Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 1/20/07 06:36 PM, JudgeDredd wrote:
Secondly, isn't blasting more provocative act regards international deplomacy than say retrieval of "junk" in Chinese aerospace ;O)

Not our fault the Russians pollute the heavens :)

At 1/20/07 03:51 PM, LadyGrace wrote: Why exalt a man for his weakness?

Kuffar!

Poisoning the minds of young Islam men with your female deviousness!

[stone throw]

Okay, I guess I should explain more about "Can God speak so softly even He couldn't hear himself", which is essentially the same as magically creating the universe and then creating something He has no power over, but not human free will, because that would have nothing to do with it...

If you set God to a task, for example, like your really big rock even He can't lift, what's to stop God from creating said rock, making a really convincing show to YOU and YOU alone that indeed, God could not lift the enormous rock? You'd go out and preach with your proof that God created something He couldn't lift (ie manipulate).

Once you leave or die or your bloodline has bred itself out, what is now to stop him from lifting the rock? The Faith in your belief that God cannot improve? Fuck, single celled bacteria can do that, why not God?

Best thing I've ever done in a drive thru was laugh at a hungover friend who had to crack the door to hurl last nights chicken wings all over in front of their window. Nothing beats watching someone puke in public, especially around food, at 7:00am.

Why the committee formation?

Start recruiting cronies early?

My fave

At 1/20/07 10:08 AM, HorseSperm wrote:

At 1/20/07 10:06 AM, Tek-dude wrote: You were at Motel or Hotel 6 weren't you?

i am 10 mins away from atlantic city. fancy hotel

..what are you wearing right now?

At 1/20/07 09:27 AM, JudgeDredd wrote: I am sure they are more worried that China will find a way to capture and return US military satellites spying over China.

No, I'm pretty sure getting our GPS blasted from the sky is ahead of that.

"Deaded."

At 1/20/07 08:43 AM, Togukawa wrote: Which means he has indeed lifted the rock, which means the rock wasn't unliftable, which means he failed at creating a rock he couldn't lift.

"Can God speak so quietly even he couldn't hear himself?"

Will God see it necessary to create an entity even he has no sway over?

Think about free will and put 2 and 2 together.

Q:What is a paradox if it isnt a paradox?
A:A paradox that is answerable.

No if a paradox isn't a paradox, it isn't a paradox at all. Besides, being answerable or not has nothing to do with being a paradox or not.

If an unliftable object must be lifted, it's not impossible, just illogical. And it's not God failing, it's you :)

RRRRRRRRRRaaaaaaaaaaaWWWWWWWWWWR

At 1/15/07 04:09 PM, Leeloo-Minai wrote:

At 1/15/07 12:31 PM, JoS wrote: Noble intentions do not bring back the four dead soliders.

If that's your goal, you might end up disappointed.

Just a question out of pure curiosity. If it had been Canadians in the air and US troops on the ground, and the situation and everything is exactly the same, would that change your opinion or thinking on what happend or how it was dealt with.

Honestly, I'd feel pretty similar to reiper on this . . . as long as there is a studious investigation, I'd expect the offending nation's military to rein in it's own, triply so in a situation of allied friendly fire as opposed to say, mexican soldier being killed by a stray test missile 2 miles over the mexican border. And vice versa.

In cases of extreme negligence, like the example I gave (and not the low-flying fighter, which is actually a very weak claim for extraditing soldiers), damaged nations may request and expect full disclosure on the matter.

Or if it had been Italian pilots who had cut a skilift cable in the US adn 20 US skiiers died?

What are you insinuating? That people fail to see the from the injured side?

And echoing someone's elses hearty jest does not make you hearty, or jestful.

noodge

At 1/15/07 04:13 PM, stafffighter wrote:

At 1/15/07 04:09 PM, Leeloo-Minai wrote:

Italian pilots over US soil? How about arabian pilots on commercial airliners ramming a skyscraper in an attempt to destroy the infrastructure of a nation? How much would foreign newsgroups react, and in what way?

Yes, I'm redirecting and whatnot, but I just can't help but correlate.

When corned in the wild the republican is at it's most desperate and feirce. This is when you can hear the distinctive battle call of "9/11, 9/11."

Hi staff.

If six profile-fitting airline passengers start switching seats, according to known methods of hijack-preperation, is it wrong to remove them from the flight, as per passenger complaints and objections?

What, that's not the point? Neither are Italian military pilots flying over Aspen trying to clip skiiers in a vengeful "fuck you" to The Man. I simply drew from Reality instead of Imaginaryland. You know, where everyone really lives?

"When hiding in a corner, Democrats will pander to any fool who'll throw them a quarter for their troubles."

At 1/15/07 12:31 PM, JoS wrote: Noble intentions do not bring back the four dead soliders.

If that's your goal, you might end up disappointed.

Just a question out of pure curiosity. If it had been Canadians in the air and US troops on the ground, and the situation and everything is exactly the same, would that change your opinion or thinking on what happend or how it was dealt with.

It would depend on how rabid your newshawks are. Chances are, if most canadians are as insecure about their image compared to the US, then the coverage would probably be more dramatic.

Or if it had been Italian pilots who had cut a skilift cable in the US adn 20 US skiiers died?

Italian pilots over US soil? How about arabian pilots on commercial airliners ramming a skyscraper in an attempt to destroy the infrastructure of a nation? How much would foreign newsgroups react, and in what way?

Yes, I'm redirecting and whatnot, but I just can't help but correlate.

We've been going from mid 30's and 40's, down to 0 with 25 mph winds, and back up to snow-melting weather. The result? Some stellar smooth ice on all the lakes, an ice skater's dream and a fishermen's bane.

Had two more people go through the ice last week, one in a brand new Cherokee and another with his tractor, hauling out his fish house. If anyone here is a snowmobile rider, WATCH OUT FOR OPEN ICE FROM IDIOTS WHO GO THROUGH. I lost a good friend a few years that way, and every time I see sledders cruisin across the ice, I can't help but think of it.

At 1/14/07 03:54 PM, Aserg wrote:

At 1/14/07 03:36 PM, Goldensheep wrote: I challenge you to give a source for ONE SINGLE claim you made.

I have already done so many times before you ignorant slave.

"I'm not ignorant, but all my sauces are!"

strafer, the jews own everything, therefore they can brainwash anybody but Aserg, our stoic watchward of the Juden.

Aserg, have you toured any of the death camps? I can't say I've been to them all, but I have been to Dachau and I can tell you for certain that that place is NO HOAX. Check it out sometime, if you can afford the trip and not blow yourself up at the steeple entrance.

At 1/14/07 08:53 AM, Disco-PiggyHammy wrote:

At 1/14/07 06:15 AM, capn-g wrote:

Fun fact, holocaust means "sacrafice". Sacrafice of whom... to whom... by whom?

No holucaust means "Wide Destruction"

Look at the latin roots, "holo" (complete) and "caust" (to burn).

Considering that part of the final solution was the burning of the labor-addled dead, "holocaust" fits pretty well.

At 1/14/07 03:34 AM, Aserg wrote:

At 1/14/07 03:26 AM, Leeloo-Minai wrote: How can thousands of abandoned German and Polish minorities be freed from obvious work camps, emaciated, and not hear tales of the hundreds of thousands before them that simply got on the train and were never seen again?

Did they all walk to Israel?

The state of Israel did not exist until 1948.

Would you have preferred that I called the region known as Israel by it's former names, in order to clear the cloud of confusion some of you are wearing?

How can thousands of abandoned German and Polish minorities be freed from obvious work camps, emaciated, and not hear tales of the hundreds of thousands before them that simply got on the train and were never seen again?

Did they all walk to Israel?

At 1/8/07 07:30 PM, Sigma-Lambda wrote:

At 1/8/07 07:24 PM, Leeloo-Minai wrote:

Meaning you can say a war is "all about" anything you want, as long as it holds some relevance.

And?

You shouldn't have to have it spelled out word for word to you that Iraq was NOT "all about" oil. Or am I wrong in the respect that a good part of this thread's posters believe exactly that?

Iraq wasn't about WMDs, tyranny or oppression. It wasn't about stability in the region, economic or otherwise, it was about how the United States could pilfer resources for 30 years in exchange for (re)building independant oil fields which would line the pockets of the elected government instead of Saddam.

Where did I ever say I didn't think it was about WMDs tyranny or oppression? Read my posts, I never said that.

You're too full of yourself, I think. Can't you see my comments were directed at the poster who equated the Iraq war with a blunderous adventure to obtain oil, and those who agreed with them?

The only posts I have made were ones criticizing your analogy

Then stick with what you know. Sheesh. You demanded clarification, then when I give it, you act all offended as if you've got something at stake here. Let me assure you, the only thing you've got at stake in this thread is your air of pompousness.

But the weathers nice up here, ain't it?

At 1/8/07 07:27 PM, SolInvictus wrote:

At 1/8/07 07:25 PM, Leeloo-Minai wrote: From a Christian or Islamic perspective? Are you familiar with the Christian Trinity?

for Islam. Christianity has trinity, Judaism only has the Holy Spirit & YHWH and i'm guessing its the same for Islam.

Okay.... so you agree with Grammer that Jesus is both not divine and Allah, from your islamic perspective. Cool.

I totally understand you now. Thanks.

At 1/8/07 07:21 PM, SolInvictus wrote:

At 1/8/07 07:19 PM, Leeloo-Minai wrote: Do Muslims know the mother of their God was Mary? No? Read cellardoors post, for real this time, to find out why.

no because Jesus was not divine. Islam apparently still loves Mary though.

From a Christian or Islamic perspective? Are you familiar with the Christian Trinity?

At 1/8/07 07:18 PM, Sigma-Lambda wrote:

At 1/8/07 07:06 PM, Leeloo-Minai wrote: I just read that America waged civil war over cotton prices.

How is that even relevant? That has nothing to do with the discussion. The civil war has nothing to do with Iraq. There is no relationship between them besides the fact that they are both wars. If you intend to make a point, just say it, instead of coming up with a smug vague analogy.

Meaning you can say a war is "all about" anything you want, as long as it holds some relevance.

Iraq wasn't about WMDs, tyranny or oppression. It wasn't about stability in the region, economic or otherwise, it was about how the United States could pilfer resources for 30 years in exchange for (re)building independant oil fields which would line the pockets of the elected government instead of Saddam.

Try cutting through others bullshit if you're so fed up with mine.

At 1/8/07 12:48 PM, Grammer wrote:

At 1/8/07 03:52 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 1/8/07 12:40 AM, Grammer wrote: Jesus Christ is Allah.

I just thought we'd clear that all up.

Then who is The Father and the Holy Ghost, which Islam makes no reference to?

I don't have to be Muslim to use the word Allah. In Pimp's profile, it says he's god, so it's like he's saying he's Allah. Get it? "Allah" doesn't necessarily refer to the god of Islam.

So yeah. Jesus is Allah.

Way to piss all over a great post.

Do Muslims know the mother of their God was Mary? No? Read cellardoors post, for real this time, to find out why.

At 1/8/07 07:02 PM, Begoner wrote:
Having ruled all of these possible motivations out, what remains? The only answer is petrol.

I just read that America waged civil war over cotton prices.

At 1/4/07 02:33 AM, Erathun wrote: Atmosphere or Sublime.

With Deltron and Hieroglyphics following soon after.

At 1/3/07 08:50 AM, Tomsan wrote:

At 1/3/07 08:34 AM, TwO-FaCeD-PaRaNoID wrote: Crusades we're not only about religion.

Nice! I rest my case

Pretty weak case. Try a western civ class, and maybe a theology course, to get a better perspective on the times.

At 12/29/06 12:10 PM, Seasons wrote: We also ordered some mushroom spores from here. We bought the PES Hawaiian and the Ecuador.

I'd love to know how that all turns out, if it does. Could you PM me, or at least make sure you post here how they were once they're finished germinating? Thanks.

At 1/3/07 08:29 AM, MiRoMe wrote:

At 1/3/07 08:08 AM, Rutz wrote: Dinosaurs, anybody remember that show? You know, with the dinos that live a normal life and have a family a job and everything.

Knockamomma, Knockamomma?

Notthemama! [pan smack]

Also, Bump in the Night was the first claymation I'd ever seen, and still the only one I've found amusing. Man... now I wish they still showed this stuff in the mornings like they used to.

I'd opt for responsible and sensible government spending over any penny-ante salary they give themselves.

I know the judiciary doesn't fall into that particular category, but congress does, and apparently that's part of why the judges feel 'left out'.

They should have better things on their minds, especially to the public.