however it's inevitable that an amount of people sufficient to promote change will do so in time.

Response to: Creationism in Public Schools Posted March 27th, 2003 in Politics

it's really difficult to comprehend a sponateuous creation of a universe...at least for me

Response to: A pic you won't see on Al Jazeera Posted March 27th, 2003 in Politics

it's ironic that despite centuries of advancement, both sides still consider the other barbarians

Response to: Creationism in Public Schools Posted March 27th, 2003 in Politics

yessir i expect more firestarters from ya