13,861 Forum Posts by "Memorize"
At 7/12/06 07:44 AM, JohnnyWang wrote:
Sure, the risks are inprobable, but when they happen, then it's hell.
Sure, but there's a very very very very (how ever many more you want to put there, go ahead) small chance of that ever happening.
We need to cut our electricity usage, period.
As long as i'm paying for electricity, i'll use however much I want.
At 7/11/06 08:34 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: H.W. Bush bla bla bla
Way to give me the history lesson of which I already know.
*thumbs up*
At 7/11/06 08:59 PM, o_r_i_g_i_n_a_l wrote:
I thought Americans were proud of their justice system. Not too scared to use it.
No, I hate our Justice System. It sucks (sometimes). How can you honestly rule in favor of a robber who broke his leg trying to break into someone's home? How can you rule in favor as someone as stupid as the lady who spilt hot cofee onto herself? How can you send a man to prison for walking into his room finding someone who's raping his wife and then killing that man who's raping his wife?
I guess it's not our system...it's our dumbass jury members and judges.
At 7/11/06 11:54 PM, Elfer wrote:
Well god damn it, we should be able to torture people and hold them indefnitely without any sort of trial or evidence against them whenever we want!
*Terrorist shoots at US soldiers*
*Terrorist is somehow captured*
*Terrorist is sent to Guantanamo Bay*
Activists: "They deserve to be treated like human beings!"
I don't really see the logic in this.
Human rights are rights for humans, no matter how shitty those humans may be.
Iraqis had shitty human rights...
But oh look, once we thought "OMG, Saddam doesn't have WMDs", human rights for Iraqi's went down the shitter.
You signed the international treaties, you agree to the rules set out in said treaties.
Uh, no. I didn't sign it. If you mean the head honchos who decided to sign it back in the day, then yes, you could say America signed it. But being as to how we're not a true democracy, then no, America didn't sign it.
At 7/11/06 07:48 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: The Gulf War was successful because the elder Bush knew when the job was done.
Funny thing is, we're in Iraq and guess what? Our jobs not done.
I'd usually apply the term "Dumbass" to you, but then I'd bet you'd pull a whole bunch of old arguements out of your ass that has nothing to do what we're talking about.
Anyway, my point is, the liberal population of today bitches about the US death count...when it's the Lowest of a war in US history (fine, technically not a war, but neither was Vietnam). Basically, liberals are bullshitting themselves into thinking many US soldiers are dying.
And yes, the War was also considered successful due to the "low" death count of the Gulf War, I didn't say there was nothing else to add to successful.
You heared it here folks. The supreme court has ruled that suicidal maniacs that target civilians should be treated with kindness.
Whoa...this is New York?
I never thought it possible.
At 7/10/06 03:04 AM, Ravariel wrote:
Yeah... how've we done since then? Thought so.
Killed the leader of Al Quida in Iraq. Performed hundreds of successful raids because of the documents we found there. Found out their future plans.
The average death toll in Iraq (US deaths) is about 63 deaths per month. Every single US war previous to Iraq had much much more, for example the Gulf War had around 300 a month yet it was considered successful due to it's once thought of low death rate.
A.K.A The media sucks today.
Nuclear Energy is probly the best kind of energy we can have at this point. And no, it's not that dangerous.
At 7/9/06 06:45 PM, Thespus wrote:
Anyone with an ounce of common sense and an education level above High School sophomore would know that decade-old mustard gas isn't usable as a weapon. They found shell casings, not bombs. I don't know why you still believe that there are WMD's in Iraq. It's disturbing.
It's disturbing how damn retarded you are.
Let me put this in a way you can understand. Mustard gas (decades old) does not have the destructive potential as it did (i've already admitted to this in this thread). However, it can still do small, but severe damage.
Way to NOT read!
I could write something completely off of my head right now and chances are, i'll somehow be plagarizing from something whether it be a book, magazine or news article.
You can't spell Unethical without UN.
I don't think the UN is that bad...it just has it's rough spots. I just think they owe a lot more to the US than they give considering that the US makes up most of their stuff.
At 7/9/06 05:33 PM, Thespus wrote:
It goes a little differently, I believe, for the originator of this very old thread and people like you, Access.
I feel loved.
"There were WMD's in Iraq!"
"Old WMD's found that can't be used in any fashion other than creating a big bump on someone's head."
"Well, uh, these are the same!"
Interesting...as the fact is that there were and still are WMDs there.
I like technicalities. Don't you?
"There are absolutely NO WMDs in Iraq"
*Old WMDs found that could be "destructive"*
"Well, uh, these aren't the same"
Canada's Healthcare. It's a lot like care insurance, it's helpful if you're accident prone, but if not, it's just a huge waste of money.
At 7/8/06 06:45 PM, _rainmaker_ wrote:
Well, in some senses they had a much more strict moral value, but in others, morals lacked. Dueling ring a bell? It was a legal practice in those days, simply because man wanted to avenge his name. Dueling (successfully) while not practiced, follows "murder" nowadays, and is obviously a felony.
Back in the day. Dueling was a regular thing.
I never said they could just look at America and just know everything that's going on. I think they would actually be extremely proud of the US considering the Nation they brought up is now the world super power.
I have to agree with JMHX, wholeheartedly. Yeah, everything didn't turn out as planned. Not much did, actually. We have political parties, economic dependency on other nations, etc. He's right, but what's to be done about it? Nothing.
I think they would be very proud. But as far as social values go they would be more angry with Liberals.
Considering the Founding Fathers had much more strict moral values...I'd say they'd be more angry against the one's wanting to tax the people more. :D
Now we're comparing Bush to Saddam...hey I finally agree with Liberals, America IS stupid. AHH, get it off, it's rubbing off on me!
Only a complete fucking moron would compare Bush to Hitler and/or Bush to Saddam.
*rubs nose pointing to Reverand_Kyle*
At 7/7/06 04:06 AM, FAB0L0US wrote: OUR people are dying in a godforsaken shithole across the globe
As much of a shithole as anyone can call it...it's not that bad. Of course, this is just comparing to other US battles across the globe. The States have gotten soft over the years.
At 7/7/06 03:24 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: It was funny, Bush recommitted to catching bin Laden on Larry King last night, but made no mention that the hunt was called off.
Who knows, why, it just might mean our focus has been shifted. Maybe, just maybe.
At 7/6/06 03:25 PM, Proteas wrote:
It's not reporting the news or what actually happened, it's sensationalist bullshit.
I hate it when posts make it seem im directly refering to the person above me.
Wow. Just completely skip over YoureAllStupid's post.
Way to go.
At 7/5/06 12:41 PM, FightingForFreedom wrote:
No oil there. Sorry.
If we wanted oil. We'd tell the enviornmentalists to fuck off and we'd start drillin'.
I don't mind paying taxes. But considering the government spends billions of dollars on useless crap...
I like him because he pisses all you people off.
At 7/3/06 05:31 PM, VigilanteNighthawk wrote: To summarize this thread: The united nations doesn't do what the united states wants, so we should leave it.
Even tho in this entire thread and topic starter didn't even say anything like that. Just that it was a waste of money and isn't performing it's job very well in recent days.
If that bear had come onto my property, i'd have shot it regardless of those dellusional idiots known as Enviornmentalists.
At 7/3/06 04:50 PM, emmytee wrote: Bush barred the election inspectors from America when he was elected.
And just to be fair. There was also Al Gore with his "What!? Miltary personel from overseas voting? I'll have none of that!"
At 7/3/06 01:06 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:
I know how you love the blood of the innocent.
*licks lips*
