Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Is this really the best picture google has for atom bomb corpses? Seriously. It's so old.
http://www.japanfocus.org/data/dead%20bo dy.JPG

...I guess the person looks burned to a crisp. Maybe i'm over thinking this. People probably just get seriously burned and shaken around.

I just want to know a few things

1) What the person looks like while directly inside of the blast. (like 5 seconds into it)
2) What they look like afterward
3) hotdug

theres still no good pictures about this at all on the internet

At 6/20/10 03:00 AM, xports wrote:

At 6/20/10 02:57 AM, MisterDielectric wrote: I want to know what the body will LOOK LIKE when that happens.

It's very simple. The force of a shockwave causes your insides to switch places with your outsides.

Imagine a hunk of raw meat.

I doubt a person would look like raw meat after that.

I'm dead serious, i want answers. real answers

.............link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-22tna7KH zI

I was in a very altered state of mind (lol) while watching nuclear bomb detonation video. It's a simulation, but real enough.

At :21 seconds is when the shockwave hits the camera.

Just for the sake of the question i'm going to ask; consider the postion of the camera a human being looking at the explosion.

Would a person standing in that position at :21 seconds die instantly when that shockwave hits them? I googled the effects of nuclear bombs on humans for about ten minutes and couldn't find anything that satisfied me. There's no simulation or raw footage in which there's a human model showing the effects of the blast.

The only thing I really found is that the sudden change of air pressure makes people die. I want to know what the body will LOOK LIKE when that happens. Does the body move in every direction and get vaporized? Like when that pressure shockwave hits you, do you basically shake around violently and maybe die within 5 seconds?

/random as fuck, i know...but seriously.

It looks perfect, you're being a hardcore knit-picker. I for one, think that non-pupil style looks best.
It works very well for "Metal Gear Awesome".

Soulless faces look the best.

At 6/16/10 04:28 PM, EclecticEnnui wrote:

At 6/16/10 04:08 PM, MisterDielectric wrote:

At 6/16/10 03:48 PM, EclecticEnnui wrote: No, you're a fact.

You're a troll who needs to fuck off.

No, you're a fact.

Guess there should've been a "*wink*" earlier.

no idea what you're saying

Okay, let this topic die now.

At 6/16/10 03:48 PM, EclecticEnnui wrote: No, you're a fact.

You're a troll who needs to fuck off.

At 6/16/10 04:31 AM, whatty wrote: Niether Slipknot or Korn are shit bands. They were very original in their time. So you're obviously a shit band.

The late nineties is the only time when nu-metal bands like Slipknot of KoRn were relevant. Yeah, they were the shit back then.

But they're shit now. This is a fact.

At 6/16/10 06:02 AM, Icecry0 wrote: even if you like what your listening too, it still might suck.

be wary

haha exactly.

At 6/16/10 01:08 AM, Eclipse wrote: Just because your music fits into what some people consider "gay" or "stupid" doesn't mean shit. If you enjoy it, it isn't affecting anyone else. It shouldn't matter.

Yeah it just baffles me that SOAD is considered gay music. It's just beyond me.

At 6/16/10 12:06 AM, ryanson209 wrote: It insults all those other bands that System of a Down be categorized in "nu-metal."

Are you agreeing with me or......?

At 6/15/10 07:52 PM, GoryBlizzard wrote: SOAD is nu-metal, but nu-metal has many different names. I hate using the term "nu-metal" because it confuses people and leads a lot of people to think that it's a valid metal sub-genre, which it's not. Equivalent names for it include aggressive rock, aggro rock or mallcore. I tend to stick with saying aggro rock--it's precise and doesn't really have the same negative connotations as "nu-metal" or "mallcore." I'm a pretty big metalhead and as far as aggro rock bands go, SOAD is one of the much better ones out there.

Ha, well that settles it. Aggro-rock seems to be metal style music with added elements. Like hip-hop, grunge, techno, or whatever. That's probably the most specific genre for SOAD.

One song I can think of is "shame on a nigg a" a song made with the wu-tang clan. Most heavy metal bands do not add any sort of hip-hop to their music. So that makes them experimental also.

It makes me wonder if System of a Down were reunited, if most people would think it's "whack". Obviously people like me wouldn't. But possibly the majority of Metal Listeners may consider them a thing of the past.

Excuse my lack of knowledge, im just spitballin' here.

At 6/15/10 05:58 PM, MrCrawford wrote: I refer you to the band "Blut Aus Nord". Particularly the song "Procession of Dead Clowns". You might see where I'm coming from.

gets extremely repetetive though

At 6/15/10 05:58 PM, MrCrawford wrote: I refer you to the band "Blut Aus Nord". Particularly the song "Procession of Dead Clowns". You might see where I'm coming from.

listening to that gave me amusement. thx

At 6/15/10 05:54 PM, MrCrawford wrote: SOAD actually belongs to the "shit" genre.

fuck u

I keep coming across websites who categorize System of a Down as nu-metal. Which is disappointing... I understand music is music, and genres really don't matter as long as you enjoy the songs.

But the genre nu-metal does not do any justice for SOAD. Shitty bands like Slipknot, KoRn, Linkin park, godsmack, or whatever are all classified as nu-metal. These bands are obviously shit and do not measure up to SOAD.

In my opinion its an insult to music for System of a Down to be in this genre, and it lowered my taste for SOAD's music. Why can't they just be in the metal category? Honestly.

/end/ pointless thread...

Nintendocore is weird.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ra5VcU8f gE
Friend showed me this, it's awesome.

At 5/23/10 12:36 AM, giveupyourwaffles wrote: oh I don't know..... the flash portal, the audio portal, the art portal.... You should really claim "The BBS" or "General" is going downhill when you make these type of threads.

Newgrounds doesn't suck, it's an amazing website with good flash animators always posting stuff. It just seemed a little more exciting during the 2006-2007 time. At least for me, i'm pretty much ignorant to the flash portal nowadays.

The General forum sucks ass now. . It can be fun sometimes...(not really)

As for flash, I think it was better a few years ago.
Back when Adam Philips made theYuYu, Metal Gear Awesome was still hilarious, Tankmen came out, Doki (david firth) Made 3 insane flash movies that I still watch ALL the time, back in 2007.

w/e i'm just spitballin' here.

It's 2010, tell me about one thing that doesn't suck.

seriously

Yesterday I was bored, so I tried knife throwing. I wanna get pro at throwing knives. Fun to do when you're bored and have no pussy to fuck.

You're cool, get a neck tattoo and be even cooler.

At 5/22/10 03:42 PM, MasterOfAssassins wrote: I think that they just learn to accept the fact everyone dies. God knows I've already got that.

I'm not compelled to say why, but in a PM I will.

post it in here, who cares

You can't handle this random thought.

Do old people ever get so scared about their impending death that they go into depressed-trances?...imagine an old person so uncomfortable with the fact they could possibly die at any moment, wouldn't their remaining years be spent in a fear-paralyzing-death-trance. Where they just look at a wall and think "fuck...holy shit, i'm going to die soon"

Nobody ever mentions how much being +65 years old must suck for that reason, I imagine that it is a big thing they think about.

My point is... penis.

Social networking is so social, get with it.

At 5/22/10 09:44 AM, xXShortEmoKidXx wrote:

At 5/22/10 09:35 AM, AlexCo wrote: CRAWLING IN MY SKINNNN, THESE WOUNDS, THEY WILL NOT HEALLLLL.

lol

the fuck?

It probably made sense in his head.

At 5/22/10 05:26 AM, Eclipse wrote: So, I've been up all night so far, downed probably 5 monsters from 9pm to 4am and I can honestly say I've never felt better. My mood is elevated, music sounds amazing (Especially SOAD), I'm a ton happier and I feel like its 3pm.

Do you guys ever pull all nighters? Seeing as how this is NG, I'm guessing you guys do frequently. Do any of you enjoy it?

The times I feel the best are while i'm staying up all night, (listening to SOAD alot also) drawing, using flash, or just random internet stuff, even homework assignments. I've been doing this every other day for months now. But it messed up your mood during the day because it screws normal sleep patterns, but it's still worth it.

The one things I can say certainly about my life is that 2am - 4am are productive and happy times.

Her ass is criminal.

*fap fep fap*

At 5/20/10 05:21 AM, Zalamel wrote: 4 days. But Les Stroud always had the bare minimum, I recommend making a large kit to take with you. The point is to be self reliant, not starve yourself.

Don't mean to drag this on, but sleeping in the forest at night is horrifying for the average person, did you at least have another person to snuggle with at night?

At 5/20/10 05:03 AM, Zalamel wrote: I have done it. And many other people do it, they're called Survivalists. Or outdoordmen. When you have nothing to rely on but yourself, you start to appreciate life.

How long did you do it, Les Stroud? lol

At 5/20/10 04:58 AM, Zalamel wrote: You wanna be happy? Live in the woods. I'm serious. Build up a survival kit and just go in the woods and live. For however long you want. The you will value life.

Have you ever done that? Who the fuck does that?

The 9/11 hijackers were on robot-steroids.

it's 5am...

n i g g e r s because they never pay rent