could someone explain why we type funny letters to sign up for somthing?

At 10/10/08 07:27 PM, cellardoor6 wrote: Okie dokie

I want that as a yard sign

At 10/13/07 02:29 PM, Aliensandwich wrote: I wear Chuck Taylors....

hi emo

Somebody has a case of the crab-apple McNasties

At 10/4/08 12:12 PM, Saruman200 wrote:

BS. The Whigs collapsed in 1856, and Lincoln was elected in 1860. The Republicans were the second biggest political party at the time. The Republicans had already run a previous time, in 1856, with Fremont, who got second place. He may have been the first Republican to win, but the Republicans were still one of the two major parties at the time, they just hadn't won yet. Learn your history.

Yeah sure...

Almost homecoming king...

Biden kept saying through-out the debate what Mccain would be doing instead of Obama as if he's any better.

OMG PUNCH-OUT!!!!! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

At 10/1/08 02:21 PM, cast wrote: YouTube Now Offering Second-by-Second Analytics

pwned

this thread is finished

I looked it up and despite being in the debates Ross Perot still lost. No one really cares about third parties and a third party has never won in history.

Abe Lincoln was third party at the time! : )

The two major parties deny third parties access to debates since they can't debate with people who make sense.

At 9/30/08 05:50 PM, TomFulp wrote:

stuff

Only an emo would know so much about that

At 9/27/08 01:19 PM, Saruman200 wrote:

At 9/27/08 12:58 PM, Mad-Mardigan wrote: It's so gay that they don't let third party candidates in anymore.

They never did, and please explain to me how that is homosexual. I don't want someone who has no chance of winning cluttering up the stage and wasting my time.

Ross Perot '92 and a bunch of others through history.
The debate commission is run by the heads of the republican and democrat parties making people like you think like that, so one of the major parties can win and make democracy GAY. It's proven that third party candidates in debates had have their polls go up in some elections, thus ruining the chances of one of the two major corporate parties.
Look it up

smoke it....

drink more

At 9/22/08 10:31 PM, homor wrote:

At 9/22/08 10:10 PM, MattHarty wrote: the vision of someone that inexperienced being in office should scare the hell out of them.

you mean like obama?

BA-ZING!

I second this
and there is a third choice! : D

I'm voting for THE man

My soul is slashed
I get so lost without you
My dreams collapse
My pain, is pulling me through....

yes

You failed to mention a certain somebody

God is everywhere

pop-tarts

Ralph Nader
I'm voting for him because he's the only man running whom I agree with.
-Dosen't have anything to hide
-Bring troops home
-Single payer Health care
-Repeal Patriot Act
-Stop corporate corruption
I not picking someone because they are ahead in the polls.

Pop-tarts

Willis?

It's just a web site

don't we have enough picture threads?

who?

You're to young to worry about that