Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/23/10 04:26 AM, YehYehYeh wrote: Me? An alt? For...HER? Bah, never.

well... that wasn't suspicious at all....

At 5/23/10 04:17 AM, YehYehYeh wrote: No scanner and a photo would look crappy.

your funeral then.

some scanners are cheap

mine cost 30 bucks

and photos when taken right and with a decent camera can look good too.

Also I can bet that your school has a scanner you can use.
I hate it when people come up with these lack of resources excuses.

At 5/23/10 03:31 AM, xlh2000 wrote: L. Ron Hubbard.

it should have read, "I make Religions because I was broke" lol

At 5/22/10 09:33 AM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: I don't particularly see how someone could be negatively judged for being percieved to be AGAINST drug addiction.

it's not the view of drug addiction that one would be worried about. It's the possible side effects or unforeseen out come of the drug.
If the drug happened to cause illness or worse death, it could be a horrible outcome for anyone considered to support it. Especially if those who supported it were ignorant of the drugs lack of extensive testing.

Someone should shoot the fucking retard who convinced you that "communist" is a race.

your the one who said "if you don't help, then the illegal communist Russian immigrants win."
That alone is an outdated concept, but it is quite racist since you single out Russians. Adding fuel to the fire, myself having a socialist political point of view can receive this statement badly.

You provide no scientific evidence for this wonder drug. No links to accredited sources. No official statement by the FDA. No Case Studies. No point of origin other than California, which is not exactly reputable for many of the drugs produced since the 1950's. Therefore I have no intention to provide you with artwork that has no real compensation value for a some internet campaign that will be lucky to be viewed by, at most 500,000 different people.

your coming off as a hotheaded ignorant fool who thinks he has a cause to fight for. You lead in with an insult of "flunkie artists" while trying to request our services. I think you need to step out, reassess your plan of action, return with an apology, actual sources and a better and nicer request.

At 5/22/10 05:09 PM, angryglacier wrote: disposition: PO

I am Disappointed, I at least expected a purple top hat and purple suit.....

At 5/22/10 05:46 PM, PixelCake wrote: I don't remember Van Goh using photoshop
what version was that? 2? to wiki!

Naw Van Gogh had other things working for him, like; insanity, eating the paint off his brushed, lopping off an ear, shooting himself in the chest and living for 3 weeks, love for his cousin....

see I said better materials

At 5/22/10 05:24 PM, YehYehYeh wrote: And thank you for making me mention pen and paper.

the why don't you have any pen and paper drawings up instead of this

At 5/22/10 05:11 PM, YehYehYeh wrote:

At 5/22/10 05:09 PM, Kinsei01 wrote:

At 5/22/10 04:53 PM, YehYehYeh wrote: Look, I doubt Cartman has a disease.

the why does your drawing of him have such horrible bone deformations?
Are you trying to make fun of people with Paget's Disease, because that is just wrong.

No, I'm not. My art is bad. BUT I use a bad quality program that comes free on every laptop. Because I don't want to be paying for a virus or receiving one for free.

yeah I completely forgot, no one can do good art with MS Paint, I mean its just impossible right? I bet if you had photoshop that you would be so much better with out any practice or effort at all. that is just how it works. All the best artist in the world aren't any better than the rest of us they just have better programs and materials. Years of training, practice and study have nothing at all to do with it...
gee I wish I had know that before I went and got myself a degree...

At 5/22/10 04:53 PM, YehYehYeh wrote: Look, I doubt Cartman has a disease.

the why does your drawing of him have such horrible bone deformations?
Are you trying to make fun of people with Paget's Disease, because that is just wrong.

At 5/22/10 04:33 PM, GrumpyTom wrote:

At 5/22/10 04:31 PM, YehYehYeh wrote:

Cartman is the dumbest of the group. AND the fattest. AND the head went wrong on that piece.

Oh shit he's got you there Kinsei.

damn your right! but Paget's Disease is nothing to joke about, it is a serious condition.
and mental retardation is just a sad site indeed.

turn a phrase?

At 5/22/10 04:31 PM, YehYehYeh wrote: Cartman is the dumbest of the group. AND the fattest. AND the head went wrong on that piece.

just the head?

At 5/22/10 04:26 PM, YehYehYeh wrote: No, Cartman ISN'T still 8 in this pic.

your right he isn't, but he does look like has a severe physical and mental illness.

I think most would call this badartistitis. it's typically seen in a lot of fan art pieces

At 5/22/10 04:06 PM, GrumpyTom wrote: don't bother.

I like this idea better for the op.

At 5/22/10 03:37 PM, Ashman wrote:

At 5/22/10 03:35 PM, YehYehYeh wrote: This one is FTW in my book.

Don't even try to say the art style is BAD. We've all seen the quality cartoon.

OMG pacman is eating that guys head!!!

oh I lol'd, I lol'd hard.

Yeh, yeah that is bad, and to be honest the art style (South Park) is bad, the animation is even worse. But that show doesn't make it by on it's art or animation, but the controversy it generates, the writing and acting. In a nutshell South Park is an artistically challenged show with good execution and resources.
Your art, this recent piece in particular, lacks both appeal, context and dynamic. That is not even going in to the lack of anatomy, including the South Park style of anatomy, style and line quality.

the lols just keep coming.
for those of you who liked hot na'vi sex

• 
  Avatar - Hot Na'vi Sex by HappyHarry

  Click to view.

  Type

  Movie

  Rated

  Ages 13+

Watch this SNL Clip for even more lols

So today I find that a sequel to the game "Robot Wants Kitty" is out and it's called "Robot Wants Puppy"

• 
  Robot Wants Kitty by Hamumu

  Click to view.

  Type

  Game

  Rated

  Everyone

• 
  Robot Wants Puppy by Hamumu

  Click to view.

  Type

  Game

  Rated

  Everyone

I liked the last one. I thought the original was a creative platformer. so I played the second. I figured the second one would be practically the same game just with a dog as the end result. well for the most part it was, but the upgrades made me lol, and lol hard.
it's well worth the play and I suggest you guys go check it out.

Pic inspired by the weapon of the game...

At 5/21/10 04:59 PM, M-Vero wrote: On the topic of opening 3d programs, I tried blender, with no experience, guidance or tutorials, and the only thing I figured out how to do was move a box around, put a color on it, turn it, and render it.

yeah that sounds about right.
as with pretty much all 3D programs, you really need something or someone to kind of nudge you in the right direction. After learning how to edit the polygons, it's really easy.

At 5/21/10 04:43 PM, Ashman wrote: because its the one that takes the longest to install?

actually it's one of my quickest installs.

CS3 usually takes an hour...

but vero is right it is the thing I use :P
I don't know how many times I have tried to go to bed and then open Max while telling myself that I'm only going to open this for a minuet or two....
yeah I have seen a lot of sun rises because of this.

At 5/21/10 04:23 PM, Ashman wrote: ill try to remember this all when i get to it lol,

for some reason, when ever my computer breaks down, which is about every 4 months (God I hate vista) the first thing I install is 3Ds Max......
kind of odd but kind of not...

At 5/21/10 03:36 PM, Ashman wrote: ok, im happy now, i got a new computer, workspeed increased, thank you windows 7, next on the list an intuos4

my bank balance hurts

you get a new computer and my bank balance hurts....
hope I get that job with THQ....

interview next Thursday :D

At 5/21/10 02:56 AM, big-jonny-13 wrote: So, how's the Art Portal scouting recovery going?

not sure, I have sent scouts to people I though were worth it, but only got back a few.
I wanna say about 30% are inactive.

At 5/21/10 03:09 AM, YehYehYeh wrote:

At 5/20/10 04:27 PM, Havegum wrote: that things neck is too big ... also, the things head looks weird, and how come it has much hair on one side, but almost no hair on the other side ...

You mean "that GUY's" neck.

no... "Thing" is about right.
Honestly, before you defend something, make sure it is worth defending.

At 5/20/10 11:28 PM, ProMotionProductions wrote:

At 5/20/10 11:21 PM, Kinsei01 wrote: have you tried asking around forums frequented by advertising students?

Well, the thing is, I don't think it has much to do with advertising.

the reason I keep trying to direct you to people who do advertising for a living or go to school for advertising degrees is because for a majority of there class projects involve making fake advertisements. And much of the time they have to create props of what they are advertising, be it as you said "a comic book, to an encyclopedia, to a blueprint of something."
So it seems to me, when creating "Fake" pieces of art, that asking an ad person would be the way to go.

At 5/20/10 11:18 PM, ProMotionProductions wrote:

At 5/20/10 11:11 PM, Kinsei01 wrote: why the interest of what it is called?

Because I've been drawing these for a long time and I found out what it was a while ago, but since forgot. I've been drawing these strange alien comics for the past 3 days as well.

have you tried asking around forums frequented by advertising students?

At 5/20/10 11:05 PM, ProMotionProductions wrote: My question is, what is this practice in art called properly? I think it's like "pseudo-something"

I have no clue I wasn't an Ad major. I do know that one of the Advertising final projects was to create a fake object and do a entire ad campaign over it.
why the interest of what it is called?

At 5/20/10 11:06 PM, ProMotionProductions wrote: Alright, I posted it there.

But I read the rules. Which one did I break?

no start image, probably the most violated rule of the entire art forum.

At 5/20/10 10:55 PM, ProMotionProductions wrote: I've seen this before, it's the art of making fake advertisements and texts, and stuff like that. Sometimes in invented languages. Sort of like Codex Seraphinianus.

My question is, what is this practice in art called properly? I think it's like "pseudo-something"

hey Promo, you should know better
Perhaps if you want to discuss this will be a better place

At 5/20/10 10:44 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: No one?

I think that a lot of us, or at least me, are a little cautious about having our art be come some political symbol of any sort. Some times the media and people in general are easily swayed, and get mind sets about certain things. And having our art associated to something could spell disaster for the future career of an artist if the public opinion goes sour.

Also, there is a possibility of other ramifications of doing this.

Lastly, your first post comes off as one of those spam bot messages that are posted from time to time. And your final line makes you seem like a closed minded racist.

Although I cannot speak for others, I myself, am not chomping at the bit for this.

I cannot believe that I'm actually doing this.
To be honest, it's kind of against my views to make fun of a religion

Scientology is a cult not a religion....

so as to why I'm participating in this Mohammed day thing is more of my views of freedom than my views of religion.
but lets not get in to that.
Besides if there is a hell, I know I'm going to burn long and hot, I might as well stoke the fire for my arrival.

actually I had to do a complete redesign of my website and I have to rework 90% of my pieces so I have been very busy lately.