Be a Supporter!
Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 3rd, 2010 in Audio

At 11/3/10 07:17 AM, LogicalDefiance wrote: I'm gonna cry....somebody hold me

I'll hold you

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 2nd, 2010 in Audio

Proposition 19

will eradicate stoner culture. In the same way legalizing alcohol eradicated speak-easy culture.

It will no longer be edgy or cool to smoke pot once its legal, just something in life that is enjoyable to do. such as consensual sex between two males.

pleasure is good, and whatever shithead fucktard tries to tell you you cant have pleasure needs to worry about why their life is so miserable they think everyone needs to restrict pleasure.

Life is short. we will all be 6 feet under the ground within a century or so, so find out what gives you pleasure, an' enjoy yo mother%$#^in life

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 2nd, 2010 in Audio

At 11/2/10 05:08 PM, LogicalDefiance wrote: Why does nobody care that 70 years of repression is about to take its first major turn by legalizing cannabis?!? ITS FUCKING INTERESTING

omg i'm literally on the edge of my seat, logical defiance. Soon it will be 420 every day!

it will be harder for kids to get it, crime surrounding its sale will be eradicated, people will stop going to prison for it, people can stop taking nasty pharmaceuticals.

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 2nd, 2010 in Audio

At 11/2/10 04:23 PM, Chronamut wrote:
At 11/2/10 03:43 PM, Envy wrote:
At 11/2/10 03:37 PM, Mich wrote:
DJ-ing

Vinyl / Serato, or full on digital, and why?
Vinyl because full on digital is homosexual
it's rather hard to fuck vinyl though..

It's the saturated environment all vinyl is exposed to which creates these tendencies!!!

Gentlemen, we have ourselves a conspiracy

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 2nd, 2010 in Audio

At 11/2/10 03:10 PM, Mich wrote: Procrastination

It's becoming a problem of mine again. Instead of coding, I'm lurking and posting on the NGBBS again. le sigh.

same here.

I wanted to reorganize my office space to seperate my music making computer from my production computer, and i ended up posting and lurking on the lounge today.

you know what, thats it. browsers going closed. I'm gonna get off my bum and do this RIGHT NOW

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 2nd, 2010 in Audio

At 11/2/10 02:30 PM, Mich wrote:
Also Disclaimer: the above statements are not representing my personal opinion, they're just there for comedic value, if you're offended that's your problem. etc etc.

Estrogen Boy

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 2nd, 2010 in Audio

At 11/2/10 12:58 PM, Envy wrote: I like how quickly it changed their minds too. They were just immediately changed cause it's\a no bullshit question that you can't beat around the bush with.

the people who are asked when they chose to be straight, although they mistakenly say "when I was born", they all realize that they didn't chose their sexuality. When they hit puberty, their hormonal levels gave rise to the feelings of attraction to the opposite sex. This video is FANTASTIC and only goes to prove my novel of a point. When men are awash in female sex hormones and their testosterone is low, when they hit puberty, they feel attraction towards men and the masculine. it is very simple. they never chose to be gay, the chemicals they were exposed to did the choosing for them by giving rise to their desires. They weren't born with a predisposition to be gay either any more than females are born with a large predisposition to be attracted to men.

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 2nd, 2010 in Audio

At 11/2/10 09:27 AM, Chronamut wrote:
At 11/1/10 06:46 PM, Bjra wrote: PS

nothing wrong with homosexuality,
YOU.. sir.. are a FUCKING hypocrite. Why do I say this? I can think of several years worth of gay hatred on your part towards me.

I never hated gays, ever. Period. Let me make that very clear.

The only thing I questioned and still do question is the absurd notion that one is born gay. I argued this back when I was 13 years old with you. But what has changed drastically is my black and white thinking, assuming that since one is not born gay it is wholly a conscious decision

In my mind, hating a gay/effeminate man for being sexually/emotionally interested in men/the masculine is just as absurd as hating a woman for being interested in men/the masculine.

In the womb, fetuses are exactly the same until around 7 or 8 weeks when the genitalia form and they start pumping out a disproportionate amount of their prospective sex hormones, based on the gender of the fetus. testosterone for guys, estrogen for women. Both hormones are present though in both genders, and are vital. It is the proportions that are different.

Left to it's own devices, this wash of hormones, up until one is an adult, will shape the human into its gender role, with both the physical characteristics and the mental and psychological characteristics. This is assuming a raw whole foods diet, consisting of whole vegetables, fruits, grains, legumes, nuts, and raw meat from fish and killed animals, we would have eaten living on the plains of Africa, along with the copious amounts of exercise we would have received all throughout our developmental years.

Men develop strong jawlines, defined brow lines, deep, deep voices, eyes recessed back into the face, masculine psychological development, including aggressive masculine behavior patterns, and a strong sexual/emotional attraction to feminine physical features and behavior patterns.

For women, They develop feminine bodily features, the round, soft face, soft facial features, breasts, fatty butts, feminine psychological features, including feminine behavioral patterns, and a strong sexual/emotional attraction to masculine/dominant as well as masculine facial and bodily features, such as voice and brow line.

Let's make something very clear, the ONLY difference between these two hypothetical humans as they reach adulthood their sex hormones. period. If you take two fetus twins at 8 weeks, one male and one female, and remove their genitals at this point, they WILL not develop into either gender, and will be right smack dab in the middle, exactly like one another.

now, for the modern man, from the time he is a fetus, he is awash in BPA and synthetic estrogen. especially if the mother normally eats canned foods, drinks cans of soda on a daily basis, or eats anything that was made from a plant doused in pesticides. Once he is born, he is fed a processed diet of garbage foods which damage his own ability to create testosterone. This processed diet makes him chunky, and saps him of vital energy to exercise. As we know, physical exercise is a trigger for our body to create testosterone to repair our muscles.

So he is awash in estrogen from the time he is a fetus, until the time he is an adult, fully past puberty. But his testosterone levels were lowered, and he was awash in synthetic estrogen his entire life.

He did not fully develop into his gender role. His face is rounder, he has adrogenous lips, adrogenous eyes, softer facial features. His voice is much higher pitched than it would have been, or not. He isn't as tall or as burly as he would have been. He has a weird combination of masculine and feminine psychological development. A similar thing happens to women, many women in our modern society are becoming adrogenous as their diet restricts their ability to produce natural amounts of estrogen. girls with boyish faces, deeper voice, who are more aggressive and dominant towards masculine approaches.

this is where the mind fuck occurs:

Which gender are they attracted to? men? woman? other physically adrogenous people? What gender is the right gender to be attracted to? Does society, and upbringing influence how one develops sexually and what they end up being attracted to? Does this lead to confusion? Is it wrong for men to be attracted to women, or women to be attracted to men? Was their attraction to that gender predisposed by their hormonal development up until adulthood? IS it wrong for women to like other women or men to like other men? Was this not predisposed by the chemicals they were awash in? Can a completely natural man like or love another completely natural man, or a natural women a woman? Do we ever see this in nature?

For that last question, the answer, looking at human tribal cultures, the answer is it is very rare but it happens. Women tend to have a widespread attraction to the masculine, although they have a bit more predisposition to bisexuality. Men on the other hand tend to feel very little/no attraction for other men whatsoever, instead feeling threatened by them. This is referring to completely natural humans.

Nonetheless, there are too many questions raised by this line of thinking, but I am wholly convinced that this line of thinking, the estrogenization of men, is the greatest factor in the massive raise in homosexuality, and bisexuality in men. The social programming surrounding homosexuality and effeminate behavior in men is merely riding the predispositions of men in our generation who are more likely to have those behavior patterns in the first place. But let's not forget, upbringing, and social influences do have a large influence on behavior. I believe that the chemical feminization of men facilitates their increased probability of picking up on these feminine behavior patterns/desires.

These links go directly to pages and a video showing the widespread pollution of estrogen in our society:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thre ad502824/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thre ad346460/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thre ad518548/pg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3_cYZKks vI

There you go Chronamut, no hate for gays here, just logic. Hating a gay is just absurd as hating a woman for liking men. And even if two completely natural men, for whatever reason get it on, I have no such hate. That might even be very hot, from my force-estrogenized mind. But good luck finding one. EVERYONE has been exposed to the same chemicals their entire lives, unless they were raised in the bush on food they found, and hunted, and in an environment unaffected by mankinds synthetic estrogens(including pesticides). This is the argument I meant to give you years ago :P

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 1st, 2010 in Audio

At 11/1/10 08:05 PM, jarrydn wrote: Androgeny was a conscious choice for me. I certainly don't eat soy, and ever since I was a child, I've never been more masculine or more feminine. I like to sit on the fence. It's fun over here :)

Maybe it's my Swedish heritage forcing me to be neutral :P

haha ten bucks said you were most likely awash in bi-phenisol-A even before you were born. BPA. It's a female sex hormone. It's in plastics, baby bottles, saran wrap, all canned goods, every can of soda, etc.

video related:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_q75F_hjg 7o

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 1st, 2010 in Audio

PS

nothing wrong with metro sexuality, homosexuality, or feminine behavior patterns in men. remember, it has less to do with feminism and their strong desire to feminize men to make up for abuse they suffered at the hand of masculinity, and actually has much more to do with the female sex hormones rampant in modern mans diet and environment, which have been adrogenizing men without their knowledge of it happening for decades. The adrogenezation deeply effects both mental patterns of behavior, sexual desires, and physical characteristics

Mainly BPA, soy based products, and pesticides created mainly out of chemicals imitating estrogen are the culprits

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted November 1st, 2010 in Audio

At 11/1/10 04:54 PM, AMP wrote: Encyclopedia Dramatica: Newgrounds AP

I know it doesn't mean anything, but I got really pissed for whatever reason >:(

DRAMATICA

if you are offended by anything on their website, please go to their offended page

Response to: Do you mix in your composing DAW? Posted October 30th, 2010 in Audio

yep i compose and master all at the same time

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 30th, 2010 in Audio

HOLY VOMITING GOLDEN PUMPKINS BATMAN

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 29th, 2010 in Audio

At 10/29/10 09:54 PM, loansindi wrote: man. philly sucks.

man cleveland sucks

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 28th, 2010 in Audio

At 10/28/10 10:22 PM, LaForge wrote:
At 10/28/10 09:59 PM, Stupor wrote:
At 10/28/10 08:01 PM, jarrydn wrote:
At 10/28/10 06:57 PM, LaForge wrote: That's something I wasn't expecting.
Beats cutting with talcum powder.
Beats cutting with crushed-up gravel and sand.
Beats cutting with the tears of crippled orphans.

beats having your cock and balls clamped with two bamboo rods

Response to: Making analog warmth from digital. Posted October 28th, 2010 in Audio

At 10/28/10 09:18 PM, Mystery-Moon-Pie-Aud wrote: Oh gosh this tape saturation sounds so delicious. Nothing beats a tape deck I suppose. I'll look out for some. Pawn shops can be a bit price gouging but I can haggle. I didn't exactly understand the whole ion saturation part with the magnet, but I'll read up on it. If tape is what is needed, then tape it shall be! I don't know exactly about rolling my tape down the street and layering it in gunk, but I could imagine the fun I'd have.

tape is exensive! i think a 24 track reel of tape, 50 minutes it like 120 bucks.

If you are poor, try out a bunch of tape saturation vst's, the emulation sounds pretty much indistinguishable

Response to: Making analog warmth from digital. Posted October 28th, 2010 in Audio

Don't use that mechanical noise emulation crap.

The warmth of analog comes not from all the problems with the gear, ie, the hum, the hiss, the crackle, the lack of highs and lows.

The warmth of analog is summarized in one word: saturation

why is the tape saturation the most important part? Is it that hiss and noise inherent in the tape machines? hell no. Is it any sort of low end hum? nope. It was the way tape changed the sound of a signal as the signal approached the max volume the tape could handle.

Tape, if you know, is a strip of material coated with a magnetic dust. The tape heads would rearrange the ions of the magnetic material. More material would be arranged the louder the signal got. Because of the fact that there was a limited amount of magnetic material on the strip, and the signal got louder and louder, the tape wouldn't clip, instead the tape would slowly saturate the signal. this saturation particularly affects the low end, acting as a multiband compressor, where the low end is progressively compressed faster than the highs.

THAT is why tape sounds so good, that inherent multiband low end compression, among its other sonic properties. We refer to this as tape saturation. Old skool engineers would have to make sure they recorded instruments they didn't want to be too heavily saturated at a lower volume, and anything they wanted to be saturated to be recorded loudly.

If you wish to emulate this sound, the vintage sound of tape, tape saturation, get yourself some quality tape saturation plugins, and experiment with them.

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 28th, 2010 in Audio

At 10/28/10 12:44 PM, Kirbyfemur wrote: At 10/28/10 10:48 AM, The Entire Audio Lounge wrote:
GAY STUFF
To put a temporary end to this gay talk, i gotted a girlfriend! WOOOOOOOOOOOO!

MONOGAMY STUFF

I have 3 girlfriends at the same time.

Response to: Game 3 music needed Posted October 26th, 2010 in Audio

VVV---Another one---VVV

Response to: Halloween 2010 Music Submissions Posted October 25th, 2010 in Audio

my real entry!

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 24th, 2010 in Audio

BDSM

so i recently have been getting into the local bdsm scene. turns out having a special lady inflict pain upon you gets you really really high. whats referred to as "sub space"

then afterwords, she comforts you and cuddles with you, while you come down from the high. A delectable chocolate is eaten at this point to restore the lowered blood sugar.

I'm sold

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 24th, 2010 in Audio

At 10/24/10 10:48 AM, sorohanro wrote: Retarded cloned reviews
Look at THIS GUY'S REVIEWS. Is just me or he's repeating himself quite a lot ?

he just learned how to tell a not joke by watching borat

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 23rd, 2010 in Audio

At 10/23/10 03:35 PM, Mich wrote:
At 10/23/10 03:22 PM, Chronamut wrote:
COCKS.
right.
Slightly to the left, actually.

I hear that's not good if it curves to the left. I would talk to your doctor...or significant other LOL

Response to: my debut single... Posted October 22nd, 2010 in Audio

i love you

Response to: Cubase 5 problem Posted October 22nd, 2010 in Audio

google it

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=no+ok+button+in+cub ase+5

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 18th, 2010 in Audio

At 10/18/10 09:03 PM, SSaB wrote: Keep getting lost in your music, or in Bjra's case, WoW. Haha.

UPDATE

I logged into wow, ran around for like 2 minutes, then logged out and deleted the game from my hard drive.

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 18th, 2010 in Audio

At 10/17/10 11:13 PM, LogicalDefiance wrote: DJRA - Move to Chicago, we need more pot loving WoW players. I think I'm the only one here

goddamn it I just downloaded the 4.0.1 trial to see what the changes were like, and I just watched a documentary about how marijuana was made illegal by the pharmaceutical industry. you got me

if you got a place I could rent out I would be more than willing to get a mcjob, work, make music, and play wow when i need to recharge my creativity, lol

I'm cruisin' around for opportunities right now

Response to: Happy birthday MrMilkcarton! Posted October 17th, 2010 in Audio

HPBDEH

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 16th, 2010 in Audio

At 10/16/10 08:25 PM, Alfraydo wrote: Before you do it, think over it. Whatever decision you make, I wish you the best of luck.

haha shit sucks here. I aint telling noone in the house of my plans, but I will actively be preparing for the move! Then one day, I can just say BYE!

If I cant get arrangements together, they will have never known the difference

Response to: The Audio Forum Lounge Posted October 16th, 2010 in Audio

That's it. I'm doing it. I'm gonna sell all my stuff and move out. soon. So what if I have to work a low end job and have to start over getting my studio gear. I'll be away from my parentssssssszzzz.

If i could work a job, then come home to a peaceful quite apartment or house. uuuhhh the thought of that....it's intoxicating...