For some reason I keep listening to Represent by (hed) PE

Can you get me some opium while you're there?

Say what?

Death is cool.

You see, kids... money fucks people up.... Working repetitive jobs to feed a family that cares more about the television than you fucks families up... If people would just talk to each other openly and spend less time watching the TV and being materialistic, things would change.

I have to say: this story reminds me of my family. You're not as uncommon as you might think.

Google Wave seems seriously dope. It's just... most of the time, all you want to do is drop an email, a Facebook status update or something. Due to the fast world that we live in... well... you're not going to be on the computer at the same time as other people, most likely.

There are loads of reasons to love Linux, namely, "there are tons of great free programs", "you can run it off a memory stick"

But then there's the... "When I plug in my USB Wifi dongle, why do I have to spend 5 hours browsing the web so I can learn how to type in lines of code just to get it to fucking work"

Pros and cons. It's still early days.

Version 9.10 of Ubuntu, coming out in 5 days, will have an app store, like the iPhone. I think this will really change the game and make installing software a lot easier.

This post is too self-reflective to be real.

I couldn't help but laugh at this t-shirt. Does this make me a bad boy?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8okYhcRwr gY

I swear, if one of you make a joke about this..

He sure does love women. Photoshop it.

I can't believe how stupid and uneducated humanity is.

At 9/23/09 02:46 PM, sharpnova wrote: Environmentalism is just a bunch of young hippies who have nothing better to pour their energy into (due to lack of intelligence enabling them to pour it into something constructive) and instead want to force their will on others.

Well, actually, it's the world's largest corporations backing this new environmentalism -- because there is a lot of money to be made out of it.

See article: http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Green Business/idUSTRE58F5R320090916

At 9/23/09 01:03 PM, AapoJoki wrote:

At 9/23/09 01:01 PM, Mr-Money wrote:

At 9/22/09 04:29 PM, Patton3 wrote: Showing an extreme side of any group proves nothing.

I'm sorry... but Gordon Brown's adviser calling for a 50% cut in world population

By what year?

Well, the thing is: he doesn't specify. Most of them don't. What we're seeing is an attempt to gradually introduce the concept of population reduction to the general public, to see if people will accept it.

Infinite wishes

And by the way, when Obama's science czar calls for a planetary military regime to enforce population control, that IS Nazism. That isn't me exaggerating. That isn't me calling people I don't like Nazis. It is in fact, cold blooded Nazism.

x10hosting.com is quite good, as is freehostia.com

At 9/22/09 04:29 PM, Patton3 wrote: Showing an extreme side of any group proves nothing.

I'm sorry... but Gordon Brown's adviser calling for a 50% cut in world population is not an "extreme side". Obama's science czar calling for mass sterilisation is not an "extreme side". These people are as close to the men in power as you can get.

Yeah, you go fight those cavemen! I'm sure they're a real threat to the world.

At 9/22/09 02:51 PM, poxpower wrote:

At 9/22/09 02:08 PM, Mr-Money wrote:

That is correct. I never said they wanted to kill people off.

So what exactly do they have in common with Nazis?
I can't really think of a single thing.

They both believe in cutting the population dramatically in a top-down fashion. How's that?

At 9/22/09 02:29 PM, StCyril wrote: Plus it does damage to the body's immune system and although not as quickly CAUSES THE SAME PROBLEMS AS SMOKING!

No, I'm afraid it's the tobacco that causes health problems. Tobacco is not found in marijuana.

And news flash: drinking a can of diet coke causes brain damage. Let's ban Coca Cola!

At 9/22/09 02:28 PM, AapoJoki wrote: Those who have no children at all are doing a great environmental deed.

Wow.. even though every human could fit into the state of Texas and have an acre of land, you continue to believe this propaganda..

At 9/22/09 02:22 PM, StCyril wrote:

At 9/22/09 02:20 PM, Mr-Money wrote: You have no answer to that question because there is no answer. It is pure hypocrisy. Weed must be legalised.

Actually jerkoff, I do have an answer. Cigs SHOULD be illegal, and they are getting there. There are now all kinds of laws making it illegal to make outside of designated areas, and tolerance for it is quickly shrinking away, plus they are $5 a pack now. Cigs killed my grandparents and I would rather they be illegal now.

OK, that's fair enough. At least you believe that both should be illegal. That is a start. However, weed is not harmful.

And if I want to harm myself, I have the right to do that. Think about that for a while.

At 9/22/09 02:16 PM, StCyril wrote: Stop trying legalize your drug habit under the guise of good intentions!

CIGARETTES ARE LEGAL. They are proven to kill people. So why should weed be illegal, when cigarettes are legal?

You have no answer to that question because there is no answer. It is pure hypocrisy. Weed must be legalised.

OK, so which gene pools will be continued and which will be killed off?

Or will we have a one-child policy like in China?

At 9/22/09 01:58 PM, Ericho wrote: I think what they mean is that they want birth control and fewer people being born, not to kill the people that are living.

That is correct. I never said they wanted to kill people off.

You can have any freedom you want if you just get up off your ass and do something.

At 9/22/09 01:49 PM, Victory wrote: You must acknowledge that, speaking from a purely environmental point of view, in our current lifestyles large numbers of humans have a devastating impact? That is.. obvious.

Really, what point are you actually making? Environmentalists have a secret agenda of pursuing National Socialism? I know you have a history of whacky conspiracy theories, but damn..

No....... The point I'm making is that they openly believe in cutting the population by up to 80%. That's what I'm saying. Now, if you think that's a good thing, you sicken me and I don't even want to hear any future responses from you. If that is not your opinion, please continue with your argument.

Here are some more sources

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-
1105255/Britain-set-population-limit-saf eguard-national-security-say-experts.htm l

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1107696/

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/en vironment/article3908588.ece

A new meme has been born

I find it funny how most prominent environmentalists just happen to believe in cutting the size of the population dramatically

Here are just a few articles I've been reading in the past few months:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/po litics/article5950442.ece

http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/0 8/07/having-children-brings-high-carbon-
impact/

http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/
04/01/why-does-anyone-have-children/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environ ment/climatechange/6161742/Contraception -cheapest-way-to-combat-climate-change.h tml

Feel free to bring on the debate