At 10/27/07 10:19 PM, Twerpo wrote: Quite honestly, I think you chose the wrong shirts.

Here are links to shirts that I could possibly wear:

http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/14/14172000/ng bbs470420f04a74f.jpg
http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/14/14218000/ng bbs47098a28077ed.jpg
http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/14/14178000/ng bbs470519ba51ff1.jpg
http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/14/14182000/ng bbs4705618a6fca0.jpg
http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/14/14190000/ng bbs47068c04cf4bd.jpg http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/14/14227000/ng bbs470aaf91678cc.jpg
http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/14/14248000/ng bbs470d65eb1ce64.jpg

Sure, these shirts may not be original, but so fucking what. The whole point of the t-shirt contest was not originality or artistic ability, but overall what design would both look good enough to wear and market NG effectivly. Quite honestly, the designs that picked, though they do have artistic quality, do not give the every day person a clue as to what it is a reference to. Zekey's is just fucking random and so is the one with random images. Even the Strawberry Clock shirt would be lost on most people.

The shirts above, in my opinion, represent NG in a stylish way and would be much better choices for winners.

I love your thinking, hopefully these go up for sale too.

Congratulations to all the winners. I will be buying several of those shirts as soon as I get some money D:

why is it that every tankmen pardoy makes fun off it using the word penis and cock and other words just because that one with the cock joke and the one where they compare penis is funny doesnt mean everyone else can do it this is toward any authors who might read this you suck yo bad to make up your own idea cmon get creative god damn

At 6/25/06 04:17 PM, MarineJarod wrote:

At 6/25/06 04:00 PM, americaman wrote:

At 6/25/06 03:20 PM, MarineJarod wrote: If you have a problem with my spelling go to another fourm topic and start a new thread talking about my spelling.

Sorry skippy I cant dot hat jack.

if that made any sense id make a comeback or i would except the insult....

accept*

At 6/25/06 04:00 PM, americaman wrote:

At 6/25/06 03:20 PM, MarineJarod wrote: If you have a problem with my spelling go to another fourm topic and start a new thread talking about my spelling.

Sorry skippy I cant dot hat jack.

if that made any sense id make a comeback or i would except the insult....

And now I will end this argument about spelling. This is not what my post is about i want answers and comments about my original post. If you have a problem with my spelling go to another fourm topic and start a new thread talking about my spelling.

At 6/25/06 03:12 PM, americaman wrote:

At 6/25/06 03:09 PM, MarineJarod wrote: i know a lot of people who have the same question and um spelling mistake with a lot lol

I have no clue what the fuck your stupid ass is saying.

lol you want me to slow down okay i know people who have the same question as my main post.STOP. You have a spelling mistake with the word a lot.STOP. You spelt a lot the following way: alot.STOP. Do you understand now ?STOP.

At 6/25/06 02:42 PM, americaman wrote:

At 6/25/06 02:29 PM, MarineJarod wrote: this makes two people who arent offended by my spelling to where they have to change the subject.

Well when its a useless and dumbass subject it kinda gets changed alot.

i know a lot of people who have the same question and um spelling mistake with a lot lol

this makes two people who arent offended by my spelling to where they have to change the subject.

At 6/25/06 01:23 PM, C-Damage wrote:

At 6/25/06 01:18 PM, doom_fan wrote: Stephen Harper sucks total ass!!!!!!

Thats not one of the options.

Thats my answer how can he be great if i dont know him?

At 6/25/06 02:02 PM, MarineJarod wrote:

At 6/25/06 01:59 PM, americaman wrote:

At 6/25/06 01:58 PM, MarineJarod wrote: There wasnt more than 10 if you think you can understand and aslo i was rushed

Were you rushed in that post too?

what do you mean was i rushed there is no spelling errors in that post if this helps "if you think, you can understand" im sorry i didnt work on punctuation.

At 6/25/06 02:00 PM, BigScizot wrote: Well first of all the Taliban is finnaly out of Afghanistan so that's probably the reason why you haven't been hearing a lot about the country.
And about Saddam the reason why we got him is because he's been commiting crimes against humanity for decades. The reason that we went into Iraq was because the CIA thought that there were WMD's in there but we soon found out that there weren't. There also was and still is a large number of Terrorist groups there.

Oh yeah and please learn to spell. I counted 13 errors in your first post in this topic.

Yes exactly there was a threat in Iraq i never said there wasnt. And if you had to take the time out of you life to count my errors then go pick on someone else like i said i was rushed (church)

At 6/25/06 01:59 PM, americaman wrote:

At 6/25/06 01:58 PM, MarineJarod wrote: There wasnt more than 10 if you think you can understand and aslo i was rushed

Were you rushed in that post too?

Because i had to go to church

At 6/25/06 01:55 PM, americaman wrote: Im sorry but I could not even read the origional post due to all those spelling errors.

There wasnt more than 10 if you think you can understand and aslo i was rushed

At 6/25/06 01:18 PM, doom_fan wrote: Stephen Harper sucks total ass!!!!!!

who the hell is Stephen Harper?

At 6/25/06 01:05 PM, SevenSeize wrote:

At 6/25/06 12:57 PM, MarineJarod wrote: My argument is not that we left Afghanistan its why did we put our main focuse directly to Iraq i never at any point said we left Afghanistan completely we put 90% of our efforts to the Iraqi situation.:

Right after 9/11, we did directly put our focus on Afghanistan. It stayed that way until the war in Iraq. Then we put more troops in Iraq. We are still very active in Afghanistan. NBC nightly news said we are making somewhere around 100 air strikes a month in Afghanistan. I'm not advocating the war in Iraq, I'm simply stating that we started out with full efforts in Afghanistan. Operation Enduring Freedom began in Afghanistan, not Iraq. Right now, our main focus is on Iraq. It will eventually be back on Afghanistan. Even if we don't like the war in Iraq, some resolve must now be reached because we already invaded the country. We are still looking for Osama Bin Laden, but I don't think he's in Afghanistan anyway.

I agree I dont think hes in iraq but you did just answer my piont we went into Iraq not long after we were in Afghanistan which i see as why did we eradicate Sudam before finding our main problem Osama?

At 6/25/06 11:10 AM, megamanfrk wrote: no contry needs to have an army. It's a waste of time, lives, and money. I'm an american and i'm not proud of america right now. It used to be a great country untill george bush was "elected" president after cheating. So much money is being wasted in america to go to the war in Iraq ...See how much money is being wasted . It's coming out of all of our taxes in such high amounts and when hurricane Katrina hit, all of out troops were in Iraq so there was barly anyone to go to New orleans. George bush didn't even go there untill a week after Katrina hit. He doesn't care about our country. Then after hurricane Katrina, gas prices went to an incredibly high over $3 amounts per gallon. About $3.40+ per gallon at all gas places. The only good news to look foward to are the senate polls in november......and after that, 2008

Buddy im afraid you see the point of having an army. Im army all the way. They pay for your college and they give you extra money here and there also its a way of getting experince before having a serious job if you plan to have one. When you get the lucky an hard job to be president you get rid of our army. The only thing that happens is if we had no army at all we would be vulnerable to those with armys. And unless you are some kind of miracle worker I dont think everyone is going to get rid of their army because its not all war purpose its also homeland security and and an enforcement force. And bud I may be 14 but I've done well that enough resarch on politics and the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines to know what im talking about.

At 6/25/06 10:50 AM, -Michael- wrote:

At 6/25/06 10:25 AM, bcdemon wrote:

At 6/25/06 10:03 AM, Shifty55 wrote: you guys get free healthcare

NO WE DO NOT GET FREE HEALTHCARE
Some pay for thier healthcare through higher provincial taxes, others pay straight out of pocket for it. I pay $1356 a year (3 people) for healthcare in British Columbia. Please oh please point me to this "free healthcare" you speak of.

Canadian, chill. It's too cold in the forum and it's going to your head. Canadians do get free healthcare, but it entirely depends on organ harvesting from the native peoples.

\
Alright buddy listen im an american iand even i understand next time you get the chance look on the back of any book or anything that has a price tag then look at the us canada differences ok? see how its more? they all pay for their health care but most of the time not directly they pay for it when they buy everyday things because they are charged more.

My argument is not that we left Afghanistan its why did we put our main focuse directly to Iraq i never at any point said we left Afghanistan completely we put 90% of our efforts to the Iraqi situation.

Um... hmmm havent you guys ever wondered why Bush didnt keep the war in Afghanistan? That was origanally who attacked us right? The Al Khida were in Afghanistan so why did we go to war mostly with Iraq? Sure they posted a threat but havent you wondered if he was finishing his dads unfinished work with Sudam Huesain? After all his dad went to war with him during Operation Desert Storm in 1991. But unfortartantly he ws unable to stay in office. Also why are we still in Iraq think of all those soilders in Iraq still been there for 4 years wanting to come back. We got rid of Sudam and we have a trained a police force and a little army. Now we are trying to change them and since there is no longer an army of hostile threat against the U.S. only a very hard to deal with sucidal Iraqi resistance. i think we should get are men out of Iraq let them blow them selves up till they relize what they are doing then swap a fresh group of soilders to deal with our main problem Afghanistan. Also we should take some of the oil from Iraq to compensate for our loses and our time and our help and for our patience. We need to let Iraq be Iraq and we need to find Osama Bin Ladin who has been unfound because nothing has been lokking for him. So steep on it Bush do what you came to do first, find Osama Bin Ladin!