Be a Supporter!
Response to: ** Weapons - MaDe in teh USA ** Posted April 8th, 2003 in Politics

a man amongst boys....

Response to: Life without Jews?!?! Posted April 8th, 2003 in Politics

not to mention political campaign funders

Response to: You wanted WMDS? Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

tool*

Response to: You wanted WMDS? Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

just like a pitchfork is an agricultural too that can be used as a weapon

Response to: Operation Iraqi Boredom Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

the CNN headlines and sportscenter are the only things i volutarilly watch lately

Operation Iraqi Boredom Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

I'm getting very bored of this war....is it just me? I mean it's the same old sorry ass posts day in, day out. This war is too dominated by media to ever keep me guessing and i'm losing interest in it constantly. Anyone feel the same way?

Response to: Rant: WMDs! Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

"I swear, I did not know they were there!"

Response to: Joke Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

nice C++ there commander...I prefer Java

import java.WMD.*;

public class operationIraqiFreedom() extends Object{
public static void main(String[]args)throws Exception{
Doagain doagain=new Doagain();
operationIraqiFreedom oif=new operationIraqiFreedom();
boolean saddamisFound=false;
do{
while(!saddamisFound(){
oif.bombBaghdad();
}
System.out.println(oif.coverUp());
}while(doagain.AskBush());
}
}

Response to: Protest Coverage Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

removal and extermination are two entirely separate definitions. If Saddam's regime was able to co-exist with the US, there wouldn't be a problem. Dictatorships have been supported through the years by the United States, thus you can't compare the two. Just because a nation removes a leader from power does not mean it is out to eradicate his or her party from the face of the earth as you are implying.

Response to: Protest Coverage Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/7/03 03:35 PM, el_foka wrote: Am I the only one who has noticed that the stations seem to cover less and less of the demonstrations each day, and more and more of the "we support genocide" campaign? (sorry about the loaded question.)

Genocide- The systematic and planned extermination of an entire national, racial, political, or ethnic group

well i wouldn't say that the US is performing acts of genocide since it is removing a select few from power...however, it is clearly evident that Saddam has inflicted genocide on his own people through his one religion, one economy, one leader dictatorship.

So is your implied statement of the pro-war agitators your own opinion or are you just mocking them?

Response to: Now, just who armed Iraq? Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

radical religion enslaves the Middle East

Response to: France Sucks!!! Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

how many of these topics how we had before?

Response to: Rant: WMDs! Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

if i read the cannisters right, they had french writing on it...so i guess they must be french-indochinese

Response to: Isreal Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/7/03 03:24 PM, Jiperly wrote: ...ironically, was one of the three thing George Washington said not to do...

oh we've disobeyed him quite alot in the last century

Response to: Eye for an Eye Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

Saddam and Osama are nothing without the anti-support of viewers like you...

Response to: Lights Out Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/5/03 02:37 PM, Judge_DREDD wrote:
again NJDZ, i pity your gloomy view of the world :(

You may have noticed that i live on an island in the south pacific (you know what they say) ..never say never!

lol i'm not pessimistic, i'm practical. It leads to less dissapointment.

Response to: 3 Famous People u Most Admire Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

hot dog, we have a weiner!

Response to: 3 Famous People u Most Admire Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/7/03 01:15 AM, evilkate wrote:
And as much as everyone would like to believe there are equal rights now as there are supposed to be by law, there will always be inequalities between the treatment of the sexes. There are still companies where women are expected to be okay with getting paid less than men for doing the same job. There are still less women going to college than men. In fact, any woman that achieves something great should be honored especially because there is still a lot of discouragement due merely to her gender.

and on the other side of the spectrum, there are situations where an equally competent man gets beaten out of a job by a woman because the company needs to fill a quota...

Response to: Isreal Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/7/03 12:57 AM, thenark wrote:
so why does the world have to keep apologizing for something that will have been forgotten in 3 more generations. It happened, It's done, get over it.

because there are still survivors of those horrible acts. Maybe it doesn't affect you as much as it severely affects Jews and others who were systematically destroyed in front of negligent eyes of the world.

Response to: -- One thing that irks me -- Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

i'm not saying there shouldn't be...but i'm not gonna expect it. Fairness is a gift and a privilege.

Response to: -- One thing that irks me -- Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/7/03 12:41 AM, thenark wrote: Yeah, thats right. Iraq, which has no navy and their missile technology is behind that of Nazi Germany during world war 2. Perhaps they could threaten Israel, but speaking of breaking UN resoultions, Israel has broken more than any other country in the world. But the US isnt attacking them...

lol you're looking for fairness

Response to: 3 Famous People u Most Admire Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

i admire Queen Elizabeth, she was a very good queen

Response to: 3 Famous People u Most Admire Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

well i couldn't standing living in there, i'm glad i was untimely ripped

Response to: PC Pictures Post Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

too many rookies from general coming in here...

PC Pictures Post

Response to: Oh Chalabi Have Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/7/03 12:09 AM, Commander-K25 wrote: They have to figure out how to work things out between all the differing ethnic groups. One plan is for a sort of United Iraqi Commonwealth composed of semi-autonomous states based upon each region's inhabitants (Kurbs, Shi'ites, Sunni, etc.)

so in essence do you see a breakup of Iraq since the Kurds in their own regard do not co-exist with multiple governments. This appears to mimic the Hungarian problem in Austria a few centuries back, where the Magyars wanted independence.

Response to: -- One thing that irks me -- Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/6/03 11:59 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: You don't defend freedom if you start the war! If anything, the Iraqis are "defending anti-liberation".

The US is not defending freedom. It's defending the concept of co-existence without religious totalitarianism. If the Iraqis have freedom, they'll just vote another Saddam back into power. That's why the US will put one of its own generals in charge of the Interim government after this invasion is over.

Response to: Bush! Posted April 7th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/6/03 11:59 PM, final wrote: You know why we don't attack Saudi Arabia... Because we havent thought of a good enough reason to yet. But the Weapons of mass destruction idea was pretty good. bush is going from one country to the next getting the oil.. He started to attacks afghanistan b/c they stop building the oil pipeline that was going to be stealing the Russians Oil from the Caspian Sea. There was American envolvement in 9-11. They started toi build the pipeline again so we can sell all the oil to ASIA.

The US will continue to defeat Arab nations until they fall in line. This is not about oil. Yes this is bullying and yes this is highly immoral, but when religious totalitarianism dominates a sub-continent, measures must be taken to avoid further backwardness. If nations refuse to co-exist, they will be forced to or will be terminated. The US has been handling these invasions similarly to the Jetsons if they were fighting the Flintstones.

Saudi Arabia is the "Nelson" of the Middle East, easy to fund pranks, and is always the one to say "Ha,ha." But they won't be laughing soon as each nation surrounding them will be falling into line

Response to: Now, just who armed Iraq? Posted April 6th, 2003 in Politics

last time i checked, successful wars are the US's biggest money maker

Response to: Bush! Posted April 6th, 2003 in Politics

At 4/6/03 11:51 PM, Kazuo_Kiriyama wrote: Sorry guys. He posted this in the General forum and I recommended he posted it here so that he'd get tore up. Thanks. I knew you all would put him back in his place. I owe you one.

Kazuo "Grateful" Kiriyama

please don't unleash any more evil...keep the crap in general, we're supposed to be the filter, not the chlorine.

Response to: Now, just who armed Iraq? Posted April 6th, 2003 in Politics

i recall a huge bunker of Iraqi artillery and ammo being discovered and inventoried by forces...maybe it was an investment