Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Right, and a conservative German would be (or at the very least FAAAAAAAAR right) for dictatorships considering their history where power was hold to a certain individual, aka Hitler or the NAZI's

At 5/14/13 03:30 PM, SuperHitler420 wrote: It's too bad the final solution didn't work. Then we wouldn't have to worry about these goddamn jews.

Given the Jews their own homeland was a mistake. Allowing those bloodsucking leaches a safe place to be have only lead to more problems. It was better when they didn't have their own homeland. Back then they didn't have to safe place to turn and weren't so damn uppity.

It's a pity the final solution did not work. If it did, we wouldn't be having these problems. Next time the Arab countries attack Israel we should just let them have it.

Alright you've had your fun, it's a little over played now. Do you seriously plan on spending the rest of the day masquerading as Hitler and posting anti-Semitic rants/threats all day online?

At 5/14/13 03:23 PM, Feoric wrote:

At 5/14/13 03:17 PM, Feoric wrote:

Well that is interesting, I had no idea Republicans were capable of understanding that Iran-Contra was an embarrassment to the country. Iran-Contra was under Reagan.

Thanks for the clear up on this, again I've been trying to gain a perspective on this and the powers at be in the more liberal news stations just flat out don't cover this story, and if they are I must have missed them because the time's I've checked in they talked more about the Cleveland situation then this one.

But in regards to Iran-Contra was it really an embarrassment? So Reagan did shady shit under the table with a shady and violent group of people. It was morally wrong I'm not denying that, but in earnest who didn't during that time period.

Nearly every president during that time helped fund several groups like this, from Eisenhower to Kennedy, maybe not so much Carter, but was their human right's violation a direct problem from Reagan.

The man was so fiercely anti-communist he probably was just willing to align himself with them merely because they were against the Commies, short sighted yes, but it was a proper move if that was your intended goal.

We'd been doing proxy wars decades before the one in Nicaragua, was the reason it was an embarrassment because it was simply a failure?

And in regards to the Iranian portion of that deal, isn't what we did sell them the weapons for not only profits to fund them, but the release of hostages?

I mean I know the weapons were used to do harm, or at least with the intent but against who? Iraq? Is it such a problem that these weapons were used to kill another Dictator's enemies soldiers?

At 5/14/13 02:34 PM, Fisplen wrote:

Unlike in the good ol' Hermit Kingdom where they send people to work in the tundra's of Siberia with the threat of death for both them and their families.

Have You watched Vice by any chance? :)

maybe.....

I can understand where the come from.

I mean how often do you hear our own media condemn Israel?

To be fair, they were the National SOCIALIST Worker's Party. I mean the title itself screams left leaning, but again that's only name and doesn't mean that the man's action's were particularly left leaning, although some of his actions did fall in line with liberal agenda's whether or not he personally agrees with them doesn't make it any less so.

-He was vegan and anti-smoking
-Enacted Gun control
-He instituted numerous public works projects in the style of FDR, who by the way was condemened for such actions as the m.o. of the day was 'rugged individualism' laissez faire, etc.

That being said I'm not saying the man was, I mean being a dictator on the whole after all is as Conservative as you can get.

At 5/14/13 08:27 AM, Camarohusky wrote:

At 5/13/13 11:00 PM, soulcailber wrote: So anyone who pursues a degree is any field outside of Law and financial institutions cannot find a job?

What does this have to do with anything? Also, that statement is flat out wrong, seeing as new law graduates have an employment rating hovering around 50%.

You're replying to a quote from another user whose saying the exact thing as you in that Lawyers can find work.

At 5/14/13 01:06 PM, Angry-Hatter wrote:

At 5/14/13 12:31 PM, Korriken wrote:

At 5/14/13 11:54 AM, MOSFET wrote:

ok both sides do this. tbh, I dont hear much about left leaning super pacs, probably because there not as many?

I'm not sure about numbers

Here are the numbers (source).

So what, both of the parties are jack-asses.

This is what I love about partisanship, both sides fire at each other and their only defense is that party x is doing it more than party y.

You've still shown us that the left still engages in such activities, it in no way gets them off the hook simply because they do it less.

Saddam may have killed less people than Hitler, but does that in any way put him in a positive light? It's still morally wrong to kill a human being whether it be 1 million to 6 or 7.

And I'm not arguing for the Republicans either, but I'm not going to address them as Republicunts or whatever simply because doing so is what's fucking up this country.

If you dislike a party or president fine, but don't go around calling them such names and despising the very party/man simply because of a few bad apples, that's simply ignorance.

Both sides have their issues and neither one is correct, while to me personally I favor the right only slightly, I'm not so blind as to merely assume they do no harm. I know better, and I know the Republicans have caused harm.

That being said I do find no fault in this so long as the IRS is cracking down of Rovian-esque 'camps' who are simply trying to evade taxes in an effort to spew out more anti-Liberal/Obama/Democrat rhetoric.

Regardless of Buk-tooth's nationality, he's still trying to compare North Korean Labor camp's to a a detention facility for terrorists, and while granted some may not be actual terrorists, I'd imagine you'd have to do something pretty significant to find yourself in that hell hole.

I mean they're not going to snag a man off the streets and through him in gitmo for being a terrorist.

Unlike in the good ol' Hermit Kingdom where they send people to work in the tundra's of Siberia with the threat of death for both them and their families.

Why is this still an issue. A gun is not a sentient being the person holding the gun is.

You have to instill responsibility and compassion in people so this type of shit won't happen. Technology is only getting more advanced and the weapons we can use and improvise.

You take away guns fine, you're not going to stop these psychos from hurting people, sure you definitely decrease how effective their rampage will be, though that didn't work out too well fort eh Tsanaev's did it?

I mean those assholes made a bomb purely of items you can find in HomeDepot or ACE hardware's. You can't outlaw weapons because anything can be used as a weapon. Hell I give it a few years before some psycho in an SUV drives down at full speed in a parade or park.

At the end of the day it's the individual that's the problem not the weapon, we can't just keep putting our heads in the sand and blaming the weapons they use.

Kennedy may have done illegal activity but at least when the man did so it was usually harmless, and nothing illegal about banging women other than your wife, though immoral.

And I never understood Iran-Contra, so he funded a terrible human rights violating insurgency, terrible I know I won't down play that, but almost every president during the Cold War did shady dealings with shady people. Short-sighted yes, immoral, but practical at the end of the day. Sure the overall result was a failure so on that you can hold the man accountable.

And in regards to this I doubt Obama was actively engaged in these organizations. I mean it may have been CIA or FBI who were behind this and lets be honest.

If it was a covert operation, then why do the hell do we need to know about it? Look I'm all for freedom of Information but what purpose would this serve to be known other than allow sensitive information loose.

Sure maybe a few months down road when this info isn't relevant anymore release it, but unless there was a screw up that cost innocent lives (again that term can be misconstrued) then there's a responsibility on the government's part to give out that information. But if there wasn't, then keep it under wraps.

Look I'll admit I tend to watch Fox News more than I do others, but before people start blasting me as using 4 dead Americans as political tools, I'd simply like to know who if anyone (and I do mean that IF) is to blame fore this

I'm not blaming Obama or Hillary, but why where these men in such a volatile area without adequate protection?

Was it covert that went wrong or did they not have the proper security.

No one in the media is really pushing for this, hell Colbert even downplayed it and only Fox seems to be reporting it so I can only take their word with a grain of salt.

Could someone explain why Rice said it was a protest over a video, which Hillary did say herself, that is clearly bull. I mean I would imagine it to be, because normally you don't bring rocket propelled grenades and mortars to a 'protest'.

Or am i wrong in this, and the whole protest angle was something pushed by Republicans/Conservatives that was only a minor detail.

No I understand Kel-chen perfectly on this. There are immigrants who assimilate and that's fine. But there are these people who cling their culture.

Now I don't know what exactly American culture is, but I could tell what isn't. Look I'm a mutt genetically, so maybe that's why i don't associate myself with a particular ethnic group, but I'll say this, save for Italians, I feel as if whites have pretty much all blended together.

I mean do people actually boldly state their Irish,German,Swedish,French, heritage anymore? I don't and see it as a good thing. I mean I can understand clinging to your culture if you moved here, and even to a lesser degree if your parents are the immigrants, but when they're the grandparent's I have to question why.

Hell I say give 'em the body, put a tracker in that corpse, and put surveillance on it's resting place regardless of whether it's on U.S. soil (assuming there's one spot of land willing to accept that douche) or Dagestan. Anyone who visits that grave other than family should be immediately marked, and have a thorough background check.

I mean lets not kid ourselves here, a normal everyday individual regardless of political tie or religion isn't going to pay respects to this prick unless they got a screw loose.

What happened here exactly.

Did the individual(s) just raise his/her (their) hand(s) in the air like as a cross or something, or did they dance around like idiots screaming something?

I mean personally excessive celebration is stupid in both ways, sure it's stupid to act like a jack ass and dance around like an idiot after a play, but it's even dumber to start throwing penalties around like that?

I mean what the hell are you going to do after you've done something worthwhile and are proud of, smirk, and just stand here? Of course you're going to express some form of joy, now that doesn't mean prance around the field like an idiot, but for God's sake you are entitled to some form of minor celebration.

Look I don't claim to be an expert on terrorism, but I feel like (and if I'm wrong tell me so) that Al Qaeda, as Dr-Worm has said isn't some far reaching monopoly on terrorism.

I mean anyone these days especially over there can get their hands on a bomb, they're not as hard to make as people think, on top of that there's more than enough chaos over there to turn a man to evil.

All it takes is some Iraqi/Pakistani/Afghan/etc. cabdriver/goat herder to be killed from a drone strike or stray bullet, hell maybe even unintentionally. Then have his kid grow up for a decade or so with hate in his heart agaisnt the US and West pick up his ak47 or strap c4 to his chest and then run out into the streets and start killing innocents.

Then this group whose hanging on by a thread somewhere in a cave or ghetto, can post online "WE DID THIS WE KILLED THE INFIDELS GLORY TO ALLAH" or some other nonsensical bullshit about how morally right it is to do so and we accept it as a sign of Al Qaeda's 'strength'.

Personally the situation sucks. There are genuine innocent people out there who are getting hurt, and probably fighters who genuinely are giving their lives to save their country from these despots and terrorists. But we can't do anything really.

If we help out and give them weapons there's a big possibility they might end up in the hands of terrorists, so really as bad as it is, we can't really do anything without causing more harm. We should just sit this one out.

I believe and do not force anyone else to (though I'd prefer it if they did, but again only by persuasion and not force do I hope people come to such a conclusion).

I understand where you're coming from, but you're argument makes it seem like people believe simply because they put faith (blind faith at that) towards their supposed teachers, whether it be actual school educators or our parents.

By this extant I feel like you can make the claim that people who are brainwashed can be excused because this is what they've been taught and know no other alternative. While such a case can be true, If some Jihadist is raised to believe America is the devil, and must be destroyed, the blame may lessen on his part, but it doesn't take away the fault/repercussion of his action.

That being said, the argument here is that people should still be opened minded enough and have enough intelligence to question what they've been taught.

I have done just that in regards to my particular religion (Catholicism) found that the answers I was given to be satisfactory, so I've stuck to the faith.

Holy shit this thing was intense.

I saw the news unfold during a vacation so I've been out of commission for a while, but damn when they released that video of the kid fighting back, it kinda just showed the kind of cajones those chechens carry. Now granted the bastard is terrorist (or criminal or whatever the term you want to use for a murderer) scum but I have slight sympathy for him.

The fact that this Dzhokar is only 19 and literally everyone save for the uncle who personally knew him has said kind words about him and expressed disbelief makes me believe Tamerlan brainwashed him.

For starters the fact the kid gave himself up is the biggest indication, granted he probably ran through all his ammunition first before (and btw does anyone now what type of firearm he was using?) rather than go out in a literal blaze (assuming he was strapped with explosives) shows a type of fear/self-preservation normally absent from such Jihadists.

Now granted these dudes were chechens, who tend to be more Muhj, than suicide bombers, so maybe they just wanted to bring war to America but rather not face the repercussions, so I guess what I'm saying is, maybe they were used more as mercenaries, and are being handled by AQ or one of their offshoots. Which personally I'm more willing to believe given the Tamerlan's trip to Russia and the fact that he must of done something to get the Russkies attention, and normally that'd have to involve a trip to his homeland and some shady dealings with some shady characters, unless they just noticed he was chechen and wanted to simply harass him, which probably was not the case.

And then the guy just told his kid brother about it and he joined up or the older brother just had this idea alone, and the were just lone wolves.

Though regardless of the scenario, I'm sure Dzhokar was merely a follower. I mean if you have friends with older brothers the wider the age gap, the greater the respect is. I mean I know firsthand, my younger brother and I only share a year between us. While one of my good friend's brother is older than him by 5 years, and the respect the kid has him for him is nearly reverent. Not a bad word about the man will ever be uttered from this kid, hell he's always bragging about his accomplishments, and rarely talks about the guy's pitfalls.

You gotta wonder whether or not freedom of information is a good thing.

Sure if a government fucks up and people die as a result of that, or they commit shady deals/acts, then that's something we need to know.

But with the News trying to get all this information, especially after seeing the Press Conference where some reporters almost seemed to demand answers, you have to ask why?

I mean giving that information to the public could be harmful, if the culprits caught wind that someone so much as fitting their description is given they'd flee the country immediately, where they may have stayed put somewhere across the state originally. Now I'm not saying they would, I'd assume they'd be smart and/or paranoid enough not to stick around, but sometimes you got to leave the public in the Dark, to get things done in the Dark.

I mean watching some of the report almost seemed like they were giving guidelines, one reporter/pundit talked about using some chemical that apparently wasn't even in these bombs, so now some future nut job could be on the lookout for that chemical to use.

Hell the information of how to make bombs themselves would be a knowledge best left out of the hands of the public lest we end up in another scenario such as this.

I mean knowledge is power afterall

Really? I thought this'd be common sense.

The more comments you have the higher a percentage you have for people to make an unrelated reply, I'm sure 90% of all of the first 100 or so comments on a video related to the actual video, the higher amount of people you have commenting the more chances you have of their being that one guy who goes off topic.

Or it could be ironic (though not really in a literal sense because then that would mean it's an occurrence that's unexpected, and from what I've seen from you, I would expect this) that you now sit back and call those people ignorant for making such comments, while you yourself sit back and make similar comments/jokes about the misfortune of these people.

Really, to default on such a spineless stance on morality and claim there is none, just shows how deeply your ignorance is ingrained to your person. You make these bold claims sitting behind a desk, or on your bed, or whatever clearly sheltered environment it is you are, because you have never been in a situation like one such as this, you can bullshit all you want about your understanding of 'empathy', but if you truly had even a sliver of an experience as these people had you would think twice before you make such a foolish, and childish reply.

And in all honestly, if someone here even did find any of these 'jokes' funny, which again I doubt (though now I can't wait to see all the smartass replies claiming they did find it funny, only in an attempt to get a rise out of me) than for you to laugh at such a calamity, just shows your ignorance, or even better, immaturity.

And for those who want to prove me wrong, here's a thought go to your parent's or any respected adult you may know and slip in such a joke, and see the reaction on their face, I can guarantee it'd be anything but a smirk, and if it is, then I guess we know where the apple fell.

Honestly, it's too soon to say who is behind it, it's clear it was a terror attack, that much is certain, as to whether it was a domestic terrorist who operates in lone wolf fashion, like a Tim McVeigh, or Holmes with bombs, or a jihadist group such as Al Qaeda or any of its offshoots.

I only hope and pray that the body count stays at 3, hopefully the remaining 130 receive the best medical care they can get and only walk out with some scratches and at the very least their lives.

At 4/15/13 07:01 PM, Ceratisa wrote:

At 4/15/13 06:57 PM, RacistBassist wrote: Know what the people of Boston should do? Have another fucking marathon tomorrow. Seems like a perfect fuck you to the people who do this kind of shit

Pretty much, that is the response to show people you won't be cowed.

I agree with that sentiment, only problem is it'd be too hard to actually run, it'd be too recent and with a boost in security, which there obviously would be people wouldn't be able to shake off the trauma/paranoia that would follow only a day after, and it'd be too visible.

If this is a terror attack they've already made their move, what we can do know is offer our condolences to the victims, tighten security to prevent any more such attacks, then find and persecute those responsible.

And to those who'd like to make light of this situation I say Fuck You, learn some respect.

This was illegal, you make a document saying that you legally gave your right to allow an abortion, yet you fall back on that, it's illegal. Moral, yes, but none the less illegal.

Think of a slave deal, If I bought a slave under the pretenses that I'd use him for plowing fields, then released him, there'd be legal repercussions for that.

But really once the Parent's decided to forgo the Child, why bother pursuing it's abortion?

I mean I can sympathize with these people, they're not monsters, and they're intentions were quite admirable kill the child to spare it a life of pain, in short euthanasia.

But really, pain will be suffered by all in life one way or another, that's just a fact of life. The problem I have with this argument is that it's sort of illusionary.

By that mentality it'd be better to kill some poor baby in Africa to save it from a life or pain and suffering, sure it's struggles may be easier to dodge than this child's but it too has a percentage for living a normal life. And hell with 25% chance, I'd take those odds if I was a betting man.

There's so much to Life, and to act as the decider for another person is wrong. Hellen Keller would have been terminated today had she been born to a similar family.

But it didn't stop her from living her life to the fullest now did it?

1st, this has nothing to do with religion. Why you felt the need to blatantly throw that in there is beyond me. If you want attention for that, go start your attention whoring thread elsewhere.

2nd, it's porn, not only will this be hard to be moinitor, but it's not like it's that major of a thing, they're not taking away sexual pleasure, and it's Europe, getting laid over there is no problem. You could still jack off anyway worst case scenario.This doesn't warrant a rage thread over something so trivial.

Lol, Morrowind is unplayable.

For starters reading the text get's annoying, sure it allows more 'depth' into the story and what not, but it adds none of the personality that voice acting does. I mean we can all agree that Sheogorath is easily more fun heard, than read.

Secondly, combat, give me a fucking break. As if blatantly missing a clearly well placed hit simply because the game decide's too, or that my athleticism/acrobatics (whatever it was) is too low.

Third, the people were sticks in the game, they barely did anything but lounge around in their house all day, at least the other games give them schedules.

But the best games to have aged:
-Paper Mario: TTYD
-Wind Waker
-Doom (always a classic)
-Pokemon Emerald,

At 3/2/13 02:05 PM, EtchASketchClock wrote:

At 3/2/13 01:56 PM, Lumber-Jax12 wrote: Aside from being a smartass it wouldn't change the fact that neither of the pokemon will appear in the game

The lack of Lavitar and Growlithe is actually an Anti-Piracy measure, you see. If you weren't so cheap you'd know that.

No, they simply don't appear in any Emerald version, I'd know I had the game only 3 years ago, and Growlithe/Lavitar are among my top 5 favorite, an they didn't appear in the game.

I'm just surprised that despite it being 2013 and all the other incredibly complex mods out there for games easily 10x as developed and complex than Pokemon (Skyrim being one of them).

It's so hard to have an emulator run a simple cheat, that simply gives me two more characters.

At 3/2/13 01:08 PM, EtchASketchClock wrote: Buy a gameboy and you won't have this problem.

Aside from being a smartass it wouldn't change the fact that neither of the pokemon will appear in the game, unless I were to buy firered/leafgreen and the additional cable that would allow me to trade them over to the game, plus the fact I'd have to play either of those two first in order to catch them.

The easiest solution here (and cheapest) is simply telling me how to trouble shoot this.

Well I downloaded the game (Pokemon Emerald) and everything is fine, and it works perfectly. Only I just want to have Lavitar and Growlithe. Nothing too complicated, so I use the cheats and the game starts to slow down and eventually freeze.

I use the codes for the Gameshark, and they pass through fine, but they always slow my computer. Is there any way to fix this issue or at the very least catch these two early in the game, or somehow get them into my game in the first place.

Any help would be appreciated.

First, any indication of me being mad is on you. Saddened maybe, that people actually think this way, but no I'm not smashing every individual key spewing curses trying to reason with you people.

Second, I wasn't responding to you, now was I?

Third, I say it again. If you sincerely believe that this man is in the right, then I'd advise you'd seek help. The LAPD has it's share of problems, sure, so does every other organization since the birth of Man. But to take up violence over fleeting corruption (which it is, If anyone has any proof otherwise, please show me) and kill people simply because they're related to a Police Officer is nonsensical.

We haven't killed Bin Laden's estranged son, because despite what some people might say, we're not lawless savages. Unlike Dorner, we can follow