Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I know alchohol might get a bad rep but sometimes just a little can enable you to be the person you want to be. Allow you to do things you were always too afraid to do. Granted sometimes that's a bad thing, but when you see a guy shitfaced drunk is he really an idiot or is he just being honest. Some might call it the same thing

if you have to shoot dont shoot to wound. otherwise your ass is SUED

that game was awesome

of course I can. I'm nhst really good at typing

I meant just dammit

NUBLUV123324: KiCK THE LAGGER!!!
Me: This isn't a RTS ffs there's no such thing as laggers

At 7/20/07 04:05 PM, firemario1 wrote: I can see perfectly fine in 60 FPS.

owned

the human eye sees at 60 fps. thats why in a game you cant tell the difference between 90 fps or 60 fps but you can tell the difference between 60 and 30.

At 7/20/07 03:37 AM, TommyGun wrote: LOL!

Kids today are stupid.

What is the framerate eyes can see anyway? Is it like 30-50 ish?

Curious, I is....

60 fps

"The human eye only sees 4 FPS. The only way you can see the framerate is if it dips to the point that one frame lasts more than a fourth of a second. If it's actually running one frame every one thirtieth of a second, then it looks exactly the same as 60 FPS or 15 FPS. You can't see the difference so long as the framerate is consistent. It doesn't matter how 1337 you or your system are, basic biology says you can't do it."

see post #4

oh dear... what are they teaching in primary schools nowadays?

At 6/22/07 06:08 PM, Musk wrote: You idiot, don't take work you can't do.

it's voluntary work, and nobody else is willing to do this. I'm doing this because if I don't translate the manual nobody else will. Plus i'm interested in what it has to say as well. I just need someone to help me with the tougher translations like "keine Sonarlauscher" which translates into "Sonar Eavesdropper" which is obvious incorrect when you see it in context.

so yeah I need help on tougher words.

cause I'm translating a manual for someone using babelfish and will need some help on some of the tougher translations.

At 6/9/07 04:26 PM, Memorize wrote:

At 6/9/07 03:41 PM, Musician wrote:

executions don't save money. An execution costs more than life imprisonment because of all the red tape they have to go through to kill someone. It's better to just give them a life sentence.

Or just give a family member a gun and pay him/her $50,000...

it's also morally wrong to kill anyone

At 6/5/07 08:05 PM, SolInvictus wrote:

At 6/5/07 08:01 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote: complete bullshit do the society a favor and KILL THEM there just wasting tax dollars using treatment, and there wont be a chance of them escalationg of turning on children

why not just execute every non-violent criminal, it would eliminate the possibility of them escalating their crimes and we wouldn't be wasting money on helping them get back into society.

executions don't save money. An execution costs more than life imprisonment because of all the red tape they have to go through to kill someone. It's better to just give them a life sentence.

"for great justice!"

"大きい正義&#12 398;ため!"

"Because of large justice!"

You're right cellardoor, just because gun control has been unable to prevent a few isolated incidents we should throw caution to the wind and allow everyone and thier mum to have military-issue fully automatic weapons. Don't worry, why would we want to use them to kill people when they're good for so many other things?

Idiot

At 5/28/07 10:20 PM, the-dunce wrote:

At 5/28/07 10:19 PM, Musician wrote:

At 5/28/07 10:17 PM, strumpy wrote: At 5/28/07 10:16 PM, Musician wrote

I'm downloading it right now to check it out.

Virus +1

I got the link from wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuma_Games

Wikipedia is anti-virus software?

no you missed my point. If wikipedia says it's for real I believe it.
besides, I've already installed and nothing's gone wrong

At 5/28/07 10:17 PM, strumpy wrote: At 5/28/07 10:16 PM, Musician wrote

I'm downloading it right now to check it out.

Virus +1

I got the link from wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuma_Games

http://www.kumagames.com/

I'm not sure how exactly I can explain this but... basically this website releases quality video games in episodes . And everything they do is fully sponsored so you get everything for free. I'm downloading it right now to check it out.

Is WW2 finally over?

haha there was a newgrounds porn site. That's just fucking hilarious.

newdgrounds.com

no www in front of it either. it will bypass your filter if your school only blocks newgrounds URL as opposed to its IP.

hey thanks I actually ended up changing the choice variable to a string (included the string library).

Hey I've got a problem. I set up this text RPG script that i'm going to use for a game but there's a minor glitch with it. you see I have this integer variable called choice. and when you have to make a decision you make an input into choice and it will select the right output depending on which number you choose. Problem is, if you enter anything other than an integer, the whole game goes into an infinite loop and continues pasting the choices over and over.

Here's the code:
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
int choice;
cout << "Welcome to...\n";
cout << "HARRISEN QUEST\n";
cout << "a game developed by Jonathan McEntee\n\n";
cout << "Press any Key to continue\n";
cin.ignore(1);
while (choice != 5){
cout << "\nYou awaken to find that X has occured\n";
cout << "Option 1: ...\n";
cout << "Option 2: ...\n";
cout << "Option 3: ...\n";
cout << "Option 4: ...\n";
cout << "Option 5: Exit Game\n";
cout << ">";
cin >> choice;
switch(choice){
case 1:
{
cout << "\ntest1\n\n";
break;
}
case 2:
{
cout << "\ntest2\n\n";
break;
}
case 3:
{
cout << "\ntest3\n\n";
break;
}
case 4:
{
cout << "\ntest4\n\n";
break;
}
}
}
return 1;
}

actually your name is kinda familiar

At 4/25/07 02:32 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Jesus Christ.

We seem to waging some war against smoking yet obesity is silently wobbling around.

fix'd

At 4/19/07 06:02 AM, IllustriousPotentate wrote: The Supreme Court upheld a 2003 ban on partial-birth abortions. It did not overturn Roe v. Wade, nor is abortion illegal as the result of this ruling. The results of this particular ruling will have few effects—only 0.17%, or 17 out of every 10,000 abortions is a partial birth abortion.

it's still a step backwards

alright i've been working HARD for more than 3 months now to try and get a six pack. I started with just running 7 days a week for 20 minutes. then 7 days a week for 30 minutes, then 5 days a week for 40 minutes. all of that time I was doing a standard amount of crunches every other day.

later I got into weight lifting and my current routine is now one day I do benching and other arm excercises, the next day I do running then the next day I do all ab excersises (70 excersice ball crunches, and 40 leg lifts with the excercise ball currently).

the first month I lost girth like crazy. but really I havn't seen any noticable changes in the past 2 months. so here's my question...

what the hell do I have to do to get a six pack?

also if you're going to suggest something please go into specifics.

sorry for being so blunt in the title. I hasnt been completely banned, but the supreme court has ruled that "partial-abortion" isn't constitutional. the new interpretation has no exceptions to the rule, even if the health of the mother is threatened.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/19/us/politics /19react.html

At 4/17/07 09:33 PM, GoryBlizzard wrote: You just have to know where to look.

where?

I cant ask him this we're not on good terms right now. But it is important