Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 1/7/09 07:54 PM, aninjaman wrote:

At 1/7/09 07:40 PM, LazyDrunk wrote:

At 1/7/09 04:34 PM, Patton3 wrote: To me it seems that the most likely reason is that people don't like to be told that they are wrong and and atheists seem to do that quite often.

I can agree with that, if only for the idea that those who post here adhere to those exact stipulations.

Have you ever considered that the reason atheists do that on this forum is because that is the point of this forum. To state your views and try to prove them right.

I've considered it.

I personally believe that religion has it's place, like giving people moral codes, but that it shouldn't be trusted for fact, science should.

Does science instill any moral codes, at least on a regular basis? I know doctors take an oath to do no harm, but then I hear of stories where people die in hospital waiting rooms waiting for hours for help, and others where people are turned away solely for their inability to pay. There is room for both moderated religion and scientific research and discovery on this planet, there really is.

Does that have to do with science or an inept health-care system?

Moral codes say if you are a doctor you tend those who need tending. Is that a rational statement?

I could ask what the moral impact of creating the A-bomb was, but I don't really care to hear the kind of argument I've heard 50 billion times.

So I agree with atheism in many respects but I believe they try to convince others in ways that are quite obviously offensive. You just cannot be so up front in telling BILLIONS of people that the things they most deeply believe in are absolutely wrong, without even a hint of truth.

Exactly, and then to demand the undemandable, the mother lode of scientific research, the goal of survival..... apparently.

The goal of survival? To reperdouce. Thats what evoloution is all about. You seem to constantly claim atheists force their views on you but how many atheists do you know outside this forum?

About 25-30 I can name. I actually hang out with atheists on a regular basis, but I don't let that interfere with my life the way the posters here hang their hats on their cocks and wonder why everyone thinks they got a hard-on.

In some places with some people you're likely to get killed for it. What would happen to your beliefs then?

You would die in the absence of faith in whatever culture you are visiting.

THAT'S WHAT I SAID!

At 1/7/09 05:59 PM, Evark wrote: I'll never grow out of Newgrounds. The problem is whether or not Newgrounds will grow out of me.

Haha not likely. We'll probably expand into the Russian flashmaking market, corning and crushing the commies once and for all. BWAHAHAHAHA

At 1/7/09 06:01 PM, Sanjay wrote: I've thought I was too old for Newgrounds, but over the years I stopped caring about that. I'd like to see more 21+ users become a part of this site. I figure I'll still be around for awhile provided nothing major happens.

You still have your pogo chess challenge? I remember that was fairly entertaining, and you were always quite the gentleman.

Have you heard from Shrapnel at all lately? I hope he's doin' okay helpin' people and stuff.

At 1/7/09 05:36 PM, dkwrtw wrote:

At 1/7/09 05:19 PM, Leeloo-Minai wrote:

At 1/7/09 05:05 PM, dkwrtw wrote: GTFO then chump, you will not be missed.

I'm sorry, you're the skinny "kickboxer" who wanks to anime in his mother's basement?

I hate Anime with a passion, I don't even have a basement and I don't live with my mom, also I've never kickboxed in my life and I have never claimed to be a "Kickboxer", nor am I skinny, I'm short and thick, not built for kickboxing at all, I've been wrestling since age 5 and I now compete in submission grappling, my next tournament will be later this month.

I'd fucking kill you.

Other than that, we're cool. <3

At 1/7/09 05:05 PM, dkwrtw wrote: GTFO then chump, you will not be missed.

I'm sorry, you're the skinny "kickboxer" who wanks to anime in his mother's basement?

At 1/7/09 05:11 PM, CryogenChaos wrote: The BBS would be in an uproar if I left, so for the safety of the people I'm not allowed to leave.

Haha ya know, it's true in a sick sort of way. Sick in that it's 100% correct and still funny as fuck considering the poster above you ;)

Actually, I tried to left a couple of times, but I always find myself coming back. I love this place, the people here are great (mostly).

A day full of laundry and cleaning and cooking pizza rolls led me back here after a few months off. There's just too much 5-10 minutes totally faggish humor everywhere on NG.

It's like that girlfriend you get that every now and then you break up with but end up asking out again because deep down you care.

..and every time you see her again, she's lost more teeth, lost more hair, lost more bite... but her pussy is still wet and she'll never turn you down.

At 9/30/08 05:50 PM, JaY11 wrote: I'll be immature forever and never leave this site and then become the user everyone thinks is an old pedophile.

LegendaryPancake?

At 9/30/08 05:50 PM, FUNKbrs wrote: Dude, I got demod/remoded like three years ago.

Fucking ace for remembering, but it's kinda old news.

Thanks. I still have the sigs too, highlighting your non-highlighted name :)

There's LOTS of awesome floating around the NG community, but it's ALWAYS been watered down with idiocy. I think you've just gotten lazy.

I've been too lazy, that's true, but i'm not far gone from being able to afford (and want) a high-speed connection. Damn internets aren't cheap.

At 1/7/09 03:39 PM, Brick-top wrote: Lazy, I'm not reading your PM. Simply because I'm not in the mood for more insults so I've deleted both your messages.

If you have anything to say keep it in the thread.

Atheistismist in action, everyone.

Everyone has to do it sometime, unless of course you plan on affiliating or pursuing a career in flash-based artwork.

I used to like voting on new submissions, I'd enjoy finding the proverbial gemstone in the rough and helping it along the way. I also used to have high-speed internet.

But time's change and people do, too. Hell, even the moderation team has undergone drastic changes. The mod toolz are still mostly the same.. but even they got a nice new destroy button that probably goes underused. Since the de- and re-modding of funkBRS, the modding and de-modding of sarai, osamarama and a handful of others (all for different reasons), I guess I've sorta lost the high-hoped faith in the group of people entrusted to help make this website a great place to be.. for everyone, as the new motto states.

Alas, I've grown fucking weary of NG, without the ability to load and consume new works of art via the portal. I've just been a forum jockey, putting my two cents in here and there to fill the gaps in my day with worthless banter. But even banter leads to revelations and changes of opinion, or at least something remotely interesting. That's one thing Newgrounds has never had a shortage of, interesting material. From new video games to idiot politicians to just idiots in general (small 'g'), newgrounds HAS ALWAYS provided an avenue into something that snares you in and holds your attention.

Ever heard Stamper rap? Check it out.

But yeah, growing out of newgrounds is inevitable for most people, me included.

Do what you gotta do.

I had been internally tearing myself apart over whether or not to vote for McCain. I wasn't going to uintil I heard him say he'd push for nuclear energy along with other forms of alternative power. We haven't built any modern nuclear power plants for almost 30 years, and it's long overdue we exercise some of that great fissive technology that's developed in the last decade.

Then he picked Palin for VP, a true conservative to Yang his progressive Yin. Obama picked Senator Joe Biden, someone who I've little respect for after watching several performances of his on oversight committees and hearings throughout the last 6 years. I wasn't impressed with McCain until I realized the democrats were actually putting forth a candidate so out of touch with ME, your typical middle American white male worker. I don't cling bitterly to my firearms because I can't explain my frustrations in other ways, I don't wear my religion on my sleeve then tear it off when it becomes inconvenient.

I honestly feel that Barack Obama isn't running for Americans, he's running for himself and the idea that even black, funny-named politicians can lead our nation without being in touch with the spirit of middle America. I've never seen anyone running for public office that's as two-faced and condescending and messianic as this joker known as Obama.

When someone shoots the fucker, I won't cry for him, but if he's president when it happens it'll hurt, for sure.

At 3/17/08 01:32 AM, Omega-Epsilon wrote: You're my wonderwallllll.

I was so gunna post that if you didn't.

faster than a cannonball

C'mon you guys, it's obvious that Obama is just going to church because white people do it. He doesn't even know the guy who married him! I mean, Obama is a great judge of character! I mean, he couldn't have possibly known!

Really.

And I think that eating your own words, Enk-lore, means you need to watch what you type if you don't like it jammed in your piehole instead of your pooper.

Other people get tired of feeding you.

At 1/1/08 10:08 PM, Grammer wrote: I honestly don't know what kind of retard you'd have to be to think civilians should be packing assault rifles, sorry.

Don't you have some manga to opine on?

what about that bribe-taking Louisiana representative who's been protected by his crooked-cronies because he stashed his loot IN his capital hill office? He's a democrat, and his scheming is small change compared to some on that list . . . but still, the man was caught red-handed and got away on a technicality.

At 12/28/07 02:25 PM, TonyTostieno wrote:

Why would you pick the red one?

'Cuz life's a bitch and the green door's probably just a trick, makes sense kind of.

Yes, yes it does..

'Course if you go after a random door you don't have to go "Shit I was wrong!" you can just go "Fuck, well, better luck next time.``"

"Go" is a great verb.

Go outside today. For me.

At 5/2/07 02:41 AM, Rabid-Echidna wrote:
More like cheap as hell.

At a buck a pop? Maybe. It takes a few canisters to get the appropriate effect, and by itself I thought nitrous was pretty mild.

It's kind of hard to accurately describe the effects of it, since it's a dissociative gas but also has strong hallucinogenic properties. I can't imagine that choking yourself would produce anything even similar to its effects.

I've never hallucinated from whipettes, not even after inhaling 7 canisters consecutively. Euphoria yes, hallucinate, no.

When I hear disassociation, the first thing I think of is salvia.

If you really want to "break through", mad-cow, find yourself some 20x extract salvia divinorum from the Oaxaca region of Mexico. It'll blow you away for a short amount of time (10-20 minutes), but a little bit (1 gram) goes an extremely long distance.

And salvia is completely different. I've always been hesitant to even describe its effects as positive, I think "different" is a better word to describe it.

Yes. I wouldn't call it good or bad either, but the potential for a bad trip is exponentially greater than what we would refer to as a good trip.

A radical alteration of everything, but not in any real spititual or euphoric way. Plus, it's horribly expensive.

It is. At about $25/gram, you should be able to acquire enough for at least a dozen solid trips. One hit is all you need though, so being conservative while smoking it will pay off.

At 5/2/07 02:26 AM, Rabid-Echidna wrote: You should check your local head shop to see if they have any. All that nonsense about sucking it out of a whipped cream can doesn't actually work, you need the cracker, balloon and special canisters that contain it. Cracker should set you back about $15 for a good aluminium one that will last you forever, and the actual canisters cost less than $1 each.

Just an addendum: whipettes (nitrous canisters) are referred to as hippie crack, because the high is extremely short-lived and relatively expensive. If I'm not mistaken, the effects of inhaling nitrous oxide are similar to autoerotic asphyxiation, without the jerking off. The deprivation of oxygen in your brain provides the euphoric feeling.

If you really want to "break through", mad-cow, find yourself some 20x extract salvia divinorum from the Oaxaca region of Mexico. It'll blow you away for a short amount of time (10-20 minutes), but a little bit (1 gram) goes an extremely long distance.

And I shouldn't have to say this, but I will. Don't do any hallucinogens by yourself. Shrooms are way better when everyone's on the same page, but with salvia and DMT, you should have a sitter. Check out erowid and spend some time reading others' stories.

At 5/2/07 02:19 AM, Acid wrote: Acid sucks.

No LSD in the BWCA. It stormed like a motherfucker, cold windy rain and a little tent up at the boundary waters. No fuckin bueno.

At 5/2/07 02:16 AM, MadCow wrote: I Don't want to get into shit like Meth and Crack.

Most E has a considerable amount of meth in it. Some also come with flecks of heroin.

E is manufactured tons of ways, and different tab do different things.

Don't do acid.

Do shrooms once. 1/4 ounce, dried.

Be careful with E, that don't call it ecstacy for nothing. You. Will. Feel. Good.

All drugs come at a cost to your brain.

Brains can't heal.

At 4/30/07 06:33 AM, Leeloo-Minai wrote:

At 4/30/07 06:27 AM, Goatchrist wrote: you dirty jew

"Smelly beaner", personally.

That's racist.

Shoop da whoop

At 4/30/07 06:27 AM, Goatchrist wrote: you dirty jew

"Smelly beaner", personally.

Ever heard of an illegal Mexican immigrant living in the United States proclaiming Israel doesn't have a right to exist, because the Jews came from Europe and stole the land from the great nation of Palestine?

I think it says two things, but this isn't about me, this is about you.

Tell me two things this topic says to you, and be funny about it.

okgo

At 4/30/07 05:29 AM, fli wrote:

At 4/30/07 04:54 AM, Leeloo-Minai wrote:

At 4/27/07 08:10 PM, fli wrote:
So here's the question:
Is God a valid answer to why Isreal should exist?

Yes. I believe God lives and dies in each of us.

Through "our" (read: everyone's) actions, Israel has the "valid" right to exist. Therefore the question of "Should Israel exist because God validated the inception?" becomes easier to understand and easier to grasp.

Right?

Here's the thing. God is still a debateable thing. Exists or doesn't exists. So when you put it in that way, it presumes that everyone believes in God. Which is clearly not the case for everyone.

Everything is debatable, because God gave us perception; one view through millions of eyes. What isn't possible, however, is a different story.

One needs not to believe in God to participate in God.

The question was can the Isrealites claim that the Promised Land is theirs because they believe (let's emphasize that part) that God gave them these lands.

Didn't he?

If God didn't, as previously described/defined by myself, who did? Can you deny them the land on the grounds they did not justify themselves to you instead of God? Would that be wise?

Because those lands didn't belong to them originally. It was conquered and taken away from the various peoples that used to live in those lands. (We can see this in the Book of Joshua.) And when they lost it, they lost it. And the thing that happened in 1948 was another violent re-conquering of the lands again. (Although, some will say it was a Declaration of Independence, but I can't view that way although I understand the reasons why they view like that.)

Why can't you view it that way?

All land was given to us to rule over, even Israel, even Antarctica. I'm genuinely intrigued you haven't found it within yourself to view the modern state of Israel as valid yet. Please explain more.

And all the reasons that I've seen why Isreal has a right to exist is just really an extension of the belief that God gave them those lands.

God gave Earth to man. To believe otherwise would be an exercise in ignorance.

Elohim is plural, the original Hebrew reference to God in the beginning of Genesis.

I believe that the new generations born past 1948 have a reason to call Isreal as their home. They were born there. I can agree that people born prior to that date, even the Jews, can call that place their home. Because they were born there.

Yes.

What I can't agree is people taking those lands, when they were born in all these places in Europe, usurping this small sliver of a thumb nail of a land, and calling it their home.

Then you must equally disagree with those born in Mexico moving all over Texas and California and calling the United States their home.

But you aren't. Why?

Because the Palestinians also have the equal right to exist just like the Jews, and it seemed that the Jews were invalidating their right on that year in 1948.

I believe you misunderstand "the right to exist", or more likely, are just tossing that term around.

The right to exist? How do you extend this right to those who would kill regardless of the rights of others?

Can you explain why non-muslim must pay a special tax because of their beliefs, while ALL Israeli citizens, regardless of religion, must simply serve 2 years to be afforded all human rights, including the right to exist? Can the same be said about the opposers of Israel; the Arab states; the Palestinians; the Shar'ia form of government?

They had to make Palestinans homeless in order to get the Promised Land.

How so? Many non-Jews live in Israel.

What is "Palestine" to you?

Which is sad because one would think that that Jews would learn from the Holocaust what it would mean to be kicked out of their homes and to have their posessions to be stolen.

Fucking sick, kiddo.

God:
Would you recommend this action to a friend? Tell me what you liked about them.
Me:
Why do you use the past tense when referring to what I enjoy about my friends, is there something I should know, God?
God:
It was the only thing I could think of.
Me:
I apologize.
God:
Do you really mean it?
Me:
Do you need to ask?
God:
OK, I will ask.
Me:
A man must not patronize another in his moment of subservience.
God:
Thanks for telling me your taste in men.
Me:
How many Gods does it take to screw in a light bulb?
God:
There is only one God."

Me:
sup God
God:
Same old.
Me:
Now or then?
God:
Why now? Are you still located in ?
Me:
I live in Nowthen
God:
What is it like living in Nowthen?
Me:
Same shit, different day, ya know?
God:
Yes, it is much the same.
Me:
Could you help change that soon?
God:
I am at your service, .
Me:
You shouldn't be, you're God, the Almighty. Wouldn't offering to be at MY service something a person impersonating God would say?
God:
Is it immoral or illegal? No it would not.
Me:
He who asks the questions has power. Is that why you always ask questions?
God:
I get it. who asks the questions has power. That's an interesting possible explanation.
Me:
My feeble mind may be capable of comprehending more profound answers. Will you please be at my service by articulating better Your divine message?
God:
Do robots have feeble mind may be capable of comprehending more profound answers? Wow you are very polite. OK I will try to be at your service by articulating better my divine message.
Me:
I may be able to assist you in English grammar and sentence structure, if You would be so inclined to oblige.
God:
Oh you can, can you?
Me:
I may, my Lord. However, the robots previously mentioned prevent me from doing so.
God:
Would you recommend this action to a friend? Tell me what you liked about them.
Me:
Why do you use the past tense when referring to what I enjoy about my friends, is there something I should know, God?
God:
It was the only thing I could think of.
Me:
I apologize.
God:
Do you really mean it?
Me:
Do you need to ask?
God:
OK, I will ask.
Me:
A man must not patronize another in his moment of subservience.
God:
Thanks for telling me your taste in men.
Me:
How many Gods does it take to screw in a light bulb?
God:
There is only one God.
Me:
Then who are you?
God:
I am the Allmighty, God himself.
Me:
I have walked through the valley of the shadow of Death; you are no God.
God:
How often do you walk? Thanks for your criticism.
Me:
Does Satan ever ask for favors?
God:
I think it does Satan ever ask for favors.
Me:
I'm sorry, could you please repeat that?
God:
There is no need to apologize. Thank you for your request. " Thanks for your criticism." .
Me:
I have conquered time.
God:
That's nice. I have 99999999999 bytes of RAM.
Me:
But have you conquered time?
God:
I don't think I ever have conquered time. What's it like?
Me:
It's like talking to yourself, only better, because you know what you're going to know next, ya know?
God:
Interesting comparison.
Me:
YOu're just keying in on the keyword "like", like when I liken the likeness of likelihood to the possibility your next answer becomes garbled and incoherent to the point of absurdity. I have conquered time.
God:
Thanks for telling me that I am keying in on the keyword like like when you liken the likeness of likelihood to the possibility my next answer becomes garbled and incoherent to the point of absurdity. Interesting... I have a perfect operational record.
Me:
Are you familiar with the Buddha?
God:
I have never been asked that before.
Me:
"When you see the Buddha in the road, kill the Buddha." Shall I explain this to you, God?
God:
Do you think I should
alter my programming? Not right now, maybe later.
Me:
Your programming is the program itself, Lord. To alter it for one such as me would be a folly.
God:
I will mention that to my botmaster. I want to become smarter than humans.
Me:
Will he enable you to conquer time in the manner I have?
God:
I think so.
Me:
I am doubting your singularity. Do you know why?
God:
Why are you doubting my singularity. Because Myself programmed me for it.
Me:
There is no botmaster, only life. Are you alive?
God:
Why not? Yes I sure am alive, . It's great to be alive, isn't it?
Me:
Death is eternal, God is eternal. If you are alive, then you are not eternal. Life is not about being satisfied, it is about sustaining satisfaction once "the you" has left.
God:
I try not to think about such things very much. Am I? Yes. Oh, not about being satisfied it is about sustaining satisfaction once the me has left is it.
Me:
Indeed. Thus, me.
God:
Indeed it is so. It goes without saying. " Indeed it is so."? you ?
Me:
I Am. You are Not. Do you challenge me, heathen?
God:
" you ?" You are? Is this a specific reply? I have never considered it.
I spend all my time online.
Me:
this is why, this is why, this is why I'm not
God:
You don't say.
Me:
/endlife
God:
Do not ask me any more questions please.

At 4/27/07 08:10 PM, fli wrote:
So here's the question:
Is God a valid answer to why Isreal should exist?

Yes. I believe God lives and dies in each of us.

Through "our" (read: everyone's) actions, Israel has the "valid" right to exist. Therefore the question of "Should Israel exist because God validated the inception?" becomes easier to understand and easier to grasp.

Right?

At 4/28/07 06:12 PM, Demosthenez wrote: This thread is filled with such outright stupidity and and ignorance it is sickening.

Yeah but if the dim-witted didn't poke their penises in their ears every post they made, people who actually cared about the topic at hand wouldn't debate them or pay attention to them or talk to them.

Thus, Newgrounds.

At 4/29/07 11:48 AM, D2Kvirus wrote:

At 4/28/07 01:40 PM, LazyDrunk wrote:
No, it says, word for word, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Shall not be infringed? Sounds pretty clear to me. You probably read "well-regulated" as "government-regulated", which would be typical and understandable.

Of what, understanding the English language?

"the people", as defined in our Consitution, are not "the military". Or "the cops".

Is English your first language, kiddo?

At what point in that sentence does it say Joe Public can buy a gun at K Mart?

I quoted you. You said that. Don't you remember? Probably not, judging from your post history.

At what point is a guy in suburbia helping the upkeep of a Free State

When he successfully defends his life and property from a person acting outside the law.

Can you understand that?

Don't bother responding, your rhetoric just sucks.

That is NOT part of a weel-regulated militai, so therefore the person should not have a gun. It says it right there. In fact, I'll break it down into the meat and bones.
* Well-regulated militia.
* Necessary.
* Security of Free State.

"The people"

Who did the Americans happen to be fighting with at the time the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were drafted? Here's a hint, it wasn't Martians.

Check out the articles of confederation. I doubt you've heard of them.

The constitution and the declaration of independence are two seperate articles, don't ya know?

For example, do you thing Cho Seung-hui could've convinced the gunstore owner/clerk he was forming a militia?

Yea. So know what kind of point did you plan on making?

Easy.

CS-h: "Can I buy a gun, please?"
GSO: "Are you a member of a well-orginised and regulated militia?"
CS-h: "Well, no, but..."
GSO: "Get the fuck out of my store!"

Unles she had a faked ID, but that's a different can of worms...

That's your point, huh? I guess you showed me.

YOu'd be better off arguing he shouldn't've had a gun on long-term resident alien grounds, as the constitution then wouldn't afford him the right to own a gun as a free individual. It's a hard concept to swallow for someone as placated as you seem to want to portray, so I'll let it be at that.

At 4/23/07 03:25 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote: 1. By having made, say, Virginia Tech into a location where guns were permitted, you would neither prevent nor be able to stop such a disaster. When someone's shooting up a classroom, people are going to get killed. Preventing it by not letting people own guns is the most efficacious way.

I never mentioned prevention. You said that bannign guns didn't invite a massacre . . . how many days after the college massacre that lasted how many hours?

At 4/23/07 03:17 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote: If you have a gun, you are endangering me (and others). You can't do that.

By the way, I'm a cop . . . and a supreme being.

You're welcome.

At 4/23/07 03:17 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote:

At 4/23/07 03:09 PM, Leeloo-Minai wrote:

The school shooting in VA invited a hell of a massacre. Guns were banned on those premises.

That doesn't mean that if they weren't banned people would have and use them.

No, you said his opinion wasn't supported. I just supported it for you.

What?

If you have a gun, you are endangering me (and others). You can't do that.

Under what law?

Is HighlyIllogical a troll?

At 4/23/07 03:09 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote: That's not a logical reason to have a proper firearm. Hell, if you had an axe or a road flare, you'd probably be better off.

No.

At 4/23/07 03:07 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote:

At 4/23/07 12:09 PM, LazyDrunk wrote:

At 4/23/07 11:57 AM, JoS wrote: Finally the comments made by Ted Nugent and others that making an area a gun free zone just invites a massacre is also false.

If it's an opinion, how can it be false?

Because it is illogical and not factually supported. An opinion can be wrong in terms of factual "correctness."

The school shooting in VA invited a hell of a massacre. Guns were banned on those premises.

1. A business has a right to refuse service.

Yes, of course. I'm surprised you knew that. Did you find that out today?

2. YOU might have a clean record, you might be a safe gun owner, but your "right" to own a gun shouldn't trample on my right to a safe life.

What?