Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

What's the first thing that comes to mind when I say "wizzer"?

At 2/28/06 09:14 PM, -86- wrote: the word "faggot" originates from old witch burnings and crap like that.

gays, homosexuals, transvestites, transexuals, and all of that kind would be burned along with wooden stakes which were called "faggots." it grew on to meaning homosexual because of this.

So, when someone says, "you're a flaming faggot." they really just want to burn you at he stake?

At 2/28/06 06:23 PM, MonkeyShooter wrote: thanks for the posts. it really means alot. and my dog died of cancer. and we put him to sleep around 10:50 PM.

It's always tough watching a good dog go. Hopefully you guys can raise another to be a great companion.

He's still right though. You do have a stupid fucking perspective.

At 2/28/06 11:54 AM, peedee wrote: humans makes diseases adapt.

Viruses could've evolved in another mammalian species, ain't gotta be human.

At 2/28/06 11:55 AM, peedee wrote: That's what I was saying. You are born dying. What don't you get? We get old and die. I don;t understand what you are fighting me over.

I'm saying aging =/= dying.

I don't see why you keep saying that every second you live, you're somehow "weaker".

At 2/28/06 11:20 AM, PhysicsMafia wrote:

At 2/28/06 11:17 AM, Leeloo_Minai wrote:

Along with alcoholism. That's an inherited disease also.

No it is not. it is a self inflicted wound of the weak willed. you are not born an alcoholic, you chose to drink and you chose to keep drinking, its the same with drug addicts

Why don't we eradicate them, if they're so dumb as to poison their bodies on a daily basis, when they could be doing other, more productive things.

At 2/28/06 10:44 AM, Leeloo_Minai wrote: Don't forget homosexuality, those are passed along in genes too.

Along with alcoholism. That's an inherited disease also.

Don't forget homosexuality, those are passed along in genes too.

At 2/28/06 03:25 AM, -Casualty- wrote: On from a guy named Link50000:

The zeroes make it funnier.

Reppin 2-1-3

10/10

From age 1 to 80, do you get weaker? It's in the long term. You don't die at age 10 from natural causes unless something interferes as far as disease or sickness.

My point being you are "dying" from the moment you were born the same way B follows A.

My take on it? You're alive at one moment, then you're dead. Simple as that.

At 2/27/06 10:14 PM, peedee wrote:

At 2/27/06 10:07 PM, Leeloo_Minai wrote:

At 2/27/06 09:38 PM, peedee wrote:

At 2/27/06 07:42 PM, Leeloo_Minai wrote:
Aging is now considered "dying"? Ok, how does one "live"?

We get older. Getting old entitles getting weaker. You eventually die.

From age 5 to age 10, did you get weaker?

Your logic sucks a fat one.

From age 1 to 80, do you get weaker? It's in the long term. You don't die at age 10 from natural causes unless something interferes as far as disease or sickness.

Disease and sickness are natural, are they not? Accidents are natural, are they not?

And that usually is made from humans.

Humans didn't make shit. We just throw shit together to make spiffy stuff.

At 2/27/06 09:38 PM, peedee wrote:

At 2/27/06 07:42 PM, Leeloo_Minai wrote:
Aging is now considered "dying"? Ok, how does one "live"?

We get older. Getting old entitles getting weaker. You eventually die.

From age 5 to age 10, did you get weaker?

Your logic sucks a fat one.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

What's the issue?

At 2/27/06 08:51 PM, Seizure_Dog wrote:

At 2/27/06 07:19 PM, Fr33kyS8AN wrote: i got a 33

Ohhh, bastard. That makes me only the 2nd smartest person in this thread. You hurt my pride :(

Anyways, I got a 31. My GPA has got to be like 2.5 by now too :P

I'm hovering just over academic probation at 2.08. I wonder what the ratio is for high GPA's who sucked it up on the ACTs against high ACTers and low GPAers.

At 2/27/06 08:51 PM, The_Obsession wrote: Anyway, the Simpsons are not as good as they used to be.

Doesn't change the fact Homer was the more bad-assed of the two :)

At 2/27/06 08:49 PM, BeFell wrote:

At 2/27/06 08:37 PM, Leeloo_Minai wrote: So is anything actually "unnatural" in your specific model?

No, how would it be possible?

I suppose you'd be right. Matter is matter no matter what shape it takes.

At 2/27/06 07:15 PM, fedges wrote: So i just got my ACT scores in the mail and my composite score was a 30. What was yours?

27 the first time I took it hungover, 30 the next. Good job.

At 2/27/06 07:15 PM, HinesDaMan wrote: Well done man, I also got a 30. It's a good score.

Likewise.

At 2/27/06 07:19 PM, Fr33kyS8AN wrote: i got a 33

Pr00z0r5?

At 2/27/06 08:15 PM, BeFell wrote:
The fact that we can do it is reason enough to say it is natural.

So, our basic question is then one of morality rather than nature.

So is anything actually "unnatural" in your specific model?

At 2/27/06 08:15 PM, Vegeton wrote:

At 2/27/06 07:33 PM, Chibi_Overlord wrote: Sooooo peter have more EXP with fights (The chicken)

So, Homer can withstand anything. He fought a professional boxer and robots, even zombies and a werewolf.

Hell, Homer took cannonballs to the gut just for mere respect, multiple times.

What did Peter do? Marry a wife who kicks ass for him?

At 2/27/06 08:12 PM, Leeloo_Minai wrote:
Alright, ya caught me there. But that still doesn't change the fact Jane mated with Thor behind Dexter's back, passing on his genes instead :P

But it follows that Jane's wit is passed on to her son/daughter, producing more Dexters and more Janes.

Take that, feminists.

At 2/27/06 08:06 PM, BeFell wrote:
It just occured to me that your point isn't even valid because the elderly would have already passed on their genes whether or not anyone cared about them. This conversation is about deteriorating the gene pool not whether or not we should be happy little helpers.

Alright, ya caught me there. But that still doesn't change the fact Jane mated with Thor behind Dexter's back, passing on his genes instead :P

So what about the gene pool? Because we can do it is reason enough that it should be done? Have I got that right yet?

At 2/27/06 07:29 PM, BeFell wrote: If someone saved through medical technology doesn't deserve to pass their traits then niether did that caveman.

Cavemen didn't squander their resources to keep old people who couldn't hunt alive.

Once you introduce commerce into the caveman system, and not just survival, you start working under a different set of rules.

At 2/27/06 07:10 PM, peedee wrote:

At 2/27/06 06:47 PM, Leeloo_Minai wrote:

At 2/27/06 06:22 PM, peedee wrote: "You begin to die the moment you are born."

True, but only in the sense that the letter B comes after the letter A.

No. true is the sense that as soon as we are born, we age. Therefore, once we are born, we begin to die.

Aging is now considered "dying"? Ok, how does one "live"?

I think you're just getting into semantics.

At 2/27/06 07:14 PM, PhysicsMafia wrote: I didnt say it was natural, i said by doing it we were controlling nature. we alter the natural course of evolution, interfere with it and bend nature to our will.

That is forcing nature, jackass.

At 2/27/06 07:03 PM, PhysicsMafia wrote:

At 2/27/06 06:44 PM, mofomojo wrote: First lesson of Nature : You cannot force nature to occur.

End of lesson.

wooaaw, that was soo deep...

sorry i mean that was sooo crap, we force nature to occur everyday, GM crops, selective breeding etc..

Care to explain how selective breeding, controlled by us, is natural?

I'd ask for the same with genetically modified crops, but there ain't no way in hell you're going to tell me that altering genes is natural. But if you wanna try, go right ahead, I'm all ears.

At 2/27/06 06:48 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: http://aolsvc.news.a..20060227131309990011

Two Stooges short of a good routine. Priceless.

At 2/27/06 06:22 PM, peedee wrote: "You begin to die the moment you are born."

True, but only in the sense that the letter B comes after the letter A.

Either way, it's true, and thats nature. We shouldn't chage it.

Yea, we really shouldn't. But we can, therefore we do.

At 2/27/06 06:38 PM, blizace wrote:
ha you cant touch peters throat becus his fats in the way

Homer's fat would seep in to fill the gap.

and peter has orbit, not homer

Homer went 3-D, invented most of Peter's jokes, and holds a pivotal role in a power plant. Peter makes toys. Badly.

I don't really see what Peter has over Homer except publicity and a younger fanbase.

Homer wins.

While Peter is busy having a flashback to his younger years, Homer would be busy guzzling Duff and passing out on top of Peter's throat, killing him instantly.

Lois = Marge

At 2/27/06 06:12 PM, mackid wrote: though some *cough* evangelical christians *cough* have ulterior motives.

Care to elaborate? You've got my attention.