Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVLjIJUCiAs

1. averages mean nothing to the individual
2. black people are on average, more likely to commit crime

why should the market reflect otherwise? by doing criminal back ground checks, they are doing the right thing and treating people as individuals.

At 7/21/13 10:29 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
You're assuming that the system doesn't already favor white children, which it clearly does.

Privilege [X]

there's a way to opt out, but they have it all backwards, it should be a program that you have to opt IN to. This is a huge inconvenience and they are literally doing this in the most expensive and invasive way possible.

Then I hear they want to completely ban "simulated rape" and other such violent porno that is done well with in the confines of consent. This would be much more dangerous because its global and there is no opting out. This sets a precedent, which could make way for banning of "simulated murder". You can call it slippery slope fallacy all you want but this is Britain we are talking about, a country with politicians who literally don't know where to draw the line, and love taking things too far.

still can't comprehend how people think the same media narrative that the world was force fed was relevant in the court room.

If the head is split, you must acquit!

advise people to stay in doors, let the gangsters kill each other off. nothing of value was lost.

At 7/11/13 04:59 PM, Warforger wrote:

Article 6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.

Unconstitutional. Congressmen cannot be jailed for misdemeanors by the text of the Constitution itself.

actually, the entire point of the constitution is so that the government has to abide by the same laws as everyone else.

we have nothing to gain except over 16.9 trillion dollars worth of debt.

At 7/3/13 10:11 AM, Tony-DarkGrave wrote: well according to some people the US better get into egypt just like they want to in syria.

what bullshit is this?

America has already backed the Egyptian army with 1.3 billion dollars.

the dream of a secular constitution and a free Egypt crushed by the 100% chance of another American puppet dictator.

Obamacare would become Romneycare.

Tyranny of the majority. Only fitting since the revolution was driven by mob mentality and not inspired by any uniting ideology. Might be another French revolution all over again. Of course this is their leaderships fault, they could have peacefully made the change for the better, they were educated. Instead they dragged the whole country to hell with them.

At 6/28/13 06:22 PM, poxpower wrote: My guess:

1. It will become legal countrywide
2. Huge corporations will become filthy rich selling it
3. Within 20-30 years people will start getting cancer because they'll smoke too much
4. Corporations will be on the same side as hippies defending excessive pot use despite any scientific evidence
5. I will laugh

I don't have the evidence to back this up but my suspicion is that there are adverse health effects to smoking 10 joints per day for 30 years.

any time you are breathing in smoke, it's probably bad for you. I don't think the real profits would come from the drug though, it would come from the industrial hemp, which doesn't get you high, but has all of the practical applications that I think would make it almost as valuable to the economy as oil.

Everyone knew the United states was doing this crap before he leaked the info. The problem was that no one cared until he did. Hero by default.

I heard from some one over there that minimum wage workers pay about 50% in taxes. Specifically, he said "65% tax rate with a chance to get up to 15% back from IRS"

so, if I had to guess, their economy is crippled by extreme tax rates. If I were taxed more than 60% of my pay check, I wouldn't work either, I'd leave the damn country or go on welfare until the system crashes, preferably the first.

At 6/11/13 04:40 PM, orangebomb wrote: Ok, is it just me or are there just more than necessary threads for the subject at hand?

I think the topic in general is just becoming more relevant. Every time any government proposes something the exact same concern is brought up. This is just a thread about the idea in general as opposed to the current events that are relating to it. You can kind of say that Fascism is slowly replacing Communism as the next big scare as communism becomes less and less relevant in the world.

there are a lot of ways you can compare Obama to Hitler, this isn't one of them.

At 6/7/13 04:23 PM, Camarohusky wrote: I'm all for it. My only qualm here is a cost benefit analysis. How much good would come from auditing a semi-governmental organization? I know it would cost an extreme amount ofmoney as the Fed is a behemoth. Would an audit of an organization that is still partially part of the government accomplish anything to justify the massive expense?

most of the time, the price of a good watch dog is less than the cost of not having one. For example in my province we have some one who's job is to investigate government proposals for potential waste and inefficiencies, and that man as a person who has been very responsible and hard working for us tax payers, has seen to it that the cost of hiring him was outweighed by the money he helped us save by making a wasteful government body more transparent and accountable.

The ironic thing is that I have a feeling that the multiculturalism experiment might have been more successful if it weren't for all the free stuff that Sweden has available to everyone. Instead of attracting people who seek opportunity with the will to work hard, they attracted criminals and deadbeats.

At 5/21/13 12:32 PM, Dawnslayer wrote:

Isn't that basically what Ayn Rand wanted?

Ayn Rand absolutely hated every ideology that wasn't specifically objectivism. If she could hate libertarians for flimsy reasons she would definitely hate anarcho- capitalism, for both the good and stupid reasons. Even Agorism, which is basically "Aynarcho"-Capitalism would have been hated by her too.

it's pretty good up here but it's not perfect, our constitution includes nothing to protect our property rights, and everyone agrees that our healthcare line ups are too long yet nobody wants to at least COMPROMISE and have both free healthcare and private healthcare for those who can afford it, which would only result in smaller line ups for both.

now they have to target leftist groups to even things out.

or, what they should have been doing to begin with would have been targeting themselves.

any one know how likely the IRS is going to target itself?

to be fair, a lot of people are in violation of the tax code with out even knowing it.

At 5/2/13 11:16 PM, Korriken wrote:

At 5/2/13 09:39 PM, Angry-Hatter wrote:

So Camo, I'm curious about what you DO consider a human right.

no such thing.

if we have no rights, then no one has the right to tell us that we have no rights, and that means we can do what ever we want, and no one has the right to stop us or tell us not to.

At 4/30/13 09:19 PM, DelRio1991 wrote:

We can in use them instead of animals for testing purposes for one thing. Think about it, why not just use despicable people to test medication and other things?

because they had no due process, there is no way for us to know if they are guilty or not.

At 4/28/13 01:01 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
"Let's solve that hunger strike by putting them back at home with hero status so they can return to committing terrorism."

fair trial =/= letting them all just walk free. Some of them might be innocent.

how about you solve the hunger strike by giving them a fair trial.

you can be secular with out being atheist.

At 4/24/13 01:03 PM, Camarohusky wrote:
Then you CLEARLY weren't paing attention to the OWS movement and were very ignorant of its base goal

opposition to the bail outs, opposition to lobbying, opposition to corporate subsidies, funny thing is if you asked the tea party people about all 3 of those original parts of the base cause, they would have found themselves in agreement.

on a side note, i just remembered that you were much more extreme left than I was, and remained so even after I had completely rejected socialism.

Anyone who thought he would be able to do more than just a couple of his campaign promises quickly (or much at all) is ignorant. They are the ones who are stupid enough to think that one President could go in and make massive waves. They seemed to forget that moving a country of 300+ million in ANY direction is hard to do, and even harder when your party gets along and agrees as much as the average family reunion, while the other might as well be one person controlling all of their posts. Ignorant of the fact that this country is center right (to its own harm). Ignorant of the fact that backing out of the Iraq War quickly would have done nothing but create a new Afganistan which would have sent the already tumultuous region into complete turmoil.

so his course of action was to, start more wars? yea, its not even about being god anymore, its just about honesty.

So these stupid stupid folks, instead of trying to support Obama so he could hopefully get more of these done, they have turned against him (and this is the ironic kicker) and have ended up making it EVEN HARDER for him to do what they blame him for failing or falling short of.

I (and most of the other people like me) oppose his solutions to the problems, If he can't come up with any better solutions than "throw money at it" or better yet: "force people to buy it" then that's not our problem.

So pardon him for not being GOD.

I'm glad he isn't.

At 4/24/13 07:14 AM, emilywilliams wrote:

He is going to have to increase costs on every person, but he said that voters should pay for what they voted for. For this reason, he wants renters to let them know how he voted so he can increase their costs first.

I think I found the hole in his plan

At 4/23/13 11:41 PM, Camarohusky wrote:

The ones that get my goat the most are the far left ones (like Iron-hampster). These people are the idiots that complain about how the World didn't magically open up into a socilist hippie bong fest the day after Obama was elected and and seem to blame Obama for the Country being a very center right country. They get mad that the person they placed all of their misguided hopes and dreams on couldn't fulfil the (then future) OWS manifesto even though 80-90% of the country absolutely hates themajority of those positions.

hold on hold on, are you faking ignorance to score cheap points at this point? When I supported OWS, it was to get the government out of the economy, and I stressed this over and over. And pardon me for holding him to his promises about ending the wars. If you have problems admitting your candidate fucked up, that's your problem, not mine.