Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Paint yourself a cryptic pic and guess others work:

Attempt to identify and contribute your own puzzling pics!

WHO AM I?!

At 12/30/06 04:28 AM, I7REI7I7 wrote: The American soliders who found him were as surprised as anyone that he was even there, so they didn't go in with express authorization to "take him out", like they did with his sons.

They had recieved a tip from one of his closest aides at the time. It wasn't a perchance find, uncovering his hole in the ground.

Yes, the troops did have express authorization to engage him differently than other spiderhole dwelling old regime members. Usually, they drop a grenade down to clear the pit. The purpose of not killing him was to let the new government decide his fate, albeit an uphill climb on ice.

Hopefully the U.S.'s outstanding participation and responsibility within the UN will outweigh misguided reprimands towards world peace. Because world peace is not on the agenda of many nations, including some members on the UN itself.

At 12/30/06 04:00 AM, SadisticSatisfaction wrote: Anything someone offered me seeing as to how SOULS AREN'T REAL.

Until you sell it.

Jewish Australians.

Mel Gibson told me so.

At 12/30/06 03:29 AM, aviewaskewed wrote: Also...if you get them before I do, SevenSeize will have no reason to talk to me anymore cause I won't be useful anymore...sad that's how I have to get women to talk to me. : p

Hey sexy.

At 9/13/06 10:45 PM, TimeTrials wrote: Because the American people have become weak.

Tired of the bullshit.

At 9/13/06 09:49 PM, Shihuangdi wrote: wait, why are you two arguing over body count, is one false, exaggeration, etc..?

Begoner seems to think it's our duty to keep them alive. It's not.

At 9/13/06 03:34 PM, Begoner wrote:

Funny the first people you would associate with "rats" are the onnocent ones. Bigot.

Obviously you didn't score to high on any reading comprehension tests. With the bombs we dropped, we killed innocent civilians, not "rats." In fact, we killed hundreds of thousands civilians.

Surround yourself with innocents and wonder why people get pissed when they die. Stand up for your own innocent civilians dying, but don't help or even try to assist those who wish to bring justice to the same? THAT'S a connection between Iraq and 9/11 . . . poetic justice.

Anyone who dances around a corpse and cheers is a rat. Our soldiers are soldiers, authorized to use deadly force (under a STRICT legal/moral code).

It was brilliantly showed off when the US refused to submit to the ICC.

I mention dead bodies mutilated and your "innocent" civilians dancing around cheering, you bring up international courts who care more about the treatment of live prisoners than the injustices of the dead. I understand that the ICC doesn't have the balls to investigate anyone who'd rather see them dead (the enemy), so to validate their existence they do whatever they can to whoever they can, ignoring the rest.

Sometimes ya gotta bite the fucking bullet and pick sides. If you can't be consistant, don't be a thorn in the ass of the good guys. Okay?

It was evident when we broke international law in the invasion of Iraq.

INTERNATIONAL LAW? Excuse me? Show me the document we're held liable to. Show me, and how it fits with our Fuck-Europe Constitution. Can you do that?

At 9/13/06 02:55 PM, Begoner wrote:

Drop more bombs, kill more rats.

Who exactly are you referring to as rats? The hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians whom we have killed?

Funny the first people you would associate with "rats" are the onnocent ones. Bigot.

The only "rats" in Iraq are the secratian terrorists and the American troops.

Anyone who dances around a corpse and cheers is a rat. Our soldiers are soldiers, authorized to use deadly force (under a STRICT legal/moral code).

Do America a favor and cut us some fucking slack once in awhile.

At 9/13/06 02:38 PM, Begoner wrote: When America was attacked in 1941, we declared war against Japan -- we did not declare war on Belgium, for example. When we were "attacked" in 2001, we declared war on Iraq, which had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. Thus, people did not sign up in droves to support a bogus fiasco.

We declared war on Afghanistan first, leading up to the Iraq war. Intel gathered from forces that were deployed in Afghanistan contributed to the Iraq war, not 9/11.

wtf

I'm willing to bet some Americans won't join the armed forces because their countrymen won't stand for them when push comes to shove, giving them EVERY benefit of the doubt.

They get to watch their brethren get mutilated and dragged through the streets to cheering crowds, while being hampered dinking around with trivial investigations in a war-torn country.

Drop more bombs, kill more rats.

Also, the Dom in Köln

At 4/11/06 03:39 PM, Penal_Disturbance wrote: Very funny, except I'm not pro-abortion anyway.

You're anti-reality, that's all.

Plus, you're ridiculous.

He's right ya know.

At 4/10/06 05:38 PM, JMHX wrote:

At 4/10/06 03:33 PM, elecman wrote: I doubt it. I saw in a lit. book about how JFK died. It said as he was parading through, there was A sharp noise, signaling one shot. Besides, there would only be an extremely rare amount of people who wanted to shoot JFK anyway.

3 shots ftw

Scoring two hits, one a headshot. Does anybody know where Mr Oswald learned to fire his rifle?

At 3/17/06 02:00 PM, red_skunk wrote:

At 3/17/06 11:53 AM, areyousure wrote: What's more effective for self-defense in closed-quarters, against a criminal potentially possessing a firearm, than a shotgun?

A land-mine.

Pressure-sensitive to the assailants weight, I presume.

At 3/17/06 12:14 PM, psycho--squirrel wrote:
i doubt that there are any white supremacists who are not angery people.

its just proof that white supremacists are better dead then alive.

Because they are angry? Your line of logic, if I understand this correctly, is that angry people need to die, preferably by a hand outside the agreed-upon rule of law. amiright?

Zen, sorry for the strife, it's been a long day already :/

At 3/17/06 12:07 PM, GrandSmith wrote: Why?

Try unchecking each of these boxes from your Edit Personal Profile link on the account options page.

At 3/17/06 11:51 AM, Penal_Disturbance wrote:
Personally I'm all for non-lethal alternatives, they just need to be better developed. There is no reason to own a lethal weapon for self defense if a non-lethal one can take it's place.

What's more effective for self-defense in closed-quarters, against a criminal potentially possessing a firearm, than a shotgun?

At 3/17/06 11:12 AM, Zenobia wrote:
Well, they do. I have never seen a group of people treat anyone with as much disrespect as rednecks.

That doesn't mean they beat their women and shoot cops.

You must be one with your short and uneducated comment.

Pardon, but my suggestion falls along the same lines as your hatespeech.

That, or you took offence at my response because you agree that shooting a pregnant girlfriend is okay.

I took offense at your attitude that rednecks are inherent criminals. You're no better than a white supremicist, really.

Or maybe you just didn't read my entire post, or this entire thread. Is your boyfriend a Klan member?

Let's review then, shall we?

No, I see your logic. That's why I'm in favor of taking a gun safety class in order to get one. Most of the rednecks can't pass it.

Right here you just classified a group of people as inferior, simply because of their culture. Gun safety classes educate people, that's obvious. Some people need longer to learn, that's obvious.

What we don't need are arrogant fucks like yourself who haven't gotten a strong grasp of what reality is really like.

I remember they all ended up taking it 3 or 4 times just so they could go hunting. I had no trouble with it.

They ALL did, huh?

Here, it was the other way around. The "rednecks" all handled their firearms properly, and passed the field tests with flying colors. There was only one person in my class of 40 that failed, and he was clinically diagnosed as mentally handicapped.

Maybe people from your area are just stupider than everyone else in the country. Seems like a fair assumption, doesn't it?

But the test asks things like, can you shoot your firearm in city limits? what times can you shoot your firearm? and they have no idea because they shoot at their pregnant girlfriends at any time of the day.

What makes you say that?

At 3/17/06 10:39 AM, Zenobia wrote: and they have no idea because they shoot at their pregnant girlfriends at any time of the day.

Choke and die.

"-LazyDrunk- was the bitch who asked after I said I was done."

At 3/1/06 11:47 PM, Socially-Failed wrote:
1. Gender

F

2. Age

22

3. Hobbies

Kickin' ass, bein' cute-like

4. Sports

kickboxing

5. Favorite Games

JTP, Twister, Chess

6. Anything else

Bruce Willis is my Meat Popsicle.

At 3/1/06 10:16 PM, Sir_Snark wrote: It's not plausable with modern science. Everything is made up of atoms,

And what are atoms made of? Protons, neutrons and electrons.

What are protons, neutrons and electrons made of?

By chance, have you taken chemistry?

Take astronomy sometime. It'll bug you out.

At 3/1/06 04:02 PM, Begoner wrote:

Holocaust never happened.

Uh, yea, it did.

The Nazis systematically slaughtered jews, and others. That was Hitler's "solution", remember?

...

At 3/1/06 04:53 AM, TheShrike wrote: I'm having an identity crisis.

TheShrike is a popular alias on the net now. See google.
Shrikey is also kind of popular.
TheShrikey sounds ghey.

Maybe TehShriker?

The Three Kingdoms
State of Fear
The Teeth of The Tiger
Watership Down
The Dark Tower series

That's all I got for rec reading up here.

At 3/1/06 11:27 AM, Pandaman64 wrote:
I suppose you could disagree with me, but i'll provide some pretty conclusive evidence.

Any time now....

I think it'll be tough topping Gorbachev.

meaning nobody is taking this thread seriously, nor will they until you reveal and back up your great claim.

Instant Download Software
We give you LICENSE instantly!
Fast Respond Customer Support To serve u Better

XP Pro SP2, MS Office Pro 2OO3, Creative Suite v2, All Ad0be softwares, Macromedia and 250 more

hurrying Download ur needed software here central
The site might slow on loading, Please All1ow 10-15 sec to load up
AOL 9.0 Users, Please Click "Show images & enable links" in Upper Right Corner

Robespierre

At 3/1/06 10:31 AM, vibes wrote:
If you want a heterosexual parade.. go ahead and fucking organise one then.

That'd be the gayest thing evar.

At 3/1/06 12:10 AM, peedee wrote:

At 2/28/06 05:08 PM, Leeloo_Minai wrote: He's still right though. You do have a stupid fucking perspective.

And I'm still right. Every second you live, you get closer to death. Get it? Or are you going to continualy argue a moot point?

Let's review, shall we?

At 2/27/06 09:38 PM, peedee wrote: We get older. Getting old entitles getting weaker. You eventually die.

When does one achieve "old"? Immediately after birth? 15? 65?

At 2/27/06 10:14 PM, peedee wrote: From age 1 to 80, do you get weaker? It's in the long term. You don't die at age 10 from natural causes unless something interferes as far as disease or sickness.

From age 1-80, you do not get weaker. You get stronger. Any 80 year old man I know could easily overpower every 1 year old I know.

Dying "young" is in your head. Everything dies, not everything dies at the same freakin time. Shit.

At 2/28/06 11:55 AM, peedee wrote: You are born dying. We get old and die.

You are born growing, developing. You adapt to survive. Hopefully you live long enough to breed and pass that survival down. Then you die.

At 2/28/06 02:56 PM, peedee wrote: every second you live, you get closer to death.

The same as B follows A. It's nothing profound or intellectual. It's common fucking sense.

What you've said each time strayed a little further from the previous. How you went from [i]"Getting old entitles getting weaker"[/i] to [i]"every second you live, you get closer to death"[/i] is kinda odd also. Don't blame me for attempting to understand how logic works in that little world of yours.