Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Definitely. If only for the experience in itself, it'd be... different.

Certainly seems to be a lot of complaining coming from that neck of the woods, but I can bet that it's only really a very vocal minority complaining in the first place, as is the same damn deal with everywhere, rendering your point moot.

It's a sandbox, and you get a bucket and shovel. There's no point, there's about as much of a point to it as there is to building an actual sandcastle. And surviving is just there for those who appreciate challenge.

At 2/11/11 06:54 AM, BizarroJoe wrote: HipHops

I remembering failing to complete my submission last year. What a better idea then try to not do so again this year?

I pretend to take a virtual piss on those piece-of-shit ads. It makes me feel better.

I'm a PC, but I would never begrudge console gamers. Console gaming is fun as well, I just affiliate better with the more hardcore gaming behind the PC.

because there are more hardcore then casual games on the PC? lolno

Still going at it with Dead Space 2. Making sweet love as the hours pass.

Dude, Video Games make a lot of money. It's fairly important to view them as a product as well as an experience.

Oblivion and Fallout 3: The dynamic NPCs within the game. If someone died, then they were dead. There were no crappy little barriers to continue their survival, but dialogue made pursuing the survival of the NPS a tad more... incentive.

Legendary: The idea and art direction. It was a great idea, but pathetic storytelling, a bunch of glitches and overall weakly-handled everything put this down. A shame, I wanted to enjoy it.

At 2/8/11 08:08 PM, orangekiller wrote: Nah no thanks I'd rather play something good then play some shitty casualized bug ridden oblivion rip.

Oblivion was a piece of shit and no-one in thier right minds would rip it. at all. It sucked balls. Let's not use that angle.

Demon Souls was good. Big difference. No sucking. If it's changed to be more casual, then yeah, it will lose that luster of challenge, but how about we wait for the game to come out before judging it?

At 2/7/11 11:35 PM, RobJohnson wrote: EA Redeemed themselves a bit since then... maybe its worth looking back into.

I don't get it. Isn't id with ZeniMax?

The game is looking good, a fun game. I might just pick it up.

Doom 4 is set to be betting looking, playing, and whatnot then RAGE, I remember them saying, and after playing the first 3 I'll say that it's alright.

HL Ep 3, on the other hand, I don't really care about. Never actually got into the games, which is a shame.

Legendary was so fucking horrible I regret buying it at all.

Portal screwed up on me and won't work with me, period. What a fucking waste of money. Probably a good game, if I could play it.

If you haven't played the first one, get that first - it'll teach you the reins and slowly pace the concept, though if you suffer from chronic anxiety you shouldn't be playing it. Both of the game slide from survival horror to sci-fi shooter early on, so if you can get over being jumped at soon you won't have much in the way of wetting yourself.

Get the first, then if you like that, you'll love the second. Well, you probably will.

Seriously... I mean, just, seriously? Between one and ten is a pretty pathetic number, and even at the most low points of my fitness I could easily accomplish 20, and that's just me.

I can appreciate your commitment, but this is seriously a bad idea, especially for someone as skinny as you to begin with. Doesn't look like you had any energy to burn off to begin with, so other then curiosity, there isn't a damn reason for you to be doing this. And you know what they say about curiosity.

I stop thinking. Only real way.

I hate the complexity, the twists and turns of life that demand action but leave you thoroughly useless...

I'm going to sit the fence until further evidence comes out suggesting otherwise. And evidence, not odds.

Personal distaste is no real reason to stereotype any sort of large group of people. And that, I usually find, is the primary reason for people judging entire groups of other people based on their interests.

There are far better things to judge people on.

Anyway, I find sweaters unnatural, with their cotton fibres, their crooked knitting, their corny slogans, and anyone who wears a sweater must therefore be some sort of devil-worshiping prat not worth the air they breath. That's about as good as a comparison as you're going to get.

Highest I've jumped is about 8 metres off the side of a bride, so no. Be willing to try, though.

At 2/6/11 03:18 AM, AZBull wrote: Man, I feel so unique, without anyone posting here! Goodness me!

Don't bother to self-bump your topics. Ever. Little tip.

I've never intentionally misspelt a word, though I can imagine it happening. Nothing to be ashamed off.

"I've had enough to do with you."
"You're a terrible person."
"Why are you... you?"

"We need to talk" is a personal favourite. The next one is hypothetical (never had it said or even implied, but surprised it wasn't mentioned yet):

"Is it in yet?"

I own a very sharp stick I use to stab children.

I could pawn this chain for more then I could fail-rob someone with it.

If I happened to own that Carl Jrs, I'd have him evicted from the premises and consequently ban him from the restaurant. On a second misuse of the provided facilities I'd call the cops on the id for being a public nuance.

Fact is, kids like that just make everyone else miserable with their antics and I wouldn't waste my time with someone who's idea of a funny is taking a shit in the urinals.

At 2/6/11 02:24 AM, Cootie wrote: I sense strong hatred toward him now.

Apparently the key to being infamous is going around trolling peoples asses off.

If that's the case, then in the (what, 10 years?) time that NG has been online, there's probably been a horrific bunch of peoples who've drifted in and out of obscurity.

She was before my time. Got no idea what you're on about, frankly.

Have to say, that the lines are way too thick for being included in anything photo-manipulated - stands out like a sore thumb. In fact, no lines at all would be preferred if you're trying to include it alongside more realistic object.

But at this rate, you're going to get really good at drawing octopi.

At 2/6/11 02:44 AM, The-Scourge wrote: deagle, sorry for quad post.

You're allowed as many posts as you like in your own personal Art Thread, provided that they provide something new to it.

Anyway, nice posts so far, and liking the amount of time you've put into your more high-resolution guns. However, all the same, they do seem rather dime-a-dozen - nothing the likes hasn't already been seen 1500 times in the likes of Battlefield, COD, and so on.

I say to try something new - add a spin to it. Make it fresh.