Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Pressident Bush called on NATO to move troops to "defend" Turkey. France, Germany and Belgium said no. I'm glad someone said did. NATO is there for defense of its' member nations. NATO is not there to provoke war with Iraq.

NATO is still commited to Turkey's defense, if Turkey is attacked. However, Iraq will not not attack Turkey unless it is attacked, and that will only happen if America makes a play for the oil.

At anyrate Pressident Bush will have to find another pupet!(Other then Tony Blair that is.)

At 2/11/03 08:29 PM, DarkCyrstal wrote:

At 2/11/03 08:21 PM, LLivingLarge wrote: May I join the clock crew as Marijuana Clock?

There already is a Marijuana clock, he hangs out in the politc section of the BBS.

Fucking Eh!

install democracy.
Hold

At 2/1/03 03:37 AM, DarkCyrstal wrote:
Isreal has always wanted peace. how do you think Isreal would end up if they didn't fight. They have tried negotioating with Palestine. they have tried giving them land. It's a holy and religeos war they're fighting. Isreal has no choice bu to use force.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA
*catches breath*
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaahhahahaha

America spends 3.2% percent of it's GDP on it's military. It's probably alot more now considering all the current military action. Thats a fucking lot, the NATO average is 2.1%, and Canada's is only 1.7%

America spends 280 billion dollars on it's military a year, where as Iraq spends 2 billion. I mean seriously. I know who I fear more. O_o

Religion is the opium of the people.

All religion, the sooner organized religion ends the better this world will be.

At 1/21/03 08:26 PM, FAdErCrUsAdEr wrote: What are you afraid of?

America

I know. but I'm not going to say. It's more entertaining that way.

EMPTY MOTHER FUCKERS! THE WAR HEADS ARE EMPTY!

At 1/18/03 06:53 PM, Slizor wrote:

Do you think that people should implicitly trust their government

I think people should trust their government until it is obvious they are untrustworthy.

So basicly every gov't on this earth then? Haha =D

No.

5'9"

At 1/16/03 12:59 AM, Recon_Rebel wrote:
100 plants or more. I think there's something in the law (in Canada) that says 99 plants or less and it's a misdemeanor (don't quote me on that). Hell Insomnia, it might even be legal by the time you get up here.

Up to six for a first time offense, no record, no court, just a warning and the destruction of equipment and plants.

Nationality: Canadain
Ethnic Backround: British Isles origin and Ukrainian origin.

Friend or Foe?

Lenin

At 1/15/03 08:07 PM, whitedragon_my wrote: Maybe Canada

Ahhhh FUCK NO!

That is all.

Considering New Grounds users are all over the political spectrum I doubt a political group would work. It simple wouldn't "mesh."

At 1/15/03 12:54 PM, Bulldawg_Steve wrote: My whole view on the matter of the international affairs of the U.S. is this: Screw the rest of the world. We ought to pull out of International Politics and worry more about our own domestic problems.

Hahahha, that would be great, although the world already hates you for your past foriegn policy.

Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod! Slizor Mod!

Well thats a good thing, religion is just another means of controling the masses. The quicker it falls the better.

FDR

I would die for my freedom and my rights. I would not die for my government though. I would not die for the corperate elite. I would not die for imperialism. I would not die for alterior interests of the rulling elite. I would not die in some third world shit hole for oil.

At 1/11/03 04:28 PM, Gorbechev wrote: There is a situation arising in Germany that shows an amzing resemblance to what happened in the 2nd world war.

I could and have said the same thing about American! Fascism isn't limited to Germany! Sterben Sie Yank!

China has the largest military in the world. With over 2.2 million men under arms(as of 2000). the People's Liberation Amry is a force to be reckoned with.

The fact is if world opinion was mobilized against America it would fall.

Russia, The United Kingdom, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, and former Soviet Republics all have nuclear weapons. Canada, South Africa, and many others can produce nuclear weapons right now, however choose not to. Many "Rouge states" are on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. The world spends three-quarters of a trillion dollars a year on military spending, America spends 276.7 billion dollars. Now although 276.7 billion dollars is an extreme amount, 276.7 billion dollars simply can not combat three-quarters of a trillion.

At 1/8/03 11:09 PM, implodinggoat wrote: Aren't there any ardent communists on here for me to argue with anymore?

One socialism is not communism fuck wit.

Two You seem to be confussing the well fare state for true socialism, so whats' the point in arguing?

At 1/8/03 11:05 PM, whitedragon_my wrote: Yes, Socialism does not work, didn't the Soviet Union prove that?

Socialism is not communism fuck wit.

I nominate [insert your name here]!

Complete social/personal freedom

Limited enconomical freedom

A Socialistic state through heavy taxation

Limited-moderate Capitalism

The nationization of key resources and industries, but only the key resources and industries.

The gurrentee of complete and total protection of civil liberties. From the right to free speech to the right to bear arms.

The Elimination of the multi party system. Regions would elect representatives, and these representitives would form a council that governs said country.

The elimination of a regular military. The military would be comprised of reservists only, the military would only be mobilized for natural emergencies or invasion of said country.

ect.....

Basicly a odd combination of libretarian and socialist theories.

At 1/7/03 06:20 PM, Dr_Arbitrary wrote: THIS IS NOT a debate forum.

P-O-L-I-T-I-C-A-L F-O-R-U-M